"Don't Listen to Him"
You're an election official, and you meet with Dr Frank. He shows you...
1) ...there are large numbers of people who voted in your election, and you don't know who they are:
2) ...there are large numbers of phantom voters in your records and rolls (people who didn't actually vote, but a ballot was turned in using their name). He shows you the affidavits of canvassers who have proven this;
3) ...sometimes there are more people listed in your rolls than there are eligible voters;
4) ...usernames and passwords for your county systems and election systems;
5) ...that he is able to predict the number of people who vote of every age in every precinct;
6) ...that he is able to predict the number of Republicans and Democrats who vote in every precinct;
7) ...that your machines are communicating over the internet during your elections.
You are concerned, so you call your state election officials. Their reply?
"Don't meet with Dr Frank. Don't listen to Dr Frank. He is lying to you."
Except for the fact that Dr Frank is simply showing you your own data and evidence of widespread election fraud under your watch, confirmed by door-to-door canvassing.
It's not your fault; you've been set up to fail. Your election systems are appallingly unsecure.
But as an election official you want to keep your job.
So, mums the word.
You're an election official, and you meet with Dr Frank. He shows you...
1) ...there are large numbers of people who voted in your election, and you don't know who they are:
2) ...there are large numbers of phantom voters in your records and rolls (people who didn't actually vote, but a ballot was turned in using their name). He shows you the affidavits of canvassers who have proven this;
3) ...sometimes there are more people listed in your rolls than there are eligible voters;
4) ...usernames and passwords for your county systems and election systems;
5) ...that he is able to predict the number of people who vote of every age in every precinct;
6) ...that he is able to predict the number of Republicans and Democrats who vote in every precinct;
7) ...that your machines are communicating over the internet during your elections.
You are concerned, so you call your state election officials. Their reply?
"Don't meet with Dr Frank. Don't listen to Dr Frank. He is lying to you."
Except for the fact that Dr Frank is simply showing you your own data and evidence of widespread election fraud under your watch, confirmed by door-to-door canvassing.
It's not your fault; you've been set up to fail. Your election systems are appallingly unsecure.
But as an election official you want to keep your job.
So, mums the word.
🤬74😢44👍27🔥13🤯6🤮5👏2😱1
“Oklahoma”
Oklahoma is not OK.
It’s election personnel are being centrally controlled by a corrupt and opaque infrastructure that would put the mafia to shame.
You bet they took the Zuckerbucks.
And when I went there to show them their own data, their election officials distributed an email telling all their local officials and legislators not to speak or meet with me.
But a few brave legislators attended my presentation at the capitol, and were appalled at what they learned.
ALL the citizens of OK should be appalled that their elections are being managed using crime family tactics.
We’ve already started canvassing, and yes... we are finding precisely the fraud we were expecting to find.
The truth will out, and these corrupt officials will be exposed for the fraudsters that they are.
I think a prison cell is waiting for some of them.
It’s just a matter of time.
Oklahoma is not OK.
It’s election personnel are being centrally controlled by a corrupt and opaque infrastructure that would put the mafia to shame.
You bet they took the Zuckerbucks.
And when I went there to show them their own data, their election officials distributed an email telling all their local officials and legislators not to speak or meet with me.
But a few brave legislators attended my presentation at the capitol, and were appalled at what they learned.
ALL the citizens of OK should be appalled that their elections are being managed using crime family tactics.
We’ve already started canvassing, and yes... we are finding precisely the fraud we were expecting to find.
The truth will out, and these corrupt officials will be exposed for the fraudsters that they are.
I think a prison cell is waiting for some of them.
It’s just a matter of time.
👍205🔥90❤18
Each month, I like to post the entire satellite record of global mean temperature from Dr Spencer's website, drroyspencer.com.
👍53❤3🔥2
Big news in South Dakota today... details on the Lindell Report!
🔥139❤31👍18
Graphs from the CDC webpage. Total deaths from all causes in all age groups are back into normal ranges. And as I’ve noted since early 2020, our children have always been at statistically negligible risk from Covid.
In fact, our children are at higher risk from the “vaccines” than they are from Covid. So requiring them to be vaccinated is putting them at higher risk to “protect” adults. (Which it doesn’t do anyway.)
Hmmm...
Since when do we protect our adults at the expense of our children?
Oh, yeah. This is America today. We kill our children all the time for the convenience of our adults.
No wonder God is judging us.
In fact, our children are at higher risk from the “vaccines” than they are from Covid. So requiring them to be vaccinated is putting them at higher risk to “protect” adults. (Which it doesn’t do anyway.)
Hmmm...
Since when do we protect our adults at the expense of our children?
Oh, yeah. This is America today. We kill our children all the time for the convenience of our adults.
No wonder God is judging us.
👍107🔥43😢40❤1
"Kentucky Elections are Full of Fraud"
Kentucky has some of the dirtiest voter rolls in the country.
That’s why Judicial Watch sued them, and won their case.
And despite recent "efforts" of their secretary of state, KY still has more people in their rolls (103%) than they have voting age residents.
I met with several KY election officials this past week, and most were unaware of the extent of their problem, having accepted leadership propaganda that the rolls are being cleaned.
Because the counties are not allowed to clean their own rolls.
Jefferson County officials were shocked when I showed them their own data (see graph): 105% of their voting age population is registered.
I also showed them that 35,999 people who voted in the 2020 General Election are not recorded in their rolls (9.3%).
At first they denied the situation. But I am using their own official numbers.
KY elections are full of widespread fraud because the STATE controls the elections instead of the counties.
Kentucky has some of the dirtiest voter rolls in the country.
That’s why Judicial Watch sued them, and won their case.
And despite recent "efforts" of their secretary of state, KY still has more people in their rolls (103%) than they have voting age residents.
I met with several KY election officials this past week, and most were unaware of the extent of their problem, having accepted leadership propaganda that the rolls are being cleaned.
Because the counties are not allowed to clean their own rolls.
Jefferson County officials were shocked when I showed them their own data (see graph): 105% of their voting age population is registered.
I also showed them that 35,999 people who voted in the 2020 General Election are not recorded in their rolls (9.3%).
At first they denied the situation. But I am using their own official numbers.
KY elections are full of widespread fraud because the STATE controls the elections instead of the counties.
🤬85👍33🔥30
"You are discouraging people from voting!"
This week, I had to endure another self-righteous speech from an election official claiming that I was discouraging people from voting because I was calling the integrity of our elections into question.
I replied that I've been encouraging people to vote in larger numbers to overcome the fraud, and have been working to restore faith in our elections by exposing the fraud that everyone knows is there.
If election officials want to restore trust in their election systems, all they have to do is to let us examine them more closely.
But they won't.
So, WHO is perpetuating the lack of transparency that allows fraud to flourish and results in less public confidence in our elections?
It ain't me.
This week, I had to endure another self-righteous speech from an election official claiming that I was discouraging people from voting because I was calling the integrity of our elections into question.
I replied that I've been encouraging people to vote in larger numbers to overcome the fraud, and have been working to restore faith in our elections by exposing the fraud that everyone knows is there.
If election officials want to restore trust in their election systems, all they have to do is to let us examine them more closely.
But they won't.
So, WHO is perpetuating the lack of transparency that allows fraud to flourish and results in less public confidence in our elections?
It ain't me.
👍184🥰24👏23❤5🔥2😢1