Forwarded from Gajes d
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Students at Sydney University carry out a protest calling for their university to divest from Israel.
The art of deception: How Israel uses ‘hasbara’ to whitewash its crimes
As Israel conducts its latest round of aggression against the Palestinians, the prevailing narrative often peddled in mainstream western media outlets continues to be implicitly framed to favour the Israeli narrative.
Under the guise of neutrality, media discourse has been to describe the conflict flaring up in occupied East Jerusalem as “clashes” between “both sides”. Israel’s ruthless bombardment of Gaza leading to the deaths of hundreds of civilians is rationalised as an act of “self defence” in response to Hamas’ indiscriminate rocket attacks and their use of “human shields”.
The Israeli state is deeply aware that perception shapes reality. While it commits alleged war crimes with impunity, it can only do so if there is a powerful enough propaganda machine it can deploy to counter inevitable public condemnation and international solidarity with Palestinians.
Enter 'hasbara’ – Israel’s primary messaging tool.
Hasbara – Hebrew for explanation – is a public diplomacy technique which links information warfare with the strategic objectives of the Israeli state. Public diplomacy is to be strategically conceived as a foreign policy priority, whereby a positive image of Israel is cultivated on the world stage, especially considering the image challenges Israel has continuously faced since its creation in 1948.
While rooted in earlier concepts of agitprop and censorship, hasbara does not look to jam the supply of contradictory information to audiences. Instead, it willingly accepts an open marketplace of opinion. What it seeks to do in this context is to promote selective listening by limiting the receptivity of audiences to information, rather than constricting its flow.
To accomplish its mission, hasbara targets diplomats, politicians and the public through mass media. It is also accomplished through numerous institutes and government agencies, as well as in research centres, universities, NGOs and lobbying firms.
Hasbara 2.0
Following the 2006 Lebanon war and ‘Operation Cast Lead’ two years later, both of which seriously damaged Israeli’s international reputation, there was a gradual shift between 2008 to 2012, to what the scholar Miriyam Aouragh called “Hasbara 2.0”: an assertive digital diplomacy that accounted for web 2.0 technologies like social media and YouTube.
Soon, hasbara-styled initiatives from the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) were being synchronised into a new online branch, with a permanent team operating in liaison with the Ministry of Strategic Affairs in 2008.
In 2012, Israel would announce its war against Gaza on Twitter. During ‘Operation Pillar of Defense’, as Israeli-funneled talking points saturated the US and European media landscape, hasbara made heavy use of the more distilled communication channels of social media. It further exploited browser functions, search engine algorithms, and other automated mechanisms that controlled what content were presented to viewers.
In the process, Israel designed a narrative of itself as the innocent victim of Palestinian terrorism, one that was accorded with the sovereign right of defense against existential assault. This, despite the fact of having initiated the escalation, possessing advanced aerial power against an adversary without one, and unloading more than one thousand times as many tons of munitions on Gazans.
In 2014, Israel’s war in Gaza under ‘Operation Protective Edge’ prompted a much greater pushback to its media narrative, clearly underestimating the extent of the global outrage to their actions in Gaza.
As images of destruction and dismembered bodies of innocent civilians flooded social media, hasbara proponents were forced to re-double their efforts in well-orchestrated PR campaigns that attempted to reframe war crimes with talking points to whitewash any disproportionate use of force – which even ended up being ineffective back in Israel.
1/2
#GhostPrincess
As Israel conducts its latest round of aggression against the Palestinians, the prevailing narrative often peddled in mainstream western media outlets continues to be implicitly framed to favour the Israeli narrative.
Under the guise of neutrality, media discourse has been to describe the conflict flaring up in occupied East Jerusalem as “clashes” between “both sides”. Israel’s ruthless bombardment of Gaza leading to the deaths of hundreds of civilians is rationalised as an act of “self defence” in response to Hamas’ indiscriminate rocket attacks and their use of “human shields”.
The Israeli state is deeply aware that perception shapes reality. While it commits alleged war crimes with impunity, it can only do so if there is a powerful enough propaganda machine it can deploy to counter inevitable public condemnation and international solidarity with Palestinians.
Enter 'hasbara’ – Israel’s primary messaging tool.
Hasbara – Hebrew for explanation – is a public diplomacy technique which links information warfare with the strategic objectives of the Israeli state. Public diplomacy is to be strategically conceived as a foreign policy priority, whereby a positive image of Israel is cultivated on the world stage, especially considering the image challenges Israel has continuously faced since its creation in 1948.
While rooted in earlier concepts of agitprop and censorship, hasbara does not look to jam the supply of contradictory information to audiences. Instead, it willingly accepts an open marketplace of opinion. What it seeks to do in this context is to promote selective listening by limiting the receptivity of audiences to information, rather than constricting its flow.
