With Eric Metaxas in Chester County, Pennsylvania. So glad to finally meet him in person... a personal hero of mine!

"Gettysburg"

Several weeks ago I was a speaker at an event with Mike Lindell in Gettysburg. We were there to discuss fixing 2020 and endorsing Doug Mastriano's bid for PA governor.

At the end of Mike's speech he said, "If you're waiting for a rainy day to commit to the battle to retake America, then... it's pouring outside."

As we left the event, indeed it was pouring outside. And while driving I was full of somber emotions as I passed through field after field, littered with civil war monuments. Tears welled up in my eyes.

We can't just roll over and let evil take this country. Too many have sacrificed, and too much is at stake.

Indeed, many have sacrificed that we might cherish the liberty that we enjoy.

When I arrived at my destination the rain stopped, and this lovely rainbow decorated the sky.

Thank you, Heavenly Father, for our lives, and the privilege of living during a time when you are redeeming our country.

People ask me how I can be both a Christian and a scientist.

Easy. How can I not be?

Modern science was born and nurtured in the church.

https://www.discovery.org/v/the-judeo-christian-origins-of-modern-science/

Eric Metaxas spoke brilliantly last evening on the "Triangle of Liberty."

In order to enjoy Freedom, we must have Virtue.

Virtue requires Faith;

And Faith requires Freedom.

To enjoy Liberty, we must govern ourselves, which requires Virtue. True and persistent Virtue requires Faith.

There is little need for government intrusion when individuals behave with integrity.

We are losing our liberty, and our country, because we have become complacent and enticed by evil.

Repent!

Be what God designed you to be, not the cheap substitute offered by evil.

Check out my birthday present from the Chester Co PA gang!

Attending a fund raiser tonight in Northern Kentucky in support of Danny Whitacre.

I'll have Nellie with me!

Two of my best friends!

I modified my name badge...

Kentucky voters take note!!!

Some of my favorite people on the planet.

“2000 Mules”

People have been asking me how my analyses align with what is shown in the 2000 Miles documentary.

Actually, the stuffing shown is precisely the sort of thing I’ve been describing since December of 2020, but people have difficulty understanding it at first. Dennis Prager’s confusion in the piece illustrates this point.

What you first need to understand is that every ballot received needs to be assigned to a person who is listed the voter rolls.

The voter rolls are online, often in real time, and they are available to multiple entities, including the cheaters.

If there aren’t enough voters listed in the rolls to obtain a desired outcome, then cheaters can add more. That’s why the voter rolls are so inflated in *every* state. It gives cheaters a larger credit line to work with.

The electronic pollbooks tell you who has voted, who has ordered mail-in ballots, and who has not returned one. Often in real time.

If insufficient mail-in ballots have been ordered, then the cheaters can order more.

If the cheaters can’t harvest enough mail-in ballots, then the cheaters can print more.

The machines tell you what the current tallies are, often in real time. Also, they sometimes manipulate the tallies and decide which voter a ballot is assigned to.

The key to all this is access to information. Electronic, real-time information. That’s why the cheaters like centrally-controlled, electronic election systems.

Then you just need a relatively few people to do the legwork, because computer algorithms can handle all of the accounting.

Recounts do not expose ballot stuffing fraud, because ballots are anonymous. What matters is if the voter a particular ballot is assigned to actually completed that particular ballot.

“It’s not how many times you count the cash in the register, it’s how many of the bills are counterfeit.”

The solution is simple: Vote Amish. All paper, no machines. A single day, photo ID, hand-counting. Transparency.

I like to say, “You could pay someone to raise your children, but things turn out far better if you do it yourself.”

It’s the same with our elections… we’ve been paying other people to run them for far too long. The systems have become so complicated that the people running them don’t understand them, and have no chance of securing them.

If we want our elections to have integrity, we need to run them with our own two hands.

I’m pleased that the documentary was released, because it provides more evidence confirming the mathematics and canvassing evidence I and my colleagues have been presenting for some time, and continues to raise awareness that the 2020 General Election was stolen from the American people.

