This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Great Replacement is the product of racial hatred towards Whites
Fayeβs attitude is based on preserving European traditions while embracing technology and innovation. He imagined a world in which Europe will perfect its own species, colonize the universe, and construct spaceships named after pagan gods. This vision was influenced by his concept of Eurosiberia, a power bloc reaching from Dublin to Vladivostok partially inspired by Belgian thinker Jean Thiriartβs ideas. Thiriart believed that a unified Europe as a geopolitical and cultural entity, based on the concept of a unified European superstate that would be strong enough to compete with the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War era, would not only serve as a counterbalance to the dominant powers of the time but also provide a more effective means of preserving Europeβs cultural heritage and identity, which he perceived as being under threat.
Faye and Dugin have opposing viewpoints on Russiaβs involvement in Europe. Faye believes that Russia should be a member of a Eurosiberian power bloc stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific, which would be a self-sufficient political and economic entity with global influence. Given their shared cultural and historical ties, Faye sees Russia as a natural ally of Europe and feels that cooperation between Europe and Russia is critical for the future of European culture. Dugin, in contrast, believes that in a multipolar world, Russia should take the lead as the unifier of the Eurasian heartland. He opposes the concept of a unified Eurosiberia (or βEuro-Russiaβ) in favor of a more fragmented world order, in which diverse civilizations cooperate and compete with one another. Dugin sees Russia as a counterweight to the Westβs cultural hegemony and believes it should fight to advance the interests of the so-called βnon-Westernβ world.
https://arktos.com/2023/06/02/guillaume-faye-vs-alexander-dugin/
Faye and Dugin have opposing viewpoints on Russiaβs involvement in Europe. Faye believes that Russia should be a member of a Eurosiberian power bloc stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific, which would be a self-sufficient political and economic entity with global influence. Given their shared cultural and historical ties, Faye sees Russia as a natural ally of Europe and feels that cooperation between Europe and Russia is critical for the future of European culture. Dugin, in contrast, believes that in a multipolar world, Russia should take the lead as the unifier of the Eurasian heartland. He opposes the concept of a unified Eurosiberia (or βEuro-Russiaβ) in favor of a more fragmented world order, in which diverse civilizations cooperate and compete with one another. Dugin sees Russia as a counterweight to the Westβs cultural hegemony and believes it should fight to advance the interests of the so-called βnon-Westernβ world.
https://arktos.com/2023/06/02/guillaume-faye-vs-alexander-dugin/
Arktos.com
Guillaume Faye vs Alexander Dugin
Constantin von Hoffmeister compares the geopolitical visions of Guillaume Faye and Alexander Dugin.
Satirical cartoon from the French "nationalist-revolutionary" student movement Groupe Union DΓ©fense:
β Will fascism pass?
β I feel like it's coming!
@gudparis
β Will fascism pass?
β I feel like it's coming!
@gudparis
"But Futurist patriotism is an eager passion for the becoming-progress-revolution of the race. As the greatest affective force of the individual, Futurist patriotism, while remaining disinterested, becomes the atmosphere most conducive to the continuation and development of the race."
β Filippo Tommaso Marinetti
β Filippo Tommaso Marinetti
Forwarded from Patriot Front Videos
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
@PatriotFrontVideos Β» Thomas of Patriot Front speaking about the goals of the organization.
Read the PF Manifesto:
patriotfront.us/manifesto/
Read the PF Manifesto:
patriotfront.us/manifesto/
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu's Speech to the Legionnaires 1937
"The souls of people, on their way to Earth-life, pass through a room full of lights; each takes a taper - often only a spark - to guide it in the dim country of this world. But some souls, by rare fortune, are detained longer - have time to grasp a handful of tapers, which they weave into a torch. These are the torch-bearers of humanity - its poets, seers and saints, who lead and lift the race out of darkness, toward the light. They are the law-givers and saviors, the light-bringers, way-showers and truth-tellers, and without them, humanity would lose its way in the dark."
β Plato
β Plato
Forwarded from COMITΓ DU 9 MAI π΄
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
julius_evola_radical_reactionary.pdf
366.3 KB
Julius Evola, Radical Reactionary and Committed Metaphysician: A Critical Analysis of the Political Thought of Julius Evola
by Alain de Benoist
Overview of the general nature of Julius Evola's political thought, its relationship to his cultural and metaphysical views, and provides a critical discussion of Evola's ideas which includes comparing and contrasting it to the ideas of other "Right-wing" (Revolutionary Conservative, VΓΆlkisch, Fascist, Aristocratist, Monarchist, Holist, and Traditionalist types). Alain de Benoist establishes that he agrees with some of Evolaβs ideas, such as his critique of petty nationalism, the support of the imperial idea, the basic anti-egalitarian idea, and certain ethical principles. However, Benoist also criticizes and rejects a number of other ideas and attitudes in Evolaβs thought, including his rigid elitism, his contempt for social and popular principles, his lack of true organicism and rejection of the value of community solidarity (in the anti-individualist sense).
by Alain de Benoist
Overview of the general nature of Julius Evola's political thought, its relationship to his cultural and metaphysical views, and provides a critical discussion of Evola's ideas which includes comparing and contrasting it to the ideas of other "Right-wing" (Revolutionary Conservative, VΓΆlkisch, Fascist, Aristocratist, Monarchist, Holist, and Traditionalist types). Alain de Benoist establishes that he agrees with some of Evolaβs ideas, such as his critique of petty nationalism, the support of the imperial idea, the basic anti-egalitarian idea, and certain ethical principles. However, Benoist also criticizes and rejects a number of other ideas and attitudes in Evolaβs thought, including his rigid elitism, his contempt for social and popular principles, his lack of true organicism and rejection of the value of community solidarity (in the anti-individualist sense).