Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
π1π₯1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
π2π₯1
Norris got P2 in China already, yet the upgrades further improved
@McLarenF1
's performance!π‘
Top speed, fast/slower corners, and lap time were all closer to the pole sitterπ
The slow-speed cornering seems to be particularly improved: from a 4km/h gap to a 1km/h edge vs RedBullπ
How much did the upgrades contributed to that? Imola will tell! π
[Drawing by @FraF1techdesign ]
@McLarenF1
's performance!π‘
Top speed, fast/slower corners, and lap time were all closer to the pole sitterπ
The slow-speed cornering seems to be particularly improved: from a 4km/h gap to a 1km/h edge vs RedBullπ
How much did the upgrades contributed to that? Imola will tell! π
[Drawing by @FraF1techdesign ]
β€10π5π2
Formula Data Analysis
RedBull might have lost last year's aero efficiency advantage (downforce/drag) β οΈ Ferrari lacked upgrades, yet it was 6km/h quicker than RedBull in the faster corner, matching their top speed too. Big updates incoming in Imola.π‘ Little drag (and downforce)β¦
Data relative to each car's fastest lap of the weekend (done in Qualifying).
π₯2π1
First photos of the 'SF-24 EVO'! π
The most visible change is the revised sidepod inlet: βUnderbite
β¬οΈ
β Overbite (Like RedBull and McLaren)
Other changes: Floor (largest impact), bodywork, front wing (minor), rear wing, halo winglets.
A very large package indeed!
The most visible change is the revised sidepod inlet: βUnderbite
β¬οΈ
β Overbite (Like RedBull and McLaren)
Other changes: Floor (largest impact), bodywork, front wing (minor), rear wing, halo winglets.
A very large package indeed!
π16β€4π₯1π1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
β€3π1
Ferrari's Imola upgrades must be worth 0.4s/lap to fight RedBull!π‘
Average Gap in 2024:
0.305s/lap in Quali
0.442s/lap in Race
β οΈ A 0.4s/lap gain would be HUGE, yet RedBull will not be standing still in the meantime...
What's your prediction for the remainder of the season?π€
Made via @JMP_software
Average Gap in 2024:
0.305s/lap in Quali
0.442s/lap in Race
β οΈ A 0.4s/lap gain would be HUGE, yet RedBull will not be standing still in the meantime...
What's your prediction for the remainder of the season?π€
Made via @JMP_software
π7π5β€4π₯1
Norris was quicker than VER even BEFORE the latter sustained floor damage!π‘
NOR pushed once in clean air: 0.4s/lap quicker than VE.Rπ
He remained quicker even after VER pitted!π³
After the restart (Lap 32) the match was over, but VER had no edge even before the damage.
The factors that made or might have made Verstappen's pace worse:
- Tyre management (first part of the race);
- Floor damage (second part of the race);
- Sub-optimal setup by RedBull.
Norris' pace advantage for several laps, however, suggests that the updated McL was as quick as RBR.
Made via @JMP_software
NOR pushed once in clean air: 0.4s/lap quicker than VE.Rπ
He remained quicker even after VER pitted!π³
After the restart (Lap 32) the match was over, but VER had no edge even before the damage.
The factors that made or might have made Verstappen's pace worse:
- Tyre management (first part of the race);
- Floor damage (second part of the race);
- Sub-optimal setup by RedBull.
Norris' pace advantage for several laps, however, suggests that the updated McL was as quick as RBR.
Made via @JMP_software
π₯11β€4π1
For telemetry nerds like me, even troubleshooting your Diesel Particulate Filter can be fun!π
Here is the Intake Absolute Pressure: the maximum should be around 255KPa (100 ambient + 155 turbocharging).
And it was! (3 in-gear accelerations shown).
As the problem was solved, the electronics were finally allowing the turbocharger to use the maximum (and correct) turbo pressure.π₯
In case you wanted to try as well: I used a simple WiFi OBD 2 scanner from Amazon, and the βCar Scannerβ iOS free app.
If you have some telemetry acquisition from your car share them! I'm curious.
Here is the Intake Absolute Pressure: the maximum should be around 255KPa (100 ambient + 155 turbocharging).
And it was! (3 in-gear accelerations shown).
As the problem was solved, the electronics were finally allowing the turbocharger to use the maximum (and correct) turbo pressure.π₯
In case you wanted to try as well: I used a simple WiFi OBD 2 scanner from Amazon, and the βCar Scannerβ iOS free app.
