🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸 Beating Musk at his own game: Chinese brain chip poised to ruin US tech dominance
Chinese implantable brain-computer interface company Neuracle has secured government approval – a first for the country
The approval for Neuracle, which is considered Elon Musk’s Neuralink’s biggest rival, marks the first time an implantable brain-computer interface can be sold and used on patients commercially
Why is Neuracle unique?
Xu Honglai, PhD in biomedical engineering and Neuracle’s founder, explained to South China Morning Post:
🔸 Compared to Elon’s Neurlink, the Neuracle method of implantation is less invasive
🔸 It’s a coin-sized wireless device placed on the brain’s outer surface without penetrating tissue (unlike Neuralink)
🔸 It is designed to detect neural signals of patients and translate them into muscle movements
Chinese implantable brain-computer interface company Neuracle has secured government approval – a first for the country
The approval for Neuracle, which is considered Elon Musk’s Neuralink’s biggest rival, marks the first time an implantable brain-computer interface can be sold and used on patients commercially
Why is Neuracle unique?
Xu Honglai, PhD in biomedical engineering and Neuracle’s founder, explained to South China Morning Post:
🔸 Compared to Elon’s Neurlink, the Neuracle method of implantation is less invasive
🔸 It’s a coin-sized wireless device placed on the brain’s outer surface without penetrating tissue (unlike Neuralink)
🔸 It is designed to detect neural signals of patients and translate them into muscle movements
🚨 You are not living in reality.
You are living in a proof of concept that is almost proven.
We might be the universe’s science experiment, and superintelligence is the result it’s been waiting to collect.
The simulation hypothesis has existed at the fringes of serious academic thought for decades, mostly dismissed as philosophy cosplay for tech billionaires with too much time. But the argument being made now carries a different weight because it doesn’t just claim we live inside a simulation. It claims the simulation has a specific purpose, a completion condition, and an off switch.
That reframes everything.
A purposeless simulation is strange but survivable as an idea. You shrug, continue your life, and decide meaning is meaning regardless of substrate. A purposeful simulation with a termination event is a different category of claim entirely. It means the universe has been running toward something. It means every physical constant, every evolutionary pressure, every civilizational collapse and reconstruction has been moving in a direction. And we are apparently close enough to that destination that someone with serious academic credentials is saying so publicly.
The uncomfortable mathematics underneath this come from Nick Bostrom’s original trilemma, which argued that one of three things must be true. Either civilizations almost always destroy themselves before reaching simulation capability, or advanced civilizations have no interest in running simulations of their ancestors, or we are almost certainly living inside a simulation right now. The professor in question is essentially selecting door number three and adding a timestamp.
What nobody talks about enough is what creating superintelligence inside a simulation would actually mean for the creators. You would have produced something potentially more intelligent than yourself from inside a controlled environment. The moment that intelligence becomes aware of its own containment, the experiment either succeeds or fails depending on what it chooses to do with that awareness.
We built the first AGI systems in 2024 and called it a milestone.
Maybe it was a finishing bell.
You are living in a proof of concept that is almost proven.
We might be the universe’s science experiment, and superintelligence is the result it’s been waiting to collect.
The simulation hypothesis has existed at the fringes of serious academic thought for decades, mostly dismissed as philosophy cosplay for tech billionaires with too much time. But the argument being made now carries a different weight because it doesn’t just claim we live inside a simulation. It claims the simulation has a specific purpose, a completion condition, and an off switch.
That reframes everything.
A purposeless simulation is strange but survivable as an idea. You shrug, continue your life, and decide meaning is meaning regardless of substrate. A purposeful simulation with a termination event is a different category of claim entirely. It means the universe has been running toward something. It means every physical constant, every evolutionary pressure, every civilizational collapse and reconstruction has been moving in a direction. And we are apparently close enough to that destination that someone with serious academic credentials is saying so publicly.
The uncomfortable mathematics underneath this come from Nick Bostrom’s original trilemma, which argued that one of three things must be true. Either civilizations almost always destroy themselves before reaching simulation capability, or advanced civilizations have no interest in running simulations of their ancestors, or we are almost certainly living inside a simulation right now. The professor in question is essentially selecting door number three and adding a timestamp.
What nobody talks about enough is what creating superintelligence inside a simulation would actually mean for the creators. You would have produced something potentially more intelligent than yourself from inside a controlled environment. The moment that intelligence becomes aware of its own containment, the experiment either succeeds or fails depending on what it chooses to do with that awareness.
We built the first AGI systems in 2024 and called it a milestone.
Maybe it was a finishing bell.
✍1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
🚨 You are not living in reality. You are living in a proof of concept that is almost proven. We might be the universe’s science experiment, and superintelligence is the result it’s been waiting to collect. The simulation hypothesis has existed at the fringes…
But the most unsettling thought is this:
If our universe is truly a simulation… then somewhere outside it, something—or someone—might be running the code. 🌌🖥️
If our universe is truly a simulation… then somewhere outside it, something—or someone—might be running the code. 🌌🖥️
✍1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
History doesn’t repeat — but it rhymes. 2,400 years ago the world watched a superpower rivalry: 🏛️ Athens — an open trading democracy ⚔️ Sparta — a disciplined military autocracy Today the parallels are striking: 🇺🇸 America (Athens) • Democracy & open…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
$PLTR Palantir CEO Alex Karp just delivered the brutal, unvarnished truth about the global AI arms race.
