🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
ChatGPT Work is why white-collar work is cooked. Not because every office job disappears tomorrow. Because the core loop of office work is now being absorbed: read the docs, understand the context, write the report, build the slides, answer the email, check…
“So you get paid $150K/yr just to forward emails from your boss to Claude, and then send those responses back to your boss?”
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
“So you get paid $150K/yr just to forward emails from your boss to Claude, and then send those responses back to your boss?”
The weirdest part of AI abundance is that people may stop respecting effort before they learn to respect judgment.
What should count as talent when output is cheap?
What should count as talent when output is cheap?
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
Both Elon Musk and Demis Hassabis has said robotics is bottlenecked by hands and robots will not become useful until hands improve massively. And now 1X Technologies is preparing to reveal a robotic hand that may surpass human finger control. The big deal…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Such brilliant piece of engineering work.
The new humanoid hand for NEO from 1X.
Most robot hands fail because they move, but they do not properly feel contact.
- 1X’s answer uses low-ratio tendon drives, so outside forces travel back through each joint. The motors sit in the forearm, pulling tendons through the wrist like biological muscle.
This keeps the fingers light, lowers impact energy, and still allows strong gripping.
- The hand has 22 actuated finger and palm axes, plus 3 wrist axes. Those joints are not spread evenly, because the thumb carries much of human dexterity.
- A real opposing thumb is so needed, because grasping is mostly about control, not squeezing.
- Closed-loop proprioception gives NEO pose and effort data without using cameras.
- Tactile skin adds contact, pressure, and shear, so slipping objects can trigger fast corrections.
- IP68 sealing and food-safe materials mean the same hand can work near water.
- Backdrivable fingers also make impacts less dangerous, because the mechanism yields under force.
- 1X says full finger assemblies have survived millions of cycles during validation.
- Hundreds are already built, with capacity planned for 10,000 hands this year.
- The interesting part is the data loop. Every grasp can now return force, pose, contact, and slip signals for robot learning.
That makes NEO more like a measuring instrument.
The new humanoid hand for NEO from 1X.
Most robot hands fail because they move, but they do not properly feel contact.
- 1X’s answer uses low-ratio tendon drives, so outside forces travel back through each joint. The motors sit in the forearm, pulling tendons through the wrist like biological muscle.
This keeps the fingers light, lowers impact energy, and still allows strong gripping.
- The hand has 22 actuated finger and palm axes, plus 3 wrist axes. Those joints are not spread evenly, because the thumb carries much of human dexterity.
- A real opposing thumb is so needed, because grasping is mostly about control, not squeezing.
- Closed-loop proprioception gives NEO pose and effort data without using cameras.
- Tactile skin adds contact, pressure, and shear, so slipping objects can trigger fast corrections.
- IP68 sealing and food-safe materials mean the same hand can work near water.
- Backdrivable fingers also make impacts less dangerous, because the mechanism yields under force.
- 1X says full finger assemblies have survived millions of cycles during validation.
- Hundreds are already built, with capacity planned for 10,000 hands this year.
- The interesting part is the data loop. Every grasp can now return force, pose, contact, and slip signals for robot learning.
That makes NEO more like a measuring instrument.
🛢WTI, Brent Crude Oil, NGAS Trading 📊
New Russian joke: A Russian man is waiting in line at the gas station. "I've had enough," he tells his wife. "Stay in line, I'm going to shoot Putin." After two hours, he returns and gets back behind the wheel. His wife asks him, "Did you shoot him?" And…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Another one….
Reports indicate a fire near Russia’s Moscow Oil Refinery this morning
Reports indicate a fire near Russia’s Moscow Oil Refinery this morning
🔥1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
For 10 years the world believed there was one way to reuse a rocket: land it upright on its engines, the way SpaceX does. Today China refused to copy it, and pulled off something SpaceX never managed on a first flight. It caught the rocket instead.
The Long March 10B lifted off from Hainan, China this morning, and about 6 minutes later its first stage came back down toward a 25,000-ton ship at sea. It did not land.
Hooks on the falling booster snagged a net of tensioned steel wires strung across the deck, the wires riding robotic rails that slid into place to meet it. No landing legs. No touchdown. A rocket plucked out of its own descent by a moving net, on the maiden flight of a brand-new vehicle.
