The announcement of $HQ establishing its second quantum computer testbed in Dublin represents a major commercial and technological expansion.
By integrating a 256-qubit system from $IONQ into its European headquarters, the company addresses the two primary challenges in the current quantum computing industry: hardware modality risk and geographic market access.
This expansion diversifies Horizon Quantum’s operational infrastructure and positions its proprietary software ecosystem for broader commercial adoption.
Operating distinct testbeds across different hardware architectures directly accelerates Horizon Quantum's software development.
The company’s existing facility in Singapore utilizes superconducting quantum processors, whereas the new Dublin deployment introduces trapped-ion technology from IonQ.
Because it remains unproven which hardware architecture will ultimately dominate the market, developing software that operates seamlessly across both modalities mitigates technical risk. This dual-track approach ensures that Horizon Quantum’s developer platform remains hardware-agnostic, allowing customers to compile and run applications regardless of the underlying processor technology.
The technical specifications of the Dublin system provide immediate computing advantages for software optimization.
The IonQ system offers 256 qubits combined with a target two-qubit gate fidelity of 99.99% and all-to-all connectivity. In quantum computing, high gate fidelity reduces the error rates that typically disrupt complex algorithmic executions.
By deploying its Triple Alpha software platform on this high-fidelity hardware, $HQ can demonstrate enterprise-grade performance metrics, which are essential for attracting corporate clients in sectors like finance, cryptography, and logistics.
Establishing this facility in Ireland secures a strategic operational base within the European Union.
Through collaboration with IDA Ireland and local academic institutions, Horizon Quantum gains direct access to regional deep-tech talent and European research funding frameworks.
This geographic expansion follows the company's recent public listing on the Nasdaq, demonstrating a rapid deployment of capital into physical infrastructure.
By anchoring its technology in both Asia and Europe, Horizon Quantum scales its deployment capacity to capture early enterprise demand for quantum-accelerated computing infrastructure.
By integrating a 256-qubit system from $IONQ into its European headquarters, the company addresses the two primary challenges in the current quantum computing industry: hardware modality risk and geographic market access.
This expansion diversifies Horizon Quantum’s operational infrastructure and positions its proprietary software ecosystem for broader commercial adoption.
Operating distinct testbeds across different hardware architectures directly accelerates Horizon Quantum's software development.
The company’s existing facility in Singapore utilizes superconducting quantum processors, whereas the new Dublin deployment introduces trapped-ion technology from IonQ.
Because it remains unproven which hardware architecture will ultimately dominate the market, developing software that operates seamlessly across both modalities mitigates technical risk. This dual-track approach ensures that Horizon Quantum’s developer platform remains hardware-agnostic, allowing customers to compile and run applications regardless of the underlying processor technology.
The technical specifications of the Dublin system provide immediate computing advantages for software optimization.
The IonQ system offers 256 qubits combined with a target two-qubit gate fidelity of 99.99% and all-to-all connectivity. In quantum computing, high gate fidelity reduces the error rates that typically disrupt complex algorithmic executions.
By deploying its Triple Alpha software platform on this high-fidelity hardware, $HQ can demonstrate enterprise-grade performance metrics, which are essential for attracting corporate clients in sectors like finance, cryptography, and logistics.
Establishing this facility in Ireland secures a strategic operational base within the European Union.
Through collaboration with IDA Ireland and local academic institutions, Horizon Quantum gains direct access to regional deep-tech talent and European research funding frameworks.
This geographic expansion follows the company's recent public listing on the Nasdaq, demonstrating a rapid deployment of capital into physical infrastructure.
By anchoring its technology in both Asia and Europe, Horizon Quantum scales its deployment capacity to capture early enterprise demand for quantum-accelerated computing infrastructure.
Do you realize Edge AI is going to control everything around you?
And did you know the United States 🇺🇸 depends almost 100% on Europe 🇪🇺 and companies like $NOK?
Yes.
For the thing that will control everything.
The solution is being developed right now by $AMPG and $NVDA.
