I'll be in Missoula on Wednesday morning (with the Professor), and Hamilton Montana on Wednesday evening!
Hope to see y'all there!
Hope to see y'all there!
👍1
That's two!
I just found a second county in the country where the election is clearly not manipulated. It's a small, rural county in Montana, and the correlation coefficient is about 0.8. It would be really hard to stuff phantom ballots in a small county where the clerk knows everyone....
The other county I found (another state) has about 12,000 residents... and I'm keeping it a secret for now...
I will reveal the identity of the Montana county during my talks in Montana on Wednesday! (Teaser!)
I just found a second county in the country where the election is clearly not manipulated. It's a small, rural county in Montana, and the correlation coefficient is about 0.8. It would be really hard to stuff phantom ballots in a small county where the clerk knows everyone....
The other county I found (another state) has about 12,000 residents... and I'm keeping it a secret for now...
I will reveal the identity of the Montana county during my talks in Montana on Wednesday! (Teaser!)
If you ask the person in charge of the election in your county for a list of everyone who voted in the November election, they typically offer you a "voter history."
Sounds reasonable.
But if you total up the number of voters in that history, it is usually substantially less than the reported numbers from November.
Too many of our election folks have no idea that they have been scammed.
Sounds reasonable.
But if you total up the number of voters in that history, it is usually substantially less than the reported numbers from November.
Too many of our election folks have no idea that they have been scammed.
My scripture for today... looking at snow-capped mountains, wildlife, and inspiring Nature. From Romans 1:
"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.
24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.
26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.
28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. 29 They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32 Though they know God's righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them."
"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.
24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.
26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.
28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. 29 They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32 Though they know God's righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them."
I was up in the Montana mountains again today, fly fishing with my dad. He's fished every puddle in the state, and knows where the best fishing spots are.
Often, we have to cross private land to reach the best river portions. So of course, dad knows all the owners and they know him, and they allow him to fish their streams.
Today, we were checking in with a new owner, and some contractors were there. We introduced ourselves to get new permission, and the guy said that he knew who I was, that he'd been watching me on FrankSpeech.com this morning.
Mike's strategy has been to pierce the media. I think it is working!
Often, we have to cross private land to reach the best river portions. So of course, dad knows all the owners and they know him, and they allow him to fish their streams.
Today, we were checking in with a new owner, and some contractors were there. We introduced ourselves to get new permission, and the guy said that he knew who I was, that he'd been watching me on FrankSpeech.com this morning.
Mike's strategy has been to pierce the media. I think it is working!
I’ve watched the Maricopa audit report a couple of times now, and read the hard copy reports. A couple of initial comments.
First, people who can’t operate something as simple as an audio visual presentation should not be expected to be able to manage and secure something as complicated as multiple integrated election systems. The situation is rife with opportunities for fraud.
We need to be voting Amish.
As Mike says, “We need to melt down the machines and make them into prison bars.”
Second, this was not a “full forensic audit.” The speakers themselves acknowledged this, because they were denied access to the most critical and vulnerable portions of the system.
Third, every piece of evidence presented confirms what we have been saying for months: the election systems are connected to the internet throughout the entire election process, signature verification is not robust, and the main hack is ballot stuffing enabled by manipulation of the voter rolls.
As I’ve said for months, analysis of the paper in the ballots themselves is the most circumstantial and least conclusive part of the audit, because there are too many variables, and insufficient controls. Perhaps worthwhile for completeness, but the rest of the audit is incomplete anyway.
Note that it took a forensic evaluation of the hard drives in the systems in order to confirm that the machines were connecting to the internet; just like we recommended to Tina Peters after meeting with her in person in Mesa County in April.
And again, I stress that although the work these folks have done is laudable and helpful, confirming that massive fraud has taken place, it will be insufficient to convince many in the public without the supporting canvassing work.
That is why this “partial audit” was permitted to proceed, while the canvassing efforts were curtailed.
If you want to help address this massive fraud, don’t wait for an official audit. You’ll likely end up right where we are today with this one. Instead, find the citizen groups in your vicinity and join their canvassing effort.
Imagine, if instead of yesterday’s report if someone showed up with a stack of 100,000 pages, where each page described a dead voter, or a voter who had moved away many years ago, or a person that did not exist, or a person who did not vote, but we have a ballot from them. Exposing 100,000 Maricopa phantom voters would be an open and shut case.
As it stands, people who already know the election was hacked will find plenty of supporting evidence in this report, but people who don’t want to accept that our elections are a mere illusion will find plenty of wiggle room.
I think both sides of this issue were not looking forward to this report. One side because the evidence confirms that massive fraud is occurring, the other side because it is likely to be insufficient to convince a gullible public.
First, people who can’t operate something as simple as an audio visual presentation should not be expected to be able to manage and secure something as complicated as multiple integrated election systems. The situation is rife with opportunities for fraud.
We need to be voting Amish.