No one handed China this. SpaceX guards its rocket tech as “trade secrets”, not “patents”, precisely so it cannot be read and copied.
China watched a decade of public flights and then built an entirely different machine to reach the same prize, catching instead of landing, which sheds the heavy legs and spares the fuel a soft touchdown burns to hover.
And this was never about cheaper satellites, though it delivers those too, feeding the thousands of birds in China's Starlink rival.
Its deeper purpose is the Moon. That booster shares its core with the rocket meant to land Chinese astronauts on the lunar surface by 2030. In the same season, America's own Moon rocket, Starship, has flown 12 times and still has not shown the single maneuver its lunar plan depends on.
One flight does not dethrone SpaceX. It has landed hundreds. What ended today is not SpaceX's lead. It is Uncle Sam’s belief that it owns the only road to the Moon.
The piece works out which way of coming home actually wins.
The Long March 10B lifted off from Hainan, China this morning, and about 6 minutes later its first stage came back down toward a 25,000-ton ship at sea. It did not land.
Hooks on the falling booster snagged a net of tensioned steel wires strung across the deck, the wires riding robotic rails that slid into place to meet it. No landing legs. No touchdown. A rocket plucked out of its own descent by a moving net, on the maiden flight of a brand-new vehicle.
No one handed China this. SpaceX guards its rocket tech as “trade secrets”, not “patents”, precisely so it cannot be read and copied.
China watched a decade of public flights and then built an entirely different machine to reach the same prize, catching instead of landing, which sheds the heavy legs and spares the fuel a soft touchdown burns to hover.
And this was never about cheaper satellites, though it delivers those too, feeding the thousands of birds in China's Starlink rival.
Its deeper purpose is the Moon. That booster shares its core with the rocket meant to land Chinese astronauts on the lunar surface by 2030. In the same season, America's own Moon rocket, Starship, has flown 12 times and still has not shown the single maneuver its lunar plan depends on.
One flight does not dethrone SpaceX. It has landed hundreds. What ended today is not SpaceX's lead. It is Uncle Sam’s belief that it owns the only road to the Moon.
The piece works out which way of coming home actually wins.
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
For 10 years the world believed there was one way to reuse a rocket: land it upright on its engines, the way SpaceX does. Today China refused to copy it, and pulled off something SpaceX never managed on a first flight. It caught the rocket instead. The Long…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😂 LOL Elon is cooked!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
♻️🚀 Today, three first-stage recovery architectures coexist worldwide:
🇨🇳 Capture by hook on tensioned cables, above a maritime platform (Long March 10B).
🇺🇸 Landing on deployable legs, on a barge at sea or a land-based landing pad (Falcon 9, New Glenn).
🇺🇸 Capture by robotic arms, directly on the launch tower (Starship).
👉 Three different technical architectures, but the same objective: to maximize launcher reuse and reduce the cost of access to space.
🇨🇳 Capture by hook on tensioned cables, above a maritime platform (Long March 10B).
🇺🇸 Landing on deployable legs, on a barge at sea or a land-based landing pad (Falcon 9, New Glenn).
🇺🇸 Capture by robotic arms, directly on the launch tower (Starship).
👉 Three different technical architectures, but the same objective: to maximize launcher reuse and reduce the cost of access to space.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"What you cannot avoid, just welcome it" Chinese proverb
🗿1
China Is Closing the Space Technology Gap 🇨🇳🚀
China has recovered an orbital-class reusable booster at sea for the first time
The Long March 10B launched from Hainan and returned to a floating recovery platform using a controlled descent and capture system
That matters because reusable rockets are one of the biggest cost advantages in space
Until now, the US had the clear lead
China is now proving it can compete
But the bigger story is the supply chain behind the rocket
The space economy depends on critical materials
🔹 Gallium for solar arrays and radio frequency systems
🔹 Graphite for satellite support and thrusters
🔹 Titanium for rocket structures and booster cases
🔹 Rare earths for gyroscopes and advanced electronics
🔹 Rhenium for high-temperature combustion systems
🔹 Helium for cryogenic systems
🔹 Oil for rocket fuels and lubricants
China already dominates several of these inputs
Now it is moving up the value chain from materials to reusable launch systems
The space race is no longer just about rockets
It is about who controls the materials, manufacturing and recovery technology behind them
China has recovered an orbital-class reusable booster at sea for the first time
The Long March 10B launched from Hainan and returned to a floating recovery platform using a controlled descent and capture system
That matters because reusable rockets are one of the biggest cost advantages in space
Until now, the US had the clear lead
China is now proving it can compete
But the bigger story is the supply chain behind the rocket
The space economy depends on critical materials
🔹 Gallium for solar arrays and radio frequency systems
🔹 Graphite for satellite support and thrusters
🔹 Titanium for rocket structures and booster cases
🔹 Rare earths for gyroscopes and advanced electronics
🔹 Rhenium for high-temperature combustion systems
🔹 Helium for cryogenic systems
🔹 Oil for rocket fuels and lubricants
China already dominates several of these inputs
Now it is moving up the value chain from materials to reusable launch systems
The space race is no longer just about rockets
It is about who controls the materials, manufacturing and recovery technology behind them
🚨 PRIVATE CREDIT MAY BE THE TRIGGER FOR THE NEXT FINANCIAL CRISIS.
