Let's check in on today's right wing trends. Oh, okay, we're giving money to a mentally unhinged single Mom because she's white and was willing to say "nigger." Definitely a worthwhile cause.
Forwarded from Ulysses Liberty
NEWSFLASH: everyone was already tired of nigger behavior long before any of us was alive. We get bombarded with these stories for a different reason
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Right wing politics 101
Let's contemplate a hypothetical scenario: My brother is an on again, off again drug addict. He maintains a modestly remunerative job that is sufficient to sustain himself and provide for his two children. However, his behavior is often erratic; he's impulsive and prone to speaking without a filter. These behavioral tendencies contribute to periodic relapses which endanger both himself and his family. Compounding this, he has a documented history of compulsive gambling, squandering tens of thousands at casinos, and has a history both of making exorbitant purchases and involving himself in pyramid schemes, precipitating recurring fiscal instability.
Now let's imagine this brother of mine has a misadventure: He's at the park with his kids when a little black boy starts riffling through and tampering with his belongings. In a lapse of judgment, exacerbated by his addiction-fueled volatility, he verbally berates the child, calling him a "nigger." A nearby individual at the park, a Somalian with a history of sex crimes against children, records the altercation and confronts my brother, who doubles down, calling this man a "nigger" as well. The video is disseminated online, igniting a firestorm of outrage. Progressive activists, inflamed by the footage of my brother calling this child sex predator a "nigger," orchestrate a campaign to ostracize my brother; they go as far as to threaten his children’s safety and contact his boss to attempt to terminate his employment.
In an effort to help, given his unreliable nature, I begin a fundraising campaign on his behalf. Sympathetic donors, those generous online racists, contribute an astonishing $5m. The question arises: Should I (1) disburse the entire lump sum to my brother immediately, or (2) assume stewardship of the funds to safeguard them from his demonstrably reckless proclivities?
The answer is obvious: entrusting such a sum to an individual with my brother’s documented history of irresponsibility would be utterly indefensible, a horrendous and indefensible crime.
Now, let us pivot away from this thought experiment and back to the real world. A woman finds herself ensnared in a strikingly similar predicament, vilified by progressives for directing "the nigger word" at a Somalian child sex predator who was patrolling a park teeming with children. She's got an unhinged look about her that screams "drugs." She has a sleeve of tattoos. She accosted a small child in public, calling him a "nigger." She's a single mother. Her kids look like they could have Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Though her circumstances are less extreme than my brother’s, her conduct radiates a comparable aura of irresponsibility. The notion of bestowing upon her a sum of $210,000—likely to surpass her $250,000 fundraising goal, with potential for further increases—is simply imprudent.
Remove the emotional context of someone being attacked for using a word you like from your mind and ask yourself whether you would normally trust someone with her disposition with such a sum. If you knew she were to receive it, would you expect it to be put to good or poor use? Given your answers to these questions, does it make sense to provide this money to her? Is it likely to help, or likely to make things worse?
Now let's imagine this brother of mine has a misadventure: He's at the park with his kids when a little black boy starts riffling through and tampering with his belongings. In a lapse of judgment, exacerbated by his addiction-fueled volatility, he verbally berates the child, calling him a "nigger." A nearby individual at the park, a Somalian with a history of sex crimes against children, records the altercation and confronts my brother, who doubles down, calling this man a "nigger" as well. The video is disseminated online, igniting a firestorm of outrage. Progressive activists, inflamed by the footage of my brother calling this child sex predator a "nigger," orchestrate a campaign to ostracize my brother; they go as far as to threaten his children’s safety and contact his boss to attempt to terminate his employment.
In an effort to help, given his unreliable nature, I begin a fundraising campaign on his behalf. Sympathetic donors, those generous online racists, contribute an astonishing $5m. The question arises: Should I (1) disburse the entire lump sum to my brother immediately, or (2) assume stewardship of the funds to safeguard them from his demonstrably reckless proclivities?
The answer is obvious: entrusting such a sum to an individual with my brother’s documented history of irresponsibility would be utterly indefensible, a horrendous and indefensible crime.
Now, let us pivot away from this thought experiment and back to the real world. A woman finds herself ensnared in a strikingly similar predicament, vilified by progressives for directing "the nigger word" at a Somalian child sex predator who was patrolling a park teeming with children. She's got an unhinged look about her that screams "drugs." She has a sleeve of tattoos. She accosted a small child in public, calling him a "nigger." She's a single mother. Her kids look like they could have Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Though her circumstances are less extreme than my brother’s, her conduct radiates a comparable aura of irresponsibility. The notion of bestowing upon her a sum of $210,000—likely to surpass her $250,000 fundraising goal, with potential for further increases—is simply imprudent.
Remove the emotional context of someone being attacked for using a word you like from your mind and ask yourself whether you would normally trust someone with her disposition with such a sum. If you knew she were to receive it, would you expect it to be put to good or poor use? Given your answers to these questions, does it make sense to provide this money to her? Is it likely to help, or likely to make things worse?
Without looking it up, guess which popular rightoid said this about Ms. Shiloh: "Listen anon as I'm about to redpill you on the future of the White race. This, right here, is a top female specimen, our reproductive elite."
THE Philosopher
Let's contemplate a hypothetical scenario: My brother is an on again, off again drug addict. He maintains a modestly remunerative job that is sufficient to sustain himself and provide for his two children. However, his behavior is often erratic; he's impulsive…
"Ngl, I saw that and hoped to be wrong, so I said nothing."
"Me too."
"Me too."
Forwarded from placeholder
THE Philosopher
Let's contemplate a hypothetical scenario: My brother is an on again, off again drug addict. He maintains a modestly remunerative job that is sufficient to sustain himself and provide for his two children. However, his behavior is often erratic; he's impulsive…
@grok summarize in ten words
placeholder
@grok summarize in ten words
Don't give an unhinged single Mom $1M, you retarded niggers
The magical garden of the gnomes
Someone tag the daily poor
This isn't how it works. They were able to do that stuff because they already had power. Violent protests are a victory celebration, not a way to win. If you try them as the losing team, your guys get Jan 6thed.
Closing out commentary on that incident for now. Those of you who feel similarly, the least we can do is pray that she be helped in handling this as well as possible. That's my final word for now.