To accomplish its mission, hasbara targets diplomats, politicians and the public through mass media. It is also accomplished through numerous institutes and government agencies, as well as in research centres, universities, NGOs and lobbying firms.
Hasbara 2.0
Following the 2006 Lebanon war and ‘Operation Cast Lead’ two years later, both of which seriously damaged Israeli’s international reputation, there was a gradual shift between 2008 to 2012, to what the scholar Miriyam Aouragh called “Hasbara 2.0”: an assertive digital diplomacy that accounted for web 2.0 technologies like social media and YouTube.
Soon, hasbara-styled initiatives from the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) were being synchronised into a new online branch, with a permanent team operating in liaison with the Ministry of Strategic Affairs in 2008.
In 2012, Israel would announce its war against Gaza on Twitter. During ‘Operation Pillar of Defense’, as Israeli-funneled talking points saturated the US and European media landscape, hasbara made heavy use of the more distilled communication channels of social media. It further exploited browser functions, search engine algorithms, and other automated mechanisms that controlled what content were presented to viewers.
In the process, Israel designed a narrative of itself as the innocent victim of Palestinian terrorism, one that was accorded with the sovereign right of defense against existential assault. This, despite the fact of having initiated the escalation, possessing advanced aerial power against an adversary without one, and unloading more than one thousand times as many tons of munitions on Gazans.
In 2014, Israel’s war in Gaza under ‘Operation Protective Edge’ prompted a much greater pushback to its media narrative, clearly underestimating the extent of the global outrage to their actions in Gaza.
As images of destruction and dismembered bodies of innocent civilians flooded social media, hasbara proponents were forced to re-double their efforts in well-orchestrated PR campaigns that attempted to reframe war crimes with talking points to whitewash any disproportionate use of force – which even ended up being ineffective back in Israel.
1/2
#GhostPrincess
Desperate measures
In the event this posturing fails, there are a few well-worn strategies in their arsenal that hasbara engineers have resorted to.
One has been to force the public to make a choice between Israel and Hamas. Today, we continually see this dichotomy played out on international broadcast segments; in doing so, Israel is framed as a rational and innocent actor provoked by an irrational terrorist threat, making any criticism of Israel’s actions de facto apologia for terrorism.
While a number of western governments have designated Hamas a terror organisation including the US and the European Union, Norway and Switzerland, they still maintain diplomatic ties with the group. Australia, New Zealand and the UK only consider its military wing a terrorist organisation. A number of other states outside of the West do not label it a terrorist organisation, and the UN in 2018 rejected a US resolution to condemn it as a terror organisation.
Probably the most common tactic has been to link any criticism of Israeli policies, whether its human rights violations or illegal colonisation of Palestinian land, to anti-Semitism.
One of the strategic threats in recent years has been the growing Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. Israeli officials have attempted to smear those who support BDS as anti-Semitic and claim it is linked to terrorism, while anti-BDS laws have been passed in the US.
Online, it has translated into pushing prominent social media companies to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of anti-Semitism, which widens potential accusation of anti-Semitism to criticism of Israel.
The weaponisation of social justice issues and appropriation of ‘woke’ language is another frequently adopted strategy. For example the narrative of how Israel is the “only democracy” in the Middle East is repeated ad infinitum; indicating its the lone country which respects human rights and the rule of law in an otherwise regressive and hostile region.
“Pinkwashing” – cynically exploiting LGBTQ+ rights to amplify a progressive veneer and conceal Israeli crimes – has been added to the hasbara repertoire, along with the support for animal rights to “veganwash” occupation.
Ultimately, this discourse is meant to operate in juxtaposition against the “backward” Palestinian – to further dehumanise them among western audiences and soften criticism of Israel.
#GhostPrincess
2/2
In the event this posturing fails, there are a few well-worn strategies in their arsenal that hasbara engineers have resorted to.
One has been to force the public to make a choice between Israel and Hamas. Today, we continually see this dichotomy played out on international broadcast segments; in doing so, Israel is framed as a rational and innocent actor provoked by an irrational terrorist threat, making any criticism of Israel’s actions de facto apologia for terrorism.
While a number of western governments have designated Hamas a terror organisation including the US and the European Union, Norway and Switzerland, they still maintain diplomatic ties with the group. Australia, New Zealand and the UK only consider its military wing a terrorist organisation. A number of other states outside of the West do not label it a terrorist organisation, and the UN in 2018 rejected a US resolution to condemn it as a terror organisation.
Probably the most common tactic has been to link any criticism of Israeli policies, whether its human rights violations or illegal colonisation of Palestinian land, to anti-Semitism.
One of the strategic threats in recent years has been the growing Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. Israeli officials have attempted to smear those who support BDS as anti-Semitic and claim it is linked to terrorism, while anti-BDS laws have been passed in the US.
