Endi esa, quyidagi variantlarga qarang.

Ularning qaysi biri sizning savollarga bergan javobingizga o'xshaydi? 🤔

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

Yuqoridagi paragraf qanday qilib shahar mayori ko'chalardagi barcha reklamani taqiqlash orqali shaharni o'zgartirgani haqida aytilgan. Shuning uchun, to'g'ri javob: "How one man changed a city?" (Qanday qilib bir odam shaharni o'zgartirdi?).

Qolgan ikkita sarlavha asosiy fikrga emas, ushbu matndagi detallarga ishora qiladi. Misol uchun "major change" (katta o'zgarish) va "the consequences of change" (o'zgarish natijalari).

Bu sarlavhalar noto'g'ri ekanligi sababi shundaki, shahar ovoz bermagan (The city votes for major change (Shahar katta o'zgarishga ovoz berdi)) yoki o'zgarish oqibatlari haqida professionallar tomonidan ogohlantirish (Professionals warn of the consequences of change (Professionallar o'zgarish oqibatlari haqida ogohlantiradi)) berilmagan.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

Talabalarimni barchasi 👨‍🎓👩‍🎓 men uchun qadrli. Lekin ularning orasida o'zining tirishqoqligi va mehnatkashligi bilan ajralib turadigan talabamiz 👩‍💼bor. U goh-gohida o'zi o'rganayotgan yangi so'z yoki bilimlarni kanalimiz obunachilari bilan bo'lishish uchun quyidagicha postlarni 📑 jo'natib turadi.

Bu talabaning tayyorlagan postlari hissiyotlarga boy, siz buni postda ishlatiladigan smayliklardan ham bilib olishingiz mumkin. Marhamat, o'qib baho bering!

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

The most Vernal Hello ever to all!🦋🌿💐

With endless enthusiasm we're back to share with you brilliant brilliants!⭐️🔥

✨ TO HAVE A HEART OF GOLD
(idiomatic) to have a kind, compassionate, or caring attitude

Ru: иметь доброе сердце
Uzb: Oltin qalb egasi sohibi bo'lmoq

e.g. Every single member of staff at our learning center does indeed have a heart of gold!😉

✨IN THE HEAT OF THE MOMENT
while temporarily angry, excited, or engrossed, and without stopping for thought

Ru: сгоряча, в пылу момента
Uzb: g'azab otiga minganda

e.g. It was in the heat of the moment.

✨A HARD NUT TO CRACK
(idiom; informal) a difficult problem or an opponent that is hard to beat

Ru: трудная задача или человек, с которым трудно иметь дело
Uzb: hal qilish qiyin muommo yoki mag'lub qilish qiyin bo'lgan odam

e.g. That fellow John is a hard nut to crack!

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

✍️ IELTS Writingda insho turlari. 1-qism.

IELTSda aslida nechta insho turi bor? 🤔

Bu juda bahsli savol bo’lib, turli manbalar turlicha javob berishadi. Shu o’rinda, Pauline Cullen (The Official Cambridge Guide to IELTS kitobining muallifi) juda qiziqarli fikrlarni o’rtaga tashlagan. Quyida uning fikrlari bilan tanishib chiqing:

Ko’pincha menga IELTS writing savollarining to’rtta, ba’zida esa oltita turi bor deb aytishadi. Va yana ta’kidlashadiki, har bir tur aniq bir uslubda javob qaytarilishi kerak. Ba’zi odamlar esa har bir tur uchun qandaydir formula yoki qoliplar yasab bu fikrni yanada chuqurlashtirishadi. 6 yoki 6,5 balga mos juda ko’plab insholar mana shu qoliplarga amal qiladigan odamlar tomonidan yoziladi.

Menga esa xuddiki kitoblarimda nimadir yashirayotgandek munosabat bildirishadi. Bir o’qituvchi yaqinda menga test tuzish bo’yicha ajoyib ustozim, haqiqiy IELTS eksperti Vanessa Jakeman tomonidan yozilgan kitobdagi model javoblar haqida quyidagicha shikoyat bildirdi:

"Opinion essaylarga yozilgan javoblar Task response baholash mezonida past bal oladi, chunki ular discussion insho usulida yozilgan."

