Forwarded from Patriot Front
@PatriotFrontUpdates Β» π«π· πΊπΈ Photos from the nationalist march in Paris. Many nationalists from across Europe joined in the demonstration. This year's manifestation gathered over a thousand nationalists.
Patriot Front's representatives were able to experience and support the patriotic movements of Europe, receiving wide remarks of support and mutual admiration for the American cause for sovereignty.
Read more about the march here.
Submit your application today:
patriotfront.us/join
Patriot Front's representatives were able to experience and support the patriotic movements of Europe, receiving wide remarks of support and mutual admiration for the American cause for sovereignty.
Read more about the march here.
Submit your application today:
patriotfront.us/join
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"The Jews have practiced usury since the time of Moses, and oppressed the other peoples. Meanwhile, the Christians were only rarely usurers, falling into disgrace when they did so. We ought to ban the Jews from commerce because they abuse it... The evils of the Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of this people."
From Napoleon's Reflections, and from speeches before the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806.
From Napoleon's Reflections, and from speeches before the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806.
Re_modelling_the_Guild_System_Corporatis.pdf
1 MB
Re-modelling the Guild-System: Corporatism in Hegel's Philosophy of Right
by Kinga-Koretta Sata
The paper revisits Hegelβs social and political system as it is presented in his Philosophy of Right from the perspective of an essential institution devised by Hegel, the corporation. It argues that the corporation, though apparently a Hegelian reappropriation of the medieval institution of the guild, serves as a cornerstone for a very modern conception of the political state and of society: corporatism is the solution Hegel devises for guarding against the increased atomization of society that came about with the advent of the modern, highly institutionalized state, a social development which would ultimately endanger the very existence of that same state. The paper looks into the version of corporatism proposed by Hegel and argues that the Hegelian model of smaller scale human associations could prove a valuable addition to liberal models of the state.
by Kinga-Koretta Sata
The paper revisits Hegelβs social and political system as it is presented in his Philosophy of Right from the perspective of an essential institution devised by Hegel, the corporation. It argues that the corporation, though apparently a Hegelian reappropriation of the medieval institution of the guild, serves as a cornerstone for a very modern conception of the political state and of society: corporatism is the solution Hegel devises for guarding against the increased atomization of society that came about with the advent of the modern, highly institutionalized state, a social development which would ultimately endanger the very existence of that same state. The paper looks into the version of corporatism proposed by Hegel and argues that the Hegelian model of smaller scale human associations could prove a valuable addition to liberal models of the state.
"I have to make these remarks, for this struggle, which became unavoidable in the early months of this year, and which the German Reich is called upon to lead, also greatly transcends the interests of our own people and nation. When the Greeks once stood against the Persians, they defended more than just Greece, when the Romans stood against the Carthaginians they defended more than just Rome, when Roman and Germanic peoples stood together against the Huns, they defended more than just the West, when German emperors stood against the Mongols they defended more than just Germany, when Spanish heroes stood against Africa, they defended not just Spain but all of Europe, in the same way, Germany does not fight today only for itself, but for our entire continent!"
β Adolf Hitler
β Adolf Hitler
"Today, the mere idea of aristocracy is incompatible with the dominant ideology. But every people needs an aristocracy. It's an integral part of human nature and can't be dispensed with. The question then is not 'For or against aristocracy?' but 'What kind of aristocracy?'"
β Guillaume Faye, Why We Fight
β Guillaume Faye, Why We Fight
βThe age we find ourselves living in clearly suggest what our primary watchword should be: to rise again, to be inwardly reborn, to create a new order and uprightness within ourselves. Those who harbor illusions about the possibility of a purely political struggle and the power of this or that formula or system, with no new human quality as its exact counterpart, have learned no lessons from the past.β
β Julius Evola, A Message to the Youth (1950)
β Julius Evola, A Message to the Youth (1950)
Plato was the first of the βplannersβ and the true founder of socialism. In his Republic the Athenian philosopher set out a blueprint for the evolution of what has come to be called the βWelfare Stateβ, writes S. Harcourt-Rivington.
It was the prime source of the socialist nationalization doctrine. Moreover, it was the fount from which both Hitler and Mussolini imbibed their system of totalitarian planningβ¦
https://mises.org/mises-daily/it-started-plato
It was the prime source of the socialist nationalization doctrine. Moreover, it was the fount from which both Hitler and Mussolini imbibed their system of totalitarian planningβ¦
https://mises.org/mises-daily/it-started-plato
Mises Institute
It Started with Plato
The choice at base, therefore, is whether the world shall go back to the principle of freedom (not necessarily the conditions) of pre-1914, which unhappily no one under forty years of age remembers, or on to closer confinement in captivity as the socialisticβ¦
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Great Replacement is the product of racial hatred towards Whites
Fayeβs attitude is based on preserving European traditions while embracing technology and innovation. He imagined a world in which Europe will perfect its own species, colonize the universe, and construct spaceships named after pagan gods. This vision was influenced by his concept of Eurosiberia, a power bloc reaching from Dublin to Vladivostok partially inspired by Belgian thinker Jean Thiriartβs ideas. Thiriart believed that a unified Europe as a geopolitical and cultural entity, based on the concept of a unified European superstate that would be strong enough to compete with the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War era, would not only serve as a counterbalance to the dominant powers of the time but also provide a more effective means of preserving Europeβs cultural heritage and identity, which he perceived as being under threat.
Faye and Dugin have opposing viewpoints on Russiaβs involvement in Europe. Faye believes that Russia should be a member of a Eurosiberian power bloc stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific, which would be a self-sufficient political and economic entity with global influence. Given their shared cultural and historical ties, Faye sees Russia as a natural ally of Europe and feels that cooperation between Europe and Russia is critical for the future of European culture. Dugin, in contrast, believes that in a multipolar world, Russia should take the lead as the unifier of the Eurasian heartland. He opposes the concept of a unified Eurosiberia (or βEuro-Russiaβ) in favor of a more fragmented world order, in which diverse civilizations cooperate and compete with one another. Dugin sees Russia as a counterweight to the Westβs cultural hegemony and believes it should fight to advance the interests of the so-called βnon-Westernβ world.
https://arktos.com/2023/06/02/guillaume-faye-vs-alexander-dugin/
Faye and Dugin have opposing viewpoints on Russiaβs involvement in Europe. Faye believes that Russia should be a member of a Eurosiberian power bloc stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific, which would be a self-sufficient political and economic entity with global influence. Given their shared cultural and historical ties, Faye sees Russia as a natural ally of Europe and feels that cooperation between Europe and Russia is critical for the future of European culture. Dugin, in contrast, believes that in a multipolar world, Russia should take the lead as the unifier of the Eurasian heartland. He opposes the concept of a unified Eurosiberia (or βEuro-Russiaβ) in favor of a more fragmented world order, in which diverse civilizations cooperate and compete with one another. Dugin sees Russia as a counterweight to the Westβs cultural hegemony and believes it should fight to advance the interests of the so-called βnon-Westernβ world.
https://arktos.com/2023/06/02/guillaume-faye-vs-alexander-dugin/
Arktos.com
Guillaume Faye vs Alexander Dugin
Constantin von Hoffmeister compares the geopolitical visions of Guillaume Faye and Alexander Dugin.