GLOBAL MEDIA BLACKOUT OVER GAZA JOURNALIST DEATHS
Over 250 outlets worldwide - including Le Monde, El País, The Guardian, Der Spiegel, and Al Jazeera - joined a coordinated blackout to protest the killing of more than 210 journalists in Gaza.
Print front pages went dark, TV and radio cut programming, and major news sites replaced their homepages with blackout banners.
@GhostPrincess
Over 250 outlets worldwide - including Le Monde, El País, The Guardian, Der Spiegel, and Al Jazeera - joined a coordinated blackout to protest the killing of more than 210 journalists in Gaza.
Print front pages went dark, TV and radio cut programming, and major news sites replaced their homepages with blackout banners.
@GhostPrincess
Forwarded from 𓂆 Palestine
The U.S. Plan for Gaza: A Blueprint for Permanent Dispossession and Colonial Fantasy
The reported proposal for the United States to administer Gaza and transforming it into a "Riviera of the Middle East" while relocating its two million people, is not a novel strategy for peace . It is the latest chapter in a long history of colonial engineering and a blatant attempt to complete the Nakba—the catastrophic displacement of Palestinians in 1948—under the guise of humanitarianism and development. This plan is profoundly doomed, not because of logistical hurdles, but because it is an affront to justice, international law, and the unyielding will of the Palestinian people to remain on their land.
1. Historical Precedent: A Legacy of Failure and Forced Erasure
The modern history of Gaza is a history of displacement and resistance. In 1948, during the Nakba, tens of thousands of Palestinians flocked to the strip after being forced from their homes in what became Israel . For decades, they have been trapped, often stateless, under successive military rulers. This U.S. plan does not offer a solution; it proposes to repeat this original sin on a monumental scale. The concept of "voluntary relocation" is a Orwellian term, as it would occur under the immense duress of a genocidal war that has left large parts of Gaza uninhabitable and under imminent threat of famine . To suggest that a population enduring such conditions can "voluntarily" agree to leave their homeland is to ignore the fundamental power dynamics of coercion.
The plan’s offer of $5,000 in cash and a "digital token" in exchange for surrendering land rights is not innovation; it is a grotesque and modernized form of colonial acquisition, leveraging the trauma of a people who have already lost everything . This scheme mirrors historical patterns where indigenous land was seized for a pittance, paving the way for external economic control. The promise of a future apartment in an "AI-powered smart city" built on the rubble of their original homes is a cruel parody of restitution, designed to permanently sever the Palestinian people's connection to their land.
2. The Current Reality: Administering a Genocide
The proposed administrator of this plan, the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), is already deeply complicit in the ongoing violence. The plan cannot be divorced from the context in which it is proposed: a genocide that has killed over 60,000 Palestinians and wounded more than 159,000, according to recent reports . The United Nations has reported that since the GHF began operating, over 1,500 people have been killed by Israeli occupation forces while desperately trying to receive aid at or near its distribution sites . Entrusting the future of Gaza to an entity that coordinates with the Israeli occupation military and operates alongside such brutality is not a path to reconstruction; it is a reward for atrocity and a mechanism to sanitize genocide.
The Israeli occupation military's current actions expose the violent groundwork for this plan. As you read this, Gaza City is being systematically reduced to "fields of rubble" . The regimes army is using "explosive robots" to demolish entire residential neighborhoods in a "scorched-earth policy" aimed at making the city uninhabitable and forcing its one million residents to flee south into confined, squalid zones . This is not a military operation against Hamas; it is a deliberate campaign of urban destruction and demographic cleansing to empty the land for the exact kind of redevelopment the U.S. plan envisions.
3. The Palestinian Response: Unyielding Resistance and Sumud
The architects of this plan fundamentally misread the Palestinian people. They assume that enough violence and deprivation will break their spirit and lead to acquiescence. They are wrong. Despite the unimaginable suffering, Palestinians in Gaza are demonstrating profound Sumud (steadfast perseverance). As one resident, Fedaa Hamad, stated, “We are tired from the first displacement.
The reported proposal for the United States to administer Gaza and transforming it into a "Riviera of the Middle East" while relocating its two million people, is not a novel strategy for peace . It is the latest chapter in a long history of colonial engineering and a blatant attempt to complete the Nakba—the catastrophic displacement of Palestinians in 1948—under the guise of humanitarianism and development. This plan is profoundly doomed, not because of logistical hurdles, but because it is an affront to justice, international law, and the unyielding will of the Palestinian people to remain on their land.
