Why does Trump want the Clarity Act so much? The answer isn't in crypto.
Trump recently made a statement.
He said that they are far ahead of China and all other countries in the crypto space, and that they want to stay ahead. He added that the only thing missing is the passage of the Clarity Act.
Everyone thought this was a crypto statement. However, what Trump was really talking about was the future of the dollar.
So what is this Clarity Act?
For years, the rules of cryptocurrency in the US have been unclear.
Whether a cryptocurrency counts as a stock or a commodity, nobody knew for sure. Two separate institutions, overlapping authorities, endless lawsuits.
Because of this uncertainty, many companies either couldn't do business or fled abroad.
The Clarity Act ends this confusion.
It clarifies which cryptocurrency will be regulated by which institution and according to which rules. Its name itself means clarity.
So why would a president attach so much importance to an ordinary regulatory law? The answer isn't in the law, it's in the dollar itself.
The dollar has been the world's currency for 80 years. Oil is sold in dollars, countries hold their reserves in dollars, and payments go through the dollar system.
Everyone needs dollars, so they accumulate dollars and US Treasury bonds.
But now money is becoming digital. This is where dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies, or stablecoins, come into play.
A stablecoin is always worth $1 because it is backed by real dollars and US Treasury bonds.
When someone in Germany, Japan, or Türkiye receives this currency on their phone, they are holding dollars without a US bank. Thus, dollars enter the pockets of billions of people at internet speed.
There's more.
As these currencies grow, the companies that issue them are forced to buy more US Treasury bonds. Today, Tether holds over $120 billion in US Treasury bonds.
This makes it one of the world's largest bondholders, even larger than Germany.
So, the dollar stablecoin is a double win for the US. It both spreads the dollar globally and creates a huge buyer for US debt.
With so much money circulating, a fight has broken out within the US itself.
On one side are the banks, on the other, the cryptocurrency exchanges.
The banks' fear is clear.
If stablecoins pay interest, people will withdraw their money from banks and move it there. The bank will then lose its most valuable asset: cheap deposits.
After long negotiations, a middle ground was found. Paying interest on idle stablecoins was prohibited, but usage-based rewards were allowed.
The banks were still not happy with this, sending over 8,000 letters of objection to the Senate offices.
The law has now passed the Senate Banking Committee. However, it still has a few hurdles to overcome before it can pass the entire Senate and become law.
This is why Trump insisted on only passing the Clarity Act.
Now let's look at the bigger picture.
The US and China have chosen two diametrically opposed paths for the currency of the future.
The US government has banned digital currency. It has left the job to dollar stablecoins issued by private companies. The government only sets the rules, and those rules are the Clarity Act.
China, on the other hand, is doing the opposite. It's nationalizing the currency, issuing the digital yuan itself, and monitoring every transaction. Its goal is to create a world independent of the dollar and SWIFT.
Two contrasting models, but the same goal: to become the global currency of the future.
That's why when Trump says we should stay ahead of China in crypto, he's not actually talking about a technology race. He's defending a throne.
That's why the Clarity Act isn't just an ordinary law.
It's the US move to bring the dollar into the digital world. China is trying the same thing with its own currency.
The issue isn't crypto.
The issue is which currency will govern the digital world.
Trump recently made a statement.
He said that they are far ahead of China and all other countries in the crypto space, and that they want to stay ahead. He added that the only thing missing is the passage of the Clarity Act.
Everyone thought this was a crypto statement. However, what Trump was really talking about was the future of the dollar.
So what is this Clarity Act?
For years, the rules of cryptocurrency in the US have been unclear.
Whether a cryptocurrency counts as a stock or a commodity, nobody knew for sure. Two separate institutions, overlapping authorities, endless lawsuits.
Because of this uncertainty, many companies either couldn't do business or fled abroad.
The Clarity Act ends this confusion.
It clarifies which cryptocurrency will be regulated by which institution and according to which rules. Its name itself means clarity.