Let me explain the whole thing.
Edge AI isn't figurative.
It's literal.
The traffic lights at your intersection.
The car next to you.
The robots on the factory floor.
The drones overhead.
The power grid feeding your house.
All of it run by AI that cannot wait for a faraway data center to answer.
It needs decisions in milliseconds, made locally, at the edge of the network.
And the edge of the network is the cell tower.
That's where this entire revolution physically lives.
Now the dependence problem.
The radios those towers run on are built by foreign companies: Nokia (Finland), Ericsson (Sweden), Samsung (Korea).
The Chinese ones, Huawei and ZTE, are banned outright.
The most powerful nation on Earth, about to wire its cars, factories, grids and defense systems into an AI-driven network, doesn't make its own radios.
That's not a supply-chain detail.
That's a strategic vulnerability.
Here's how the solution fits together.
The industry calls this AI-RAN, and the AI-RAN
Alliance breaks it into 3 focus areas:
1️⃣ AI-AND-RAN: AI and the network sharing the same infrastructure. The tower runs network traffic AND AI workloads on the same hardware. Every tower becomes a mini data center. Payoff: asset utilization, monetizing billions in idle infrastructure.
2️⃣ AI-ON-RAN: AI applications enabled by the network. The network becomes a platform for real-time edge AI: autonomous vehicles, AR, industrial robots. Payoff: new applications that cloud-only AI physically can't do, because the round-trip is too slow.
3️⃣ AI-FOR-RAN: AI improving the network itself. Smarter beamforming, scheduling, self-optimizing cells. Payoff: spectral efficiency, more performance from the same scarce, expensive spectrum.
Now the part the diagram doesn't say out loud.
All three are software and compute layers.
That's NVIDIA's world: Aerial, the GPU brain.
NVIDIA is pushing so hard it's even signaling GPUs inside the radio itself will become essential as MIMO scales toward 6G.
But NVIDIA doesn't make radios.
The brain needs a body.
An open, high-capacity radio the AI layers can actually plug into, not a locked foreign box.
$AMPG is the only American company that designs and commercializes that open 64T64R Massive MIMO radio.
And the two have already met: AMPG's radio ran with NVIDIA's Aerial software in the world's first open-source AI-RAN demo, inside Open6G, the hub the DoD is funding precisely to build a trusted, domestic foundation for next-gen wireless.
Source: prnewswire.com/news-releases/northeastern-university-demonstrates-first-open-source-prototype-of-a-massive-mimo-ai-ran-system-302777855.html
America's brain (NVIDIA) and America's radio (AMPG), tested together, in the government's own lab.
Add what's already real: deployed at Telus, a Tier-1 carrier, 2 of 5 radios per sector per Telus's own VP.
Defense-qualified with Lockheed, Northrop, L3Harris, Boeing. Debt-free, 48% gross margins, sub-$1B.
So when people say the next photonics-style run is hiding in plain sight in 5G/6G, Edge AI and AI-RAN, they're right.
But ask the better question: which layer do you own?
Everyone's crowded into software and compute, where the giants already rule.
I'm in the layer with exactly one American name: the physical foundation the entire revolution has to run on, in a country that just realized it can't keep renting it from abroad.
That's why I'm in $AMPG.
Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR.
And did you know the United States 🇺🇸 depends almost 100% on Europe 🇪🇺 and companies like $NOK?
Yes.
For the thing that will control everything.
The solution is being developed right now by $AMPG and $NVDA.
Let me explain the whole thing.
Edge AI isn't figurative.
It's literal.
The traffic lights at your intersection.
The car next to you.
The robots on the factory floor.
The drones overhead.
The power grid feeding your house.
All of it run by AI that cannot wait for a faraway data center to answer.
It needs decisions in milliseconds, made locally, at the edge of the network.
And the edge of the network is the cell tower.
That's where this entire revolution physically lives.
Now the dependence problem.
The radios those towers run on are built by foreign companies: Nokia (Finland), Ericsson (Sweden), Samsung (Korea).
