Forwarded from Azazel News (Aries)
๐23๐3โค1
Forwarded from Fireworks Daily Team 2.0 (Mezlim)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ BREAKING: GRID COLLAPSE IN CUBA ๐จ๐บ
โLOCATION: Nationwide / Republic of Cuba
STATUS: Total Blackout (SEN Disconnection)
โTHE SITUATION:
The Cuban power operator, Uniรณn Elรฉctrica (UNE), has confirmed a total failure of the National Electric System (SEN) as of Monday morning. For the second time in less than a month, the island of 10 million people is without power, following a catastrophic failure at the Antonio Guiteras thermoelectric plant.
โ๐ TACTICAL BREAKDOWN
โThe Trigger: Reports indicate the Antonio Guiteras plant suffered a critical boiler failure. The plant was operating at suboptimal levels to conserve what little fuel remains in the national reserve.
โEnergy Deficit: Before the total collapse, the gap between demand and supply was a staggering 1,930 MW. The system essentially "choked" under the pressure of trying to distribute a fraction of the power needed.
โThe Geopolitical Factor: This collapse is inextricably linked to the fallout of the Venezuelan transition earlier this year. With Maduro out and U.S. sanctions tightening on maritime shipping, Cubaโs traditional oil lifeline has been severed. Plus Mexico now cutting โ๏ธ supply.
โโ ๏ธ FRONTLINE IMPACT
โCivil Unrest:
Scattered reports of cacerolazos and demonstrations in Havana. Tensions are high as residents face the loss of refrigerated food and the cessation of water pumping services.
โState Response: President Dรญaz-Canel has declared a state of emergency, blaming the "energy blockade" for the inability to procure fuel for the island's aging infrastructure.
โRecovery Timeline: Restoring a grid from "Black Start" status is a high-risk technical operation. Recovery is expected to be piecemeal, focusing on small "energy islands" before attempting to sync the national grid.
โLOCATION: Nationwide / Republic of Cuba
STATUS: Total Blackout (SEN Disconnection)
โTHE SITUATION:
The Cuban power operator, Uniรณn Elรฉctrica (UNE), has confirmed a total failure of the National Electric System (SEN) as of Monday morning. For the second time in less than a month, the island of 10 million people is without power, following a catastrophic failure at the Antonio Guiteras thermoelectric plant.
โ๐ TACTICAL BREAKDOWN
โThe Trigger: Reports indicate the Antonio Guiteras plant suffered a critical boiler failure. The plant was operating at suboptimal levels to conserve what little fuel remains in the national reserve.
โEnergy Deficit: Before the total collapse, the gap between demand and supply was a staggering 1,930 MW. The system essentially "choked" under the pressure of trying to distribute a fraction of the power needed.
โThe Geopolitical Factor: This collapse is inextricably linked to the fallout of the Venezuelan transition earlier this year. With Maduro out and U.S. sanctions tightening on maritime shipping, Cubaโs traditional oil lifeline has been severed. Plus Mexico now cutting โ๏ธ supply.
โโ ๏ธ FRONTLINE IMPACT
โCivil Unrest:
Scattered reports of cacerolazos and demonstrations in Havana. Tensions are high as residents face the loss of refrigerated food and the cessation of water pumping services.
โState Response: President Dรญaz-Canel has declared a state of emergency, blaming the "energy blockade" for the inability to procure fuel for the island's aging infrastructure.
โRecovery Timeline: Restoring a grid from "Black Start" status is a high-risk technical operation. Recovery is expected to be piecemeal, focusing on small "energy islands" before attempting to sync the national grid.
