Good news: my in-depth 'Sprint and Quali Preview' article is free for everyone for this GP! ๐
~ 10 analyses and many pages of content are waiting for you: enjoy! ๐คฉ
๐
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/brazil-gp-sprint-quali-race-preview-3175433
~ 10 analyses and many pages of content are waiting for you: enjoy! ๐คฉ
๐
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/brazil-gp-sprint-quali-race-preview-3175433
๐7
Formula Data Analysis
๐กMAIN CHANGES (vs 2023) #BrazilianGP More performance: ~Softer compounds (C2-C4โก๏ธC3-C5) Less performance: ~0.25deg less camber (Front: 3.25โก๏ธ3deg; Rear: 2โก๏ธ1.75deg) ~1psi (0.07bar) higher minimum pressure (Front: 23โก๏ธ24psi, Rear: 21โก๏ธ22psi) The medium-โฆ
Sรฃo Paulo Rear Wings:
๐กMcLaren has a new wing:
- the lower plane is the most shallow of any teamโก๏ธlow drag;
- the upper plane is one of the most loadedโก๏ธhigh downforce.
Likely target: maximum DRS effectiveness! ๐ฏ
Higher load: Aston/Alpine
Medium load: McL/RBR/Merc/Ferrari
Lower load: Williams/RacingB
๐ธ: @AlbertFabrega
๐กMcLaren has a new wing:
- the lower plane is the most shallow of any teamโก๏ธlow drag;
- the upper plane is one of the most loadedโก๏ธhigh downforce.
Likely target: maximum DRS effectiveness! ๐ฏ
Higher load: Aston/Alpine
Medium load: McL/RBR/Merc/Ferrari
Lower load: Williams/RacingB
๐ธ: @AlbertFabrega
โค5๐4
๐SPRINT QUALIFYING DATA
๐ McLaren's new wing finally reduced their drag - but their downforce was still excellent!
๐ด Leclerc's exit from T12 was excellent, but they now have a top speed deficit (-3km/h) vs McL
๐ต Verstappen: excellent braking;
โช๏ธ Bearman: highest top speed
1) BEST SECTOR TIMES:
McL dominated Sectors 1 (where Ferrari struggled) and 2 (Excellent downforce with the new wing)!
LEC and BEA quicker than PIA in S3 (where VER struggled).
The quickest Aston lost 1.17s to a Haas in Sector 2 alone!
2) TOP SPEEDS:
Haas on top: 333km/h
McL, RBR: 331
Ferrari, Mercedes: 328
3) MINISECTORS (PIA vs VER vs LEC):
PIA dominated the lap up to T4, but VER and LEC were quicker after that.
VER's braking was excellent.
Game on for the Sprint! ๐คฉ
๐ McLaren's new wing finally reduced their drag - but their downforce was still excellent!
๐ด Leclerc's exit from T12 was excellent, but they now have a top speed deficit (-3km/h) vs McL
๐ต Verstappen: excellent braking;
โช๏ธ Bearman: highest top speed
1) BEST SECTOR TIMES:
McL dominated Sectors 1 (where Ferrari struggled) and 2 (Excellent downforce with the new wing)!
LEC and BEA quicker than PIA in S3 (where VER struggled).
The quickest Aston lost 1.17s to a Haas in Sector 2 alone!
2) TOP SPEEDS:
Haas on top: 333km/h
McL, RBR: 331
Ferrari, Mercedes: 328
3) MINISECTORS (PIA vs VER vs LEC):
PIA dominated the lap up to T4, but VER and LEC were quicker after that.
VER's braking was excellent.
Game on for the Sprint! ๐คฉ
โค11๐3
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
๐Use this link๐
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
๐Use this link๐
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL ๐ฌ
How Lando Norris lost to GeorgeRussell at the start?๐
1) Too much throttle at ~50km/h
2) Rear tyres spun (rpm increased quickly)
3) The wheelspin reduced their gripโก๏ธAcceleration got worse
4) To compensate, he could not go full-throttle
5) Less power โก๏ธ Less acceleration
Notice that the acceleration (the slope of the โSpeedโ graph) increases over time: the faster the car is going, the more downforce it produces, the more grip it has, and the more quickly it can gain speed!
1) Too much throttle at ~50km/h
2) Rear tyres spun (rpm increased quickly)
3) The wheelspin reduced their gripโก๏ธAcceleration got worse
4) To compensate, he could not go full-throttle
5) Less power โก๏ธ Less acceleration
Notice that the acceleration (the slope of the โSpeedโ graph) increases over time: the faster the car is going, the more downforce it produces, the more grip it has, and the more quickly it can gain speed!
๐21โค6
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
๐
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Verstappen brilliantly won after starting P17, yet his top speed was far from stellar: only 8th fastest๐ก
He probably ran a more loaded wing than PER.
Ferrari and Mercedes were quickest in the speed trap (on average), particularly SAI and HAM.
Sauber's drag was off the charts!
Made via @JMP_software
He probably ran a more loaded wing than PER.
Ferrari and Mercedes were quickest in the speed trap (on average), particularly SAI and HAM.
Sauber's drag was off the charts!
Made via @JMP_software
๐6๐ฅ4
In the dry (SQ3), RedBull was quickest at Turn 6 (232km/h) by a good margin! (+8km/h vs 2nd best - Ferrari)โก๏ธStill unmatched high-speed downforce.