The Chinese ones, Huawei and ZTE, are banned outright.
The most powerful nation on Earth, about to wire its cars, factories, grids and defense systems into an AI-driven network, doesn't make its own radios.
That's not a supply-chain detail.
That's a strategic vulnerability.
Here's how the solution fits together.
The industry calls this AI-RAN, and the AI-RAN
Alliance breaks it into 3 focus areas:
1️⃣ AI-AND-RAN: AI and the network sharing the same infrastructure. The tower runs network traffic AND AI workloads on the same hardware. Every tower becomes a mini data center. Payoff: asset utilization, monetizing billions in idle infrastructure.
2️⃣ AI-ON-RAN: AI applications enabled by the network. The network becomes a platform for real-time edge AI: autonomous vehicles, AR, industrial robots. Payoff: new applications that cloud-only AI physically can't do, because the round-trip is too slow.
3️⃣ AI-FOR-RAN: AI improving the network itself. Smarter beamforming, scheduling, self-optimizing cells. Payoff: spectral efficiency, more performance from the same scarce, expensive spectrum.
Now the part the diagram doesn't say out loud.
All three are software and compute layers.
That's NVIDIA's world: Aerial, the GPU brain.
NVIDIA is pushing so hard it's even signaling GPUs inside the radio itself will become essential as MIMO scales toward 6G.
But NVIDIA doesn't make radios.
The brain needs a body.
An open, high-capacity radio the AI layers can actually plug into, not a locked foreign box.
$AMPG is the only American company that designs and commercializes that open 64T64R Massive MIMO radio.
And the two have already met: AMPG's radio ran with NVIDIA's Aerial software in the world's first open-source AI-RAN demo, inside Open6G, the hub the DoD is funding precisely to build a trusted, domestic foundation for next-gen wireless.
Source: prnewswire.com/news-releases/northeastern-university-demonstrates-first-open-source-prototype-of-a-massive-mimo-ai-ran-system-302777855.html
America's brain (NVIDIA) and America's radio (AMPG), tested together, in the government's own lab.
Add what's already real: deployed at Telus, a Tier-1 carrier, 2 of 5 radios per sector per Telus's own VP.
Defense-qualified with Lockheed, Northrop, L3Harris, Boeing. Debt-free, 48% gross margins, sub-$1B.
So when people say the next photonics-style run is hiding in plain sight in 5G/6G, Edge AI and AI-RAN, they're right.
But ask the better question: which layer do you own?
Everyone's crowded into software and compute, where the giants already rule.
I'm in the layer with exactly one American name: the physical foundation the entire revolution has to run on, in a country that just realized it can't keep renting it from abroad.
That's why I'm in $AMPG.
Not financial advice. I'm long $AMPG. DYOR.
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
The K-shaped economy is playing out in real-time. If you're not on the right side of it, I'd be very worried. AI is splitting every industry into two camps: a) People who are genuinely great at their craft are becoming exponentially more valuable. b) People…
In 10 years, there will be two classes of people.
Economists call it the "K-shaped economy" - and the next 2-3 years will decide which line you're on.
• An overclass that uses AI as a lever to build wealth, automate income, and make decisions at a speed no human can compete with alone.
• And an underclass that gets managed by it.
This isn't just "coming". It's already happening.
Some mind-blowing stats:
• Workers with AI skills earn 56% more than the same job without them. That premium doubled in a single year.
• Industries adopting AI are seeing 3x the revenue growth per employee.
• Meanwhile, 90% of workers haven't taken a single hour of AI training.
• Goldman Sachs estimates 300 million jobs will be affected by AI by 2028. That's 24 months from now.
If you're reading this now and you haven't built systems with AI - haven't automated a single workflow, haven't used it to create anything that makes you money or makes you irreplaceable - you are currently on the wrong line.
That's not an insult. You have the agency to change your trajectory right now.
But six months from now, the gap will be twice as wide. And a year from now, it may not be crossable.
Economists call it the "K-shaped economy" - and the next 2-3 years will decide which line you're on.