So why would a president attach so much importance to an ordinary regulatory law? The answer isn't in the law, it's in the dollar itself.
The dollar has been the world's currency for 80 years. Oil is sold in dollars, countries hold their reserves in dollars, and payments go through the dollar system.
Everyone needs dollars, so they accumulate dollars and US Treasury bonds.
But now money is becoming digital. This is where dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies, or stablecoins, come into play.
A stablecoin is always worth $1 because it is backed by real dollars and US Treasury bonds.
When someone in Germany, Japan, or Türkiye receives this currency on their phone, they are holding dollars without a US bank. Thus, dollars enter the pockets of billions of people at internet speed.
There's more.
As these currencies grow, the companies that issue them are forced to buy more US Treasury bonds. Today, Tether holds over $120 billion in US Treasury bonds.
This makes it one of the world's largest bondholders, even larger than Germany.
So, the dollar stablecoin is a double win for the US. It both spreads the dollar globally and creates a huge buyer for US debt.
With so much money circulating, a fight has broken out within the US itself.
On one side are the banks, on the other, the cryptocurrency exchanges.
The banks' fear is clear.
If stablecoins pay interest, people will withdraw their money from banks and move it there. The bank will then lose its most valuable asset: cheap deposits.
After long negotiations, a middle ground was found. Paying interest on idle stablecoins was prohibited, but usage-based rewards were allowed.
The banks were still not happy with this, sending over 8,000 letters of objection to the Senate offices.
The law has now passed the Senate Banking Committee. However, it still has a few hurdles to overcome before it can pass the entire Senate and become law.
This is why Trump insisted on only passing the Clarity Act.
Now let's look at the bigger picture.
The US and China have chosen two diametrically opposed paths for the currency of the future.
The US government has banned digital currency. It has left the job to dollar stablecoins issued by private companies. The government only sets the rules, and those rules are the Clarity Act.
China, on the other hand, is doing the opposite. It's nationalizing the currency, issuing the digital yuan itself, and monitoring every transaction. Its goal is to create a world independent of the dollar and SWIFT.
Two contrasting models, but the same goal: to become the global currency of the future.
That's why when Trump says we should stay ahead of China in crypto, he's not actually talking about a technology race. He's defending a throne.
That's why the Clarity Act isn't just an ordinary law.
It's the US move to bring the dollar into the digital world. China is trying the same thing with its own currency.
The issue isn't crypto.
The issue is which currency will govern the digital world.
✍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Every mistake is a lesson, but every risk is a possibilty
🗿1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇸🇮🇷 My Analysis: The U.S. May Be Entering a New Phase of the Iran War
The biggest challenge for the United States is no longer simply striking targets inside Iran. The real problem is what comes next.
Iran has shown that it can absorb heavy airstrikes while continuing to launch missiles and drones against U.S. forces, military bases, and infrastructure across the Gulf. That creates a much more complicated battlefield for Washington.
If the conflict expands toward critical energy infrastructure, the risks become even greater. Any major damage to Gulf oil facilities or shipping routes could trigger a massive economic shock, while an Iranian retaliation against regional energy infrastructure could create enormous consequences for the U.S., its allies, and the global economy.
This could force Washington to reconsider its strategy.
The U.S. may need to combine sustained long range airpower with stronger ground based air defense, deploying significantly larger numbers of interceptors and layered missile defense systems to protect its forces and regional allies from Iranian retaliation.
A ground operation would be an extremely costly and dangerous option, but if the current air campaign fails to achieve its objectives, pressure for a broader change in strategy could increase.
One thing that stands out to me is the continued effectiveness of the B 2 Spirit. The stealth bomber's ability to penetrate heavily defended airspace, operate at long range, and deliver precision strikes against high value and hardened targets makes it one of the most important platforms in the U.S. arsenal for this type of conflict.
My assessment is that the U.S. is approaching a strategic decision point: continue the current air campaign, significantly expand defensive capabilities, or fundamentally change the way the war is being fought.
