Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
Mexico City GP offers a unique challenge:
The ~20% lower air density (due to altitude) reduces downforce and drag massively.
β¬οΈ
- High drag not as critical (will help McL)
- High downforce even more crucial!
Often highest top speeds of the season despite the high-downforce wings. π‘
Cars will be sliding significantly due to the decreased downforce and the slippery tarmac.
πΈ @pirellisport
The ~20% lower air density (due to altitude) reduces downforce and drag massively.
β¬οΈ
- High drag not as critical (will help McL)
- High downforce even more crucial!
Often highest top speeds of the season despite the high-downforce wings. π‘
Cars will be sliding significantly due to the decreased downforce and the slippery tarmac.
πΈ @pirellisport
π13
In the race, Charles Leclerc was on average over THREE SECONDS PER LAP quicker than last year... using the same strategy (Mediumβ‘οΈHard)! π€―
Track conditions alone cannot explain this impressive improvement... and now Ferrari is given over 1 in 4 chances of getting the WCC. π
The team also introduced a more flexible front wing, providing at least two benefits:
-Reduced drag at high speed;
-Speed-dependent aero balance (Low speed: more front downforce β‘οΈ better agility and overall grip; High speed: less front downforce β‘οΈ better stability, aiding driver confidence).
Race pace Improvement by other drivers:
NOR: 2.44s/lap (one less stop than in β23)
VER: 2.04 s/lap (one less stop than in β23)
SAI: 2.55s/lap (one less stop than in β23)
Even SAI, despite being quicker than LEC in β23 (due to the additional stop) and slower in β24, gained over half a second vs VER.
Track conditions alone cannot explain this impressive improvement... and now Ferrari is given over 1 in 4 chances of getting the WCC. π
The team also introduced a more flexible front wing, providing at least two benefits:
-Reduced drag at high speed;
-Speed-dependent aero balance (Low speed: more front downforce β‘οΈ better agility and overall grip; High speed: less front downforce β‘οΈ better stability, aiding driver confidence).
Race pace Improvement by other drivers:
NOR: 2.44s/lap (one less stop than in β23)
VER: 2.04 s/lap (one less stop than in β23)
SAI: 2.55s/lap (one less stop than in β23)
Even SAI, despite being quicker than LEC in β23 (due to the additional stop) and slower in β24, gained over half a second vs VER.
π₯15β€2π1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Mexico's lower air density is forcing Ferrari to add cooling louvres to its car - even compared to another high-altitude track like Austria. π₯
Engine cooling is improved at the expense of more drag and less rear downforce. π
Ferrari struggled with temperatures in '23 when they opted for an asymmetrical cooling arrangement. π¨
F1 teams with lower cooling requirements and turbocompressors better suited to the less dense air will lose less performance in Mexico!
Engine cooling is improved at the expense of more drag and less rear downforce. π
Ferrari struggled with temperatures in '23 when they opted for an asymmetrical cooling arrangement. π¨
F1 teams with lower cooling requirements and turbocompressors better suited to the less dense air will lose less performance in Mexico!
β€12π3π₯2
Austin GP damaged Lando Norris's championship hopes while reviving Ferrariβs chances. π₯
WDC probability (Before vs After Austin)
π₯π΅VER: 58.89% β‘οΈ 80.13% (+21.24%π)
π₯π NOR: 38.37% β‘οΈ 17.60% (-20.77%π)
WCC
π₯π McL: 86.86% β‘οΈ 88.50% (+1.64%π)
π₯π΄Ferrari: 6.47% β‘οΈ 14.29% (+7.82%π)
π₯π΅RBR: 9.20% β‘οΈ 5.88% (-3.32%π)
The probability swing after Mexico will be wild (as fewer and fewer points are available).
Data by : @oddschecker
You might have noticed that the sum of the βpost Austinβ WCC percentages is over 100%. Thatβs because I forgot to remove the bookmakerβs edge, my bad!
The pecking order is not affected by that, obviously.
WDC probability (Before vs After Austin)
π₯π΅VER: 58.89% β‘οΈ 80.13% (+21.24%π)
π₯π NOR: 38.37% β‘οΈ 17.60% (-20.77%π)
WCC
π₯π McL: 86.86% β‘οΈ 88.50% (+1.64%π)
π₯π΄Ferrari: 6.47% β‘οΈ 14.29% (+7.82%π)
π₯π΅RBR: 9.20% β‘οΈ 5.88% (-3.32%π)
The probability swing after Mexico will be wild (as fewer and fewer points are available).
Data by : @oddschecker
You might have noticed that the sum of the βpost Austinβ WCC percentages is over 100%. Thatβs because I forgot to remove the bookmakerβs edge, my bad!
The pecking order is not affected by that, obviously.