• An overclass that uses AI as a lever to build wealth, automate income, and make decisions at a speed no human can compete with alone.
• And an underclass that gets managed by it.
This isn't just "coming". It's already happening.
Some mind-blowing stats:
• Workers with AI skills earn 56% more than the same job without them. That premium doubled in a single year.
• Industries adopting AI are seeing 3x the revenue growth per employee.
• Meanwhile, 90% of workers haven't taken a single hour of AI training.
• Goldman Sachs estimates 300 million jobs will be affected by AI by 2028. That's 24 months from now.
If you're reading this now and you haven't built systems with AI - haven't automated a single workflow, haven't used it to create anything that makes you money or makes you irreplaceable - you are currently on the wrong line.
That's not an insult. You have the agency to change your trajectory right now.
But six months from now, the gap will be twice as wide. And a year from now, it may not be crossable.
✍1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
This is f*cking insane when you think about it. Claude & GPT are literally losing up to $13,800 per subscription per month. This is the Uber model: Start cheap, get everyone hooked, then hike prices. You literally have access to the same AI tools as the…
Back then, the K-shape was about skills: Who uses AI vs who gets managed by it.
Now it's being built into the pricing itself:
• AI labs are subsidizing your $20 plan so aggressively they lose up to $13,800/month on power users
• Anthropic's new Fable model costs ~$600/HOUR to run properly on the API
• And on June 22, Fable leaves subscription plans entirely. Pay-per-use only.
For the first time ever, a frontier model is priced beyond the reach of normal people.
It won't be the last.
The original K was about effort. The new K is about access.
Right now, you still have the same AI tools as the billionaires.
In 10 days, the first crack appears.
Use this window while it still exists.
Now it's being built into the pricing itself:
• AI labs are subsidizing your $20 plan so aggressively they lose up to $13,800/month on power users
• Anthropic's new Fable model costs ~$600/HOUR to run properly on the API
• And on June 22, Fable leaves subscription plans entirely. Pay-per-use only.
For the first time ever, a frontier model is priced beyond the reach of normal people.
It won't be the last.
The original K was about effort. The new K is about access.
Right now, you still have the same AI tools as the billionaires.
In 10 days, the first crack appears.
Use this window while it still exists.
👨💻1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
Claude Fable 5 (Mythos) can literally build entire video games from scratch. Use the Higgsfield MCP to generate entire storylines, in-game visuals, and have Mythos code the entire thing end-to-end. Here's exactly how to code entire playable games with Fable…
Stop prompting your agents manually.
Loops are the most powerful way to use AI in 2026.
This guy built a directory of pre-built agent workflows for Claude, Codex & more.
You can now let agent loops complete tasks end-to-end.
Dozens of loops live here:
loops.elorm.xyz
Loops are the most powerful way to use AI in 2026.
This guy built a directory of pre-built agent workflows for Claude, Codex & more.
You can now let agent loops complete tasks end-to-end.
Dozens of loops live here:
loops.elorm.xyz
✍1
The US government just completely banned Fable 5 (Mythos) for ALL users.
I went through all the docs to piece together exactly what happened...
Here's everything you need to know (in 60 seconds):
What exactly happened
The US government issued an export control directive today at 5:21 pm ET.
Every single user (domestic and foreign) lost access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 immediately.
All other Claude models remain unaffected (for now).
Why?
The government claims someone found a jailbreak for Fable 5 that bypasses its safety measures.
More specifically, asking Mythos to read a codebase and fix software flaws.
Anthropic's response
They're complying - but they strongly disagree.
Their argument:
- The jailbreak shown is narrow and non-universal
- The same capability exists in GPT-5.5 and other public models
- No harmful result was ever actually produced
- Fable's safeguards are more robust than any previously deployed model
In plain English: the government flagged something that every other major AI model can already do.
For weeks, Anthropic has claimed Mythos is extremely dangerous.
What did they expect to happen?
anthropic.com/news/fable-mythos-access
I went through all the docs to piece together exactly what happened...
