This is perhaps the best real world man-on-the-street history of the Russian fight in the Donbass from people who are living there. It is hard to dismiss this as just Russian propaganda— in spite of the msm non stop narrative pushing. Keep in mind that from 850- 1918 Kiev was a cardinal city of the Rus. I suspect the wars of the 20th century which resulted in many artificial redistribution of boundaries were carried out to create such a conflict as this. Also it is important to understand ( not mentioned in the film) that after WWII, the Nazis along with the newly formed CIA Soviet Branch under General Gehlen occupied Western Ukraine and never left. And generations were taught the philosophy including hatred of Slavic Russians.

Hmmm. Do they use the Clinton witness disposal service?

No surprise here.

Wow wow…

Pfizer CEO, Albert Bourla:

"I truly think the best days of Pfizer are ahead of us, because Covid was for me like a rehearsal."

As I was saying—- its wavelength!

See how they always tell you how it will medically help something like a “brain disorder”

Caltech’s Enzyme Discovery Enables New Mechanism for Crossing the Blood–Brain Barrier
https://scitechdaily.com/caltechs-enzyme-discovery-enables-new-mechanism-for-crossing-the-blood-brain-barrier/

Manhole SF

What is happening? Mental cases but all acting in same ways? Hmmm

Be careful out their folks.
Peeps are acting strange. 🙄

https://t.me/vaccinezombies

How liberal politicians steer trillions of public funds via ESG
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/how-liberal-politicians-steer-trillions-of-public-funds-via-esg/ar-AA1abXpl

One of the first things President Biden did after entering the White House was reverse his predecessor’s decision to abandon the Paris Climate Accords. And replace the rules it did. In October 2021, the Biden administration proposed a new regulation that repealed the Trump-era rules and replaced them with one that encouraged ESG investing with retirement and pension fund money.

The proposed rule pushed retirement fund managers to consider ESG factors such as “climate change” and “collateral benefits other than investment returns” when investing employees’ money. Indeed, it said that consideration of ESG factors was “often require[d].”

There’s another little-known federal agency that is playing a big role in allowing ESG to go unchecked: the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). The agency is tucked inside the Department of the Treasury and is tasked with regulating US banks. In 2022, Black Rifle Coffee Company was prevented from opening an account at Chase Bank because of its controversial pro-veteran and pro-gun stances. Per the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the OCC’s mission is, among other things, to ensure “fair access to financial services.” Like many other laws, it lets the agency concerned make specific rules and takes enforcement actions to carry out its mission.

It said that “fair access” means that banks have to evaluate customers individually, not make blanket refusals to serve, say, coal-mining companies, gun manufacturers, or whatever the socially unfashionable cause du jour may be.

As ESG proponents know, access to banking services from major financial institutions is a critical part of any business—if a business can’t open a bank account, process credit card payments, or get lines of credit, it can’t exist. Cutting off banking services is a death blow and one that can be delivered without political or market accountability. Indeed, to the extent that there is accountability, it is pressuring banks to act in the other direction—to deny fair access to banking services through politicized banking policies. This was not a hypothetical concern. As the rule makers noted, both for-profit and nonprofit activists had been pressuring banks to cut off disfavored businesses on both sides of the political divide. Abortion-clinic operators, adult entertainers, and condom-manufacturing startups, for instance, had reportedly been refused banking services due to the nature of their businesses. On the other side, ESG activists pressured banks to de-bank rifle makers, private-prison operators, large agricultural businesses, and, of course, the US fossil-fuel industry. In many instances, the banks complied. The rule makers were particularly concerned because the banks didn’t just cut off lending — which could theoretically be justified as a concern about mitigating financial “risk”— but all banking services, including advisory services. The goal was to punish certain businesses, to deprive them of the banking services their businesses needed.

PayPal made headlines after it updated its terms of service to prohibit transactions that involved the “sending, posting, or publication of any messages, content, or materials” that PayPal, at its sole discretion, finds objectionable. The penalty was a $2,500 fine, which PayPal could take directly from users’ accounts. After public backlash, it backtracked on the fine when it came to “misinformation” but stood by its policy of fining users for speech it deems intolerant. So through the OCC’s somewhat obscure rule-making and guidance-issuing process, the Biden administration has handed ESG activists their sledgehammer back.