Formula Data Analysis
3.4K subscribers
1.42K photos
10 videos
3 files
916 links
All the analyses of the world’s most famous page on Formula 1 telemetry: join NOW to understand F1 better!πŸŽπŸ“ˆ
Download Telegram
TOP SPEEDS - SPRINT SHOOTOUT

Nine teams were in a narrow 3km/h range:
-Fastest (322km/h): Aston, Haas and Williams
-Slower: (319km/h): McL and Ferrari
-Slowest (just 315km/h): Alpine (high drag and, despite that, the drivers had to brake sooner than most!)
πŸ‘2πŸ€”2
RACE PACE - Chinese GP SPRINT

πŸ₯‡No one could match VER: 0.74s/lap quicker than anyone else!

πŸ₯ˆLEC was 2nd quickest, thenπŸ₯‰PER (+0.79s/lap) and ALO (+0.80s/lap). HAM was in the mix, too (+0.82s/lap)

McLaren was uncompetitive

What's your prediction for the race?πŸ€”
πŸ€”4πŸ‘2
Highest top speed in the Sprint: 348km/h for Stroll.

Leclerc was close (347km/h), and his average top speed was the highest together with Ricciardo's (337km/h for both).

Highest top speed without DRS: 324km/h (TSU).
πŸ”₯3πŸ‘2
πŸ“ˆSTART ANALYSIS - Chinese GP SPRINT

Best Starters: HAM and LEC
Worst Starter: PIA (0.4s slower than HAM and LEC to reach 200km/h).

The two Williams struggled, too (0.3s lost to the best start).

Despite the Softs, Russell's start was just average.
❀9πŸ‘3
πŸ—’Notes on Chinese GP!

πŸ”΅VER won and made the difference: PER couldn’t gain over NOR on the last stint
🟠NOR was MVP: he needs a win now
πŸ”΄Solid race by LEC; Ferrari limited the damage waiting for the upgrades
⚫️Good recovery by HAM
βšͺ️HUL in the points!

What’s YOUR take?πŸ€”
πŸ‘11❀2πŸ€”2
RACE PACE - Chinese GP

🟑VER 0.67s/lap quicker than PER. A lot, even taking the traffic into account!

🟠McL (NOR) was 0.88s/lap behind but with one pit less.
πŸ”΄LEC: +0.31s/lap vs NOR➑️McL was clearly quicker.
🟒Aston's pace aided by the additional pits.

Mercedes: no pace.
πŸ‘9πŸ”₯2
TOP SPEEDS - Chinese GP

Stroll reached 348km/h as in the Sprint, the highest top speed once again: Aston reached the highest top speed in qualifying too, which confirms their low drag here.

McL was the slowest car when the DRS was inactive: only 314km/h.
πŸ‘7πŸ”₯1
AVERAGE TIME IN PITS - Chinese GP

πŸ₯‡πŸŸ‘RBR was fastest: flawless execution by
@F1mech and his crew!
πŸ₯ˆπŸŸ McL: +0.06s slower
πŸ₯‰πŸ”΄Ferrari: +0.10s

🟒Sauber desperately needs the updated wheel nuts to fix their troublesome pit stops.

Aston’s average was high due to STR.
πŸ”₯5πŸ‘2
TYRE DEG
(PIA excluded due to the damaged floor)

Aston: 4 tyre sets
RBR/Mercedes: 3 sets
NOR: 2 sets (M-H)
Ferrari: 2 sets

🟠NOR: excellent pace on the Hards (same as πŸ”΅RBR); very good on Medium with low deg.

πŸ”΄Ferrari slower than NOR on both compounds.

Merc lacked pace on all compounds.
❀9πŸ‘3πŸ”₯1πŸ€”1🀣1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
πŸ‘‡
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
πŸ‘1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
πŸ‘‡
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
πŸ‘1
πŸ“ŠPositions gained in the Chinese GP

πŸ“ˆHamilton gained the most (P18 to P9).
πŸ“‰Bottas lost the most (P10 to P20 due to his retirement).

Ferrari recovered well after a disappointing qualifying (4 places gained in total).

The opposite for Aston: ALO and STR lost 4 places each.

Via @JMP_software
πŸ‘2
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πŸ‘‡Use this linkπŸ‘‡
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πŸ‘‡Use this linkπŸ‘‡
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
REMEMBER WHEN REDBULL WAS UNDERPOWERED?

Their '17 car was held back by Renault's low power (and unreliability):
-Competitive in street circuits
-Unsuitable for fast tracks

Still, Newey's team trimmed the rear wing significantly while retaining good downforce: P4 by Daniel Ricciardo in Monza!
πŸ‘5
Remember when Ferrari surprised everyone in 2017?

The SF70H was much shorter than the Mercedes (3594mm vs 3726mm wheelbase)

Strengths:
-Downforce
-Race Pace

Weaknesses:
-Top Speed
-Reliability (season-end)

In '18/'19 Ferrari reduced the drag - but lost their downforce edge.

πŸ“Έ: Foto Morio
❀12πŸ‘2πŸ”₯2
πŸ“‰Mercedes' inexorable (so far) decline:

POINTS AFTER 5 RACES:
2019: 217 (1st)
2020: 180 (1st)
2021: 148 (2nd)
2022: 95 (3rd)
2023: 96 (3rd)
2024: 52 (4th)

Will the team come on top of their problems? And when?πŸ€”
😭8πŸ‘3πŸ€”3πŸ₯°2πŸ‘1
The 'Ferrari Rollercoaster'🎒

POINTS AFTER 5 RACES:
2019: 121 (2nd)
2020: 55 (3rd)❌
2021: 78 (4th)
2022: 157 (1st)βœ…
2023: 78 (4th)
2024: 151 (2nd)

Ferrari was 3rd in '20 (due to poor competition), and just 4th in '21 and '23!
❀9πŸ”₯7πŸ‘1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
πŸ‘‡
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
πŸ”₯2
πŸ—’Notes on Miami GP

- Low grip➑️High track evolution: timing in quali will be crucial!
- Long straight➑️Excessive drag will be costly! Peculiar track, as it includes a very slow section, too.
- Rear-limited, due to the frequent traction zones.

Your prediction?πŸ€”
πŸ“Έ @pirellisport
❀8πŸ”₯2πŸ‘1
The last scientific article of my PhD has finally been published! 🀩

I propose and validate a way to ride a motorcycle and derive a complete overview of its tyre behaviour!πŸπŸ›ž
A world's first😏

Curious?πŸ‘€
Read/download the pre-review version here!

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380287686_An_enhanced_motorcycle_tyre_model_characterised_through_experimental_riding_data
❀13πŸ‘4πŸ‘4