Here's everything you need to know (in 60 seconds):
What exactly happened
The US government issued an export control directive today at 5:21 pm ET.
Every single user (domestic and foreign) lost access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 immediately.
All other Claude models remain unaffected (for now).
Why?
The government claims someone found a jailbreak for Fable 5 that bypasses its safety measures.
More specifically, asking Mythos to read a codebase and fix software flaws.
Anthropic's response
They're complying - but they strongly disagree.
Their argument:
- The jailbreak shown is narrow and non-universal
- The same capability exists in GPT-5.5 and other public models
- No harmful result was ever actually produced
- Fable's safeguards are more robust than any previously deployed model
In plain English: the government flagged something that every other major AI model can already do.
For weeks, Anthropic has claimed Mythos is extremely dangerous.
What did they expect to happen?
anthropic.com/news/fable-mythos-access
👀1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
The US government just completely banned Fable 5 (Mythos) for ALL users. I went through all the docs to piece together exactly what happened... Here's everything you need to know (in 60 seconds): What exactly happened The US government issued an export…
This is one of the craziest headlines you'll read all year.
The US government has suspended the use of Claude Fable 5 & Mythos 5.
My thoughts on the ramifications:
- There is a strong motive to overturn the ban, as the ramifications for equities are significant. Trillions of dollars of data centers/contracts rely on the AI trade - free markets don't like intervention.
- Raises concerns over favoritism, clearly favors competitors - this likely buys OpenAI/Google more time.
- Sets a worrying precedent in terms of control (regulation is important, but I can't help but feel the best models will be controlled by governments and big corporations - they're afraid of the little guy having too much power).
- Open-source models are going to accelerate and drive cost down (there is growing demand) - meanwhile, frontier models are only getting more costly. Has fascinating knock-on effects for the AI trade.
- A reminder that if you don't own your own models/compute, you're trading sovereignty for convenience. Local models will become a massive trend.
The US government has suspended the use of Claude Fable 5 & Mythos 5.
My thoughts on the ramifications:
- There is a strong motive to overturn the ban, as the ramifications for equities are significant. Trillions of dollars of data centers/contracts rely on the AI trade - free markets don't like intervention.
- Raises concerns over favoritism, clearly favors competitors - this likely buys OpenAI/Google more time.
- Sets a worrying precedent in terms of control (regulation is important, but I can't help but feel the best models will be controlled by governments and big corporations - they're afraid of the little guy having too much power).
- Open-source models are going to accelerate and drive cost down (there is growing demand) - meanwhile, frontier models are only getting more costly. Has fascinating knock-on effects for the AI trade.
- A reminder that if you don't own your own models/compute, you're trading sovereignty for convenience. Local models will become a massive trend.
✍1🔥1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
Claude Fable 5 (Mythos) can literally build entire video games from scratch. Use the Higgsfield MCP to generate entire storylines, in-game visuals, and have Mythos code the entire thing end-to-end. Here's exactly how to code entire playable games with Fable…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
CLAUDE FABLE 5 REBUILT GTA VI IN 10 HOURS WITH 4 MILLION TOKENS WHILE ROCKSTAR NEEDED 8 YEARS AND $1 BILLION
no studio, no payroll, and it cut a trailer before logging off. the wall between you and a AAA game used to be $1 billion, now it's a prompt.
no studio, no payroll, and it cut a trailer before logging off. the wall between you and a AAA game used to be $1 billion, now it's a prompt.
👨💻1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
Photo
$ENSI - $ARM - $TSM Ecosystem for $XFAB
In the modern semiconductor landscape, the collaboration between EnSilica, ARM, TSMC, and X-FAB represents a highly complementary ecosystem where X-FAB significantly benefits from EnSilica’s deep-rooted industry relationships.
As a specialized foundry for analog and mixed-signal technologies, $XFAB leverages this network to secure high-value business that might otherwise remain out of reach, transforming what appears to be a competitive market into a collaborative win.
