'Puzzling' top speeds in FP2π€
-Aston was fastest despite running a very loaded rear wingβ‘οΈHigher engine mode?
-On the other hand, Mercedes had a pretty low top speed considering the lower downforce wing they were running!β‘οΈDraggy chassis?
All teams within 3km/h of each other!
-Aston was fastest despite running a very loaded rear wingβ‘οΈHigher engine mode?
-On the other hand, Mercedes had a pretty low top speed considering the lower downforce wing they were running!β‘οΈDraggy chassis?
All teams within 3km/h of each other!
π4π₯2π1π€1
Leclerc got P1 in FP2 by gaining under braking over Verstappen:
The SF-24 (and LEC) seem very strong in this regard, and didn't sacrifice the corner exit too much. He used his signature 'partial throttle' when braking!π
VER gained a lot in turn 10 and the following straight.
The SF-24 seems competitive everywhere in Albert Park (braking, cornering, traction and straight-line speed).
Unless he had significantly less fuel in the tank, this might be LECβs best shot for a pole position, as he also stated.
The SF-24 (and LEC) seem very strong in this regard, and didn't sacrifice the corner exit too much. He used his signature 'partial throttle' when braking!π
VER gained a lot in turn 10 and the following straight.
The SF-24 seems competitive everywhere in Albert Park (braking, cornering, traction and straight-line speed).
Unless he had significantly less fuel in the tank, this might be LECβs best shot for a pole position, as he also stated.
β€14π₯1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
π₯1
LONG RUNS - FP2
π McL had the lowest average laptime, producing the quickest lap in the process, too
π΄Ferrari's was just 0.15s behind on average, though
π΅RBR and π’Aston were close, but RBR's high variance might suggest some sandbagging
β«οΈMerc didn't do any real long runs
π McL had the lowest average laptime, producing the quickest lap in the process, too
π΄Ferrari's was just 0.15s behind on average, though
π΅RBR and π’Aston were close, but RBR's high variance might suggest some sandbagging
β«οΈMerc didn't do any real long runs
β€10π3π1π€1
Practice 2 - Time at Maximum Throttle:
Aston Martinβs performance in FP2 is hard to decipherπ€
They had the highest top speed (323km/h) despite their loaded rear wing BUT they could stay full throttle more than any other team, which is usually correlated with less power, more drag and better grip.
Despite all these positives, STRβs gap to LEC was over 0.5s.
π‘My opinion, comparing STRβs telemetry to LECβs:
Astonβs DRS has improved significantly, providing an excellent top speed when active.
They still have significant drag without it.
The PU doesnβt seem to be turned up too much, while the grip is average to good.
How do you interpret these contradictory data? π
Aston Martinβs performance in FP2 is hard to decipherπ€
They had the highest top speed (323km/h) despite their loaded rear wing BUT they could stay full throttle more than any other team, which is usually correlated with less power, more drag and better grip.
Despite all these positives, STRβs gap to LEC was over 0.5s.
π‘My opinion, comparing STRβs telemetry to LECβs:
Astonβs DRS has improved significantly, providing an excellent top speed when active.
They still have significant drag without it.
The PU doesnβt seem to be turned up too much, while the grip is average to good.
How do you interpret these contradictory data? π
π4π₯1π€1
Each car's characteristics - #AustralianGP Quali
Right side: higher mean speed (better performanceπ)
Upper side: better top speed (lower dragπ)
π‘Red Bull was extremely efficient, butπ McL was quick DESPITE their terrible top speed!
Aston and Mercedes performed similarly
Right side: higher mean speed (better performanceπ)
Upper side: better top speed (lower dragπ)
π‘Red Bull was extremely efficient, butπ McL was quick DESPITE their terrible top speed!
Aston and Mercedes performed similarly
π6β€1π€1
Sainz had the pole in the bag, but he unfortunately made a mistake into Turn 9!π²
He was on par with Verstappen, butπ£braked too late into T9 andπ’had to lift in T10, losing around 0.4s!
He started gaining again, but not enough
Still, incredible post-surgery performanceπ
He was on par with Verstappen, butπ£braked too late into T9 andπ’had to lift in T10, losing around 0.4s!
He started gaining again, but not enough
Still, incredible post-surgery performanceπ
π12π₯2π€2β€1π1
πBest sectors in Qualifying
- Ferrari was the most competitive car in Sector 1 (P1 and P3).
- The very fast Sector 2 (for the most part a long straight with a DRS zone) was RedBullβs playground.
- In Sector 3 (the slowest) the two cars were equally quick, while McL struggled more.
