π Hungarian GP - Race | Race Pace Analysis
π§ NOR remains quickest even after correcting for his additional tyre set, yet π¦ VER was just 1 tenth behind, π© ANT 0.15s behind!
π₯ Ferrari was just 4th best on the track they should have dominated (also due to traffic).
π© Aston's updates really worked: 8th fastest team in the race, in front of Haas, Williams, and unreliable Cadillac!
π§ NOR remains quickest even after correcting for his additional tyre set, yet π¦ VER was just 1 tenth behind, π© ANT 0.15s behind!
π₯ Ferrari was just 4th best on the track they should have dominated (also due to traffic).
π© Aston's updates really worked: 8th fastest team in the race, in front of Haas, Williams, and unreliable Cadillac!
β€9π₯6π2
βοΈ Engine Development Under the Previous and New Regulations
3 years of F1 development under engine freeze are still worth
2.280 s/lap: that's the average 2022β2025 improvement!
Best development: Williams (-3.315s).
Worst: Ferrari (-1.464s), best car at the start of '22, only 4th best by '25.
Williams was 5.635s quicker in Australia 2025 than in 2022!
Ferrari was SLOWER (+0.099s) in Baku 2025 compared to 2022...
2026 cars are just 0.208s slower than in 2022: they will soon match the 2025 ones through combined chassis and PU development. π
The increased fuel flow going forward will help too!
[Data: Dry quali with identical track layouts, by @mecanico_al_detalle]
Via @JMP_software
3 years of F1 development under engine freeze are still worth
2.280 s/lap: that's the average 2022β2025 improvement!
Best development: Williams (-3.315s).
Worst: Ferrari (-1.464s), best car at the start of '22, only 4th best by '25.
Williams was 5.635s quicker in Australia 2025 than in 2022!
Ferrari was SLOWER (+0.099s) in Baku 2025 compared to 2022...
2026 cars are just 0.208s slower than in 2022: they will soon match the 2025 ones through combined chassis and PU development. π
The increased fuel flow going forward will help too!
[Data: Dry quali with identical track layouts, by @mecanico_al_detalle]
Via @JMP_software
β€10π₯°1
Create YOUR dream F1 ruleset!
β’ Engine: displacement and cylinders, hybrid or not, turbocharged vs naturally aspirated.
β’ Chassis: active vs passive aero, ground effect vs flat floors.
β’ Tyres: single manufacturer vs tyre war.
β’ Refuelling: yes or no?
β’ Overtake aids: yes or no?
Comment!
β’ Engine: displacement and cylinders, hybrid or not, turbocharged vs naturally aspirated.
β’ Chassis: active vs passive aero, ground effect vs flat floors.
β’ Tyres: single manufacturer vs tyre war.
β’ Refuelling: yes or no?
β’ Overtake aids: yes or no?
Comment!
β€9π€6
π SUMMER BREAK GAME
Can you GUESS the F1 track from telemetry alone? π
Note: Not all tracks are currently on the F1 calendar!
Comment with your guess, but don't look at what others answered.
Can you GUESS the F1 track from telemetry alone? π
Note: Not all tracks are currently on the F1 calendar!
Comment with your guess, but don't look at what others answered.
π Dutch GP - Sprint Qualifying | Qualifying Analysis
Both π§NOR and π₯LEC were ~0.1s ahead of RUS out of the last corner, before π©RUS clawed it all back with full deployment (+30 km/h in a few metres, vs LEC's 14 km/h!)
NOR and LEC were fastest through the fastest corner; a weaker PU held LEC back
π¦VER's RBR couldn't match the pace of the others
Both π§ NOR and π₯ LEC were ~0.1s ahead of RUS out of the last corner, before π© RUS clawed it all back with full deployment (+30 km/h in a few metres, vs LEC's 14 km/h)!
NOR and LEC were fastest through the fastest corner; a weaker PU held LEC back.
π¦ VER's RBR couldn't match the pace of the others.
What's YOUR Sprint prediction? π
Both π§NOR and π₯LEC were ~0.1s ahead of RUS out of the last corner, before π©RUS clawed it all back with full deployment (+30 km/h in a few metres, vs LEC's 14 km/h!)
NOR and LEC were fastest through the fastest corner; a weaker PU held LEC back
π¦VER's RBR couldn't match the pace of the others
Both π§ NOR and π₯ LEC were ~0.1s ahead of RUS out of the last corner, before π© RUS clawed it all back with full deployment (+30 km/h in a few metres, vs LEC's 14 km/h)!
NOR and LEC were fastest through the fastest corner; a weaker PU held LEC back.
π¦ VER's RBR couldn't match the pace of the others.
What's YOUR Sprint prediction? π
β€5π4
Formula Data Analysis
π Dutch GP - Sprint Qualifying | Qualifying Analysis Both π§NOR and π₯LEC were ~0.1s ahead of RUS out of the last corner, before π©RUS clawed it all back with full deployment (+30 km/h in a few metres, vs LEC's 14 km/h!) NOR and LEC were fastest through theβ¦
This is what happened out of T14...
π7β€2
π Dutch GP - Sprint | Sprint Pace
Not only was LEC quickest (marginally), but he had better degradation on the Softs than Mercedes and McL had on the Mediums!
HAM and the two Red Bulls had better deg than Merc/McL.
GAS and BOR were best of the rest.
Aston was close to Haas, and ahead of Williams and Cadillac!
Not only was LEC quickest (marginally), but he had better degradation on the Softs than Mercedes and McL had on the Mediums!
HAM and the two Red Bulls had better deg than Merc/McL.
GAS and BOR were best of the rest.
Aston was close to Haas, and ahead of Williams and Cadillac!
π7β€3
π Dutch GP - Race | Race Pace
ANT used one additional set (4) compared to NOR (3), yet he was no quicker: thatβs why he won comfortably!
LEC was as quick as ANT, using as many sets (4): Ferrari threw away a great result by botching quali for both Sprint and Race!
ALOβs good pace won him 2 points: he used just TWO sets, yet his laptimes were good! Promising! π
ANT used one additional set (4) compared to NOR (3), yet he was no quicker: thatβs why he won comfortably!
LEC was as quick as ANT, using as many sets (4): Ferrari threw away a great result by botching quali for both Sprint and Race!
ALOβs good pace won him 2 points: he used just TWO sets, yet his laptimes were good! Promising! π
π₯5β€4β€βπ₯3