Private credit defaults just hit their highest level ever recorded. Fitch's U.S. Private Credit Default Rate hit 6.0% through April 2026.
That's the highest since this data started being tracked in 2024.
Just three months earlier, in January, it was 5.8%, which was already a record at the time. For all of 2025, defaults came in at 9.2%, beating the old record of 8.1% set in 2024.
And the real number is worse than what's reported.
Some borrowers are avoiding an official default by paying their interest with more debt instead of cash. This is called a PIK loan.
The lender still counts it as income, even though no actual cash came in. This practice has more than doubled since 2022, from 5% to 11% of all private credit loans.
Companies using this method have pushed their debt up to 76% of their total assets, up from 40% three years ago. It's a way of delaying a default, not avoiding one.
Two of the biggest lenders, Ares Capital and Blue Owl, both said around 15% of their income last year came from these non-cash payments. The clearest real example of the risk is Medallia.
Thoma Bravo bought the software company for $6.4 billion in 2021. Its revenue later stalled because of AI competition, and lenders had to take control of the company. $5.1 billion in shareholder value was wiped out, and the loans were marked down to 60 cents on the dollar.
Blackstone, Apollo, and FS KKR all took losses on this deal.
Software companies are a big part of the risk here, making up somewhere between 19% and 35% of private credit loans, depending on the estimate. Morgan Stanley expects 11% of these loans to come due by the end of 2027, with another 20% due the year after.
That's when companies will need to refinance old debt, and many may not be able to on the same terms.
At the same time, investors are trying to pull their money out of these funds. In the first quarter of 2026, they requested $13.9 to $20 billion in withdrawals. Only about $7.4 billion, roughly half, was actually paid out.
Some investors selling their positions on the secondary market are accepting 30% to 65% less than the fund's stated value, just to get their cash back sooner.
The part that gets the least attention is who actually holds this risk. U.S. life insurance companies hold $849 billion in private credit. If defaults keep rising, insurers are the ones who absorb it, not banks.
That risk moves quietly through retirement and insurance policies, long before it shows up as a major headline.
Warren Buffett has said the risk is more serious than that, pointing to how connected banks already are to this market. Either way, the default rate is already at a record, and the loans most at risk from AI disruption haven't come due yet.
Private credit defaults just hit their highest level ever recorded. Fitch's U.S. Private Credit Default Rate hit 6.0% through April 2026.
That's the highest since this data started being tracked in 2024.
Just three months earlier, in January, it was 5.8%, which was already a record at the time. For all of 2025, defaults came in at 9.2%, beating the old record of 8.1% set in 2024.
And the real number is worse than what's reported.
Some borrowers are avoiding an official default by paying their interest with more debt instead of cash. This is called a PIK loan.
The lender still counts it as income, even though no actual cash came in. This practice has more than doubled since 2022, from 5% to 11% of all private credit loans.
Companies using this method have pushed their debt up to 76% of their total assets, up from 40% three years ago. It's a way of delaying a default, not avoiding one.
Two of the biggest lenders, Ares Capital and Blue Owl, both said around 15% of their income last year came from these non-cash payments. The clearest real example of the risk is Medallia.
Thoma Bravo bought the software company for $6.4 billion in 2021. Its revenue later stalled because of AI competition, and lenders had to take control of the company. $5.1 billion in shareholder value was wiped out, and the loans were marked down to 60 cents on the dollar.
