1-Vulnerability Report: Binance PoR Dummy User Attack https://www.leku.blog/binance_vuln/ 2-Rolling in the Shadows: Analyzing the Extraction of MEV Across Layer-2 Rollups https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00138 3-Patrick collins & txFusion join
to discuss TxFusion, a set of tools and products designed to improve developers' experience on the ZK ecosystem.
Today, at 7 pm UTC on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUmM7LF4ch0 @EthSecurity1

Blast integration Bugs https://nirlinsecurity.xyz/p/blast-integration-bugs-part-1
Hamburger Validity Proof
https://xuwinnie.review/research/hamburger-factory-validity @EthSecurity1

Cosmos IBC Reentrancy Infinite Mint https://www.asymmetric.re/blog/cosmos-ibc-reentrancy-infinite-mint @EthSecurity1

sonneFinance Post-mortem Lost 20 m $
https://medium.com/@SonneFinance/post-mortem-sonne-finance-exploit-12f3daa82b06 @EthSecurity1

https://reports.yaudit.dev/reports/05-2023-Sonne/#4-high---unclear-protection-against-hundred-finance-attack-vector

Auditors mentioned their unclear approach! @Ethsecurity1

💡 Sonne Finance's Timelock Implementation on Optimism Hack Analysis:

https://x.com/Olympix_ai/status/1792534207769510123

https://medium.com/@olympixai/sonne-finance-exploited-a-detailed-analysis-0b52151d4d2a

#Defi_Research Optimized lending protocol for redeemable assets https://gist.github.com/0xngmi/c92ce3fce377a0e72c1e90052db98bf1 Modern DeFi Lending Protocols, how it's made: Euler V2 https://mixbytes.io/blog/modern-defi-lending-protocols-how-its-made-euler-v2 @EthSecurity1

the problem with eip4337. https://x.com/jtriley_eth/status/1795151789282750481 @EthSecurity1

unassigned pool earnings In the context of the Uniswap V3 protocol, the "unassigned pool earnings" How it works:

When a user deposits their assets into the pool, they earn a share of the pool's earnings.
The pool earns rewards in the form of interest, fees, or other incentives.
The pool's earnings are not yet assigned to any specific user, so they are considered "unassigned".
When a user withdraws their assets from the pool, their share of the unassigned earnings is assigned to them.
Why unassigned pool earnings?

The unassigned pool earnings are a result of the way the Uniswap V3 protocol is designed. When a user deposits their assets into the pool, they earn a share of the pool's earnings. However, the earnings are not yet assigned to any specific user, so they are considered "unassigned".

How are unassigned pool earnings assigned?

When a user withdraws their assets from the pool, their share of the unassigned earnings is assigned to them. This is done by calculating the user's share of the pool's earnings based on their deposited assets and the pool's earnings.

Why is it important?

The unassigned pool earnings are important because they represent the rewards earned by the pool, which are not yet assigned to any specific user. When a user withdraws their assets from the pool, their share of the unassigned earnings is assigned to them, ensuring that they receive their fair share of the pool's earnings. in recent audit protocol ignored unassigned pool earnings https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-04-interest-rate-model-judging?tab=readme-ov-file#issue-h-2-unassigned-pool-earnings-can-be-stolen-when-a-maturity-borrow-is-liquidated-by-depositing-at-maturity-with-1-principal
@EthSecurity1

#Defi_reasearch Typical vulnerabilities in lending and CDP protocols https://blog.decurity.io/typical-vulnerabilities-in-lending-and-cdp-protocols-e778e540e215 Borrowing on Ethereum: Comparing Architecture Evolution of MakerDAO, Yield, Aave, Compound, & Euler https://hackernoon.com/borrowing-on-ethereum-comparing-architecture-evolution-of-makerdao-yield-aave-compound-and-euler Trustless Yield Aggregator protocol with customized risk profiles based on per-user policies https://gist.github.com/0xngmi/653aa70d3162f0ef4a41d56ced602a6c @EthSecurity1

Velocore Incident Post-Mortem 7 m$ loss
https://velocorexyz.medium.com/velocore-incident-post-mortem-6197020ec3e9 @EthSecurity1

An OKX user disclosed today that hackers purchased his personal information and used AI to create fake videos. Hackers used these to change the victim's OKX passwords and even 2FA. More than $2 million US were stolen. Be wary of Deepfakes and personal data leaks. — link

$1.5M was hacked from the liquidity pool of yolo on blast.
90% funds returned @EthSecurity1

seems certik(The blackhat team) will going to jail. some people think they are same Lazarus.

Post the @krakenfx breach, have detected similar activity on @base, @BNBCHAIN, @Optimism, @arbitrum, @avax, @LineaBuild and @0xPolygon trying to target @okx, @BingXOfficial, @gate_io, and @binance and others and some unknown addresses.


Here is poc: https://x.com/danielvf/status/1803780167027871878?s=61
@Ethsecurity1

THREAD: How are Thefts from Mt. Gox, the Blockchain Bandit, Ethereum Foundation all tied to one another?

https://x.com/BoringSleuth/status/1800407010611003903
@EthSecurity1

Two blazing web3sec repos

https://github.com/immunefi-team/Bounty_Boosts

https://github.com/SunWeb3Sec/DeFi-Security-Breach-RCA
@Ethsecurity1

Guest Spotlight Article: How to analyze reports and become a great auditor

https://hatsfinance.medium.com/guest-spotlight-article-how-to-analyze-reports-and-become-a-great-auditor-8429e20df2c2

Concentrated liquidity Managers vulners

https://dacian.me/concentrated-liquidity-manager-vulnerabilities @ethsecurity1

When call and delegatecall return false

A crucial point to understand is when the success value will be true or false. Essentially, it depends on whether the function being executed will revert or not. There are three ways an execution can revert:

• if it encounters a REVERT opcode,
• if it runs out of gas,
• if it attempts something prohibited, such as dividing by zero.

If the function being executed via delegatecall (or call) encounters any of these conditions, it will revert, and the return value of the delegatecall will be false



A question that often confuses developers is why a delegatecall for a non-existent contract doesn't revert and still reports that the execution was successful. an empty address will never meet one of the three conditions for reverting, so it will never revert.
@EthSecurity1