β€11π6π₯3
FP2 - F1 DATA HIGHLIGHTS
π΄SAI was 0.178s quicker than π PIA, but McL's engine mode was clearly lower! π
1) TOP SPEEDS:
Ferrari: 352km/h... and it's still FP2!
+5km/h vs RedBull, +9km/h vs McL
2) BEST SECTORS:
In fact, SAI/LEC were quickest in S1 (two long straights)
McL dominated the slow S3
3) Sainz vs Piastri:
SAI's higher engine power is clear as day: he gained significantly through all the straights.
Once McL turns up the power, they should be on par or quicker than Ferrari. π₯
π΄SAI was 0.178s quicker than π PIA, but McL's engine mode was clearly lower! π
1) TOP SPEEDS:
Ferrari: 352km/h... and it's still FP2!
+5km/h vs RedBull, +9km/h vs McL
2) BEST SECTORS:
In fact, SAI/LEC were quickest in S1 (two long straights)
McL dominated the slow S3
3) Sainz vs Piastri:
SAI's higher engine power is clear as day: he gained significantly through all the straights.
Once McL turns up the power, they should be on par or quicker than Ferrari. π₯
π9β€2
π RACE PACE #MexicoGP
SAI just 0.05s/lap quicker than NOR! (Who suffered the initial gap)
VER was no quicker than HAM: what a difference vs season-start!
MAG as quick as (traffic-hit) PIA
Change vs '23 (s/lap)
McL: -2.33π
Ferrari: -2.20π
Merc: -1.45π
RBR: -1.03π¨
It's your turn: who will win the two championships?π€
SAI just 0.05s/lap quicker than NOR! (Who suffered the initial gap)
VER was no quicker than HAM: what a difference vs season-start!
MAG as quick as (traffic-hit) PIA
Change vs '23 (s/lap)
McL: -2.33π
Ferrari: -2.20π
Merc: -1.45π
RBR: -1.03π¨
It's your turn: who will win the two championships?π€
β€19π₯2π1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
Piastri reached 361km/h in the #MexicoGP ! He had frequent slipstreams and DRS opportunities during his recovery drive
Mercedesβ top speed was very high, too: 359km/h for HAM and RUS
Ferrari had the lowest one: SAI used the DRS on the main straight just once, overtaking VER!
Mercedesβ top speed was very high, too: 359km/h for HAM and RUS
Ferrari had the lowest one: SAI used the DRS on the main straight just once, overtaking VER!
β€15π3
Back in Austin, Russell was quickest in the last stint!π
This time, YOU will do the analysis, following my tutorial!π€©
1)Download JMP: https://www.jmp.com/en_us/download-jmp-free-trial.html?utm_source=x&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=fdataanalysis_en_post&utm_audience=f1race-interest&utm_content=trial
2)Download the data: https://bit.ly/austinData
3)Follow my tutorial, and enjoy! π
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT3m9ureVcE
#YesJMPCan
This time, YOU will do the analysis, following my tutorial!π€©
1)Download JMP: https://www.jmp.com/en_us/download-jmp-free-trial.html?utm_source=x&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=fdataanalysis_en_post&utm_audience=f1race-interest&utm_content=trial
2)Download the data: https://bit.ly/austinData
3)Follow my tutorial, and enjoy! π
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT3m9ureVcE
#YesJMPCan
Jmp
Download JMP Trial
Download your free trial of JMP software. See for yourself why JMP is the data analysis tool of choice for hundreds of thousands of data explorers worldwide.
β€3π₯2π1π1
π‘MAIN CHANGES (vs 2023) #BrazilianGP
More performance:
~Softer compounds (C2-C4β‘οΈC3-C5)
Less performance:
~0.25deg less camber (Front: 3.25β‘οΈ3deg; Rear: 2β‘οΈ1.75deg)
~1psi (0.07bar) higher minimum pressure (Front: 23β‘οΈ24psi, Rear: 21β‘οΈ22psi)
The medium- and high-speed corners should suit @McLarenF1
Whatβs YOUR prediction? π€
More performance:
~Softer compounds (C2-C4β‘οΈC3-C5)
Less performance:
~0.25deg less camber (Front: 3.25β‘οΈ3deg; Rear: 2β‘οΈ1.75deg)
~1psi (0.07bar) higher minimum pressure (Front: 23β‘οΈ24psi, Rear: 21β‘οΈ22psi)
The medium- and high-speed corners should suit @McLarenF1
Whatβs YOUR prediction? π€
π8β€2
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Good news: my in-depth 'Sprint and Quali Preview' article is free for everyone for this GP! π
~ 10 analyses and many pages of content are waiting for you: enjoy! π€©
π
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/brazil-gp-sprint-quali-race-preview-3175433
~ 10 analyses and many pages of content are waiting for you: enjoy! π€©
π
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/brazil-gp-sprint-quali-race-preview-3175433
π7