This benefit becomes highly visible through the rising trend of heterogeneous integration, such as System-in-Package or Chiplet architectures.
Modern smart devices and automotive applications require ultra-small, high-performance digital processors alongside specialized analog components.
While $ENSI designs the cutting-edge digital core using $ARM IP and manufactures it at $TSM using leading-edge nodes, the crucial analog front-ends, power management, or sensor interfaces are routed to $XFAB.
Consequently, X-FAB gains a guaranteed role in complex, high-margin systems, securing manufacturing volume that depends entirely on EnSilica’s ability to integrate TSMC’s digital power.
Furthermore, $XFAB gains valuable access to Tier-1 customers through EnSilica's prestigious ecosystem accreditations.
Holding statuses as both an $ARM Approved Design Partner and a member of the TSMC Design Center Alliance, EnSilica acts as a magnet for automotive, industrial, and medical OEMs seeking turnkey ASIC solutions.
When these customers approach EnSilica for a complete system, they rarely need a purely digital solution, requiring mixed-signal and high-voltage capabilities instead. As a trusted manufacturing partner in EnSilica’s X-CHAIN network, $XFAB is seamlessly pulled into these lucrative customer roadmaps, with EnSilica effectively acting as an outsourced technical sales channel.
Ultimately, this relationship thrives because TSMC and X-FAB occupy entirely different, yet symbiotic, technical niches.
While TSMC focuses on shrinking digital transistors for massive computing power, analog and MEMS technologies require X-FAB's specialized, automotive-grade processes. EnSilica bridges this gap by acting as the sole architectural integrator. Instead of competing with TSMC, X-FAB is positioned as the ideal complementary partner, ensuring both foundries maximize their respective strengths while boosting $XFAB long-term factory utilization.
In the modern semiconductor landscape, the collaboration between EnSilica, ARM, TSMC, and X-FAB represents a highly complementary ecosystem where X-FAB significantly benefits from EnSilica’s deep-rooted industry relationships.
As a specialized foundry for analog and mixed-signal technologies, $XFAB leverages this network to secure high-value business that might otherwise remain out of reach, transforming what appears to be a competitive market into a collaborative win.
This benefit becomes highly visible through the rising trend of heterogeneous integration, such as System-in-Package or Chiplet architectures.
Modern smart devices and automotive applications require ultra-small, high-performance digital processors alongside specialized analog components.
While $ENSI designs the cutting-edge digital core using $ARM IP and manufactures it at $TSM using leading-edge nodes, the crucial analog front-ends, power management, or sensor interfaces are routed to $XFAB.
Consequently, X-FAB gains a guaranteed role in complex, high-margin systems, securing manufacturing volume that depends entirely on EnSilica’s ability to integrate TSMC’s digital power.
Furthermore, $XFAB gains valuable access to Tier-1 customers through EnSilica's prestigious ecosystem accreditations.
Holding statuses as both an $ARM Approved Design Partner and a member of the TSMC Design Center Alliance, EnSilica acts as a magnet for automotive, industrial, and medical OEMs seeking turnkey ASIC solutions.
When these customers approach EnSilica for a complete system, they rarely need a purely digital solution, requiring mixed-signal and high-voltage capabilities instead. As a trusted manufacturing partner in EnSilica’s X-CHAIN network, $XFAB is seamlessly pulled into these lucrative customer roadmaps, with EnSilica effectively acting as an outsourced technical sales channel.
Ultimately, this relationship thrives because TSMC and X-FAB occupy entirely different, yet symbiotic, technical niches.
While TSMC focuses on shrinking digital transistors for massive computing power, analog and MEMS technologies require X-FAB's specialized, automotive-grade processes. EnSilica bridges this gap by acting as the sole architectural integrator. Instead of competing with TSMC, X-FAB is positioned as the ideal complementary partner, ensuring both foundries maximize their respective strengths while boosting $XFAB long-term factory utilization.