The next phase could determine whether Iran can be forced to change its behavior or whether the conflict evolves into a much larger regional war.
The biggest challenge for the United States is no longer simply striking targets inside Iran. The real problem is what comes next.
Iran has shown that it can absorb heavy airstrikes while continuing to launch missiles and drones against U.S. forces, military bases, and infrastructure across the Gulf. That creates a much more complicated battlefield for Washington.
If the conflict expands toward critical energy infrastructure, the risks become even greater. Any major damage to Gulf oil facilities or shipping routes could trigger a massive economic shock, while an Iranian retaliation against regional energy infrastructure could create enormous consequences for the U.S., its allies, and the global economy.
This could force Washington to reconsider its strategy.
The U.S. may need to combine sustained long range airpower with stronger ground based air defense, deploying significantly larger numbers of interceptors and layered missile defense systems to protect its forces and regional allies from Iranian retaliation.
A ground operation would be an extremely costly and dangerous option, but if the current air campaign fails to achieve its objectives, pressure for a broader change in strategy could increase.
One thing that stands out to me is the continued effectiveness of the B 2 Spirit. The stealth bomber's ability to penetrate heavily defended airspace, operate at long range, and deliver precision strikes against high value and hardened targets makes it one of the most important platforms in the U.S. arsenal for this type of conflict.
My assessment is that the U.S. is approaching a strategic decision point: continue the current air campaign, significantly expand defensive capabilities, or fundamentally change the way the war is being fought.
The next phase could determine whether Iran can be forced to change its behavior or whether the conflict evolves into a much larger regional war.
✍1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
“Crypto is a scam” Me:
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
You thought trading was a shortcut to money but it taught you the meaning of life instead
✍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The most violent encounter is looking in the eyes of the version of you who actually did it
✍1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
👀 Ships involved in transporting military cargo from Iran, as well as a military ship, have been attacked in the Caspian Sea, — Zelenskyy.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ukraine says it has struck several vessels in the Caspian Sea used to transport Russian military cargo to Iran. Reports suggest the cargo ships Port Olya 2 and Begey were hit. Meanwhile, Iranian regime-affiliated channels are threatening ballistic missile strikes on Ukraine.
🔥1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
❗️“All of this needs to be stopped,” — the president of Kazakhstan proposed to Putin that the war in Ukraine be frozen.
🙈 Putin's face when Tokayev told him it was time to end the war in Ukraine
✍1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
Zelensky in a meeting with Raytheon VP Joseph DeAntona announces plans to co-produce Patriot interceptors “I am grateful for the company’s readiness to take our partnership to an even higher level, where Ukraine would co-produce, together with Raytheon, some…
Ukraine is going to end up being the backbone of US defense production.
Putin's a moron.
Putin's a moron.
✍1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
Count Dorcula 🩸🩸🩸
❗️The Commander of the Unmanned Systems Forces, Robert “Magyar” Brovdi, stated that the number of RF Armed Forces personnel on the front line has increased by 18% compared to May (or by 12% compared to June). Russian commanders, fearing inspections and the discrepancy between the real situation and the “painted-over” maps, are increasing the number of fighters in assaults, which has led to a rise in suicidal infiltration attempts aimed at displaying the flag on a drone camera. At the same time, the Russians are actively intensifying the covert mobilization of the population, so the situation should be treated soberly.
👀1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT'S COMING!!!😎🇺🇸🥳🥳🥳
Global electricity demand is set to almost double by 2050.
Electricity generation is projected to rise from 32,000 TWh in 2025 to 60,000 TWh by 2050.
• 75% of the growth will come from developing economies.
• Nearly 60% will come from developing Asia alone.
• Wind and solar generation will jump from 5,400 TWh to 26,000 TWh.
The energy transition isn't reducing electricity demandit's massively increasing it. The challenge is building enough generation, grids and storage to keep up.
Electricity generation is projected to rise from 32,000 TWh in 2025 to 60,000 TWh by 2050.