1. Historical Precedent: A Legacy of Failure and Forced Erasure
The modern history of Gaza is a history of displacement and resistance. In 1948, during the Nakba, tens of thousands of Palestinians flocked to the strip after being forced from their homes in what became Israel . For decades, they have been trapped, often stateless, under successive military rulers. This U.S. plan does not offer a solution; it proposes to repeat this original sin on a monumental scale. The concept of "voluntary relocation" is a Orwellian term, as it would occur under the immense duress of a genocidal war that has left large parts of Gaza uninhabitable and under imminent threat of famine . To suggest that a population enduring such conditions can "voluntarily" agree to leave their homeland is to ignore the fundamental power dynamics of coercion.
The plan’s offer of $5,000 in cash and a "digital token" in exchange for surrendering land rights is not innovation; it is a grotesque and modernized form of colonial acquisition, leveraging the trauma of a people who have already lost everything . This scheme mirrors historical patterns where indigenous land was seized for a pittance, paving the way for external economic control. The promise of a future apartment in an "AI-powered smart city" built on the rubble of their original homes is a cruel parody of restitution, designed to permanently sever the Palestinian people's connection to their land.
2. The Current Reality: Administering a Genocide
The proposed administrator of this plan, the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), is already deeply complicit in the ongoing violence. The plan cannot be divorced from the context in which it is proposed: a genocide that has killed over 60,000 Palestinians and wounded more than 159,000, according to recent reports . The United Nations has reported that since the GHF began operating, over 1,500 people have been killed by Israeli occupation forces while desperately trying to receive aid at or near its distribution sites . Entrusting the future of Gaza to an entity that coordinates with the Israeli occupation military and operates alongside such brutality is not a path to reconstruction; it is a reward for atrocity and a mechanism to sanitize genocide.
The Israeli occupation military's current actions expose the violent groundwork for this plan. As you read this, Gaza City is being systematically reduced to "fields of rubble" . The regimes army is using "explosive robots" to demolish entire residential neighborhoods in a "scorched-earth policy" aimed at making the city uninhabitable and forcing its one million residents to flee south into confined, squalid zones . This is not a military operation against Hamas; it is a deliberate campaign of urban destruction and demographic cleansing to empty the land for the exact kind of redevelopment the U.S. plan envisions.
3. The Palestinian Response: Unyielding Resistance and Sumud
The architects of this plan fundamentally misread the Palestinian people. They assume that enough violence and deprivation will break their spirit and lead to acquiescence. They are wrong. Despite the unimaginable suffering, Palestinians in Gaza are demonstrating profound Sumud (steadfast perseverance). As one resident, Fedaa Hamad, stated, “We are tired from the first displacement.
Forwarded from 𓂆 Palestine
Where are we going to go? Is there a place in the south? We cannot find it... We have no plans to leave” . Another, Akram Mzini, declared, “Life is difficult, so we will stay in our home, and whatever God wants will happen” .
This defiance is echoed across historic Palestine. A new wave of popular grassroots mobilization is growing, with massive protests in cities like Sakhnin within Israel and hunger strikes in Ramallah, all aimed at bridging historical divisions and sustaining resistance against oppression. This movement understands that the Palestinian struggle is not just about land, but about "physical and cultural survival in the face of a colonial project to eliminate all forms of life in Palestine" . No amount of money or digital tokens can compensate for the right to exist, to remember, and to belong.
4. The Flawed Foundation: Illegality and Illegitimacy
The entire premise of the plan is illegal under international law. The United States, which has provided Israel with extensive military, diplomatic, and financial support throughout the genocide, now proposes to become the beneficiary of that destruction . This makes it a party to the conflict and an active participant in the project of dispossession.
* Violation of Sovereignty: The plan denies the Palestinian people their fundamental right to self-determination. It treats their land as real estate to be developed and their future as a problem to be managed by foreign powers.
* Legitimizing Resistance: By seeking to eradicate Hamas, which is a deeply rooted political and social movement that won democratic elections in 2006, the plan criminalizes all forms of Palestinian resistance . International law explicitly recognizes the "legitimate right to resist, including by armed means, against the occupying power" . Framing this resistance as mere terrorism is a propaganda tool to justify its elimination and silence debate on the root cause of the conflict: the occupation itself .