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
This is one of the craziest headlines you'll read all year. The US government has suspended the use of Claude Fable 5 & Mythos 5. My thoughts on the ramifications: - There is a strong motive to overturn the ban, as the ramifications for equities are significant.…
The US government just set a precedent. It ripped the most powerful American AI model away from every foreigner on earth.
Critical tech is becoming a "made in America, controlled by America" game.
I expect $AMPG to re-rate aggressively on this news, and here's why:
AmpliTech is the ONLY American company with a commercialized, O-RAN certified 64T64R Massive MIMO radio. The highest radio config in the entire 5G stack. Not the only one on earth, but the only American one.
When Washington starts walling off the supply chain, that one word "American" becomes their moat.
The same company also manufactures 4K cryogenic LNAs for quantum readout and defense/satcom RF. American-made, across the exact categories the US just declared strategic.
And here's where it gets interesting:
Telus is investing $66 billion to modernize its fibre and 5G network and to convert corporate buildings into residential housing. This is exactly what CEO Fawad Maqbool talked about on LinkedIn three weeks ago. Connect the dots. And that's just one project from one telecom company.
After this news, do you think US telecom companies will want to keep building on Korean, Swedish, or Finnish radios from the likes of Samsung, $ERIC or $NOK and risk retrofitting the entire network later with American-made tech?
No. They'll go straight to AmpliTech, which has the only American commercial product and the patent portfolio behind it.
When you buy $AMPG, you're not just betting on the future of O-RAN and quantum computing. You're buying a $200M micro-cap that's the only American-made way to do it.
The market hasn't priced this in yet at all. It will. NFA.
Critical tech is becoming a "made in America, controlled by America" game.
I expect $AMPG to re-rate aggressively on this news, and here's why:
AmpliTech is the ONLY American company with a commercialized, O-RAN certified 64T64R Massive MIMO radio. The highest radio config in the entire 5G stack. Not the only one on earth, but the only American one.
When Washington starts walling off the supply chain, that one word "American" becomes their moat.
The same company also manufactures 4K cryogenic LNAs for quantum readout and defense/satcom RF. American-made, across the exact categories the US just declared strategic.
And here's where it gets interesting:
Telus is investing $66 billion to modernize its fibre and 5G network and to convert corporate buildings into residential housing. This is exactly what CEO Fawad Maqbool talked about on LinkedIn three weeks ago. Connect the dots. And that's just one project from one telecom company.
After this news, do you think US telecom companies will want to keep building on Korean, Swedish, or Finnish radios from the likes of Samsung, $ERIC or $NOK and risk retrofitting the entire network later with American-made tech?
No. They'll go straight to AmpliTech, which has the only American commercial product and the patent portfolio behind it.
When you buy $AMPG, you're not just betting on the future of O-RAN and quantum computing. You're buying a $200M micro-cap that's the only American-made way to do it.
The market hasn't priced this in yet at all. It will. NFA.
✍1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
The US government just completely banned Fable 5 (Mythos) for ALL users. I went through all the docs to piece together exactly what happened... Here's everything you need to know (in 60 seconds): What exactly happened The US government issued an export…
‼️🚨 BREAKING: Amazon researchers snitched to the US government about jailbreaking Fable 5 and Mythos 5, forcing Anthropic to immediately shut down worldwide access.
A security export control directive from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick enforced the action.
Anthropic is fighting the directive and calls it a misunderstanding.
This isn't the first clash. The Trump administration had already tried to get Anthropic to pause the release of its latest models before this directive landed.
A security export control directive from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick enforced the action.
Anthropic is fighting the directive and calls it a misunderstanding.
This isn't the first clash. The Trump administration had already tried to get Anthropic to pause the release of its latest models before this directive landed.
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
AMD Ryzen AI Halo. The ultimate local AI developer platform. Pre-order now: bit.ly/4xv5PJS ⚡ Up to 128GB unified memory ⚡ Support for models up to 200B parameters ⚡ Windows & Linux support ⚡ Ready-to-run AI workflows out of the box Build, prototype, and…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚀 AMD Ryzen AI Halo is now available for pre-order!