๐36โค18๐ฑ3๐ฅ2
Forwarded from Fireworks Daily Team 2.0 (Roosevelt Terriers)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Drone intercepted by U.S. C-RAM air defense system in Baghdad
๐19๐9โค3๐1
Forwarded from Fireworks Daily Team 2.0 (Roosevelt Terriers)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
U.S. C-RAM systems are firing on Iranian drones attacking the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad
๐19๐8๐ฅ3๐1
Forwarded from Fireworks Daily Team 2.0 (Roosevelt Terriers)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Massive fire in oil refinery in Tabasco, Mexico, 5 people dead
๐ข30๐17๐ค6โค1๐ฆ1
Forwarded from Fireworks Daily Team 2.0 (Roosevelt Terriers)
Largest wildfire in Nebraska history scorches over 540,000 acres as multiple others continue to burn
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/1-killed-raging-wildfires-scorch-175215354.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/1-killed-raging-wildfires-scorch-175215354.html
Yahoo News
Largest wildfire in Nebraska history scorches over 540,000 acres as multiple others continue to burn
Wildfires have erupted across the state of Nebraska, with gusty winds and low humidity fueling fire risk through the weekend.
๐ข37๐27๐ฑ6โค1๐คฏ1๐ฆ1
Forwarded from Fireworks Daily Team 2.0 (Sis)
vxTwitter / fixvx
Simplifying AI (@simplifyinAI)
๐จ BREAKING: Someone just open-sourced a full suite for tracking satellites and decoding their radio signals locally.
You don't even need the internet. It uses an SDR to pull weather images and raw data straight from space to your hard drive.
100% Open Source.
You don't even need the internet. It uses an SDR to pull weather images and raw data straight from space to your hard drive.
100% Open Source.
โค13๐8๐ฅ3๐2๐ค1
This ๐๐ป๐๐ป๐๐ป is super interesting as an example of the world we are inโ we are being shown a false reality but as the lies have gotten bigger the ability to maintain the facade is breaking down.
โค22๐ฅ9๐ฏ1
Forwarded from Fireworks Daily Team 2.0 (Roosevelt Terriers)
Unrelated clips misrepresented as Middle East war scenes
https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/unrelated-clips-misrepresented-as-middle-east-war-scenes/
https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/unrelated-clips-misrepresented-as-middle-east-war-scenes/
www.aap.com.au
Unrelated clips misrepresented as Middle East war scenes
Old videos showing a plane crash, a mushroom hunt and a courtroom protest are being shared as evidence of wartime chaos in the Middle East.
๐27โค8โก4๐ฅ4๐ฏ4
Not random reconโ Lincoln and probably Stratcom ( Offutt Air Base)
๐1
This is a translation of a Russian ( Probably a Wagner guy because it was on the Wagner Telegram site), about how modern warfare has changed dramatically recently. Itโs pretty interesting. When the AI translator supplies this they consistently mistranslate a word probably meaning assault eschalon or maybe stormtrooper as โAssault Aircraftโ. I need to look it up in my 1970โs Smirnitskiโs Russian dictionary because it is somehow wrong in all computer translation. But it clearly is not airplane and I know the word for airborne so its not that. Hereโs what they describe in current ground warfare:
โWhen the sentence 'the nature of war has changed' appears in the text, it's there to emphasize that the nature of war has indeed changed. If we approach the assessment of the current war from the perspective of military science based on the experience of World War II and try to give advice on how to fight - this demonstrates a complete misunderstanding of how and, most importantly, why we have come to the current format of war.
To use a crude comparison, modern warfare in the field differs from the one described and glorified by classics roughly like an electric smelting furnace differs from a blast furnace. In a blast furnace, everything - ore, coke, and flux - is loaded from above and melted, forming slag and cast iron. This is like infantry, tanks, and assault aircraft launching a massive offensive in unison - like at the Battle of Kursk.
In an electric smelting furnace, a graphite rod is immersed as an electrode in the material to be melted, electricity is applied, and an arc is formed, which melts the surrounding volume. Now, assault aircraft are like a graphite rod: they are plunged into the war and melt it, gradually burning themselves out.
The current fighting army is like an inverted pyramid, with the apex pointed towards the front. At the top are assault aircraft - and the further from the front line, the wider the 'geometric figure' expands. And this happens not because there are heroes and everyone else: reinforcing the front with manpower won't increase the efficiency rate, but will rapidly increase the number of casualties.