Online, it has translated into pushing prominent social media companies to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of anti-Semitism, which widens potential accusation of anti-Semitism to criticism of Israel.
The weaponisation of social justice issues and appropriation of ‘woke’ language is another frequently adopted strategy. For example the narrative of how Israel is the “only democracy” in the Middle East is repeated ad infinitum; indicating its the lone country which respects human rights and the rule of law in an otherwise regressive and hostile region.
“Pinkwashing” – cynically exploiting LGBTQ+ rights to amplify a progressive veneer and conceal Israeli crimes – has been added to the hasbara repertoire, along with the support for animal rights to “veganwash” occupation.
Ultimately, this discourse is meant to operate in juxtaposition against the “backward” Palestinian – to further dehumanise them among western audiences and soften criticism of Israel.
#GhostPrincess
2/2
Students regroup at New York University demanding the administration to divest from Israeli institutions over the regime's genocidal war on Gaza.
#WeAreAllGaza
#WeAreAllGaza
A demonstration in the Moroccan city of Tangier in support of Palestine coincided with the 200th day of the Israeli onslaught on Gaza.
#WeAreAllGaza
#WeAreAllGaza
Anonymous claims a successful cyberattack against the Israeli Defence Force (IOF), gaining access to 20 gigabytes of data, which allegedly includes over 233,000 military documents in various formats, like PDFs, Word files, and presentations.
#OpIsrael
#OpIsrael
Hacked Rafalife : is a company founded in 2018 and started in the online sales giant "Amazon" the business was successful and in 2021 it was decided to copy the success to a blue and white Israeli website. The site provides products and services. etc
Prime Minister of Jamaica:
We have decided to officially recognize the State of Palestine.
Jamaica becomes the 142nd State to recognise the State of Palestine.
We have decided to officially recognize the State of Palestine.
Jamaica becomes the 142nd State to recognise the State of Palestine.
🫡1
Picture above: 1972 > University of Michigan, anti-Vietnam war protest
2024: Anti-Israel 🇮🇱 | Anti-Apartheid | Anti-Zionist | Anti-War | Pro-Palestine
2024 > Columbia University, anti-Zionist protest
2024 > University of Southern California, anti-Zionist protest
2024 > University of Texas in Austin, anti-Zionist protest
2024 > Harvard University, anti-Zionist protest
2024 > University of Michigan, anti-Zionist protest
2024 > Yale University, anti-Zionist protest
2014 > New York University, anti-Zionist protest
US was and is always a police state. Nothing has changed, history repeats itself, US empire keeps on funding, fighting new wars, the same elites are in power.
They own Hollywood and media and will make sure to brainwash their population about their good intentions.
#GhostsPrincess #GazaGENOCIDE
https://t.me/GhostPrincess
2024: Anti-Israel 🇮🇱 | Anti-Apartheid | Anti-Zionist | Anti-War | Pro-Palestine
2024 > Columbia University, anti-Zionist protest
2024 > University of Southern California, anti-Zionist protest
2024 > University of Texas in Austin, anti-Zionist protest
2024 > Harvard University, anti-Zionist protest
2024 > University of Michigan, anti-Zionist protest
2024 > Yale University, anti-Zionist protest
2014 > New York University, anti-Zionist protest
US was and is always a police state. Nothing has changed, history repeats itself, US empire keeps on funding, fighting new wars, the same elites are in power.
They own Hollywood and media and will make sure to brainwash their population about their good intentions.
#GhostsPrincess #GazaGENOCIDE
https://t.me/GhostPrincess
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
These are some of the activities being observed these days by students at Columbia University's Gaza Solidarity Encampment.
Sciences Po Paris university in France joins the US universities and establishes the Gaza Solidarity Encampment.
BREAKING: Georgia Police SHOOTING At Students And University Professors
Students and professors at Emory University are being shot at with rubber bullets in America, for standing against Israel.
This a foreign government interference into universities.
Students and professors at Emory University are being shot at with rubber bullets in America, for standing against Israel.
This a foreign government interference into universities.
👻2
After Niger, US troops are now being forced out of Chad
At the moment, the US is losing ground faster in Africa than in the Middle East
At the moment, the US is losing ground faster in Africa than in the Middle East
Forwarded from Gajes d
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Students have launched a Gaza Solidarity Encampment this morning at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Forwarded from Gajes d
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Atlanta Police and Georgia State Patrol forcefully disperse and violently arrest students who are protesting in solidarity with Gaza.
Forwarded from Gajes d
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Sorbonne University students join the global uprising for a free Palestine.
The movement against Israel’s genocide reverberates across continents.
The movement against Israel’s genocide reverberates across continents.
Forwarded from Gajes d
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Police in Atlanta, Georgia, reportedly used tear gas and tasers to forcefully disperse students protesting for Palestine at Emory University, leading to arrests after ambushing the encampment.