Blackstone, Apollo, and FS KKR all took losses on this deal.
Software companies are a big part of the risk here, making up somewhere between 19% and 35% of private credit loans, depending on the estimate. Morgan Stanley expects 11% of these loans to come due by the end of 2027, with another 20% due the year after.
That's when companies will need to refinance old debt, and many may not be able to on the same terms.
At the same time, investors are trying to pull their money out of these funds. In the first quarter of 2026, they requested $13.9 to $20 billion in withdrawals. Only about $7.4 billion, roughly half, was actually paid out.
Some investors selling their positions on the secondary market are accepting 30% to 65% less than the fund's stated value, just to get their cash back sooner.
The part that gets the least attention is who actually holds this risk. U.S. life insurance companies hold $849 billion in private credit. If defaults keep rising, insurers are the ones who absorb it, not banks.
That risk moves quietly through retirement and insurance policies, long before it shows up as a major headline.
Warren Buffett has said the risk is more serious than that, pointing to how connected banks already are to this market. Either way, the default rate is already at a record, and the loans most at risk from AI disruption haven't come due yet.
🔥1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How to Think Rich:
1. Think like an owner, not a consumer.
2. Buy value that outlives today's excitement.
3. Let patience compound where urgency destroys.
4. Protect every dollar until it earns the next one.
5. Ignore the crowd when the numbers tell a better story.
6. Wealth grows quietly while attention chases noise.
7. Make fewer decisions, but make each one worth decades.
8. The richest people collect assets; everyone else collects expenses.
1. Think like an owner, not a consumer.
2. Buy value that outlives today's excitement.
3. Let patience compound where urgency destroys.
4. Protect every dollar until it earns the next one.
5. Ignore the crowd when the numbers tell a better story.
6. Wealth grows quietly while attention chases noise.
7. Make fewer decisions, but make each one worth decades.
8. The richest people collect assets; everyone else collects expenses.
🗿1
Circle is up 13% in premarket after winning final OCC approval to launch a national trust bank.
$CRCL's new entity, Circle National Trust, lets the company act as a federally regulated custodian for its own USDC reserves and hold digital assets for institutional clients directly.
It also opens the door for Circle to eventually manage the full USDC reserve under direct federal oversight, something that's never operated inside a national banking framework before.
This puts USDC on the same regulatory footing as a national bank, at a time when GENIUS Act rules are already pushing stablecoin issuers toward stricter federal oversight.
Circle applied for this charter back in June 2025 and got conditional approval in December. Today's final approval is what's moving the stock.
The bounce comes just days after Circle crashed 17.55% in a single session on June 30, wiping out nearly $3.6 billion in market value.
That drop came from two things hitting at once: a new rival stablecoin called Open USD launching with backing from Stripe, Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock, and Coinbase, and Circle getting removed from several Russell growth indexes during the annual rebalancing, which forced index funds to sell.
Today's approval doesn't erase that competitive threat, but it strengthens Circle's regulatory position at the exact moment that threat is being priced in.
$CRCL's new entity, Circle National Trust, lets the company act as a federally regulated custodian for its own USDC reserves and hold digital assets for institutional clients directly.
It also opens the door for Circle to eventually manage the full USDC reserve under direct federal oversight, something that's never operated inside a national banking framework before.
This puts USDC on the same regulatory footing as a national bank, at a time when GENIUS Act rules are already pushing stablecoin issuers toward stricter federal oversight.
Circle applied for this charter back in June 2025 and got conditional approval in December. Today's final approval is what's moving the stock.
The bounce comes just days after Circle crashed 17.55% in a single session on June 30, wiping out nearly $3.6 billion in market value.
That drop came from two things hitting at once: a new rival stablecoin called Open USD launching with backing from Stripe, Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock, and Coinbase, and Circle getting removed from several Russell growth indexes during the annual rebalancing, which forced index funds to sell.
Today's approval doesn't erase that competitive threat, but it strengthens Circle's regulatory position at the exact moment that threat is being priced in.
✍1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
“So you get paid $150K/yr just to forward emails from your boss to Claude, and then send those responses back to your boss?”
The end of work will not begin with people cheering.
It will begin with everyone secretly hoping their own task is harder to automate than it looks.
Which task is people most wrong about?
It will begin with everyone secretly hoping their own task is harder to automate than it looks.
Which task is people most wrong about?