Repost this if you're not getting a GF in 2024, because your wife would be pissed.

I've been told this archive is good on this topic

https://t.me/dissidenthomeschoolarchive

Daily Poor scientists, any ideas what might be causing this???

But... But... But... Gavin Newsom said this wouldn't happen

One of the biggest misconceptions in the racist community is that you need to pay big money to not live around blacks. To the contrary, living near blacks often comes at a premium.

Will run some stats soon and create new maps based on the newly published Census data.

Check out the previous year's maps if you haven't yet: https://t.me/TheDailyPoor/277?single

When non-poor people try to enjoy themselves

Reminder that people who advocate for the male breadwinner role being the main male function in families and society are just libs from a bit farther back; never forget what the revolution has taken from us.

Commentary from the author of the graphic:

For most of the nineteenth century, production was carried out by families. In 1800, about three-quarters of the population was engaged in agricultural work, and a majority of the population lived on farms until 1850. All family members who were old enough contributed to farm production, and farms depended on family labor.

Among the quarter of the population that did not work on farms at the beginning of the nineteenth century, most still made their living through the family economy. Most nonfarm production was carried out by family businesses. Among the top job titles were shoemakers, merchants, tailors, physicians, butchers, grocers, bakers, and tavern keepers. In most such businesses, the family resided on the same premises as the shop, and the whole family worked in the business. Like farms, such businesses were usually handed down from generation to generation.

[The graphic] illustrates the scope of change in the family economy of married couples over the past two centuries. The category labeled “Corporate Family Economy” includes all families with self-employed married men, except for those with wives who had an occupation outside the family business. Most of the couples in this category had farms. Corporate families were in the majority throughout the nineteenth century, and remained important through the first half of the twentieth century.

The traditional family is not the Ozzie-and-Harriet male breadwinner family that briefly prevailed in the mid-twentieth century; the corporate family predominated for hundreds of years before.... They were organized according to patriarchal tradition; the master of the household had a legal right to command the obedience of his wife and children and to use corporal punishment to correct insubordination. In most states, husbands owned the value of their wives’ labor, as well as most property women brought into marriage. For 180 years, the authority of the patriarch was enshrined in the decennial census, which explicitly identified the head of each household; only in 1980 was the household head concept abandoned.

They've pitted wife against husband and children against parents and won... Consolidation of power and resources to the few. Loss of locally made hand crafted and repairable goods to be replaced by foreign disposable goods. Loss of empowering knowledge and skill so that everyone is a dependent cog in the machine

Take the poor pill and leave your family behind. No, this isn't a cult. Don't be crazy

One of my favorite things about being a Telegram channel admin is that I can quickly make a react available for just a single post but then delete it really fast so it can't be used for others.