And it’s not the first time.

“Public Psychology”

Say that you are sitting in the doctor’s office and he shows you blood test results which prove that you have a cancer tumor in your thyroid.

Basically, the doctor is showing you *numbers*. Do you believe him?

Then he shows you an MRI image of the tumor.

Somehow seeing is believing, but the numbers should have been sufficient.

People that understand or work with numbers will be convinced by numbers, but some need to see it with their own eyes in order for it to become real to them.

Really, an MRI is just a bunch of numbers shown in a way that makes them easy to visualize.

The mathematics, the numbers, and computer logs have been available for the 2020 election for some time, and over 60% of the population now acknowledges that the outcome of the 2020 election was fraudulent.

Hopefully, many more people will see the images in 2000 Mules and finally accept the fact of a stolen election.

But there will always remain some who will never accept the truth, regardless of the evidence.

“Good Grammar”

As I was growing up, my father would always correct my grammar.

Relentlessly.

Sometimes, even though I knew the proper language, I would speak casually or improperly for effect. It didn’t matter, he would correct me anyway.

I think the reason he did this was primarily twofold. First, as my father he felt obligated to train me up properly. Second, he wanted my communication to be credible. He didn’t want listeners to think that I “only just fell off the back of a turnip truck.”

For example, when I am debating alternative energy with someone and they speak of “Nukular Power” (instead of “nuclear”), it decreases the credibility of their argument. It makes me wonder if they even understand the science behind what they are discussing.

It’s the same with numbers. If someone is constantly mispronouncing numbers, it makes me wonder how much they really understand them.

For example, the number 107, 231 is correctly pronounced, “one hundred seven thousand, two hundred thirty one.”

Not: “one hundred *and* seven thousand, two hundred *and* thirty one.” (The *and* is reserved for the decimal point.)

If someone speaking in a documentary presenting lots of numbers mispronounces one or two, it is easy to overlook. But when they mispronounce nearly every number it makes me wonder if they even understand them.

Credibility matters.

“Evidence vs Proof”

It might seem like a trivial distinction at first, but it is really important when you are presenting an argument to distinguish between “evidence” and “proof.”

For example, the 2000 Mules documentary provides a small sampling of evidence and a compelling argument supporting the claim that a massive amount of ballot-stuffing took place in the 2020 general election.

Of course, I agree with their claim because I have also accumulated a massive amount of evidence which supports it. But it is incorrect to say that the documentary itself proves it. But it does provide additional very compelling supporting evidence.

The documentary was designed to reach the general listener and was time-constrained. Accordingly, they did not ‘dig into the weeds’ and show you all the data; they told you about it. You have to trust them and their methodology. (And I do.)

I think the most compelling argument they make that widespread ballot-stuffing took place is that many single individuals visited multiple ballot drop boxes, often in the wee hours of the night.

But allow me to play devil’s advocate for a moment with an unlikely example. Imagine that there are single moms who make extra income after hours by picking up ballots from multiple care facilities and delivering them to multiple drop boxes. They would meet the criteria shown in the documentary, showing up in the video and the geolocation data.

One of the important lessons we learned during 2021 is that even the most compelling sounding evidence needs to be followed up with additional, in-person investigations. And near the end of the documentary the producers of 2000 Mules wisely made this very recommendation.

Be careful when you discuss the documentary with your friends to not overstate your argument; you actually decrease your own credibility when you do so. Encourage people to consider the very compelling evidence, and then let them come to their own conclusions.

You saw compelling evidence and heard a compelling argument, not proof.

The follow up investigations are going to be glorious!

The Otero County Commission heard from nation-state vulnerability expert, Jeff Lenburg.

Lenburg explains how Dominion machines are able to fill out a ballot, and make it look as if a human filled in the ballot oval.

No tabulating machine should both scan and fill out a ballot.

Yet, this highly vulnerable and exploitable feature exists in Dominion machines across the country.

This is unacceptable.

Get rid of the rigged election machines.

#NMauditforce