As Mike says, “We need to melt down the machines and make them into prison bars.”
Second, this was not a “full forensic audit.” The speakers themselves acknowledged this, because they were denied access to the most critical and vulnerable portions of the system.
Third, every piece of evidence presented confirms what we have been saying for months: the election systems are connected to the internet throughout the entire election process, signature verification is not robust, and the main hack is ballot stuffing enabled by manipulation of the voter rolls.
As I’ve said for months, analysis of the paper in the ballots themselves is the most circumstantial and least conclusive part of the audit, because there are too many variables, and insufficient controls. Perhaps worthwhile for completeness, but the rest of the audit is incomplete anyway.
Note that it took a forensic evaluation of the hard drives in the systems in order to confirm that the machines were connecting to the internet; just like we recommended to Tina Peters after meeting with her in person in Mesa County in April.
And again, I stress that although the work these folks have done is laudable and helpful, confirming that massive fraud has taken place, it will be insufficient to convince many in the public without the supporting canvassing work.
That is why this “partial audit” was permitted to proceed, while the canvassing efforts were curtailed.
If you want to help address this massive fraud, don’t wait for an official audit. You’ll likely end up right where we are today with this one. Instead, find the citizen groups in your vicinity and join their canvassing effort.
Imagine, if instead of yesterday’s report if someone showed up with a stack of 100,000 pages, where each page described a dead voter, or a voter who had moved away many years ago, or a person that did not exist, or a person who did not vote, but we have a ballot from them. Exposing 100,000 Maricopa phantom voters would be an open and shut case.
As it stands, people who already know the election was hacked will find plenty of supporting evidence in this report, but people who don’t want to accept that our elections are a mere illusion will find plenty of wiggle room.
I think both sides of this issue were not looking forward to this report. One side because the evidence confirms that massive fraud is occurring, the other side because it is likely to be insufficient to convince a gullible public.
My wife of forty years, Donna, is an excellent sounding board. She's my toughest critic, and she is brilliant. (And usually correct.) So, before I shared my opinions about the Maricopa audit report I asked her for hers.
She said that she thought that the Maricopa audit report would DIMINISH the effort in other states, deflating the movement.
Why? Because people will see the Maricopa result and question whether it is worth all the effort in their own states to end up with another version of the same outcome.
This has been my biggest fear concerning the audit.
I am not opposed to audits. But strategy matters.
She said that she thought that the Maricopa audit report would DIMINISH the effort in other states, deflating the movement.
Why? Because people will see the Maricopa result and question whether it is worth all the effort in their own states to end up with another version of the same outcome.
This has been my biggest fear concerning the audit.
I am not opposed to audits. But strategy matters.
The cyber forensic portion of the Maricopa audit is particularly damaging to the credibility of the state election officials, because it shows:
1) Incontrovertible proof that the machines were connected to the internet (the official claim was that the machines were *never* connected). In order to discover this, Mr Cotton had to examine the "unallocated" portions of the discs... the portion with the *deleted* log files;
2) A *remotely* executed purge of November 2020 election records, just prior to the state audit in February.
My comment above about the technical expectations of our election officials is highlighted here; it takes cyber experts to uncover what election officials have no idea is taking place in their systems.
How can we expect them to secure our elections when they don't even understand that every user needs their own unique login ID and password?
We cannot vote this way, because it is impractical to assume that we can defend elections held in this manner.
It's simple: Vote Amish.
1) Incontrovertible proof that the machines were connected to the internet (the official claim was that the machines were *never* connected). In order to discover this, Mr Cotton had to examine the "unallocated" portions of the discs... the portion with the *deleted* log files;
2) A *remotely* executed purge of November 2020 election records, just prior to the state audit in February.
My comment above about the technical expectations of our election officials is highlighted here; it takes cyber experts to uncover what election officials have no idea is taking place in their systems.
How can we expect them to secure our elections when they don't even understand that every user needs their own unique login ID and password?
We cannot vote this way, because it is impractical to assume that we can defend elections held in this manner.
It's simple: Vote Amish.
Folks, here is the issue: Too many people still do not believe the November election was fraudulent.
We need to convince them that a murder has taken place *before* we will be able to interest them in how the door locks were picked or the dimensions of the murder weapon.
Our number one goal should be to convince them of the murder.
In order to do this, you need clean, incontrovertible evidence, and then to disperse it far and wide.
Then, people will demand an investigation.
We need to convince them that a murder has taken place *before* we will be able to interest them in how the door locks were picked or the dimensions of the murder weapon.
Our number one goal should be to convince them of the murder.
In order to do this, you need clean, incontrovertible evidence, and then to disperse it far and wide.
Then, people will demand an investigation.
😢1
Critics will say, "Sure, the election was botched in some ways in Maricopa, but you haven't proven fraud, nor sufficient fraud to change the outcome of the election. Even the auditors were making suggestions for legislation for the next time, rather than suggesting decertification."