McL was quickest in the rain (158km/h); RBR slowest! (152km/h, -80km/h vs in the dry).
The laps are from the same session (Q2, before the red flag)โก๏ธsame track conditions.
The red flag timing hurt VER, yet the car underperformed in qualifying.
(Race-focused setup? Low tyre temp?)
Who will win in Las Vegas? ๐
McL was quickest in the rain (158km/h); RBR slowest! (152km/h, -80km/h vs in the dry).
The laps are from the same session (Q2, before the red flag)โก๏ธsame track conditions.
The red flag timing hurt VER, yet the car underperformed in qualifying.
(Race-focused setup? Low tyre temp?)
Who will win in Las Vegas? ๐
๐2โ1
A very cool comparison of the size of many famous racetracks: Las Vegas is HUGE! ๐ฎ
The main straight is 500m longer than Monza's... including the 'Parabolica' corner!
(Taken from Reddit, 4x upscaled by me: https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comments/tt95ci/size_of_the_las_vegas_gp_compared_at_scale_to/)
The main straight is 500m longer than Monza's... including the 'Parabolica' corner!
(Taken from Reddit, 4x upscaled by me: https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comments/tt95ci/size_of_the_las_vegas_gp_compared_at_scale_to/)
๐ฅ11๐3โค2
Iโve spent the whole season analysing the telemetries of each F1 session๐
I have a clear idea of the strengths and weaknesses of each car: here is my summary! What's your opinion? ๐
Read the thread for a more detailed discussion, and check my profile for daily F1 analyses!๐
I have a clear idea of the strengths and weaknesses of each car: here is my summary! What's your opinion? ๐
Read the thread for a more detailed discussion, and check my profile for daily F1 analyses!๐
๐ฅ15๐4๐3
Formula Data Analysis
Iโve spent the whole season analysing the telemetries of each F1 session๐ I have a clear idea of the strengths and weaknesses of each car: here is my summary! What's your opinion? ๐ Read the thread for a more detailed discussion, and check my profile forโฆ
MCL38: an extremely grippy and versatile car, with a wide setup window (enabling it to be competitive everywhere... but dominant only in the absence of very long straights).
Medium-speed corners (like in Zandvoort) suit the car best, but slower and faster corners pose no problem.
Medium-speed corners (like in Zandvoort) suit the car best, but slower and faster corners pose no problem.
๐ฅ14โค1๐1
Formula Data Analysis
Iโve spent the whole season analysing the telemetries of each F1 session๐ I have a clear idea of the strengths and weaknesses of each car: here is my summary! What's your opinion? ๐ Read the thread for a more detailed discussion, and check my profile forโฆ
SF-24: Its low drag and excellent traction and braking properties make it very competitive in fast and stop-and-go tracks.
Tyre wear has been very solid (The best area of improvement compared to last year).
Fast corners remain a weakness even after they fixed the bouncing.
Tyre wear has been very solid (The best area of improvement compared to last year).
Fast corners remain a weakness even after they fixed the bouncing.
๐ฅ17๐1
Formula Data Analysis
Iโve spent the whole season analysing the telemetries of each F1 session๐ I have a clear idea of the strengths and weaknesses of each car: here is my summary! What's your opinion? ๐ Read the thread for a more detailed discussion, and check my profile forโฆ
RB20: Still the best performance in high-speed corners, despite the troublesome development.
Excellent aero efficiency (High downforce, moderate drag).
Faces problems in traction, braking, and in the slow corners.
Tyre wear has been inferior to McL and Ferrari on average.
Excellent aero efficiency (High downforce, moderate drag).
Faces problems in traction, braking, and in the slow corners.
Tyre wear has been inferior to McL and Ferrari on average.
๐ฅ12๐4
Formula Data Analysis
Iโve spent the whole season analysing the telemetries of each F1 session๐ I have a clear idea of the strengths and weaknesses of each car: here is my summary! What's your opinion? ๐ Read the thread for a more detailed discussion, and check my profile forโฆ
That's it: I hope you enjoyed the breakdown!
Do you agree with my conclusions? Is there anything you would change or mention?
Don't forget to follow @FDataAnalysis (if you don't do yet) to understand F1 better! ๐ก
Do you agree with my conclusions? Is there anything you would change or mention?
Don't forget to follow @FDataAnalysis (if you don't do yet) to understand F1 better! ๐ก
๐11
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
๐Use this link๐
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
๐Use this link๐
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL ๐ฌ
๐ McLaren's chances of winning the #F1 Constructor's Championship (last one was in 1998! with Hakkinen and Coulthard!) surged from 74% to 81.5% after Brazil: lead to Ferrari 29โก๏ธ36pts, with one less race to go.
๐ดFerrari still has a 17% chance (1 in 6)
๐ตRBR only has a 1.5% chance (1 in 67!)
Chances before the first race:
๐ตRBR 72.4%
๐ดFerrari 11.1%
โซ๏ธMercedes 8.0%
๐ McL 4.9% (!)
Data from @oddschecker
Made via @JMP_software
๐ดFerrari still has a 17% chance (1 in 6)
๐ตRBR only has a 1.5% chance (1 in 67!)
Chances before the first race:
๐ตRBR 72.4%
๐ดFerrari 11.1%
โซ๏ธMercedes 8.0%
๐ McL 4.9% (!)
Data from @oddschecker
Made via @JMP_software
โค11๐2