Back in Austin, Russell was quickest in the last stint!👀
This time, YOU will do the analysis, following my tutorial!🤩
1)Download JMP: https://www.jmp.com/en_us/download-jmp-free-trial.html?utm_source=x&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=fdataanalysis_en_post&utm_audience=f1race-interest&utm_content=trial
2)Download the data: https://bit.ly/austinData
3)Follow my tutorial, and enjoy! 👇
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT3m9ureVcE
#YesJMPCan
This time, YOU will do the analysis, following my tutorial!🤩
1)Download JMP: https://www.jmp.com/en_us/download-jmp-free-trial.html?utm_source=x&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=fdataanalysis_en_post&utm_audience=f1race-interest&utm_content=trial
2)Download the data: https://bit.ly/austinData
3)Follow my tutorial, and enjoy! 👇
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT3m9ureVcE
#YesJMPCan
Jmp
Download JMP Trial
Download your free trial of JMP software. See for yourself why JMP is the data analysis tool of choice for hundreds of thousands of data explorers worldwide.
❤3🔥2👍1👏1
💡MAIN CHANGES (vs 2023) #BrazilianGP
More performance:
~Softer compounds (C2-C4➡️C3-C5)
Less performance:
~0.25deg less camber (Front: 3.25➡️3deg; Rear: 2➡️1.75deg)
~1psi (0.07bar) higher minimum pressure (Front: 23➡️24psi, Rear: 21➡️22psi)
The medium- and high-speed corners should suit @McLarenF1
What’s YOUR prediction? 🤔
More performance:
~Softer compounds (C2-C4➡️C3-C5)
Less performance:
~0.25deg less camber (Front: 3.25➡️3deg; Rear: 2➡️1.75deg)
~1psi (0.07bar) higher minimum pressure (Front: 23➡️24psi, Rear: 21➡️22psi)
The medium- and high-speed corners should suit @McLarenF1
What’s YOUR prediction? 🤔
👍8❤2
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Good news: my in-depth 'Sprint and Quali Preview' article is free for everyone for this GP! 😏
~ 10 analyses and many pages of content are waiting for you: enjoy! 🤩
👇
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/brazil-gp-sprint-quali-race-preview-3175433
~ 10 analyses and many pages of content are waiting for you: enjoy! 🤩
👇
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/brazil-gp-sprint-quali-race-preview-3175433
👍7
Formula Data Analysis
💡MAIN CHANGES (vs 2023) #BrazilianGP More performance: ~Softer compounds (C2-C4➡️C3-C5) Less performance: ~0.25deg less camber (Front: 3.25➡️3deg; Rear: 2➡️1.75deg) ~1psi (0.07bar) higher minimum pressure (Front: 23➡️24psi, Rear: 21➡️22psi) The medium-…
São Paulo Rear Wings:
💡McLaren has a new wing:
- the lower plane is the most shallow of any team➡️low drag;
- the upper plane is one of the most loaded➡️high downforce.
Likely target: maximum DRS effectiveness! 🎯
Higher load: Aston/Alpine
Medium load: McL/RBR/Merc/Ferrari
Lower load: Williams/RacingB
📸: @AlbertFabrega
💡McLaren has a new wing:
- the lower plane is the most shallow of any team➡️low drag;
- the upper plane is one of the most loaded➡️high downforce.
Likely target: maximum DRS effectiveness! 🎯
Higher load: Aston/Alpine
Medium load: McL/RBR/Merc/Ferrari
Lower load: Williams/RacingB
📸: @AlbertFabrega
❤5👍4
📊SPRINT QUALIFYING DATA
🟠 McLaren's new wing finally reduced their drag - but their downforce was still excellent!
🔴 Leclerc's exit from T12 was excellent, but they now have a top speed deficit (-3km/h) vs McL
🔵 Verstappen: excellent braking;
⚪️ Bearman: highest top speed
1) BEST SECTOR TIMES:
McL dominated Sectors 1 (where Ferrari struggled) and 2 (Excellent downforce with the new wing)!
LEC and BEA quicker than PIA in S3 (where VER struggled).
The quickest Aston lost 1.17s to a Haas in Sector 2 alone!
2) TOP SPEEDS:
Haas on top: 333km/h
McL, RBR: 331
Ferrari, Mercedes: 328
3) MINISECTORS (PIA vs VER vs LEC):
PIA dominated the lap up to T4, but VER and LEC were quicker after that.
VER's braking was excellent.
Game on for the Sprint! 🤩
🟠 McLaren's new wing finally reduced their drag - but their downforce was still excellent!
🔴 Leclerc's exit from T12 was excellent, but they now have a top speed deficit (-3km/h) vs McL
🔵 Verstappen: excellent braking;
⚪️ Bearman: highest top speed
1) BEST SECTOR TIMES:
McL dominated Sectors 1 (where Ferrari struggled) and 2 (Excellent downforce with the new wing)!
LEC and BEA quicker than PIA in S3 (where VER struggled).
The quickest Aston lost 1.17s to a Haas in Sector 2 alone!
