I’ve watched the Maricopa audit report a couple of times now, and read the hard copy reports. A couple of initial comments.
First, people who can’t operate something as simple as an audio visual presentation should not be expected to be able to manage and secure something as complicated as multiple integrated election systems. The situation is rife with opportunities for fraud.
We need to be voting Amish.
As Mike says, “We need to melt down the machines and make them into prison bars.”
Second, this was not a “full forensic audit.” The speakers themselves acknowledged this, because they were denied access to the most critical and vulnerable portions of the system.
Third, every piece of evidence presented confirms what we have been saying for months: the election systems are connected to the internet throughout the entire election process, signature verification is not robust, and the main hack is ballot stuffing enabled by manipulation of the voter rolls.
As I’ve said for months, analysis of the paper in the ballots themselves is the most circumstantial and least conclusive part of the audit, because there are too many variables, and insufficient controls. Perhaps worthwhile for completeness, but the rest of the audit is incomplete anyway.
Note that it took a forensic evaluation of the hard drives in the systems in order to confirm that the machines were connecting to the internet; just like we recommended to Tina Peters after meeting with her in person in Mesa County in April.
And again, I stress that although the work these folks have done is laudable and helpful, confirming that massive fraud has taken place, it will be insufficient to convince many in the public without the supporting canvassing work.
That is why this “partial audit” was permitted to proceed, while the canvassing efforts were curtailed.
If you want to help address this massive fraud, don’t wait for an official audit. You’ll likely end up right where we are today with this one. Instead, find the citizen groups in your vicinity and join their canvassing effort.
Imagine, if instead of yesterday’s report if someone showed up with a stack of 100,000 pages, where each page described a dead voter, or a voter who had moved away many years ago, or a person that did not exist, or a person who did not vote, but we have a ballot from them. Exposing 100,000 Maricopa phantom voters would be an open and shut case.
As it stands, people who already know the election was hacked will find plenty of supporting evidence in this report, but people who don’t want to accept that our elections are a mere illusion will find plenty of wiggle room.
I think both sides of this issue were not looking forward to this report. One side because the evidence confirms that massive fraud is occurring, the other side because it is likely to be insufficient to convince a gullible public.
First, people who can’t operate something as simple as an audio visual presentation should not be expected to be able to manage and secure something as complicated as multiple integrated election systems. The situation is rife with opportunities for fraud.
We need to be voting Amish.
As Mike says, “We need to melt down the machines and make them into prison bars.”
Second, this was not a “full forensic audit.” The speakers themselves acknowledged this, because they were denied access to the most critical and vulnerable portions of the system.
Third, every piece of evidence presented confirms what we have been saying for months: the election systems are connected to the internet throughout the entire election process, signature verification is not robust, and the main hack is ballot stuffing enabled by manipulation of the voter rolls.
As I’ve said for months, analysis of the paper in the ballots themselves is the most circumstantial and least conclusive part of the audit, because there are too many variables, and insufficient controls. Perhaps worthwhile for completeness, but the rest of the audit is incomplete anyway.
Note that it took a forensic evaluation of the hard drives in the systems in order to confirm that the machines were connecting to the internet; just like we recommended to Tina Peters after meeting with her in person in Mesa County in April.
And again, I stress that although the work these folks have done is laudable and helpful, confirming that massive fraud has taken place, it will be insufficient to convince many in the public without the supporting canvassing work.
That is why this “partial audit” was permitted to proceed, while the canvassing efforts were curtailed.
If you want to help address this massive fraud, don’t wait for an official audit. You’ll likely end up right where we are today with this one. Instead, find the citizen groups in your vicinity and join their canvassing effort.
Imagine, if instead of yesterday’s report if someone showed up with a stack of 100,000 pages, where each page described a dead voter, or a voter who had moved away many years ago, or a person that did not exist, or a person who did not vote, but we have a ballot from them. Exposing 100,000 Maricopa phantom voters would be an open and shut case.
As it stands, people who already know the election was hacked will find plenty of supporting evidence in this report, but people who don’t want to accept that our elections are a mere illusion will find plenty of wiggle room.
I think both sides of this issue were not looking forward to this report. One side because the evidence confirms that massive fraud is occurring, the other side because it is likely to be insufficient to convince a gullible public.
My wife of forty years, Donna, is an excellent sounding board. She's my toughest critic, and she is brilliant. (And usually correct.) So, before I shared my opinions about the Maricopa audit report I asked her for hers.
She said that she thought that the Maricopa audit report would DIMINISH the effort in other states, deflating the movement.
Why? Because people will see the Maricopa result and question whether it is worth all the effort in their own states to end up with another version of the same outcome.