A compact local AI developer platform powered by the Ryzen AI Max+ 395:
🧠 128GB unified LPDDR5x memory
⚡ 40 CU Radeon 8060S graphics (RDNA 3.5)
📦 Run models up to 200B parameters locally
🖥️ Windows + Linux support out of the box
Build and deploy AI workflows without cloud dependency.
Pre-order → @ amd
A compact local AI developer platform powered by the Ryzen AI Max+ 395:
🧠 128GB unified LPDDR5x memory
⚡ 40 CU Radeon 8060S graphics (RDNA 3.5)
📦 Run models up to 200B parameters locally
🖥️ Windows + Linux support out of the box
Build and deploy AI workflows without cloud dependency.
Pre-order → @ amd
45 leading names that are above the 10-MA with over $100M in dollar volume to build your relative strength watchlist, even as the market remains beneath its 10 and 20-MAs.
$RXT — Software Infrastructure
$AMC — Entertainment
$AEHR — Semiconductor Equipment
$ALK — Airlines
$MARA — Crypto Mining
$SEI — Energy Infrastructure
$CLF — Steel
$VSH — Semiconductors
$OSCR — Health Care Providers
$CORZ — Crypto Mining
$CIFR — Crypto Mining
$RIOT — Crypto Mining
$CAVA — Restaurants
$BROS — Restaurants
$WULF — Crypto Mining
$GLXY — Crypto Mining
$VIAV — Communication Equipment
$SMTC — Semiconductors
$FPS — Electrical Equipment
$LSCC — Semiconductors
$TTMI — Electronic Components
$AMKR — Semiconductor Equipment
$RIVN — EVs
$ROKU — Entertainment
$IREN — Crypto Mining
$ENTG — Semiconductor Equipment
$TSEM — Semiconductors
$GFS — Semiconductors
$CRDO — Semiconductors
$UMC — Semiconductors
$ALAB — Semiconductors
$TER — Semiconductor Equipment
$STM — Semiconductors
$LITE — Communication Equipment
$ASX — Semiconductor Packaging & Testing
$WDC — Data Storage
$STX — Data Storage
$MRVL — Semiconductors
$SNDK — Data Storage
$KLAC — Semiconductor Equipment
$ARM — Semiconductors
$AMAT — Semiconductor Equipment
$LRCX — Semiconductor Equipment
$INTC — Semiconductors
$AMD — Semiconductors
$MU — Memory Semiconductors
$RXT — Software Infrastructure
$AMC — Entertainment
$AEHR — Semiconductor Equipment
$ALK — Airlines
$MARA — Crypto Mining
$SEI — Energy Infrastructure
$CLF — Steel
$VSH — Semiconductors
$OSCR — Health Care Providers
$CORZ — Crypto Mining
$CIFR — Crypto Mining
$RIOT — Crypto Mining
$CAVA — Restaurants
$BROS — Restaurants
$WULF — Crypto Mining
$GLXY — Crypto Mining
$VIAV — Communication Equipment
$SMTC — Semiconductors
$FPS — Electrical Equipment
$LSCC — Semiconductors
$TTMI — Electronic Components
$AMKR — Semiconductor Equipment
$RIVN — EVs
$ROKU — Entertainment
$IREN — Crypto Mining
$ENTG — Semiconductor Equipment
$TSEM — Semiconductors
$GFS — Semiconductors
$CRDO — Semiconductors
$UMC — Semiconductors
$ALAB — Semiconductors
$TER — Semiconductor Equipment
$STM — Semiconductors
$LITE — Communication Equipment
$ASX — Semiconductor Packaging & Testing
$WDC — Data Storage
$STX — Data Storage
$MRVL — Semiconductors
$SNDK — Data Storage
$KLAC — Semiconductor Equipment
$ARM — Semiconductors
$AMAT — Semiconductor Equipment
$LRCX — Semiconductor Equipment
$INTC — Semiconductors
$AMD — Semiconductors
$MU — Memory Semiconductors