Formula Data Analysis
3.4K subscribers
1.42K photos
10 videos
3 files
916 links
All the analyses of the world’s most famous page on Formula 1 telemetry: join NOW to understand F1 better!πŸŽπŸ“ˆ
Download Telegram
πŸ”΄Bearman asked me for this analysis, and I couldn't refuse!😁

F2 Qualifying
Speed Trap (Vertical) vs Average Speed (Horizontal)

The dashed trend line shows that better average speed↔️higher top speed (Better aero efficiency and corner exit)

Two exceptions:⚫️Rodin and 🟠Campos teams showed large wing load differences!

Made via JMP Software
❀22πŸ‘7πŸ”₯2πŸ‘2
Formula Data Analysis
πŸ”΄Bearman asked me for this analysis, and I couldn't refuse!😁 F2 Qualifying Speed Trap (Vertical) vs Average Speed (Horizontal) The dashed trend line shows that better average speed↔️higher top speed (Better aero efficiency and corner exit) Two exceptions:⚫️Rodin…
How does F1 compare to F2?
Speed Trap: ~ +40km/h (+14%)
Average Speed: ~ +35km/h (+16%)

Huge difference!
Their speed advantage over the whole lap seems to be analogous to their top-speed advantage

We can conclude that F1 cars gain a lot... everywhere
And Ollie now knows it!
πŸ‘9🀯5πŸ”₯1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πŸ‘‡Use this linkπŸ‘‡
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πŸ‘2πŸ”₯1
RACE PACE - Australian GP

πŸ”΄Ferrari was quickest, and just 0.05s/lap separated SAI and LEC!

🟠Norris was just 0.11s/lap behind though: McL can take the jump if the updates work

🟑Perez was half a second behind (damaged floor on his 2nd stint, though)

🟒ALO matched RUS

🟣Alpine's pace was terrible once again: OCO was slower than BOT despite pitting one time more. GAS had the worst pace

The 'Race Pace' analysis script is the first one I've restored, as I know how much you love this analysis!πŸ˜πŸ’»
❀12πŸ”₯8πŸ‘4🀝1
TOP SPEEDS - AUSTRALIAN GP

πŸ”΄Sainz only used the DRS twice (to overtake VER!)

🟠McL's drag was quite high: PIA only reached 330km/h despite using the DRS often, and NOR was at the bottom of the standings. Solid performance despite that

PER (339km/h) and Haas: very low dragπŸš€
❀4πŸ‘2
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
πŸ‘‡
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
πŸ”₯1
πŸ—’NOTES ON SUZUKA TRACK

-One of the most severe tracks on the tyres due to the frequent, long, consecutive fast corners!➑️Wear will be high even on the C1-C3 compoundsπŸ›žπŸ”₯
-High downforce is crucial, BUT having a single DRS zone will punish excessive drag!πŸ’‘
πŸ”₯9πŸ‘3⚑1
Main contenders for the #JapaneseGP:

πŸ”΅RBR: will bring updates (floor?); currently the team to beat

🟠McL: high downforce➑️crucial for the fast corners; Double podium last year

πŸ”΄Ferrari: has momentum, aero efficient, will update the rear suspension fairing

Your prediction?πŸ€”
❀7πŸ‘4πŸ”₯4
Rear Wings!

Japanese GP: Medium-high load wings

βœ…Downforce CRUCIAL for the many fast corners➑️More grip/preserves tyres
❌1 DRS zone (vs Australia’s 4): Cannot go max load

πŸ”΄Ferrari/πŸ”΅RBs: least loaded (top speed over grip)⏬

🟒Aston/🟒Sauber: most loaded⏫

Others: in between

πŸ“Έ @AlbertFabrega
❀9πŸ‘3πŸ”₯3
Rear wings - Japanese GP
(πŸ”΅RBR: reference)

🟒Merc: deep lower plane spoon (and less loaded DRS plane)

πŸ”΄Ferrari: same wing as in the first 3 races! Beam wing used to set load

🟠McL: compared to Merc, more loaded DRS plane and less loaded lower plane➑️Stronger DRS?

Drawings made by my collaborator @CatalinEpu πŸ”₯
❀6πŸ‘4πŸ”₯1🀯1πŸ‘€1
πŸ“ŠTOP SPEEDS SO FAR (FP1)

βšͺ️Haas was unmatched (327km/h!): low-drag car + less loaded wing➑️might go for slightly more load in the next sessions

🟑RBR had a loaded DRS plane, but an unloaded lower plane: this made their DRS very powerful

🟠McL's DRS doesn't perform well

Both Williams and Alpine DID use DRS during their respective best laps

ALB lifted early into T1, however
Alpine's top speed, instead, is concerning
❀3⚑2😒2πŸ‘1
πŸ“ŠBEST SECTORS
(Everyone on Softs, except for BOT/ZHO/SAR on Mediums)

🟑RBR was quickest in every sector!
Next quickest car:
S1: πŸ”΄Ferrari (+0.03s)
S2: πŸ”΄Ferrari (+0.02s)
S3: 🟒Merc (+0.08s)

🟠McL was quick in S1, but their low top speed held them back in the fast S3
❀5πŸ‘2πŸ”₯1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πŸ‘‡Use this linkπŸ‘‡
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πŸ”₯1
Verstappen's best FP1 lap was just 0.015s away from the ideal lap (VER S1 and S3, PER S2)⏱

NOR and STR didn't combine their best sectors into their best laps:
🟠NOR would have finished P8 (instead of P10)
🟒STR P11 (instead of P15)

Weak points:
⚫️Merc S1
🟠McL S2
πŸ”΄Ferrari S3
πŸ”₯3πŸ‘2❀1
πŸ—’Notes on Japanese GP Quali!

πŸ”΅VER gained 0.68s over his last pole: LEC/ALO/HAM wondered how they could be so far after good laps!
🟒Aston: in Q1, ALO was P2, STR P16. Better lineup needed
πŸ”΄Ferrari has lost their quali pace since FP3
🟠Solid P3 for McL, but was P2-3 last year

Who surprised you the most? And WHY?πŸ€”
😱2
AERO PROPERTIES
➑️Higher mean Speed (more performance)
⬆️Higher top speed (lower drag)

🟠McL got P3 with the lowest top speed on the grid! Crazy downforce, but they need less drag for a front row. Same for🟒Mercedes

πŸ”΄Ferrari lost their top-speed edgeπŸ€”

βšͺ️Haas=RocketπŸš€
πŸ‘3😭1
BEST SECTORS - Japanese GP Quali
🟑RBR was quickest in all sectors, but as in FP1 PER beat VER in S2

🟠McL's excellent downforce helped them massively in S1: virtually as quick as RBR!

πŸ”΄Ferrari was TERRIBLE in S3: slower than HUL, ALB, both RBs...

What's your opinion?πŸ€”
πŸ‘2πŸ”₯1
THROTTLE USE - Quali

🟑RedBull got pole by being able to stay full-throttle for 2/3 of the lap: they put the power down better than anyone else

Similar for🟒Merc/🟠McL, but their high drag caused a loss of pace on every straight

πŸ”΄Ferrari: no grip, and 'meh' top speed!
πŸ‘2πŸ”₯2