Formula Data Analysis
Russell had an issue on the last lap, and BEA almost caught him! He lifted massively from T4 onwards, losing 3s in one lapβ‘οΈLucky to still finish 2.7s ahead. Ferrari's tyre wear on the Hards was excellent: even lower than RedBull's, per Marko's admission.
Through a tense team radio, Russell told his engineer to check his front right pressure.
The race engineer said that everything seemed fine, but Russell insisted that something about the front right tyre definitely wasnβt right.
https://twitter.com/russellius/status/1766536170756850099
The race engineer said that everything seemed fine, but Russell insisted that something about the front right tyre definitely wasnβt right.
https://twitter.com/russellius/status/1766536170756850099
X (formerly Twitter)
β (@russellius) on X
LAP 50
GEORGE: Check front right tyre pressure!!!! Front right tyre pressure!!! [...] Something's not right, front right.
heart attack with half a lap to go π«
GEORGE: Check front right tyre pressure!!!! Front right tyre pressure!!! [...] Something's not right, front right.
heart attack with half a lap to go π«
π1π₯1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
β€2π1π₯1
MERCEDES' RADICAL WING CHANGE
In Bahrain, they had the lowest top speed (Bottom): just 313km/hπ
For Saudi Arabia (Top), they drastically reduced their rear wing load: they gained 19km/h (βΌοΈ) and were 2nd fastestπ
This, however, clearly hampered their tyre wear and cornering.
It seems that the car has inherently high drag, or at least higher than most:
- In Bahrain, when they ran a wing in line with the competition, they were slowest;
- In Saudi Arabia, despite running by far the skinniest wing, they were still 2km/h slower than Haas.
Something to work on...
In Bahrain, they had the lowest top speed (Bottom): just 313km/hπ
For Saudi Arabia (Top), they drastically reduced their rear wing load: they gained 19km/h (βΌοΈ) and were 2nd fastestπ
This, however, clearly hampered their tyre wear and cornering.
It seems that the car has inherently high drag, or at least higher than most:
- In Bahrain, when they ran a wing in line with the competition, they were slowest;
- In Saudi Arabia, despite running by far the skinniest wing, they were still 2km/h slower than Haas.
Something to work on...
π6π6π€2
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
Formula Data Analysis
AVERAGE GAP TO FASTEST QUALI LAPπ Ferrari got closer to the top (+0.18% vs +0.26% last year) Aston: 4thβ‘οΈ3rd fastest, but its race pace got worse Merc: 3rdβ‘οΈ5th fastest Improved the most: McLπ (-0.28%) Receded the most: Alpineπ (+0.95%, or ~0.8s fartherβ¦
Last year's average, for comparison:
Keep in mind that, even though Aston and McLaren were on average equal in qualifying, they did so with opposite trajectories: Aston was much quicker in the first half of the season, and the opposite for McLaren.
Keep in mind that, even though Aston and McLaren were on average equal in qualifying, they did so with opposite trajectories: Aston was much quicker in the first half of the season, and the opposite for McLaren.
π9π₯1
RACE START - SAUDI ARABIAN #F1 GP
πPerez was the best starter, but Leclerc was close (0.1s slower to reach 200km/h)
πThe Soft compound didn't help Bearman and Bottas off the line: they were among the slowest drivers to reach 100km/h
πWorst starter: Gasly
To add context and for those wondering why: even though Perezβ onboard showed that he was moving BEFORE the lights went off, his movement didnβt trigger the sensor, and the start was declared regular.
πPerez was the best starter, but Leclerc was close (0.1s slower to reach 200km/h)
πThe Soft compound didn't help Bearman and Bottas off the line: they were among the slowest drivers to reach 100km/h
πWorst starter: Gasly
To add context and for those wondering why: even though Perezβ onboard showed that he was moving BEFORE the lights went off, his movement didnβt trigger the sensor, and the start was declared regular.
π7β€4
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
π
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
π1π₯1
In Jeddah, Mercedes ran a more loaded beam wing configuration compared to Red Bull to partially compensate for their very unloaded rear wing.
In contrast, Ferrari and McLaren removed their upper beam wings altogether to save drag.
( πΈ u/alenpetak11, collab with @aerodynam1cs )
In contrast, Ferrari and McLaren removed their upper beam wings altogether to save drag.