* Global Isolation: The U.S. and Israel are increasingly isolated. The International Court of Justice is reviewing a case accusing Israel of genocide, and the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for its leaders . The U.S. has responded by imposing sanctions on the ICC in a blatant attempt to shield Israel from accountability . A plan built on such a foundation of impunity will be rejected by the majority of the world's nations and people.
Conclusion: Toward Justice, Not Colonial Fantasy
The U.S. plan for Gaza is not a serious proposal for peace. It is a fantasy of control, a blueprint for permanent displacement, and a direct continuation of the Zionist project to claim Palestinian land while removing its people. It will fail, as all such projects ultimately do, because it is built on the false notion that a people's identity and right to their homeland can be bought, bombed, or bulldozed away.
A just future for Gaza and Palestine is not one designed in Washington boardrooms or enforced by American-administered trust funds. It is one built on the following principles:
* An immediate and permanent ceasefire and an end to the genocide.
* The unconditional right of return for all displaced Palestinians to their original homes and lands.
* The end of the Israeli occupation and the system of apartheid that enforces it.
* Full self-determination for the Palestinian people, allowing them to choose their own governance and future freely, without external interference.
The path forward is not through more colonial management, but through decolonization, reparations, and justice. The Palestinian people have shown for over 75 years that they will not disappear. Any plan that does not start with this understanding is not just doomed to fail—it is a dangerous escalation of a ongoing crime against humanity. @OpZionism
This defiance is echoed across historic Palestine. A new wave of popular grassroots mobilization is growing, with massive protests in cities like Sakhnin within Israel and hunger strikes in Ramallah, all aimed at bridging historical divisions and sustaining resistance against oppression. This movement understands that the Palestinian struggle is not just about land, but about "physical and cultural survival in the face of a colonial project to eliminate all forms of life in Palestine" . No amount of money or digital tokens can compensate for the right to exist, to remember, and to belong.
4. The Flawed Foundation: Illegality and Illegitimacy
The entire premise of the plan is illegal under international law. The United States, which has provided Israel with extensive military, diplomatic, and financial support throughout the genocide, now proposes to become the beneficiary of that destruction . This makes it a party to the conflict and an active participant in the project of dispossession.
* Violation of Sovereignty: The plan denies the Palestinian people their fundamental right to self-determination. It treats their land as real estate to be developed and their future as a problem to be managed by foreign powers.
* Legitimizing Resistance: By seeking to eradicate Hamas, which is a deeply rooted political and social movement that won democratic elections in 2006, the plan criminalizes all forms of Palestinian resistance . International law explicitly recognizes the "legitimate right to resist, including by armed means, against the occupying power" . Framing this resistance as mere terrorism is a propaganda tool to justify its elimination and silence debate on the root cause of the conflict: the occupation itself .
* Global Isolation: The U.S. and Israel are increasingly isolated. The International Court of Justice is reviewing a case accusing Israel of genocide, and the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for its leaders . The U.S. has responded by imposing sanctions on the ICC in a blatant attempt to shield Israel from accountability . A plan built on such a foundation of impunity will be rejected by the majority of the world's nations and people.
Conclusion: Toward Justice, Not Colonial Fantasy
The U.S. plan for Gaza is not a serious proposal for peace. It is a fantasy of control, a blueprint for permanent displacement, and a direct continuation of the Zionist project to claim Palestinian land while removing its people. It will fail, as all such projects ultimately do, because it is built on the false notion that a people's identity and right to their homeland can be bought, bombed, or bulldozed away.
A just future for Gaza and Palestine is not one designed in Washington boardrooms or enforced by American-administered trust funds. It is one built on the following principles:
* An immediate and permanent ceasefire and an end to the genocide.
* The unconditional right of return for all displaced Palestinians to their original homes and lands.
* The end of the Israeli occupation and the system of apartheid that enforces it.
* Full self-determination for the Palestinian people, allowing them to choose their own governance and future freely, without external interference.
The path forward is not through more colonial management, but through decolonization, reparations, and justice. The Palestinian people have shown for over 75 years that they will not disappear. Any plan that does not start with this understanding is not just doomed to fail—it is a dangerous escalation of a ongoing crime against humanity. @OpZionism
International Association of Genocide Scholars declares Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
The U.S. has suspended visa approvals for nearly all Palestinian passport holders, expanding Trump’s earlier restrictions on Gaza. The suspension would prevent Palestinians from traveling to the United States for medical treatment, family reunification, attending college and business travel.
51 martyrs by the fire of the occupation army since dawn today, including 32 in Gaza City.