Bu fikr IELTS haqida uydirmalarga asoslangan va u masala qanchalik chigallashganini ko’rsatadi. Shu narsa aniqki, writingga kelganda, o’qituvchilar ham, o’quvchilar ham qanday manbalarga ishonish kerakligini bilishmaydi. Siz Cambridge tomonidan chop etilgan hech qaysi kitobda turli xil insho turlari yoki ularga qay tarzda javob yozish kerakligi haqida ma’lumotga duch kelmaysiz. Negaki, bunday asossiz fikrlar faqat testdan tashqarida mavjud.

Men 20 yildan ko’proq test ustida ishlab, hamon odamlar “discussion”, “opinion” yoki “argument” insholar deb nimalarni nazarda tutishini tushunmayman. Men faqat shuni aytishim mumkinki, bunday yorliqlash tufayli test haqida juda ko’p chalkashliklar kelib chiqadi va test topshiruvchilar ham necha marotaba urinishlariga qaramasdan yuqori balga erisha olishmaydi.

Writing Task 2 ni biz discursive essay deb qabul qilishimiz kerak, ya’ni siz unda avvaliga mavzuni xolis muhokama qilishingiz va so’ngra o’z qarashingizni aniq ifodalab berishingiz kerak.

Davomi bor.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

✍️ IELTS Writing: Opinion and discussion

IELTS eksperti Pauline Cullen fikrlarini davom ettiramiz. 2-qism.

Meni fikrimcha, bu savol “opinion essay” turi va unda faqat siz qo’shiladigan tomonni yozishingiz kerak yoki mavzuni bir tomoni haqida yozishingiz kerak kabi fikrlar noto’g’ri shakllangan tushunchalardir.

“To what extent do you agree or disagree?” kabi savollar aslida sizdan berilgan masalani mantiqiy muhokama qilish va bu mavzuga munosabatingiz qay darajada ekanligini aytishingizni so’ramoqda. Boshqacha aytganda, siz mavzuga butunlay qo’shilasizmi, batamom qarshimisiz, yoki ikki fikr o’rtasidami, nima bo’lishidan qat’iy nazar, shuni ko’rsata olishingiz kerak. Barcha Task 2 savollari bilan bo’lgani kabi, bunday savollarga javob berayotganda, savolda ko’tarilgan masalani muhokama qilishingiz kerak.

"Xo'sh, nega unday?" deysizmi? Bu savolga javobni, IELTS Writingni baholash mezonining Task response (So'ralgan vazifaga javob berish) bo'limidan topamiz. E'tibor bering:

Band score 6: addresses all parts of the task although some parts may be more fully covered than others; presents a relevant position although the conclusions may become unclear or repetitive.

Tarjimasi: vazifaning barcha qismlariga javob beradi, ammo ba'zi qismlar boshqalaridan ko'ra ko'proq yozilgan; mavzuga oid munosabat berilgan ammo xulosalar noaniq yoki takroriy bo'lishi mumkin.

Band score 7: addresses all parts of the task; presents a clear position throughout the response.

Tarjimasi: Savolning barcha qismlari qamrab olingan va javob berish davomida aniq munosabat berilgan.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

Faqat siz qo’shiladigan tomon haqida bahs olib borish ko’tarilgan masalaning boshqa tomonini muhokama qilish mumkin emas degani emas. Agar savolda ikki xil qarama-qarshi fikrlar berilgan bo’lsa, siz ularning ikkalasini ham Task response baholash mezonidan 7 bal olishingiz uchun teng muhokama qilishingiz kerak.

Faqatgina siz qo’shiladigan tomonni yoritib berish kerak degan noto’gri fikr IELTS kandidatlarini 6 balda qotib qolishiga sababchi bo’ladi, chunki ularning insholarida savolning ba’zi qismlari boshqalaridan ko’ra ko’proq yoritilgan bo’ladi. (6 balning Task Response baholash mezoniga e’tibor bersangiz, ba’zi qismlar boshqalaridan ko’ra ko’proq yoritilgan deb aytiladi.)

