Formula Data Analysis
3.41K subscribers
1.43K photos
10 videos
3 files
918 links
All the analyses of the worldโ€™s most famous page on Formula 1 telemetry: join NOW to understand F1 better!๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ“ˆ
Download Telegram
In 2014 in Barcelona, Caterhamโ€™s F1 car was SLOWER than their GP2 car! ๐Ÿคฏ

-1.30.3 for the F1 car
-1.29.8 for the GP2 car(0.5s faster!)

F1 cars became terribly slow in โ€˜14, and Caterhamโ€™s car was terrible all-around!

I explain this strange result in this thread๐Ÿ‘‡
๐Ÿ˜ฑ9๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ˜2๐Ÿค”1
Formula Data Analysis
In 2014 in Barcelona, Caterhamโ€™s F1 car was SLOWER than their GP2 car! ๐Ÿคฏ -1.30.3 for the F1 car -1.29.8 for the GP2 car(0.5s faster!) F1 cars became terribly slow in โ€˜14, and Caterhamโ€™s car was terrible all-around! I explain this strange result in thisโ€ฆ
F1 cars became terribly slow in 2014.

This was due to:
- New PUโžก๏ธSignificantly increased mass (+49kg over 2013);
- Lower peak and mean power than the already weak V8s (Considering Caterhamโ€™s Renault PU: around 750hp+80hp of KERS for V8, around 600+160hp for V6s);
- Narrower front wing.
๐Ÿ˜ข4๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ”ฅ2
Formula Data Analysis
F1 cars became terribly slow in 2014. This was due to: - New PUโžก๏ธSignificantly increased mass (+49kg over 2013); - Lower peak and mean power than the already weak V8s (Considering Caterhamโ€™s Renault PU: around 750hp+80hp of KERS for V8, around 600+160hp forโ€ฆ
Caterham, in particular, suffered from the low power of the Renault PU and the very low aerodynamic efficiency (look at how wide, โ€˜boxyโ€™ and simple their sidepods are. Moreover, the air intakes were HUGE).

They were 4s off the pole!
๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿคฏ2
Formula Data Analysis
Caterham, in particular, suffered from the low power of the Renault PU and the very low aerodynamic efficiency (look at how wide, โ€˜boxyโ€™ and simple their sidepods are. Moreover, the air intakes were HUGE). They were 4s off the pole!
The GP2s, on the contrary, kept the same performance as the previous years' thanks to stable rules:
- They were, for the first time, lighter than F1 (-3kg, 688kg vs 691kg);
- The engine produced 612hp, around the same as the Combustion Engine of F1 cars (~600hp);
- Same track width.

The main advantages of F1 cars were:
- Better acceleration (thanks to better peak power due to the ERS system, which, however, was still inefficient in 2014 for most teams);
- DRS (that is worth several tenths in a fast, high-load track like Barcelona);
- Higher aero complexity.
๐Ÿ‘7
Formula Data Analysis
The GP2s, on the contrary, kept the same performance as the previous years' thanks to stable rules: - They were, for the first time, lighter than F1 (-3kg, 688kg vs 691kg); - The engine produced 612hp, around the same as the Combustion Engine of F1 cars (~600hp);โ€ฆ
Consequently, the GP2 pole was good enough to beat FOUR F1 cars!

And what is even more impressive is one team, such as Caterham, having a faster GP2 car than their F1 car. ๐Ÿคฏ

Surely the GP2 team was grinning. ๐Ÿคฃ
๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿ˜2
Formula Data Analysis
Consequently, the GP2 pole was good enough to beat FOUR F1 cars! And what is even more impressive is one team, such as Caterham, having a faster GP2 car than their F1 car. ๐Ÿคฏ Surely the GP2 team was grinning. ๐Ÿคฃ
And donโ€™t let all this tech talk distract you from the โ€˜14 Caterham F1 having an โ€˜interestingโ€™ shape of the nose. ๐Ÿคฃ

That's it!
Retweet the thread if you enjoyed this historical curiosity!๐Ÿคฉ

Do you know other interesting facts?๐Ÿ‘€
I'm a Mech Engineer working on road vehicles: follow my page @FDataAnalysis to understand F1 better! ๐ŸŽ
๐Ÿ‘5๐ŸŒš4โค3๐Ÿค”2๐Ÿ”ฅ1
Did you know that the air resistance alone makes F1 cars slow down at a rate higher than gravity?๐Ÿคฏ

That's more than you get when stomping on the brakes of a road car... and the F1 driver isn't even braking! ๐Ÿ˜ณ

Here are the calculations: over 1.08g!
Absolutely mind-blowing!

