Miami GP - Sprint Qualifying | Top Speed:
Teams can change the setup again after the Sprint, but who will use that for a rear wing change?π€
-Mercedes might decrease the load (they were very slow on the straights, for a small downforce gain)
-Williams might increase the load: they were 1s off in S1 alone!
Teams can change the setup again after the Sprint, but who will use that for a rear wing change?π€
-Mercedes might decrease the load (they were very slow on the straights, for a small downforce gain)
-Williams might increase the load: they were 1s off in S1 alone!
π4
πTHOUGHTS ON Miami GP SPRINT
π΅VER wins, yet his ex-teammate RIC stole the show: brilliant P4!π
π No laps for NORβ‘οΈNo data to improve the setup for quali/raceβ
β«οΈNo pace nor top speed for Merc: they might reduce the wing loadπ
π΄LEC: P2 with no updatesπ
YOUR take?π€
π΅VER wins, yet his ex-teammate RIC stole the show: brilliant P4!π
π No laps for NORβ‘οΈNo data to improve the setup for quali/raceβ
β«οΈNo pace nor top speed for Merc: they might reduce the wing loadπ
π΄LEC: P2 with no updatesπ
YOUR take?π€
π3π1
Formula Data Analysis
TOP SPEEDS - Miami GP SPRINT Albon reached 361km/h!π Williams ran a very skinny rear wing: in fact, his teammate SAR was 2nd fastest (355km/h). HUL/LEC/VER never used DRS: yet, HUL was 12km/h quicker than VER, explaining HAM's difficulty in overtaking theβ¦
The βTop Speed heatmapβ analysis is one of the many Iβve used in my in-depth βSprint Analysisβ article
Become a page supporter, and access it though this link!π (only real F1-nerds allowed!π€)
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/miamigp-sprint-analysis
Become a page supporter, and access it though this link!π (only real F1-nerds allowed!π€)
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/miamigp-sprint-analysis
Buy Me a Coffee
MiamiGP - Sprint Analysis β Formula Data Analysis
Post by Formula Data Analysis
π2π₯1
McLaren gained 0.8s over last year's quali, while Aston lost over 1s!π‘
Track conditions were better last year: only 3 teams improved their lap times. π
Mercedes was one of them.
Ferrari got no closer to RedBull, yet they qualified better due to others' downfall: P2/P3 Vs P3/P7.π
Track conditions were better last year: only 3 teams improved their lap times. π
Mercedes was one of them.
Ferrari got no closer to RedBull, yet they qualified better due to others' downfall: P2/P3 Vs P3/P7.π
π5β€2π1
Notes on Miami GP:
π Norrisβ excellent drive (and some luck!) won him his first race!π
π΅VER understeered on Hards: constantly lost to NOR and couldnβt gap LEC on fresher tyresβ οΈ
β«οΈHAMβs best β24 raceπ
π£First points for Alpine
Updated McL + Ferrariβs Imola package β‘οΈSPICY championship! π₯
π Norrisβ excellent drive (and some luck!) won him his first race!π
π΅VER understeered on Hards: constantly lost to NOR and couldnβt gap LEC on fresher tyresβ οΈ
β«οΈHAMβs best β24 raceπ
π£First points for Alpine
Updated McL + Ferrariβs Imola package β‘οΈSPICY championship! π₯
π₯11β€9π4
Formula Data Analysis
What made this race so good?π‘ The top 3 teams had the SAME PACE! π₯Ferrari: 1.32.28 π₯McL: 1.32.30 (+0.02s/lap) π₯RBR: 1:32.31 (+0.03s/lap) McL has cooked with the upgrades, and Ferrari will bring theirs in Imola! Lando Norris was quickest despite being inβ¦
This is the teams' pecking order when, instead, only each team's quicker driver is considered:
1) McL (NOR)
2) RBR (VER) +0.07s/lap
3) Ferrari (LEC) +0.11s/lap
4) Merc (HAM) + 0.61s/lap
5) RacingBulls (TSU) +0.93s/lap
1) McL (NOR)
2) RBR (VER) +0.07s/lap
3) Ferrari (LEC) +0.11s/lap
4) Merc (HAM) + 0.61s/lap
5) RacingBulls (TSU) +0.93s/lap
π9π4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πTRACK DOMINANCE - WEEKEND's FASTEST LAPS
The βideal lapβ (laptime obtained by combining the three purple sectors) was 1:27.075, or 0.166s quicker than Verstappenβs pole!β±
Still, 0.234s slower than last year's poleπ
Video-collab with @formulaneonf1: feedbacks are welcomed!π€©
The βideal lapβ (laptime obtained by combining the three purple sectors) was 1:27.075, or 0.166s quicker than Verstappenβs pole!β±
Still, 0.234s slower than last year's poleπ
Video-collab with @formulaneonf1: feedbacks are welcomed!π€©
β€9π2π2
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
π1π₯1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
π2π₯1
Norris got P2 in China already, yet the upgrades further improved
@McLarenF1
's performance!π‘
Top speed, fast/slower corners, and lap time were all closer to the pole sitterπ
The slow-speed cornering seems to be particularly improved: from a 4km/h gap to a 1km/h edge vs RedBullπ
How much did the upgrades contributed to that? Imola will tell! π
[Drawing by @FraF1techdesign ]
@McLarenF1
's performance!π‘
Top speed, fast/slower corners, and lap time were all closer to the pole sitterπ
The slow-speed cornering seems to be particularly improved: from a 4km/h gap to a 1km/h edge vs RedBullπ
How much did the upgrades contributed to that? Imola will tell! π
[Drawing by @FraF1techdesign ]
β€10π5π2
Formula Data Analysis
RedBull might have lost last year's aero efficiency advantage (downforce/drag) β οΈ Ferrari lacked upgrades, yet it was 6km/h quicker than RedBull in the faster corner, matching their top speed too. Big updates incoming in Imola.π‘ Little drag (and downforce)β¦
Data relative to each car's fastest lap of the weekend (done in Qualifying).
π₯2π1
First photos of the 'SF-24 EVO'! π
The most visible change is the revised sidepod inlet: βUnderbite
β¬οΈ
β Overbite (Like RedBull and McLaren)
Other changes: Floor (largest impact), bodywork, front wing (minor), rear wing, halo winglets.
A very large package indeed!
The most visible change is the revised sidepod inlet: βUnderbite
β¬οΈ
β Overbite (Like RedBull and McLaren)
Other changes: Floor (largest impact), bodywork, front wing (minor), rear wing, halo winglets.
A very large package indeed!
π16β€4π₯1π1