Breaking News:
- UN Rapporteur on Palestinian Territories: Since October 7, Israel has killed more journalists than were killed in both World Wars combined.
- Al-Shifa Medical Complex in Gaza: Reports indicate 9 martyrs, including children, due to an Israeli terror attack on a house in the Tel al-Hawa neighborhood, southwest of Gaza City.
- Emergency Services in Gaza: 4 martyrs and several injured following an Israeli terror attack on two houses in the Sheikh Radwan neighborhood, northern Gaza.
- Emergency Services in Gaza: Injuries reported from an Israeli terror attack on a tent housing displaced persons in the southern area of Khan Younis.
- Nasser Medical Complex in Gaza: 5 martyrs among aid seekers shot by Israeli occupation forces in Khan Younis, southern Gaza.
- Gaza Hospitals: 20 martyrs reported from Israeli terror attacks on the Gaza Strip since dawn today.
- Gaza Hospitals: Among the martyrs from the Israeli terror attacks today, 5 were aid seekers.
- The Israeli occupation army is conducting demolition operations on buildings in the Jabalia area, northern Gaza Strip.
- Belgian Foreign Minister: Belgium will recognize Palestine in a UN session and impose strict sanctions on the Israeli government.
- Belgian Foreign Minister: Belgium has decided to vote positively at the European level on measures to suspend cooperation with Israel.
- UN Rapporteur on Palestinian Territories: Since October 7, Israel has killed more journalists than were killed in both World Wars combined.
- Al-Shifa Medical Complex in Gaza: Reports indicate 9 martyrs, including children, due to an Israeli terror attack on a house in the Tel al-Hawa neighborhood, southwest of Gaza City.
- Emergency Services in Gaza: 4 martyrs and several injured following an Israeli terror attack on two houses in the Sheikh Radwan neighborhood, northern Gaza.
- Emergency Services in Gaza: Injuries reported from an Israeli terror attack on a tent housing displaced persons in the southern area of Khan Younis.
- Nasser Medical Complex in Gaza: 5 martyrs among aid seekers shot by Israeli occupation forces in Khan Younis, southern Gaza.
- Gaza Hospitals: 20 martyrs reported from Israeli terror attacks on the Gaza Strip since dawn today.
- Gaza Hospitals: Among the martyrs from the Israeli terror attacks today, 5 were aid seekers.
- The Israeli occupation army is conducting demolition operations on buildings in the Jabalia area, northern Gaza Strip.
- Belgian Foreign Minister: Belgium will recognize Palestine in a UN session and impose strict sanctions on the Israeli government.
- Belgian Foreign Minister: Belgium has decided to vote positively at the European level on measures to suspend cooperation with Israel.
As world leaders are preparing to gather in New York for the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in September, one nation will not have any representatives: the Palestinian people. That is because the United States Department of State has decided to deny visas to Palestinian officials seeking to attend the UNGA session.
Since 1947, the US has mostly honoured its “headquarters agreement” with the UN, granting visas — albeit limited in scope — to officials from around the world invited to attend UN meetings. There have been occasions, however, where the US has used its position as a UNGA host to deny visas to foreign diplomats from countries it wished to isolate, such as Russia, Iran, Venezuela and others.
In the case of Palestine, this is not the first time Palestinian leaders have faced a visa denial. In 1988, Yasser Arafat, the leader of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), was also not allowed to come to the UN to participate in the UNGA, with the US government justifying its decision with “security threats.
It is important to remember that the PA was created by the 1993 Oslo Accords, which were signed at the White House by Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, with US President Bill Clinton hosting the ceremony. In the following years, the PA received substantial support from Washington, including a significant amount of funds, and went along with any US-led peace initiative.
In this regard, to accuse the PA of “undermining the prospects for peace” is simply absurd. The reason for the visa denials clearly lies elsewhere.
By contrast, Israeli War Criminal Benjamin Netanyahu will be welcomed with open arms in the US. Despite the International Criminal Court (ICC) issuing a warrant for his arrest, war criminal Netanyahu has been the most frequent guest at the White House since Trump’s inauguration; he will also be in attendance at the UNGA. Curiously, in 2013, the US government denied a visa to Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, citing his ICC arrest warrant.
@GhostPrincess
Since 1947, the US has mostly honoured its “headquarters agreement” with the UN, granting visas — albeit limited in scope — to officials from around the world invited to attend UN meetings. There have been occasions, however, where the US has used its position as a UNGA host to deny visas to foreign diplomats from countries it wished to isolate, such as Russia, Iran, Venezuela and others.