The calculation stems from the fact that at the car's top speed (311km/h) the power of the engine equates to the power produced by the drag.

As Power = Force*Speed, and Force = Mass*Acceleration, we can obtain the acceleration value using the other known quantities.
๐Ÿ‘8๐Ÿคฏ5
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
๐Ÿ‘‡
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
THE CRAZIEST F1 PHOTO YOU'LL SEE TODAY!๐Ÿ”ฅ

Cornering produces huge๐Ÿ”ตLateral forces (โžก๏ธFy), equal to the๐ŸŸขInertial Force (-m*ay)

The resulting lateral load transfer increases the outer tyre๐ŸŸฃLoad (โฌ†๏ธFz)

The rear left rim pokes out of the tyre, and the front right lifts!๐Ÿคฏ
โค9๐Ÿคฏ3๐Ÿ˜1๐Ÿ˜1
Formula Data Analysis
THE CRAZIEST F1 PHOTO YOU'LL SEE TODAY!๐Ÿ”ฅ Cornering produces huge๐Ÿ”ตLateral forces (โžก๏ธFy), equal to the๐ŸŸขInertial Force (-m*ay) The resulting lateral load transfer increases the outer tyre๐ŸŸฃLoad (โฌ†๏ธFz) The rear left rim pokes out of the tyre, and the frontโ€ฆ
LATERAL LOAD TRANSFER
Corner to the rightโžก๏ธThe load transfers from the right-hand tyres to the left-hand tyres

LONGITUDINAL LOAD TRANSFER
Exiting the cornerโžก๏ธThe load transfers from the front to the rear tyres

Most loaded tyre: Rear Left
Least loaded: Front Right
The consequences are clear:

-The huge lateral force on the rear-left wheel shifts the tyre to the right compared to the rim. Static waves appear, too!
-The inertial force makes the chassis roll to the left
-The unloaded front-right tyre lifts
-The suspension becomes asymmetric

There are also other consequences (Camber, Toe variation, ...?) which are clearly visible from the image

Comment if you find them!๐Ÿ‘€

And follow my page @FDataAnalysis to understand #F1 to a deeper level!๐ŸŽ
โค4๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ˜1
Leclerc on an old-gen (top) vs new-gen (bottom) #F1 car, exiting the Degner Curve in Suzuka
๐Ÿง

You can notice how softer the 2019 car was compared to the 2022 one!

The 13'' tyres were softer due to the much higher sidewall, contributing to the roll.๐Ÿ›ž


[๐Ÿ“ธ @SmilexTech & @formu1a__uno ]
๐Ÿ‘4โค2๐Ÿ”ฅ2
The Yamaha MotoGP Team has a new Performance Engineer: me! ๐Ÿคฉ

I will work to extract the full potential of the bike, optimising the setup based on telemetry data, developing simulation tools... and more!๐Ÿ๏ธ

I cannot express how happy I am: I think that what I've found is the perfect match for me (as someone with a background in Motorcycle Dynamics๐Ÿ๏ธ)

And don't worry: the F1-related content will continue, as I love managing this page!๐ŸŽ๏ธ
โค56๐Ÿ”ฅ13๐Ÿ‘9๐Ÿ‘6๐Ÿคฉ1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
๐Ÿ‘‡Use this link๐Ÿ‘‡
https://t.me/FDataAnCHAT
๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1
McLaren's new livery looks... pretty familiar!๐Ÿ‘€

Maybe they will surprise the competition with some out-of-the-box thinking... as Arrows did in Monaco 2001, with a crazy additional front wing to maximise downforce!๐Ÿ’ก
๐Ÿ˜8โค4๐Ÿ‘1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
๐Ÿ‘‡
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1
Formula 4
Formula 3
Formula 2
Formula 1

๐ŸŽ What makes these cars different, and each one faster than the previous one?๐Ÿค”

