Forwarded from GhosteraŸM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from GhosteraŸM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from GhosteraŸM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from GhosteraŸM
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from 𓂆 Princess™
The Biafra crisis
During the Biafra conflict, a blockade imposed by the Nigerian government cut off essential supplies to the secessionist region of Biafra. This blockade, combined with military actions, led widespread starvation and suffering among civilians. The international community responded with humanitarian aid efforts, but the crisis highlighted gaps in international law concerning the protection of civilian populations during conflicts.
Key contributions and implications of the Biafra crisis include:
1. Humanitarian Principles: The Biafra crisis underscored the importance of humanitarian principles in international law, particularly the protection of civilians during armed conflicts. It prompted discussions on the ethical and legal responsibilities of states to ensure humanitarian access and prevent starvation as a tactic of war.
2. International Awareness: The media coverage and humanitarian responses to the Biafra crisis raised international awareness about the devastating impact of conflicts on civilian populations. This contributed to increased advocacy for stronger protections for civilians in international law.
3. Evolution of Humanitarian Law: While the Biafra crisis itself did not directly result in new treaties or conventions, it contributed to the development of customary international law norms related to the protection of civilians in armed conflicts. Subsequent conflicts and humanitarian crises further shaped international legal frameworks, including provisions in the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols.
4. Impact on Humanitarian Assistance: The Biafra crisis highlighted the importance of humanitarian assistance and the need for international cooperation in providing aid to civilians affected by conflicts.
Blockades as a war crime
Blockades have been a subject of international law and regulation for centuries, evolving over time to address their humanitarian and legal implications. The concept of blockade as a violation of international law gained attention after 19th century.
Key developments include:
1. Post-World War II: The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols of 1977 provided more detailed provisions on the protection of civilians during armed conflict. They established that blockades should not prevent the delivery of essential humanitarian assistance to civilian populations.
2. Customary International Law: Over time, customary international law has reinforced these principles, emphasizing the protection of civilians and humanitarian access even in the context of blockades during armed conflict.
Starvation as a war crime
Under international humanitarian law, particularly in the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols. Here are the key points regarding starvation as a war crime:
1. Geneva Conventions: The Geneva Conventions of 1949, specifically the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, prohibits starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. Article 33 states that "No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed."
2. Additional Protocols: The Additional Protocols I and II of 1977 further reinforce these principles. They prohibit the starvation of civilians as a means of warfare and emphasize the obligation of parties to an armed conflict to ensure that civilians have access to essential food and medical supplies.
3. Customary International Law: The prohibition against starvation as a method of warfare has also become a part of customary international law. This means that even states not party to the Geneva Conventions are bound by these rules.
4. Responsibility: Individuals responsible for deliberately using starvation as a method of warfare, or for intentionally depriving civilians of food and other essential supplies, can be prosecuted for war crimes under international criminal law. This includes military commanders, government officials, and others who plan, order, or participate in such actions.
#GhostPrincess
During the Biafra conflict, a blockade imposed by the Nigerian government cut off essential supplies to the secessionist region of Biafra. This blockade, combined with military actions, led widespread starvation and suffering among civilians. The international community responded with humanitarian aid efforts, but the crisis highlighted gaps in international law concerning the protection of civilian populations during conflicts.
Key contributions and implications of the Biafra crisis include:
1. Humanitarian Principles: The Biafra crisis underscored the importance of humanitarian principles in international law, particularly the protection of civilians during armed conflicts. It prompted discussions on the ethical and legal responsibilities of states to ensure humanitarian access and prevent starvation as a tactic of war.
2. International Awareness: The media coverage and humanitarian responses to the Biafra crisis raised international awareness about the devastating impact of conflicts on civilian populations. This contributed to increased advocacy for stronger protections for civilians in international law.
3. Evolution of Humanitarian Law: While the Biafra crisis itself did not directly result in new treaties or conventions, it contributed to the development of customary international law norms related to the protection of civilians in armed conflicts. Subsequent conflicts and humanitarian crises further shaped international legal frameworks, including provisions in the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols.
4. Impact on Humanitarian Assistance: The Biafra crisis highlighted the importance of humanitarian assistance and the need for international cooperation in providing aid to civilians affected by conflicts.
Blockades as a war crime
Blockades have been a subject of international law and regulation for centuries, evolving over time to address their humanitarian and legal implications. The concept of blockade as a violation of international law gained attention after 19th century.
Key developments include:
1. Post-World War II: The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols of 1977 provided more detailed provisions on the protection of civilians during armed conflict. They established that blockades should not prevent the delivery of essential humanitarian assistance to civilian populations.
2. Customary International Law: Over time, customary international law has reinforced these principles, emphasizing the protection of civilians and humanitarian access even in the context of blockades during armed conflict.