This has been my biggest fear concerning the audit.
I am not opposed to audits. But strategy matters.
She said that she thought that the Maricopa audit report would DIMINISH the effort in other states, deflating the movement.
Why? Because people will see the Maricopa result and question whether it is worth all the effort in their own states to end up with another version of the same outcome.
This has been my biggest fear concerning the audit.
I am not opposed to audits. But strategy matters.
The cyber forensic portion of the Maricopa audit is particularly damaging to the credibility of the state election officials, because it shows:
1) Incontrovertible proof that the machines were connected to the internet (the official claim was that the machines were *never* connected). In order to discover this, Mr Cotton had to examine the "unallocated" portions of the discs... the portion with the *deleted* log files;
2) A *remotely* executed purge of November 2020 election records, just prior to the state audit in February.
My comment above about the technical expectations of our election officials is highlighted here; it takes cyber experts to uncover what election officials have no idea is taking place in their systems.
How can we expect them to secure our elections when they don't even understand that every user needs their own unique login ID and password?
We cannot vote this way, because it is impractical to assume that we can defend elections held in this manner.
It's simple: Vote Amish.
1) Incontrovertible proof that the machines were connected to the internet (the official claim was that the machines were *never* connected). In order to discover this, Mr Cotton had to examine the "unallocated" portions of the discs... the portion with the *deleted* log files;
2) A *remotely* executed purge of November 2020 election records, just prior to the state audit in February.
My comment above about the technical expectations of our election officials is highlighted here; it takes cyber experts to uncover what election officials have no idea is taking place in their systems.
How can we expect them to secure our elections when they don't even understand that every user needs their own unique login ID and password?
We cannot vote this way, because it is impractical to assume that we can defend elections held in this manner.
It's simple: Vote Amish.
Folks, here is the issue: Too many people still do not believe the November election was fraudulent.
We need to convince them that a murder has taken place *before* we will be able to interest them in how the door locks were picked or the dimensions of the murder weapon.
Our number one goal should be to convince them of the murder.
In order to do this, you need clean, incontrovertible evidence, and then to disperse it far and wide.
Then, people will demand an investigation.
We need to convince them that a murder has taken place *before* we will be able to interest them in how the door locks were picked or the dimensions of the murder weapon.
Our number one goal should be to convince them of the murder.
In order to do this, you need clean, incontrovertible evidence, and then to disperse it far and wide.
Then, people will demand an investigation.
😢1
Critics will say, "Sure, the election was botched in some ways in Maricopa, but you haven't proven fraud, nor sufficient fraud to change the outcome of the election. Even the auditors were making suggestions for legislation for the next time, rather than suggesting decertification."
Please don't misunderstand my comments today regarding the Maricopa audit... I think the tide has turned, and we are winning back our country. The Maricopa audit is an important chapter in this war, and I support it and the workers who did some really excellent work.
But it represents only one battle in a much larger war.
In a war, soldiers are taught to "keep their pulse at 90, and to remember that it is only Tuesday."
I'm in this for the long haul.
But it represents only one battle in a much larger war.
In a war, soldiers are taught to "keep their pulse at 90, and to remember that it is only Tuesday."
I'm in this for the long haul.
I'm going to be on FrankSpeech.com in a few minutes... (Worldview Weekend with Brannon Howse)
Before my interview with Brannon on FrankSpeech.com tonight (warm up to the President’s speech), Senator Borrelli was on. As always, he was articulate and inspiring. But something he said gave me chills...
First, he admitted that there would be no legislative solution, because they did not have the votes.
Instead, there would be criminal prosecutions.
This is good, because then the evidence makes it into court.
But this is bad, because such cases take years to prosecute.
But this is good, because there will be whistleblowers to avoid prosecution.
But this is bad, because evidence will be sealed by the court until it is presented formally. Maybe only before a grand jury.
They may have just navigated the best evidences right out of the public discussion... where it is needed the most.
Folks, this is no longer about evidence. It hasn’t been about evidence for months.
It is about a *movement*
It is about WHEN the American public will stand up and demand that the 2020 election be decertified.
All the rest is designed to keep the public placated.
First, he admitted that there would be no legislative solution, because they did not have the votes.
Instead, there would be criminal prosecutions.
This is good, because then the evidence makes it into court.
But this is bad, because such cases take years to prosecute.
But this is good, because there will be whistleblowers to avoid prosecution.
But this is bad, because evidence will be sealed by the court until it is presented formally. Maybe only before a grand jury.
They may have just navigated the best evidences right out of the public discussion... where it is needed the most.
Folks, this is no longer about evidence. It hasn’t been about evidence for months.