This thread compares their performance: you canโ€™t miss it if youโ€™re a #F1 enthusiast!
๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡
โค5๐Ÿ‘1
Formula Data Analysis
Formula 4 Formula 3 Formula 2 Formula 1 ๐ŸŽ What makes these cars different, and each one faster than the previous one?๐Ÿค” This thread compares their performance: you canโ€™t miss it if youโ€™re a #F1 enthusiast! ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡
Formula 4
-Engine: road car engines (1.4l to 2.0l), ~160hp
-Mass: 570kg
-Width: 1750mm
-Wheelbase: 2750mm
-6 Gears
-0-100km/h: 3.5s
-Top speed: 250km/h (in low-drag spec)

Small, lightweight, raw: despite the road-car power, it would still destroy supercars in most circuits!
๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿ”ฅ2โค1
Formula Data Analysis
Formula 4 -Engine: road car engines (1.4l to 2.0l), ~160hp -Mass: 570kg -Width: 1750mm -Wheelbase: 2750mm -6 Gears -0-100km/h: 3.5s -Top speed: 250km/h (in low-drag spec) Small, lightweight, raw: despite the road-car power, it would still destroy supercarsโ€ฆ
Formula 3
-Engine: 3.4l V6 N/A 380hp
-Mass: 550kg
-6 Gears
-0-100km/h: 3.1s
-0-200km/h: 7.8s
-Top speed: 300km/h (in low-drag spec)
-Max lateral acceleration: 2.6g
-Max braking acceleration: 1.9g [low, but official value]

A big step from F4: similar mass but over twice the power
๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿ”ฅ2โค1
Formula Data Analysis
Formula 3 -Engine: 3.4l V6 N/A 380hp -Mass: 550kg -6 Gears -0-100km/h: 3.1s -0-200km/h: 7.8s -Top speed: 300km/h (in low-drag spec) -Max lateral acceleration: 2.6g -Max braking acceleration: 1.9g [low, but official value] A big step from F4: similar massโ€ฆ
Formula 2
-Engine: 3.4l V6 Turbo 620hp
-Mass: 755kg
-6 Gears
-0-100km/h: 2.9s
-0-200km/h: 6.6s
-Top speed: 335km/h (in low-drag spec)
-Max lateral acceleration: 3.5g
-Max braking acceleration: 3.9g

The game gets serious: almost unmatched downforce/mass and power/mass ratios!
๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿ”ฅ3โค1๐Ÿ‘Ž1
Formula Data Analysis
Formula 2 -Engine: 3.4l V6 Turbo 620hp -Mass: 755kg -6 Gears -0-100km/h: 2.9s -0-200km/h: 6.6s -Top speed: 335km/h (in low-drag spec) -Max lateral acceleration: 3.5g -Max braking acceleration: 3.9g The game gets serious: almost unmatched downforce/mass andโ€ฆ
Formula 1
-Engine: 1.6l V6 Turbo ~1000hp
-Mass: 798kg
-8 Gears
-0-100km/h: 2.2s
-0-200km/h: 4.4s
-Top speed: 350km/h (in low-drag spec)
-Max lateral acceleration: 6.0g
-Max braking acceleration: 6.0g

The queen of open-wheel racing: the downforce/mass ratio is unmatched
๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿ‘4โค1๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚1
Formula Data Analysis
Formula 1 -Engine: 1.6l V6 Turbo ~1000hp -Mass: 798kg -8 Gears -0-100km/h: 2.2s -0-200km/h: 4.4s -Top speed: 350km/h (in low-drag spec) -Max lateral acceleration: 6.0g -Max braking acceleration: 6.0g The queen of open-wheel racing: the downforce/mass ratioโ€ฆ
Summarising the main trends from F4 to F1:

- Cars get way bigger (Width 1750mmโžก๏ธ2000mm, Wheelbase 2750mmโžก๏ธ3600mm).

Therefore, the aerodynamics surfaces grow in areaโžก๏ธMore Downforce and Aero Efficiency.

- Better materials mitigate the weight increase.

- Engines get more complex and advancedโžก๏ธMore powerโžก๏ธDrag penalty is reducedโžก๏ธPossible to produce even more downforce through more loaded wings!
๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ”ฅ3โค1