2) TOP SPEEDS:
Haas on top: 333km/h
McL, RBR: 331
Ferrari, Mercedes: 328
3) MINISECTORS (PIA vs VER vs LEC):
PIA dominated the lap up to T4, but VER and LEC were quicker after that.
VER's braking was excellent.
Game on for the Sprint! 🤩
❤11👍3
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
👇Use this link👇
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
👇Use this link👇
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL 💬
How Lando Norris lost to GeorgeRussell at the start?👇
1) Too much throttle at ~50km/h
2) Rear tyres spun (rpm increased quickly)
3) The wheelspin reduced their grip➡️Acceleration got worse
4) To compensate, he could not go full-throttle
5) Less power ➡️ Less acceleration
Notice that the acceleration (the slope of the ‘Speed’ graph) increases over time: the faster the car is going, the more downforce it produces, the more grip it has, and the more quickly it can gain speed!
1) Too much throttle at ~50km/h
2) Rear tyres spun (rpm increased quickly)
3) The wheelspin reduced their grip➡️Acceleration got worse
4) To compensate, he could not go full-throttle
5) Less power ➡️ Less acceleration
Notice that the acceleration (the slope of the ‘Speed’ graph) increases over time: the faster the car is going, the more downforce it produces, the more grip it has, and the more quickly it can gain speed!
👍21❤6
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Verstappen brilliantly won after starting P17, yet his top speed was far from stellar: only 8th fastest💡
He probably ran a more loaded wing than PER.
Ferrari and Mercedes were quickest in the speed trap (on average), particularly SAI and HAM.
Sauber's drag was off the charts!
Made via @JMP_software
He probably ran a more loaded wing than PER.
Ferrari and Mercedes were quickest in the speed trap (on average), particularly SAI and HAM.
Sauber's drag was off the charts!
Made via @JMP_software
👍6🔥4
In the dry (SQ3), RedBull was quickest at Turn 6 (232km/h) by a good margin! (+8km/h vs 2nd best - Ferrari)➡️Still unmatched high-speed downforce.
McL was quickest in the rain (158km/h); RBR slowest! (152km/h, -80km/h vs in the dry).
The laps are from the same session (Q2, before the red flag)➡️same track conditions.
The red flag timing hurt VER, yet the car underperformed in qualifying.
(Race-focused setup? Low tyre temp?)
Who will win in Las Vegas? 👀
McL was quickest in the rain (158km/h); RBR slowest! (152km/h, -80km/h vs in the dry).
The laps are from the same session (Q2, before the red flag)➡️same track conditions.
The red flag timing hurt VER, yet the car underperformed in qualifying.
(Race-focused setup? Low tyre temp?)
Who will win in Las Vegas? 👀
👍2✍1
A very cool comparison of the size of many famous racetracks: Las Vegas is HUGE! 😮
The main straight is 500m longer than Monza's... including the 'Parabolica' corner!
(Taken from Reddit, 4x upscaled by me: https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comments/tt95ci/size_of_the_las_vegas_gp_compared_at_scale_to/)
The main straight is 500m longer than Monza's... including the 'Parabolica' corner!
(Taken from Reddit, 4x upscaled by me: https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comments/tt95ci/size_of_the_las_vegas_gp_compared_at_scale_to/)
🔥11👍3❤2
Formula Data Analysis
I’ve spent the whole season analysing the telemetries of each F1 session📊 I have a clear idea of the strengths and weaknesses of each car: here is my summary! What's your opinion? 👀 Read the thread for a more detailed discussion, and check my profile for…
MCL38: an extremely grippy and versatile car, with a wide setup window (enabling it to be competitive everywhere... but dominant only in the absence of very long straights).
Medium-speed corners (like in Zandvoort) suit the car best, but slower and faster corners pose no problem.
Medium-speed corners (like in Zandvoort) suit the car best, but slower and faster corners pose no problem.
🔥14❤1👍1
Formula Data Analysis
I’ve spent the whole season analysing the telemetries of each F1 session📊 I have a clear idea of the strengths and weaknesses of each car: here is my summary! What's your opinion? 👀 Read the thread for a more detailed discussion, and check my profile for…
SF-24: Its low drag and excellent traction and braking properties make it very competitive in fast and stop-and-go tracks.
Tyre wear has been very solid (The best area of improvement compared to last year).
Fast corners remain a weakness even after they fixed the bouncing.
Tyre wear has been very solid (The best area of improvement compared to last year).
Fast corners remain a weakness even after they fixed the bouncing.
🔥17👍1
Formula Data Analysis
I’ve spent the whole season analysing the telemetries of each F1 session📊 I have a clear idea of the strengths and weaknesses of each car: here is my summary! What's your opinion? 👀 Read the thread for a more detailed discussion, and check my profile for…
RB20: Still the best performance in high-speed corners, despite the troublesome development.
Excellent aero efficiency (High downforce, moderate drag).
Faces problems in traction, braking, and in the slow corners.
Tyre wear has been inferior to McL and Ferrari on average.
Excellent aero efficiency (High downforce, moderate drag).
Faces problems in traction, braking, and in the slow corners.
Tyre wear has been inferior to McL and Ferrari on average.
🔥12👍4