Xuddi shunday yana bir muommo “discussion essay” deb ataladigan tur bilan bog’liq. Ko’pincha menga, bunday turda o’z fikringni bermasliging kerak deb aytishadi. Bu fikr shunchalik muammoliki, u ko’p odamlarni 6 balda qotib qolishiga sababchi bo’ladi, chunki bunday fikrga asoslanib yozilgan insholar berilgan savolga javob orqali yozuvchining aniq munosabatini ifodalamaydi. (Aniq munosabatni ifodalay olish Task Responseda 7 balga tengdir.) Butun inshodan kelib chiqib o’z munosabatingizni aniq ifoda etish juda muhimdir va ko’pchilik 6 baldagi o’quvchilar bu borada xato qilishadi.

Xattoki, vazifani “opinion essay” deb tahlil qilib, barcha qoidalarga aniq amal qilib yozuvchilar ham o’z fikrlarini javob bo’ylab yaxlit shakllantira olmaydilar. Shuni aytish kerakki, siz fikringizni introduction (kirish qism), conclusion (xulosa) yoki body paragraf (asosiy qism) da aytib o’tish orqali yaxlit va aniq shakllantirishga erisha olmaysiz.
Sizning savolga munosabatingiz sizning argumentingiz va siz ishlatgan til orqali aniq yoki noaniq bo’ladi.

Eslab qoling, IELTS tildan qanchalik mohirona foydalana olish, murakkab masalani qanchalik aniq va tushunarli muhokama qila olish va shu mavzuda fikrlaringizni ifodalay ola bilish qobiliyatingizni tekshiradi.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

✍️ IELTS Writing. 3-qism.

Axir IELTS Writingda turli savollar beriladi, nega biz ularni turlay olmaymiz? 🤔

Insholarni turlashda asosiy muommo shuki, o'quvchilar savolni o'qishadi va o'zlari o'rgangan turlar va qoidalarga moslashtirish uchun savolni o'zlari sezmagan holda o'zgartirib yuborishadi.

Shuning uchun ham, "bu mavzudagi hamma narsani muhokama qilishim va o'z munosabatimni aniqlashtirishim kerak" deyishdan ko'ra, ular "men discussion insho yozishim kerak va fikrimni bermasligim kerak" yoki "opinion insho yozishim kerak va savolning men qo'shiladigan tomonini yozib, qolganlariga e'tibor bermasligim kerak" deb o'ylashadi.

Bu fikrning ikkisi ham noto'g'ri va ular balingizni tushiradi. Agar men IELTS guruhiga dars o'tsam, men talabalarga qandaydir insho turlarini emas, balkim bir qancha mavzular va ularga oid ingliz tilida ishlatiladigan so'zlar va grammatika qoidalarini o'rgatgan bo'lardim.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

IELTS o'rganuvchilari uchun quyidagilarni bilish muhim:

☑️ mavzuga oid muommolarni muhokama qilish va ehtimoliy yechimlar berish;

☑️ nimadirning yaxshi va yomon tomonlarini muhokama qilish va baho berish;

☑️ mavzuga oid bir yoki ikki fikrni muhokama qilish va o'z fikrini berish;

☑️ muommoning ehtimoliy sabablarini va oqibatlarini muhokama qilish;

Esda saqlang, hech bir savolga mana bunday usulda javob berish shart yoki, aynan, shu yo'sinda javob berish mumkin deb aytish noto'g'ri. Har bir imtihonda, sizga berilgan savolni muvozanatni saqlagan holda muhokama qiling va mavzuga o'z munosabatingizni aniq ifodalang.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

✍️ IELTS Writing. Shaxsiy munosabatning yo’qligi (by Pauline Cullen)

6 balda qotib qolgan odamlar ko’pincha mendan: “Men IELTS writing dagi savolga qo’shilganim yaxshimi yoki qarshi bo’lganim yaxshiroqmi?” deb so’rashadi. Shu savolni berishning o’ziyoq 6 balga xos yana boshqa bir muammoni ko’rsatadi: ko’plab o’quvchilar shu mavzu borasida o’z fikrlarini aniq bilmasdan turib, yozishni boshlashadi.