• 75% of the growth will come from developing economies.
• Nearly 60% will come from developing Asia alone.
• Wind and solar generation will jump from 5,400 TWh to 26,000 TWh.
The energy transition isn't reducing electricity demandit's massively increasing it. The challenge is building enough generation, grids and storage to keep up.
Forwarded from 🛢WTI, Brent Crude Oil, NGAS Trading 📊
🚨🇷🇺 RUSSIA EXTENDS ITS GASOLINE EXPORT BAN THROUGH THE END OF 2026
Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak says the restriction will continue for both producers and non-producers.
Diesel exports, however, could resume once the domestic market stabilises.
The reason is important:
Russia needs to protect local gasoline supply, but keeping diesel exports blocked for too long risks creating oversupply, pressuring refinery margins and forcing lower crude processing.
This is another sign that repeated refinery disruptions are creating a difficult balancing act between domestic fuel security and export revenues.
Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak says the restriction will continue for both producers and non-producers.
Diesel exports, however, could resume once the domestic market stabilises.
The reason is important:
Russia needs to protect local gasoline supply, but keeping diesel exports blocked for too long risks creating oversupply, pressuring refinery margins and forcing lower crude processing.
This is another sign that repeated refinery disruptions are creating a difficult balancing act between domestic fuel security and export revenues.
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
Photo
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
‼️ WE ARE ABOUT TO WITNESS A QUIET WAR BETWEEN THE TWO SUPERPOWERS
While the U.S. is dealing with multiple military wars funding and Tariffs war with alliance countries, China is preparing for the war to replace the Dollar dominance with the Yuan.
China is now expected to hold over 30,000 metric tonnes of gold reserves while the U.S. is believed to hold 5,000.
While the U.S. debt hits $40 Trillion, Clarity Act still struggling and The Fort Knox not been audited since 1953…
China is building a BRICS Payment System using Blockchain and backed by Gold.
Iran had announced that every barrel of oil flowing through the Strait Of Hormuz will be traded in the Chinese Yuan, Bitcoin, Solana or XRP.
CHINA HAS DUMPED $663 BILLION IN U.S. TREASURY HOLDINGS. IT NOW HOLDS JUST $659 BILLION - THE LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 2008.
China’s near-monopoly on rare-earth processing, aggressive domestic AI-chip buildout, and aggressively growing gold stockpile give it a structural edge over the U.S. in the resource-and-hardware race of the coming AI era.
While other currencies are on a free fall against the dollar, the Chinese Yuan is starting to show strength.
Although it is unlikely that the U.S. would ever let this happen, dominance can gradually and quietly change hands.
We saw this when the EU turned towards China when they saw President Trump getting hostile with Tariffs.
While the U.S. is dealing with multiple military wars funding and Tariffs war with alliance countries, China is preparing for the war to replace the Dollar dominance with the Yuan.
China is now expected to hold over 30,000 metric tonnes of gold reserves while the U.S. is believed to hold 5,000.
While the U.S. debt hits $40 Trillion, Clarity Act still struggling and The Fort Knox not been audited since 1953…
China is building a BRICS Payment System using Blockchain and backed by Gold.
Iran had announced that every barrel of oil flowing through the Strait Of Hormuz will be traded in the Chinese Yuan, Bitcoin, Solana or XRP.
CHINA HAS DUMPED $663 BILLION IN U.S. TREASURY HOLDINGS. IT NOW HOLDS JUST $659 BILLION - THE LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 2008.
China’s near-monopoly on rare-earth processing, aggressive domestic AI-chip buildout, and aggressively growing gold stockpile give it a structural edge over the U.S. in the resource-and-hardware race of the coming AI era.
While other currencies are on a free fall against the dollar, the Chinese Yuan is starting to show strength.
Although it is unlikely that the U.S. would ever let this happen, dominance can gradually and quietly change hands.
We saw this when the EU turned towards China when they saw President Trump getting hostile with Tariffs.
✍1