Hamiltonβa exclusion from Q3 had to do with an uncompetitive performance in Sector 1.
In Sector 3, instead, he was quicker than Russell despite not running in Q3! (Where the track conditions were better).
- Ferrari was the most competitive car in Sector 1 (P1 and P3).
- The very fast Sector 2 (for the most part a long straight with a DRS zone) was RedBullβs playground.
- In Sector 3 (the slowest) the two cars were equally quick, while McL struggled more.
Hamiltonβa exclusion from Q3 had to do with an uncompetitive performance in Sector 1.
In Sector 3, instead, he was quicker than Russell despite not running in Q3! (Where the track conditions were better).
β‘2π2π₯1
πNotes on #AustralianGP
-Heroic Sainz WINS through a flawless race. Just 11 points behind VER despite skipping a weekend
-RBR didnβt impress all weekend and is nowhere without VER. The season is still open!
-McL got more points (27) than Merc (26) and Aston (25) did in 3 races!
-Heroic Sainz WINS through a flawless race. Just 11 points behind VER despite skipping a weekend
-RBR didnβt impress all weekend and is nowhere without VER. The season is still open!
-McL got more points (27) than Merc (26) and Aston (25) did in 3 races!
π11β€7π₯2
POINTS AFTER 3 RACES
Ferrari is now just 4 points behind RBR
Big shakeups year after year: Ferrari went from being comfortably 1st in 2022, to 4th (βΌοΈ) in 2023, to close second in 2024
Ferrariβs consistent trait is its inconsistency, but Vasseurβs team seem to be reviving!π
Ferrari is now just 4 points behind RBR
Big shakeups year after year: Ferrari went from being comfortably 1st in 2022, to 4th (βΌοΈ) in 2023, to close second in 2024
Ferrariβs consistent trait is its inconsistency, but Vasseurβs team seem to be reviving!π
π₯22β€7π1
RACE PACE - Australian GP
(Considering each teamβs faster driver)
For once, π΄Ferrari was fastest!
π McL was close, though: ~0.1s/lap difference
π΅PER had over 0.5s/lap slower than SAI: VER would NOT have won easily
π’Aston and Merc were matched
Thanks βFormula1 Stat Analysisβ for helping me with this one!π€
(Considering each teamβs faster driver)
For once, π΄Ferrari was fastest!
π McL was close, though: ~0.1s/lap difference
π΅PER had over 0.5s/lap slower than SAI: VER would NOT have won easily
π’Aston and Merc were matched
Thanks βFormula1 Stat Analysisβ for helping me with this one!π€
π12π₯7π€1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
π₯2
Formula Data Analysis
"Iβm having a walk in the original Temple of Speed! π Iβve measured the banking of the old Parabolica: ~40degrees at the highest point, 7deg more than the most banked corner in NASCAR! I struggled to reach the highest point by feet."
Some more photos...
β€20π9π2π1
π΄Bearman asked me for this analysis, and I couldn't refuse!π
F2 Qualifying
Speed Trap (Vertical) vs Average Speed (Horizontal)
The dashed trend line shows that better average speedβοΈhigher top speed (Better aero efficiency and corner exit)
Two exceptions:β«οΈRodin and π Campos teams showed large wing load differences!
Made via JMP Software
F2 Qualifying
Speed Trap (Vertical) vs Average Speed (Horizontal)
The dashed trend line shows that better average speedβοΈhigher top speed (Better aero efficiency and corner exit)
Two exceptions:β«οΈRodin and π Campos teams showed large wing load differences!
Made via JMP Software
β€22π7π₯2π2
Formula Data Analysis
π΄Bearman asked me for this analysis, and I couldn't refuse!π F2 Qualifying Speed Trap (Vertical) vs Average Speed (Horizontal) The dashed trend line shows that better average speedβοΈhigher top speed (Better aero efficiency and corner exit) Two exceptions:β«οΈRodinβ¦
How does F1 compare to F2?
Speed Trap: ~ +40km/h (+14%)
Average Speed: ~ +35km/h (+16%)
Huge difference!
Their speed advantage over the whole lap seems to be analogous to their top-speed advantage
We can conclude that F1 cars gain a lot... everywhere
And Ollie now knows it!
Speed Trap: ~ +40km/h (+14%)
Average Speed: ~ +35km/h (+16%)
Huge difference!
Their speed advantage over the whole lap seems to be analogous to their top-speed advantage
We can conclude that F1 cars gain a lot... everywhere
And Ollie now knows it!
π9π€―5π₯1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
π2π₯1