Bu fikrni aytayotgan odamlar aslida “Men nima deb fikr berishim kerakligini o’rgating. Menga qanday fikrlashni o’rgating” deyayotgan bo’ladi. Agar siz yozishdan oldin bu mavzu haqida fikrlaringizni aniqlashtirib olmasangiz, o’z shaxsiy munosabatingizni bildira olmaysiz. Bu esa keying muammoga chambarchas bog’liq: fikrlarning yetishmasligi.☝️

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

P.S. Ehh, Pauline xonim qanchalar haq! U bu gaplari orqali meni yuragimdagi gaplarni aytayotganga o’xshaydi. Chunki, ba’zi talabalarning fikrlash darajasi shunchalik cheklanganki, ularga shu mavzuda o’z fikrlaringni bildir deb aytsam, lom-mim demay, tikilib turishadi va mendan nima deyishim mumkin deb so’rashadi. 🙄 Axir, meni vazifam til o’rgatish, qanday fikrlashni o’rgatish emasku! 😣

Qadrli o’quvchilar, siz ingliz tilida yaxshi insho yozishdan avval, shu mavzuni o’z ona tilingizda to’liq tushunishingiz va shaxsiy qarashlaringizni ravon ifodalay olishingiz kerak. Tajribam orqali shuni kuzatamanki, aksariyat talabalar, hattoki o’z ona tilisida fikrlarni ifodali bildira olishmaydi. Yuqorida Pauline xonim tomonidan aytilgandek, insho yozish bilan bog’liq muammolarimiz fikr yetishmasligidan kelib chiqadi. Fikr yetishmasligi esa kitob o’qimasligimizdan yoki kam kitob kam o’qiganimiz 📚 uchun shakllanadi. 😔

Gapirsam gap ko’p! Bu men uchun eng og’riqli mavzulardan biri! Keyingi postlarimda men, albatta, shu mavzuga qaytaman!

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

Let's today read and analyse with you a sample essay 📑. The following essay is taken from Practice Tests Plus 2 📚 (which is notorious for its challenging reading passages) by Morgan Terry and Judy Wilson. My personal analysis 👩‍🏫 of the essay will soon be posted.

The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true to say that fossil fuels are still our main source of energy today, and as more countries develop their industries and their economies, the scale of their use continues to grow.

However, we are now well aware of the consequences of relying on this energy source for our natural environment. Global warming and the damage to the protective ozone layer are caused by carbon dioxide and other by-products of fossil fuels. So I certainly agree that these problems are global rather than national ones. They threaten our whole planet and no action by a single country could solve them. Furthermore these problems are urgent as nobody knows when our natural world will be so damaged that it will no longer be able to support us.

While some countries already use safer alternative energy sources, such as wind, water or solar power, it seems that there has not been sufficient investment in developing the technology to make such alternatives viable for all. So
it should definitely be a global priority to invest in such research and development.

Of course there are other global priorities that we also need to address, such as poverty and disease. But while it may be the case that these problems are just as important as the energy problem, there is a sense that time is ticking away for our planet and any solutions to the energy issue will take some time to achieve.

So in conclusion, I would agree that finding alternatives to fossil fuels is certainly the most pressing global priority, if not the most important one for our world today.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

Below you may read my personal analysis of a sample essay 📑 given in the previous post. 🔎✍

The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true to say that fossil fuels are still our main source of energy today, and as more countries develop their industries and their economies, the scale of their use continues to grow.

This is introduction and it includes only a paraphrase of the topic. However, it doesn’t paraphrase word by word; instead, it gives a general idea about the topic: fossil fuels are our main source and their use is growing.

However, we are now well aware of the consequences of relying on this energy source for our natural environment. Global warming and the damage to the protective ozone layer are caused by carbon dioxide and other by-products of fossil fuels. So I certainly agree that these problems are global rather than national ones. They threaten our whole planet and no action by a single country could solve them. Furthermore these problems are urgent as nobody knows when our natural world will be so damaged that it will no longer be able to support us.

In the first body paragraph, they described problems caused by fossil fuels. They stressed the urgency and the scale of such problems.

