Formula Data Analysis
3.41K subscribers
1.42K photos
10 videos
3 files
918 links
All the analyses of the world’s most famous page on Formula 1 telemetry: join NOW to understand F1 better!πŸŽπŸ“ˆ
Download Telegram
Ferrari has cooked: in the race simulation, Sainz was 0.59s/lap quicker (on average) than Verstappen in last year's race!😳

RACE PACE
SF24: 96.87s
RB19: 97.46s (+0.59s)
SF23: 98.33s (+1.46s ‼️)

And his top speed was still 9km/h down vs last race➑️Turned-down PUπŸ”₯

The team seem to have solved their tyre wear issues, probably to a higher degree than we expected

In the last stint (on Hards) the laptimes improved throughout the stint: the tyre wear didn't even offset the decreasing fuel load!

So far, Ferrari IMHO looks clearly 2nd quickest
🀯8πŸ”₯7πŸ‘4πŸ₯°1πŸ‘1πŸ†1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
πŸ‘‡Use this linkπŸ‘‡
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
πŸ”₯1
TOP SPEEDS - DAY 2
(During the fastest laps)

Red Bull 320km/h (-3 vs quali)
Williams 317
Alpine 315
Ferrari 315 (-10 vs quali‼️)
Aston 315
Merc 314
VCARB 312
McL 311
Haas 302⬅️Working on tyre deg

πŸ’‘Ferrari on a lower PU mode
πŸš€RB20 might have even less drag than the RB19!
❀6πŸ”₯2πŸ‘1
πŸ“ŠSF24 vs RB20 (and comparison with 2023 quali)

RB20's top speed and cornering speeds were higher; yet, SF24 produced an overall quicker lap

The SF24 is still far from the SF23's top speed and high-speed cornering performance➑️Time to be gained there!πŸ› 

I think we can draw two conclusions:

1) Ferrari was still way down on power, at least on the main straight (-10km/h vs last year is massive, and cannot be explained by a slightly more loaded wing alone).

2) RedBull probably has further reduced their drag (to just lose 3km/h to β€˜full beans qualifying PU mode’).
πŸ‘5❀1πŸ”₯1
I'm preparing an extensive long-run analysis right now!🀩

Meanwhile, here is my (very early, so don't count on it!) pecking order prediction:
πŸ₯‡Red Bull
πŸ₯ˆFerrari
πŸ₯‰McLaren
4️⃣5️⃣Aston/Mercedes
6️⃣7️⃣VCARB/Alpine
8️⃣9οΈβƒ£πŸ”ŸSauber, Williams, Haas

What's yours? What surprised you?πŸ€”
πŸ‘11❀2πŸ”₯2πŸ€”1
The Race Simulations show thatπŸ”΄Ferrari has a sizeable advantage over🟠McLaren! (+0.975s/lap on average)
On hards, the gap grew to 2s/lap!

⏱Improvement over last year's race:
Ferrari: -1.48s/lap➑️From 4th fastest to 1st
McL: -0.54s/lap➑️From 6th to 2nd

10kg fuel ~ 0.3s/lap
πŸ‘14πŸ‘1
Ready to compete with the best F1 strategists?
My Fantasy League is finally online!🀩

πŸ†Prize for the winner
πŸ“ŠLooking at the data will become crucial!

If you joined last year, you're already set
Otherwise, download the GridRival app and use this link:
https://gridrival.app.link/7duqlADFtHb

You must have the gridRival app already open before clicking the link

The league is called β€˜Formula Data Analysis and his Strategists’

Just 5 days left to set your team!
πŸ‘7
CARS COMPARISON-DAY3 BEST LAPπŸ’‘

πŸ”΄SF24: best laptime and top speed
πŸ”΅RB20: same top speed and fastest in T6➑️Great aero efficiency?

LEC and RUS used softer tyres (C4 vs C3)
⬇️
🟠PIA and🟒ALO [more fuel too?] were quick considering that!
πŸ”΅RB20 looks mighty

What's your take?πŸ€”
❀8πŸ‘2
We'll see some record cornering speeds in 2024!πŸ’‘

Sainz had a 135km/h minimum speed in Turn 15: 6km/h more than the fastest F1 car of all time! (Mercedes W11)
Thanks to that, the SF24 has been consistently the fastest in sector 3πŸ”₯

God knows what the RB20 will do in quali😳

Before someone says β€˜But the RB19 is the most dominant car ever…’ β€”>
- On a single lap, the Mercedes W11 is the F1 car which produced the lowest lap times ever;
- β€˜Fastest’ depends on the ruleset too and does not imply β€˜most dominant’ (even though the W11 was extremely dominant too).
πŸ”₯10πŸ‘4
Ferrari made a massive step in race pace vs last year (~1.4s/lap), but the RB20 is the car to beat!πŸ†

They had the same pace over a race distance
However, Verstappen had minimal tyre wear (even on the softs!), indicating that he was not even pushing 100%😳
Crazy consistencyπŸ‘Œ

The two race simulations were made at the same time (during DAY 3):

Leclerc used a different setup than Sainz the day before and pushed more➑️Slightly better lap times than him but more tyre wear as well.

Leclerc's pace was excellent on all compounds, but the wear was similarly high too.

On the Hards, Verstrappen's lap times improved even when taking the decreasing fuel load into account!
πŸ‘17πŸ”₯1
Which team has the longest gears?βš™οΈ

Rules allow the full fuel flow (100kg/h) from 10500rpm onwards➑️engines can reach their maximum power

The graph shows each car's speed in VIII gear at 10500rpm:
🟠McL has the longest gear
🟣Alpine the shortest
Less than 6km/h between them!
πŸ‘6
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
πŸ‘‡
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
πŸ”₯1
πŸ—’Notes on #BahrainGP Track!

-Very abrasive asphalt➑️High Tyre wear➑️C1-C3 (hard) compounds to compensateπŸ›ž
-Longitudinal grip (traction and braking) is crucial for laptime⏱
-Mitigating wear on the rear left tyre will be critical!πŸ”₯

What’s your prediction?πŸ€”

πŸ“Έ : @pirellisport
πŸ‘2πŸ”₯1
Bahrain GP Weekend Schedule

Don't forget everything is a day earlier than normal. So Practice sessions start on Thursday, Quali on Friday, Race on Saturday!

Schedule image shows TRACK TIMES!

For full schedule including F2 & F3 series visit:
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.formula-1-gulf-air-bahrain-grand-prix-2024-timetable.Ew65oxdOdqxlil2DFngCz.html
πŸ‘5❀1
Rear wings!πŸ‘€

#BahrainGP: moderate load levelsπŸ’‘
βœ…Acceptable drag on the 4 straights
βœ…Good traction, braking and cornering➑️Tyre wear under control!πŸ‘Œ

RedBull/McL: Medium-high loadπŸ”Ό (less top speed, more grip)
Merc/Alpine/Aston: Medium▢️
Ferrari/VCARB/Williams: Medium-lowπŸ”½
❀6πŸ”₯3
Bahrain GP - Rear Wings Comparison:

[Oracle Red Bull Racing as reference]
πŸ‘15❀5
❀15
TOP SPEEDS - FP1

πŸ”΄Ferrari still 13km/h off their 2023 quali

🟠McL used a very conservative deployment setting on the main straight: NOR was 11km/h slower than RIC there (299 vs 310km/h), but slightly quicker on the back straight (307 vs 306km/h)

βšͺ️Haas didn't use the DRS
πŸ‘10πŸ”₯2