When we see the ruins of cities where battles are still ongoing, we won't actually see conventional combat in the traditional sense. What we'll see are destroyed buildings and deserted streets littered with debris - even burned-out equipment won't be in large quantities, because there are no fools left to drive heavy equipment into urban traps. The city will seem dead, but in every surviving basement, in every suitable crevice, we or the enemy will be hiding. Sitting quietly like mice, sometimes not even understanding where our own are and where the enemy's. In Kupiansk, the enemy identified ten authentic call signs - somewhere our people are hiding, but the enemy only hears them on the radio, not seeing them. He doesn't conduct classic sweeps - he seems to control something, but he's also afraid to venture out into the open, because our drones aren't sleeping either.
In the past, breaking out into operational space meant opening up room for maneuver. Now, it's much harder in open terrain than in ruins. There, at least, you can try to run from shelter to shelter, but in the open field with sparse forest strips, people who are already running for ammunition or supplies with a halo over their heads... They're already one foot in the grave. If we declare mobilization and try to return to large-scale tactical operations - the enemy will just rejoice. There will be no result, but the losses will increase by about eight times: the troops won't even make it to the front line. In the past, a man in a fur hat with a telescopic sight would command: 'Right flank regiment! Left flank regiment! Ambush regiment!' Now, if the command's ears are exposed somewhere - within five minutes, a Hellfire missile will be shoved into the telescopic sight...
That's it, we can safely send most military science books to the archives and start writing new ones."
โWhen the sentence 'the nature of war has changed' appears in the text, it's there to emphasize that the nature of war has indeed changed. If we approach the assessment of the current war from the perspective of military science based on the experience of World War II and try to give advice on how to fight - this demonstrates a complete misunderstanding of how and, most importantly, why we have come to the current format of war.
To use a crude comparison, modern warfare in the field differs from the one described and glorified by classics roughly like an electric smelting furnace differs from a blast furnace. In a blast furnace, everything - ore, coke, and flux - is loaded from above and melted, forming slag and cast iron. This is like infantry, tanks, and assault aircraft launching a massive offensive in unison - like at the Battle of Kursk.
In an electric smelting furnace, a graphite rod is immersed as an electrode in the material to be melted, electricity is applied, and an arc is formed, which melts the surrounding volume. Now, assault aircraft are like a graphite rod: they are plunged into the war and melt it, gradually burning themselves out.
The current fighting army is like an inverted pyramid, with the apex pointed towards the front. At the top are assault aircraft - and the further from the front line, the wider the 'geometric figure' expands. And this happens not because there are heroes and everyone else: reinforcing the front with manpower won't increase the efficiency rate, but will rapidly increase the number of casualties.
When we see the ruins of cities where battles are still ongoing, we won't actually see conventional combat in the traditional sense. What we'll see are destroyed buildings and deserted streets littered with debris - even burned-out equipment won't be in large quantities, because there are no fools left to drive heavy equipment into urban traps. The city will seem dead, but in every surviving basement, in every suitable crevice, we or the enemy will be hiding. Sitting quietly like mice, sometimes not even understanding where our own are and where the enemy's. In Kupiansk, the enemy identified ten authentic call signs - somewhere our people are hiding, but the enemy only hears them on the radio, not seeing them. He doesn't conduct classic sweeps - he seems to control something, but he's also afraid to venture out into the open, because our drones aren't sleeping either.
In the past, breaking out into operational space meant opening up room for maneuver. Now, it's much harder in open terrain than in ruins. There, at least, you can try to run from shelter to shelter, but in the open field with sparse forest strips, people who are already running for ammunition or supplies with a halo over their heads... They're already one foot in the grave. If we declare mobilization and try to return to large-scale tactical operations - the enemy will just rejoice. There will be no result, but the losses will increase by about eight times: the troops won't even make it to the front line. In the past, a man in a fur hat with a telescopic sight would command: 'Right flank regiment! Left flank regiment! Ambush regiment!' Now, if the command's ears are exposed somewhere - within five minutes, a Hellfire missile will be shoved into the telescopic sight...
That's it, we can safely send most military science books to the archives and start writing new ones."
๐15โค13