Friends of Red Jenny Main
3 subscribers
400 photos
96 videos
25 files
191 links
Tactics, Strategy, Necessity, Inevitability
Download Telegram
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
MACRON : «We must help our African neighbors by massively cancelling their debt»

🇨🇵 The french president made an official address to the nation on Monday 13. He explained that, during the hard crisis striking France, he decided to focus on helping Africa, by "massively cancelling their debts".

💶 In other words : while France is going into debt for damage-control purpose, the french president announced he will not ask african nations to pay their own debt. Thus causing a huge shortfall for France.

📎 Source : Macron official address to the french nation, April 13, 2020
King Solomon the "wisest" man to ever live who is said to have met 'God' twice still somehow wound up worshiping other Gods?

So even if the most astute man on the planet not only meets God but is endorsed and made legitimate by him and yet despite this still decides to walk away, what does that tell you about not only a stories inconsistencies but the anti-climax meeting your hero brings.
Observation: Show me an animal lover that hates the wolf because it hunts the rabbit. Or hates the lion for stalking the zebra. Or wants sharks extinct, or the predatory falcon. A rare find indeed. So how much truth is there to Leftists hating the White man for conquest or slavery? And how do they not hate Arabs for the same? I think no truth at all. It contradicts itself. They hate the White man from envy. They hate because they are miserable in their own miserable lives and the White man is the most acceptable target. Because they have singled out as unique to the White man slavery and conquest, thus justifying their hatred.
Hegel or Rousseau?
Anonymous Poll
100%
Hegel
0%
Rousseau
When Napoleon crossed the Rhine, the German princes panicked, knowing that Napoleon's first goal was the confiscation of their wealth. As a result, the Prince of Hesse-Cassel gave his gold to Mayer Amschel Rothschild, who then sent it out of the country, to his son Nathan, who was living in London. Having inside information about Napoleon's defeat at the Battle of Waterloo, Nathan made a fortune by using the Prince of Hesse-Cassel's gold to speculate on the British consol. As a result, he became the richest man in England. Over the course of the next century, the Rothschild family and other Jewish usurers used that wealth to enslave the English aristocracy with debt. The most prominent example was the Churchill family. When Winston Churchill's father died, he was 60,000 pounds in debt to Natty Rothschild. By forgiving Randolph's debt, Natty Rothschild made his son Winston a pawn of Jewish interests, a fact which led indirectly to World War I.
This restriction must be kept in mind. What I am about to say does not concern the ordinary man of our day. On the contrary, I have in mind the man who finds himself involved in today’s world, even at its most problematic and paroxysmal points; yet he does not belong inwardly to such a world, nor will he give in to it. He feels himself, in essence, as belonging to a different race from that of the overwhelming majority of his contemporaries. The natural place for such a man, the land in which he would not be a stranger, is the world of Tradition. I use the word tradition in a special sense, which I have defined elsewhere.1 It differs from the common usage, but is close to the meaning given to it by René Guénon in his analysis of the crisis of the modern world.2 In this particular meaning, a civilization or a society is “traditional” when it is ruled by principles that transcend what is merely human and individual, and when all its sectors are formed and ordered from above, and directed to what is above. Beyond the variety of historical forms, there has existed an essentially identical and constant world of Tradition.
Nevertheless, a few men exist who are, so to speak, still on their feet among the ruins and the dissolution, and who belong, more or less consciously, to that other world. A little group seems willing to fight on, even in lost positions. So long as it does not yield, does not compromise itself by giving in to the seductions that would condition any success it might have, its testimony is valid. For others, it is a matter of completely isolating themselves, which demands an inner character as well as privileged material conditions, which grow scarcer day by day. All the same, this is the second possible solution. -Ride The Tiger, Julius Evola