( πΈ u/alenpetak11, collab with @aerodynam1cs )
β€5π2
Australian GP: medium-high wing load levelsπ‘
β Downforce needed for fast corners+braking points
β Frequent (but short-ish) straights: Cannot go maximum load
β«οΈMerc/π£Alpine/π΅RacingBulls: least loadedβ¬ (top speed over grip).
π΅RBR/π’Aston/π McL/π΅Williams: most loadedβ«.
πΈ @AlbertFabrega
β Downforce needed for fast corners+braking points
β Frequent (but short-ish) straights: Cannot go maximum load
β«οΈMerc/π£Alpine/π΅RacingBulls: least loadedβ¬ (top speed over grip).
π΅RBR/π’Aston/π McL/π΅Williams: most loadedβ«.
πΈ @AlbertFabrega
β€10π4
'Puzzling' top speeds in FP2π€
-Aston was fastest despite running a very loaded rear wingβ‘οΈHigher engine mode?
-On the other hand, Mercedes had a pretty low top speed considering the lower downforce wing they were running!β‘οΈDraggy chassis?
All teams within 3km/h of each other!
-Aston was fastest despite running a very loaded rear wingβ‘οΈHigher engine mode?
-On the other hand, Mercedes had a pretty low top speed considering the lower downforce wing they were running!β‘οΈDraggy chassis?
All teams within 3km/h of each other!
π4π₯2π1π€1
Leclerc got P1 in FP2 by gaining under braking over Verstappen:
The SF-24 (and LEC) seem very strong in this regard, and didn't sacrifice the corner exit too much. He used his signature 'partial throttle' when braking!π
VER gained a lot in turn 10 and the following straight.
The SF-24 seems competitive everywhere in Albert Park (braking, cornering, traction and straight-line speed).
Unless he had significantly less fuel in the tank, this might be LECβs best shot for a pole position, as he also stated.
The SF-24 (and LEC) seem very strong in this regard, and didn't sacrifice the corner exit too much. He used his signature 'partial throttle' when braking!π
VER gained a lot in turn 10 and the following straight.
The SF-24 seems competitive everywhere in Albert Park (braking, cornering, traction and straight-line speed).
Unless he had significantly less fuel in the tank, this might be LECβs best shot for a pole position, as he also stated.
β€14π₯1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πUse this linkπ
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL π¬
π₯1
LONG RUNS - FP2
π McL had the lowest average laptime, producing the quickest lap in the process, too
π΄Ferrari's was just 0.15s behind on average, though
π΅RBR and π’Aston were close, but RBR's high variance might suggest some sandbagging
β«οΈMerc didn't do any real long runs
π McL had the lowest average laptime, producing the quickest lap in the process, too
π΄Ferrari's was just 0.15s behind on average, though
π΅RBR and π’Aston were close, but RBR's high variance might suggest some sandbagging
β«οΈMerc didn't do any real long runs
β€10π3π1π€1
Practice 2 - Time at Maximum Throttle:
Aston Martinβs performance in FP2 is hard to decipherπ€
They had the highest top speed (323km/h) despite their loaded rear wing BUT they could stay full throttle more than any other team, which is usually correlated with less power, more drag and better grip.
Despite all these positives, STRβs gap to LEC was over 0.5s.
π‘My opinion, comparing STRβs telemetry to LECβs:
Astonβs DRS has improved significantly, providing an excellent top speed when active.
They still have significant drag without it.
The PU doesnβt seem to be turned up too much, while the grip is average to good.
How do you interpret these contradictory data? π
Aston Martinβs performance in FP2 is hard to decipherπ€
They had the highest top speed (323km/h) despite their loaded rear wing BUT they could stay full throttle more than any other team, which is usually correlated with less power, more drag and better grip.
Despite all these positives, STRβs gap to LEC was over 0.5s.
π‘My opinion, comparing STRβs telemetry to LECβs:
Astonβs DRS has improved significantly, providing an excellent top speed when active.
They still have significant drag without it.
The PU doesnβt seem to be turned up too much, while the grip is average to good.
How do you interpret these contradictory data? π
π4π₯1π€1
Each car's characteristics - #AustralianGP Quali
Right side: higher mean speed (better performanceπ)
Upper side: better top speed (lower dragπ)
π‘Red Bull was extremely efficient, butπ McL was quick DESPITE their terrible top speed!
Aston and Mercedes performed similarly
Right side: higher mean speed (better performanceπ)
Upper side: better top speed (lower dragπ)
π‘Red Bull was extremely efficient, butπ McL was quick DESPITE their terrible top speed!
Aston and Mercedes performed similarly
π6β€1π€1