Starvation as a war crime
Under international humanitarian law, particularly in the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols. Here are the key points regarding starvation as a war crime:
1. Geneva Conventions: The Geneva Conventions of 1949, specifically the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, prohibits starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. Article 33 states that "No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed."
2. Additional Protocols: The Additional Protocols I and II of 1977 further reinforce these principles. They prohibit the starvation of civilians as a means of warfare and emphasize the obligation of parties to an armed conflict to ensure that civilians have access to essential food and medical supplies.
3. Customary International Law: The prohibition against starvation as a method of warfare has also become a part of customary international law. This means that even states not party to the Geneva Conventions are bound by these rules.
4. Responsibility: Individuals responsible for deliberately using starvation as a method of warfare, or for intentionally depriving civilians of food and other essential supplies, can be prosecuted for war crimes under international criminal law. This includes military commanders, government officials, and others who plan, order, or participate in such actions.
#GhostPrincess
Forwarded from 𓂆 Princess™
𓂆 Princess™
The Biafra crisis During the Biafra conflict, a blockade imposed by the Nigerian government cut off essential supplies to the secessionist region of Biafra. This blockade, combined with military actions, led widespread starvation and suffering among civilians.…
The Israeli government is using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare in the Gaza Strip, which is a war crime.
Forwarded from 𓂆 Princess™
𓂆 Princess™
The Israeli government is using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare in the Gaza Strip, which is a war crime.
Israeli officials have made public statements expressing their aim to deprive civilians in Gaza of food, water, and fuel – statements reflected in Israeli forces’ military operations.
Forwarded from 𓂆 Princess™
𓂆 Princess™
Israeli officials have made public statements expressing their aim to deprive civilians in Gaza of food, water, and fuel – statements reflected in Israeli forces’ military operations.
The Israeli government should not attack objects necessary for the survival of the civilian population, lift its blockade of the Gaza Strip, and restore electricity and water.
Forwarded from 𓂆 Princess™
𓂆 Princess™
The Israeli government should not attack objects necessary for the survival of the civilian population, lift its blockade of the Gaza Strip, and restore electricity and water.
In addition, Israel’s continuing blockade of Gaza, as well as its more than 16-year closure, amounts to collective punishment of the civilian population, a war crime. As the occupying power in Gaza under the Fourth Geneva Convention, Israel has the duty to ensure that the civilian population gets food and medical supplies.
Forwarded from 𓂆 Princess™
𓂆 Princess™
In addition, Israel’s continuing blockade of Gaza, as well as its more than 16-year closure, amounts to collective punishment of the civilian population, a war crime. As the occupying power in Gaza under the Fourth Geneva Convention, Israel has the duty to…
Prior to the current hostilities, 1.2 million of Gaza’s 2.2 million people were estimated to be facing acute food insecurity, and over 80 percent were reliant on humanitarian aid. Israel maintains overarching control over Gaza, including over the movement of people and goods, territorial waters, airspace, the infrastructure upon which Gaza relies, as well as the registry of the population. This leaves Gaza’s population, which Israel has subjected to an unlawful closure for 16 years, almost entirely dependent on Israel for access to fuel, electricity, medicine, food, and other essential commodities.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Civilians were the victims of Israeli massacres in Gaza today, which targeted four residential blocks in different areas of the city.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Palestinian medical student Ezzedin Lulu speaks about the dire situation at Al-Ahli Hospital following a deadly day of intense Israeli airstrikes on Gaza.
Forwarded from 𓂆 Princess™
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In her speech, Professor Dr. Kristen Bos urged the University of Toronto to divest from institutions and companies complicit in harming indigenous populations, including Palestinians.
Forwarded from 𓂆 Princess™
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Activists in Ireland organize an event simulating the crimes committed by the Israeli occupation against the prisoners of Gaza.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Three Palestinians were killed, and multiple others injured in an Israeli airstrike that targeted the Ahil family home in the Al-Tuffah neighborhood of Gaza City.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Due to Israel prohibiting fuel and deliberately targeting ambulances, Palestinians in Gaza resort to transporting victims of Israeli attacks on animal carts; many of the wounded die on their way to the depleted hospitals.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Israel's army commits a massacre, murdering several civilians most of whom are children, in Al Shate' refugee camp west of Gaza.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
You will NEVER defeat these people!
Forwarded from 𓂆 Princess™
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Masses of Palestinian activists staged a sit-in protest at Berlin's Alexa shopping mall, one of the city's largest retail hubs, calling for a boycott of "enablers of genocide" against the Palestinian people.
Forwarded from 𓂆 Princess™
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A pro-Palestine car rally surged through the streets of Seoul, South Korea, voicing their solidarity with the Palestinian people.
Forwarded from 𓂆 Princess™
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Pro-Palestine activists rallied outside a branch of Barclays Bank in Lambeth, London, in protest of the bank's complicity in the Israeli genocidal war in Gaza.