REAR WINGS - Miami GP
β«οΈMerc: Medium-high loadπΌ (very deep spoon)β‘οΈThey'll struggle on the straights
π McL: MediumβΆοΈ
π΄Ferrari/π΅RBR: Medium-lowπ½
π£Alpine is testing two specs:
-GAS: Medium-lowπ½
-OCO: Low load!β¬ (Engine deficit?)
Very diverse choices across the grid!
πΈ @AlbertFabrega & @Graftechweb
β«οΈMerc: Medium-high loadπΌ (very deep spoon)β‘οΈThey'll struggle on the straights
π McL: MediumβΆοΈ
π΄Ferrari/π΅RBR: Medium-lowπ½
π£Alpine is testing two specs:
-GAS: Medium-lowπ½
-OCO: Low load!β¬ (Engine deficit?)
Very diverse choices across the grid!
πΈ @AlbertFabrega & @Graftechweb
π€6π2π1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
π₯1
WINGS COMPARISON - Miami GP
π΅RBR as reference
π΄Ferrari:
-slightly more loaded lower plane
-slightly less loaded DRS plane
Similar to RBR, with possibly less effective DRS
π McL: more loaded lower plane
β«οΈMerc: MUCH more loaded lower planeβ‘οΈHighest drag
π΅RBR as reference
π΄Ferrari:
-slightly more loaded lower plane
-slightly less loaded DRS plane
Similar to RBR, with possibly less effective DRS
π McL: more loaded lower plane
β«οΈMerc: MUCH more loaded lower planeβ‘οΈHighest drag
β€9π6π₯1
McLaren's upgrade is massive!π‘
π£RedBul-style extended upper lip
π΄Shorter, wider inlets
π’New cooling louvres
π΅Redesigned sidepodsβ‘οΈmore π‘undercut (that allows air to reach the back)
9 performance updates (0 to 2 for the other teams): can you spot a few more?π€
Norris was already quicker than both Ferrari cars in China, which couldn't heat their Hards properly.
If this upgrade works as intended, I expect them to get closer to RBR and fight more easily with Ferrari in all conditions.
Ferrari will introduce their big update in Imola.
π£RedBul-style extended upper lip
π΄Shorter, wider inlets
π’New cooling louvres
π΅Redesigned sidepodsβ‘οΈmore π‘undercut (that allows air to reach the back)
9 performance updates (0 to 2 for the other teams): can you spot a few more?π€
Norris was already quicker than both Ferrari cars in China, which couldn't heat their Hards properly.
If this upgrade works as intended, I expect them to get closer to RBR and fight more easily with Ferrari in all conditions.
Ferrari will introduce their big update in Imola.
π11β€4
Miami GP - Sprint Qualifying | Top Speed:
Teams can change the setup again after the Sprint, but who will use that for a rear wing change?π€
-Mercedes might decrease the load (they were very slow on the straights, for a small downforce gain)
-Williams might increase the load: they were 1s off in S1 alone!
Teams can change the setup again after the Sprint, but who will use that for a rear wing change?π€
-Mercedes might decrease the load (they were very slow on the straights, for a small downforce gain)
-Williams might increase the load: they were 1s off in S1 alone!
π4
πTHOUGHTS ON Miami GP SPRINT
π΅VER wins, yet his ex-teammate RIC stole the show: brilliant P4!π
π No laps for NORβ‘οΈNo data to improve the setup for quali/raceβ
β«οΈNo pace nor top speed for Merc: they might reduce the wing loadπ
π΄LEC: P2 with no updatesπ
YOUR take?π€
π΅VER wins, yet his ex-teammate RIC stole the show: brilliant P4!π
π No laps for NORβ‘οΈNo data to improve the setup for quali/raceβ
β«οΈNo pace nor top speed for Merc: they might reduce the wing loadπ
π΄LEC: P2 with no updatesπ
YOUR take?π€
π3π1
Formula Data Analysis
TOP SPEEDS - Miami GP SPRINT Albon reached 361km/h!π Williams ran a very skinny rear wing: in fact, his teammate SAR was 2nd fastest (355km/h). HUL/LEC/VER never used DRS: yet, HUL was 12km/h quicker than VER, explaining HAM's difficulty in overtaking theβ¦
The βTop Speed heatmapβ analysis is one of the many Iβve used in my in-depth βSprint Analysisβ article
Become a page supporter, and access it though this link!π (only real F1-nerds allowed!π€)
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/miamigp-sprint-analysis
Become a page supporter, and access it though this link!π (only real F1-nerds allowed!π€)
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/miamigp-sprint-analysis
Buy Me a Coffee
MiamiGP - Sprint Analysis β Formula Data Analysis
Post by Formula Data Analysis
π2π₯1
McLaren gained 0.8s over last year's quali, while Aston lost over 1s!π‘
Track conditions were better last year: only 3 teams improved their lap times. π
Mercedes was one of them.
Ferrari got no closer to RedBull, yet they qualified better due to others' downfall: P2/P3 Vs P3/P7.π
Track conditions were better last year: only 3 teams improved their lap times. π
Mercedes was one of them.
Ferrari got no closer to RedBull, yet they qualified better due to others' downfall: P2/P3 Vs P3/P7.π
π5β€2π1
Notes on Miami GP:
π Norrisβ excellent drive (and some luck!) won him his first race!π
π΅VER understeered on Hards: constantly lost to NOR and couldnβt gap LEC on fresher tyresβ οΈ
β«οΈHAMβs best β24 raceπ
π£First points for Alpine
Updated McL + Ferrariβs Imola package β‘οΈSPICY championship! π₯
π Norrisβ excellent drive (and some luck!) won him his first race!π
π΅VER understeered on Hards: constantly lost to NOR and couldnβt gap LEC on fresher tyresβ οΈ
β«οΈHAMβs best β24 raceπ
π£First points for Alpine
Updated McL + Ferrariβs Imola package β‘οΈSPICY championship! π₯
π₯11β€9π4
Formula Data Analysis
What made this race so good?π‘ The top 3 teams had the SAME PACE! π₯Ferrari: 1.32.28 π₯McL: 1.32.30 (+0.02s/lap) π₯RBR: 1:32.31 (+0.03s/lap) McL has cooked with the upgrades, and Ferrari will bring theirs in Imola! Lando Norris was quickest despite being inβ¦
This is the teams' pecking order when, instead, only each team's quicker driver is considered:
1) McL (NOR)
2) RBR (VER) +0.07s/lap
3) Ferrari (LEC) +0.11s/lap
4) Merc (HAM) + 0.61s/lap
5) RacingBulls (TSU) +0.93s/lap
1) McL (NOR)
2) RBR (VER) +0.07s/lap
3) Ferrari (LEC) +0.11s/lap
4) Merc (HAM) + 0.61s/lap
5) RacingBulls (TSU) +0.93s/lap
π9π4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πTRACK DOMINANCE - WEEKEND's FASTEST LAPS
The βideal lapβ (laptime obtained by combining the three purple sectors) was 1:27.075, or 0.166s quicker than Verstappenβs pole!β±
Still, 0.234s slower than last year's poleπ
Video-collab with @formulaneonf1: feedbacks are welcomed!π€©
The βideal lapβ (laptime obtained by combining the three purple sectors) was 1:27.075, or 0.166s quicker than Verstappenβs pole!β±
Still, 0.234s slower than last year's poleπ
Video-collab with @formulaneonf1: feedbacks are welcomed!π€©
β€9π2π2