In the case of Palestine, this is not the first time Palestinian leaders have faced a visa denial. In 1988, Yasser Arafat, the leader of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), was also not allowed to come to the UN to participate in the UNGA, with the US government justifying its decision with “security threats.
It is important to remember that the PA was created by the 1993 Oslo Accords, which were signed at the White House by Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, with US President Bill Clinton hosting the ceremony. In the following years, the PA received substantial support from Washington, including a significant amount of funds, and went along with any US-led peace initiative.
In this regard, to accuse the PA of “undermining the prospects for peace” is simply absurd. The reason for the visa denials clearly lies elsewhere.
By contrast, Israeli War Criminal Benjamin Netanyahu will be welcomed with open arms in the US. Despite the International Criminal Court (ICC) issuing a warrant for his arrest, war criminal Netanyahu has been the most frequent guest at the White House since Trump’s inauguration; he will also be in attendance at the UNGA. Curiously, in 2013, the US government denied a visa to Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, citing his ICC arrest warrant.
@GhostPrincess
❤1
Everything you need to know about the Flotilla
The Global Sumud Flotilla for Gaza has set out towards Gaza after a false start on Sunday.
Hundreds of people are on board about 15 vessels, including journalists, doctors, politicians, humanitarians and activists from 44 countries.
The flotilla’s planned first stop is Tunisia, where they will link up with other ships.
They will be joined by more boats from Italy and other undisclosed ports in an effort to break Israel’s illegal siege on Gaza, which is starving Palestinians to death as Israel’s war on Gaza continues.
The volunteers hope to transport much-needed food and medicine to besieged Palestinians and to open a humanitarian corridor, allowing more civilian vessels to follow.
This is the largest effort to break Israel’s siege on Gaza and follows previous attempts dating back to 2010. Israel intercepted and sometimes attacked past flotillas.
The Global Sumud Flotilla for Gaza has set out towards Gaza after a false start on Sunday.
Hundreds of people are on board about 15 vessels, including journalists, doctors, politicians, humanitarians and activists from 44 countries.
The flotilla’s planned first stop is Tunisia, where they will link up with other ships.
They will be joined by more boats from Italy and other undisclosed ports in an effort to break Israel’s illegal siege on Gaza, which is starving Palestinians to death as Israel’s war on Gaza continues.
The volunteers hope to transport much-needed food and medicine to besieged Palestinians and to open a humanitarian corridor, allowing more civilian vessels to follow.
This is the largest effort to break Israel’s siege on Gaza and follows previous attempts dating back to 2010. Israel intercepted and sometimes attacked past flotillas.
Sumud Flotilla perseveres, departs Barcelona despite bad weather
The Global Sumud Flotilla has departed Barcelona on Monday evening after having had to return to port on Sunday due to bad weather.
Conditions are still far from ideal, with six of the smaller vessels already having had to return to port for repairs.
The Global Sumud Flotilla has departed Barcelona on Monday evening after having had to return to port on Sunday due to bad weather.
Conditions are still far from ideal, with six of the smaller vessels already having had to return to port for repairs.
‘It’s not about us, it’s about Gaza’
Before departing from Barcelona on Sunday, hundreds of volunteers on the Sumud Flotilla stressed that the “news story” is not them, but the hundreds of thousands of people dying from Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
“We are not heroes. We are not the story. The story is about the people of Gaza,” said Thiago Avila, a lifelong activist for Palestine and an organiser for the flotilla.
Many others on board the Flotilla echoed that sentiment and stressed that they were compelled to join the flotilla due to the distressing and horrific images of Palestinian children being relentlessly killed and starved to death.
“I love my daughter so much, as the mothers and fathers in Gaza [love their children], and because of this love. We cannot leave a world like this,” said Avila.
Before departing from Barcelona on Sunday, hundreds of volunteers on the Sumud Flotilla stressed that the “news story” is not them, but the hundreds of thousands of people dying from Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
“We are not heroes. We are not the story. The story is about the people of Gaza,” said Thiago Avila, a lifelong activist for Palestine and an organiser for the flotilla.
Many others on board the Flotilla echoed that sentiment and stressed that they were compelled to join the flotilla due to the distressing and horrific images of Palestinian children being relentlessly killed and starved to death.
“I love my daughter so much, as the mothers and fathers in Gaza [love their children], and because of this love. We cannot leave a world like this,” said Avila.