It is about a *movement*
It is about WHEN the American public will stand up and demand that the 2020 election be decertified.
All the rest is designed to keep the public placated.
No one is coming to save us.
We are the people we are waiting for.
Politicians don’t start parades, they join them.
Each citizen must make a personal stand, and teach their neighbors so that they will also make their stands.
Then, we can stand together, and take our country back.
We are the people we are waiting for.
Politicians don’t start parades, they join them.
Each citizen must make a personal stand, and teach their neighbors so that they will also make their stands.
Then, we can stand together, and take our country back.
👍1
In my opinion, we just need ONE state to decertify. Because once they do, others will follow.
People question why I am spending so much time in conservative states... because that is where we have the best chance of finding a conservative majority willing to decertify.
For example, I was just in the great state of Montana. Patriots there have already done the groundwork, ferreting out substantial fraud in Missoula. And legislator Teresa Manzella is on top of this, organizing over sixty legislators in the effort.
C’mon, Montana. Lead the way.
And there are other states too. But I can’t tell you about them yet... ;-)
People question why I am spending so much time in conservative states... because that is where we have the best chance of finding a conservative majority willing to decertify.
For example, I was just in the great state of Montana. Patriots there have already done the groundwork, ferreting out substantial fraud in Missoula. And legislator Teresa Manzella is on top of this, organizing over sixty legislators in the effort.
C’mon, Montana. Lead the way.
And there are other states too. But I can’t tell you about them yet... ;-)
Professor Clements, Capt. Keshel and I have crossed paths a lot recently. Good guys, and solid patriots.
Even though we’ve heard each other’s presentations several times, we still try to be attentive and supportive.
Recently, I was called out of a meeting to do a zoom call with a SoS, so I missed Seth’s talk. Later he said, “So... were you engaged in insurrection again this morning?”
Funny guy.
Professor Clements said he loves it when I’m in the back of the audience, hammering away on my laptop (trying to get state calculations done), and I occasionally exclaim, “Boom!” without looking up from my work. He says some pretty profound things.
It is a challenge balancing work with meetings and presentations, but both are critical to the effort. So I endeavor to continually do both.
It is an honor to serve my country, but also a great pleasure and inspiration to hang out with so many hard-working patriots.
Even though we’ve heard each other’s presentations several times, we still try to be attentive and supportive.
Recently, I was called out of a meeting to do a zoom call with a SoS, so I missed Seth’s talk. Later he said, “So... were you engaged in insurrection again this morning?”
Funny guy.
Professor Clements said he loves it when I’m in the back of the audience, hammering away on my laptop (trying to get state calculations done), and I occasionally exclaim, “Boom!” without looking up from my work. He says some pretty profound things.
It is a challenge balancing work with meetings and presentations, but both are critical to the effort. So I endeavor to continually do both.
It is an honor to serve my country, but also a great pleasure and inspiration to hang out with so many hard-working patriots.
The situation with gold-star mother, Tina Peters, has national implications.
First, it sounded the national alarm that election machine “updates” were actually a concerted and deliberate national attempt to erase elections records; they knew we were on to them, and they were covering their tracks.
Second, Tina’s bravery has emboldened county clerks and election managers all over the country to re-examine their voting systems and to confront their state governments with their own evidence that their elections are being hacked.
(Enabled by the *fact* that the machines routinely connect to the internet, despite what we are told by election officials. Many of them know, and are lying to you. Others are just clueless, because they are technologically inexperienced. The reason some officials lie to you about it, is because it is *illegal* for these machines to be connected to the internet during the elections and they know it. But they *like* remotely monitoring the elections... it gives them a sense of power and security about what is going on. But it also enables the fraud.)
And third, state legislators are now desperately trying to preserve the election fraud evidence by doing forensic backups of their own voting systems. When they look into it, many of them are disappointed to discover that they are too late, and it raises their suspicions about the integrity of their elections. It also exposes the fact that election records are being routinely deleted that are required to be preserved according to federal law.
Tina Peters is not the only clerk that has discovered fraud in their elections. Most of these election managers are patriots, and when they discover their elections are being manipulated they become very angry.
Sometimes it takes a couple meetings with them, because they have been trained to believe that their elections are secure if they follow the instructions carefully. However, their procedures are wrought with opportunities for fraud, and when I help them to discover this... by looking at their own data and their own records, as well as supplementary data I can provide, then these folks are some of our most powerful allies in the fight to reclaim our country.