If you have some telemetry acquisition from your car share them! I'm curious.
β€6π2π₯2π2
Ferrari was confident about their 2022 cooling layout, retaining it for 2023 (with a mid-season change to the rear).
The team changed approach in '24: front overbite and (smaller) cooling louvres moved upwards.
The SF24 EVO 2 changes it again (Overbite + single cooling outlet).
The cannon exit at the end of the engine cover seems to be larger to compensate the reduced louvres area.
The team changed approach in '24: front overbite and (smaller) cooling louvres moved upwards.
The SF24 EVO 2 changes it again (Overbite + single cooling outlet).
The cannon exit at the end of the engine cover seems to be larger to compensate the reduced louvres area.
π₯23π2
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
Will Ferrariβs in-season updates be successful?π€
They had fluctuating success recently:
β Big gains:
-2019 (Nosecone capeβ‘οΈLess understeer)
-2021 (Improved ERS and efficiency)
-2023 (Improved race pace)
βWent backwards:
-2018 (Correlation issues)
-2022 (Detuning + TD39)
πΈ: @FraF1techdesign
They had fluctuating success recently:
β Big gains:
-2019 (Nosecone capeβ‘οΈLess understeer)
-2021 (Improved ERS and efficiency)
-2023 (Improved race pace)
βWent backwards:
-2018 (Correlation issues)
-2022 (Detuning + TD39)
πΈ: @FraF1techdesign
π15
Ferrari has been using the same rear wing for all the tracks, but the updated SF24 finally introduces a new one!π‘
Notice the much straighter upper plane 'cut'. Surprisingly, the load level hasn't changed much: the SF24 seems to work well around a specific downforce level.π€
πΈ @AlbertFabrega
Notice the much straighter upper plane 'cut'. Surprisingly, the load level hasn't changed much: the SF24 seems to work well around a specific downforce level.π€
πΈ @AlbertFabrega
π8π₯6β€1π₯°1π€1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
Red Bull RB20's diffuser can finally be compared to its predecessor's! π
π£Much less rounded exit; the diffuser itself sports several changes
Upgrades for Imola:
π‘Brake ductsβ
Front wingβ
Floorβ
RedBull's updates are significant: will they work?π€
πΈ AMuS, @xavigazquez
π£Much less rounded exit; the diffuser itself sports several changes
Upgrades for Imola:
π‘Brake ductsβ
Front wingβ
Floorβ
RedBull's updates are significant: will they work?π€
πΈ AMuS, @xavigazquez
π5π€1
RED BULL VS MCLAREN DIFFUSER
The terminal part of Red Bull's diffuser is more complex: notice the additional π‘ribs and the π΄step
McL's diffuser is more minimalistic
A diffuser produces a lot of downforce, and little dragβ‘οΈ extracting its potential is crucial for performance!
πΈ @xavigazquez
The terminal part of Red Bull's diffuser is more complex: notice the additional π‘ribs and the π΄step
McL's diffuser is more minimalistic
A diffuser produces a lot of downforce, and little dragβ‘οΈ extracting its potential is crucial for performance!
πΈ @xavigazquez
π3π₯2β€1
Race pace wins you races, and it's not looking good for the updated Red Bullβ οΈ
PIA did the fastest long run (Average: 1:20.6 on Hards)
NOR was 2nd quickest (1:20.8).
The updated Ferrari was right behind (1:20.9).
Next up, Mercedes (1:21.0).
RBR: 0.6s/lap behind.π€
If both drivers of a team did their long runs on the same compound, their average was considered for that team.
McL was the only top team to test two different compounds in the long runs.
PIA did the fastest long run (Average: 1:20.6 on Hards)
NOR was 2nd quickest (1:20.8).
The updated Ferrari was right behind (1:20.9).
Next up, Mercedes (1:21.0).
RBR: 0.6s/lap behind.π€
If both drivers of a team did their long runs on the same compound, their average was considered for that team.
McL was the only top team to test two different compounds in the long runs.
π₯8π€2π1π€―1
Formula Data Analysis
Race pace wins you races, and it's not looking good for the updated Red Bullβ οΈ PIA did the fastest long run (Average: 1:20.6 on Hards) NOR was 2nd quickest (1:20.8). The updated Ferrari was right behind (1:20.9). Next up, Mercedes (1:21.0). RBR: 0.6s/lapβ¦
To access all the analyses and my in-depth 'Quali and Race preview' article π
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/imole-gp-analyses-repository
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/imole-gp-analyses-repository
π₯1