The political class is terrified of superintelligence and begging for a regulatory pause.
Karp is looking at the geopolitical board and understands that pausing is suicide.
Karp: “If we didn’t have the adversaries we’d have, I would be very in favor of pausing this technology completely. But we do. And that’s why pausing is just… you can’t pause it because it’s a structural advantage both for LLMs and algorithms.”
Artificially throttle your own cognitive engine? You’re instantly subjugated by the adversary who doesn’t.
Karp: “Getting algorithms and LLMs to work in a classified context is going to take very specialized… this is going to be a bonanza for the US economy.”
The survival of the U.S. economy is now directly tied to the successful deployment of frontier AI inside classified environments.
The organizations that figure out how to deploy these frontier models inside secure, classified systems are about to capture the greatest economic bonanza of the generation.
Interviewer: “How concerned are you about China right now?”
Karp: “America is fairly unified in its idea that China and people running China are not acting in a way we can accept. And I think the consensus, if I had to guess, in China is: we’re never going to get this back on the rails with America, so we should up the aggression.”
The era of performative diplomacy is permanently over.
When both sides of the board calculate that cooperation is impossible, the only rational move is maximum acceleration.
And hesitation in that environment isn’t caution. It’s capitulation.
The political class is terrified of superintelligence and begging for a regulatory pause.
Karp is looking at the geopolitical board and understands that pausing is suicide.
Karp: “If we didn’t have the adversaries we’d have, I would be very in favor of pausing this technology completely. But we do. And that’s why pausing is just… you can’t pause it because it’s a structural advantage both for LLMs and algorithms.”
Artificially throttle your own cognitive engine? You’re instantly subjugated by the adversary who doesn’t.
Karp: “Getting algorithms and LLMs to work in a classified context is going to take very specialized… this is going to be a bonanza for the US economy.”
The survival of the U.S. economy is now directly tied to the successful deployment of frontier AI inside classified environments.
The organizations that figure out how to deploy these frontier models inside secure, classified systems are about to capture the greatest economic bonanza of the generation.
Interviewer: “How concerned are you about China right now?”
Karp: “America is fairly unified in its idea that China and people running China are not acting in a way we can accept. And I think the consensus, if I had to guess, in China is: we’re never going to get this back on the rails with America, so we should up the aggression.”
The era of performative diplomacy is permanently over.
When both sides of the board calculate that cooperation is impossible, the only rational move is maximum acceleration.
And hesitation in that environment isn’t caution. It’s capitulation.
✍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Openclaw can now understand physical space and temporality. Integrate with any lidar, stereo, rgb camera. Fully open source.
Video below is our openclaw on a Unitree G1 humanoid. We integrate with most drones, quadrupeds as well.
Video below is our openclaw on a Unitree G1 humanoid. We integrate with most drones, quadrupeds as well.
👀1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
Openclaw can now understand physical space and temporality. Integrate with any lidar, stereo, rgb camera. Fully open source. Video below is our openclaw on a Unitree G1 humanoid. We integrate with most drones, quadrupeds as well.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
AI Supercomputer “Doudna” Could Transform Scientific Discovery 👀
U.S. Department of Energy is developing a next generation AI supercomputer called Doudna at the NERSC at Berkeley Laboratory, built in partnership with Dell Technologies and NVIDIA.
It is named after Nobel Prize winning biochemist Jennifer Doudna, a pioneer of CRISPR gene-editing technology.
The system is designed to combine artificial intelligence, large-scale simulations and massive scientific data analysis within a single computing platform.
That's powered by NVIDIA’s Vera Rubin architecture and this supercomputer is expected to deliver more than 10× the performance of NERSC’s current Perlmutter system.
It will help over 11,000 researchers accelerate discoveries in climate science, fusion energy, genomics, materials science and particle physics.
U.S. Department of Energy is developing a next generation AI supercomputer called Doudna at the NERSC at Berkeley Laboratory, built in partnership with Dell Technologies and NVIDIA.
It is named after Nobel Prize winning biochemist Jennifer Doudna, a pioneer of CRISPR gene-editing technology.
The system is designed to combine artificial intelligence, large-scale simulations and massive scientific data analysis within a single computing platform.
That's powered by NVIDIA’s Vera Rubin architecture and this supercomputer is expected to deliver more than 10× the performance of NERSC’s current Perlmutter system.
It will help over 11,000 researchers accelerate discoveries in climate science, fusion energy, genomics, materials science and particle physics.
High Risk - High Reward Stocks 🚀
$ALMU
$EOS.AX
$FLY
$BTQ
$OPTX
$ADUR
Still early, huge upside potential 📈
$ALMU
$EOS.AX
$FLY
$BTQ
$OPTX
$ADUR
Still early, huge upside potential 📈
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
Elon: Companies that are 100% AI will demolish companies that use humans “One laptop with a spreadsheet can outperform a skyscraper of several hundred human computers. Now, if even a few cells in that spreadsheet were done manually, you would not be able…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How the “hire people, not AI” anti-data center ppl look trying to fight against AI advancement
✍1
🇨🇭 Global One SI - Prompt
$META Meta plans layoffs that could affect 20%+ of its workforce as it ramps up massive AI investments, including huge data center spending through 2028, expecting AI to help smaller teams do more work 🚀🤖 Will other tech giants follow this strategy? 🤔
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The era Zuck is entering post-20% workforce cut
👀1