Tina Peters is a hero. Sherronna Bishop is a hero. And there are many others who also made this possible. I am honored to serve shoulder to shoulder with these ladies, who are not only patriots, but also beloved sisters in Christ.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/an-elections-supervisor-embraced-conspiracy-theories-officials-say-she-has-become-an-insider-threat/2021/09/26/ee60812e-1a17-11ec-a99a-5fea2b2da34b_story.html)
First, it sounded the national alarm that election machine “updates” were actually a concerted and deliberate national attempt to erase elections records; they knew we were on to them, and they were covering their tracks.
Second, Tina’s bravery has emboldened county clerks and election managers all over the country to re-examine their voting systems and to confront their state governments with their own evidence that their elections are being hacked.
(Enabled by the *fact* that the machines routinely connect to the internet, despite what we are told by election officials. Many of them know, and are lying to you. Others are just clueless, because they are technologically inexperienced. The reason some officials lie to you about it, is because it is *illegal* for these machines to be connected to the internet during the elections and they know it. But they *like* remotely monitoring the elections... it gives them a sense of power and security about what is going on. But it also enables the fraud.)
And third, state legislators are now desperately trying to preserve the election fraud evidence by doing forensic backups of their own voting systems. When they look into it, many of them are disappointed to discover that they are too late, and it raises their suspicions about the integrity of their elections. It also exposes the fact that election records are being routinely deleted that are required to be preserved according to federal law.
Tina Peters is not the only clerk that has discovered fraud in their elections. Most of these election managers are patriots, and when they discover their elections are being manipulated they become very angry.
Sometimes it takes a couple meetings with them, because they have been trained to believe that their elections are secure if they follow the instructions carefully. However, their procedures are wrought with opportunities for fraud, and when I help them to discover this... by looking at their own data and their own records, as well as supplementary data I can provide, then these folks are some of our most powerful allies in the fight to reclaim our country.
Tina Peters is a hero. Sherronna Bishop is a hero. And there are many others who also made this possible. I am honored to serve shoulder to shoulder with these ladies, who are not only patriots, but also beloved sisters in Christ.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/an-elections-supervisor-embraced-conspiracy-theories-officials-say-she-has-become-an-insider-threat/2021/09/26/ee60812e-1a17-11ec-a99a-5fea2b2da34b_story.html)
One of the telltale signs of bias in the recent Wash Post article is that they fail to mention that Tina Peters lost her son in a military operation. He was a Navy Seal. She is a gold-star mom.
Instead, they mention that she used to sell magnets and alternative medicine health care products. Hmmm.
She deserves our respect, yet they mock her.
I often hear veterans say that their oath to defend our country never expires, and that they have pledged to defend it against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. They and their buddies have suffered casualties in their defense of freedom, and they are not going to just roll over and yield the country to communism.
Thank you for your service, Tina Peters. And thank you for your son’s service. I am honored to call you a friend.
http://blog.mesacounty.us/2017/08/commissioners-honor-navy-seal-remington.html
Instead, they mention that she used to sell magnets and alternative medicine health care products. Hmmm.
She deserves our respect, yet they mock her.
I often hear veterans say that their oath to defend our country never expires, and that they have pledged to defend it against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. They and their buddies have suffered casualties in their defense of freedom, and they are not going to just roll over and yield the country to communism.
Thank you for your service, Tina Peters. And thank you for your son’s service. I am honored to call you a friend.
http://blog.mesacounty.us/2017/08/commissioners-honor-navy-seal-remington.html
blog.mesacounty.us
Commissioners honor Navy SEAL, Remington Jordan Peters
The Board of Mesa County Commissioners adopted a proclamation to honor the life of Special Warfare Operator (SEAL) Petty Officer 1st Class R...
Forwarded from Joe Oltmann Official (Joe Oltmann)
This needs to be shared.... https://nationalfile.com/county-clerk-submits-report-that-colorado-secretary-of-state-and-dominion-destroyed-election-data/
National File
County Clerk Submits Report That Colorado Secretary of State And Dominion 'Destroyed' Election Data - National File
Mesa County, Colorado Clerk and Recorder Tina M. Peters has submitted a forensic examination report to the Mesa County commissioners. The report shows that a massive amount of election data was deleted and “destroyed” by the office of the Democrat Colorado…
Forwarded from David Clements
Grand Junction, CO.
Delighted to be here with Dr. Frank.
We are preaching TRUTH about the stolen election.
We the People vs. the godless commies.
Colorado is ground zero for Dominion, and home to one of the most corrupt Secretaries of State in the country.
They are being exposed.
Momentum is in the air.
Delighted to be here with Dr. Frank.
We are preaching TRUTH about the stolen election.
We the People vs. the godless commies.
Colorado is ground zero for Dominion, and home to one of the most corrupt Secretaries of State in the country.
They are being exposed.
Momentum is in the air.