While some countries already use safer alternative energy sources, such as wind, water or solar power, it seems that there has not been sufficient investment in developing the technology to make such alternatives viable for all. So it should definitely be a global priority to invest in such research and development.

In this paragraph, the writer emphasized why such matters should be of global importance and be given a worldwide priority. The writer focuses attention to the need for enough investment and research in these fields.

Of course there are other global priorities that we also need to address, such as poverty and disease. But while it may be the case that these problems are just as important as the energy problem, there is a sense that time is ticking away for our planet and any solutions to the energy issue will take some time to achieve.

The third body paragraph mentions about other global issues. However, the writer states that they are not as pressing as the problems created by fossil fuel use.

So in conclusion, I would agree that finding alternatives to fossil fuels is certainly the most pressing global priority, if not the most important one for our world today.

In the conclusion, the writer restates the urgent demand for solving issues brought about by fossil fuel use.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

Below you can read my own answer to the same question. 👩‍🏫📄

The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays we are bombarded with worrying news about the urgent need to find alternative energy sources to replace the use of fossil fuels. However, I do think that these issues have been exaggerated by the media.

In fact, fossil fuel use has created many problems for the environment such as global warming, rising sea levels or deterioration of the ozone layer. These issues have significantly affected the world, as a result, some natural wonders and miracles have become a thing of the past and our future posterity can no longer witness them. Not only humans, but also flora and fauna world have suffered noticeably as their habitats are being destroyed, which makes them adapt to new living conditions.

However, media coverage of such issues plays a role on this regard. Usually, these problems are overstated by the media, which colors our judgment. The media benefits when a recently published or broadcast piece of news grabs public attention, making them overreact. Thus, such matters are chosen deliberately, the most threatening features being stressed.

In my opinion, changes in the ecology and climate are inexorable as they have happened several times since the dawn of mankind. We, as humans, are flexible beings and able to adjust our lifestyles. Instead, we must turn attention to other pressing problems of our humanity such as arms trade and wars. These issues are a stain on the whole humanity, and hundreds of innocent lives are lost every day. Maintenance of peace and gun control should be prioritized on a global scale.

To sum up, some problems are simply highlighted on purpose, which turns people’s attention away from other weighty matters. Matters of global importance should be explored thoroughly before they are dealt with.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

Xabaringiz bor, so’nggi kunlarda Pauline Cullen tomonidan yozilgan qo’llanmalarga 📚 bo’lgan ixlosim ortgan. Men har kun uning kitoblaridan o’zim uchun yangi narsalar kashf etyapman va topganlarimni siz qadrli obunachilar bilan ham bo’lishib boryapman.

Men o’rgangan eng asosiy tushuncha bu IELTS da yozilgan insholarni qandaydir qoliplarga solish, aynan mana shu uslub to’g’ri va hamma shu uslubda yozishi kerak degan tushunchalar noto’g’ri. Insho yozish bu shaxsiy mahoratning bir namoyishi bo’lib, unda belgilab berilgan qoidalar bo’lmaydi.☝️Qoliplar faqatgina insho yozishni endigina o’rganayotgan yoki til darajasi 4-5 bal atrofida bo’lgan o’quvchilar uchung insho yozish haqida umumiy tasavvur hosil qilish uchungina ishlatilishi mumkin. Bu fikrlar ham o’z writing uslubimni, ham teaching metodlarimni o’zgartirishimga sababchi bo’ldi.

Mening Pauline Cullen fikrlariga amal qilgan holda, quyidagi mavzuda insho yozdim. Marhamat, o’qib ko’ring. Quyiroqda, bu inshoning tuzilishi haqida fikrlarimni keltirib o’taman.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is argued that a growth in the number of sport amenities promises an improvement in public health. Although such facilities are indispensible to maintain public health, I do think that it is not adequate and some other measures should be taken for this purpose.

Admittedly, the number of sport clubs, gyms and others certainly contributes to better public health. Particularly, such amenities should be created sufficiently and be fully equipped in schools, as children need to understand the importance of sport in our life. Besides that, having a gym within the walking distance of people’s homes or workplaces facilitates taking up sports for overly busy people such as working mothers.

However, merely increasing sport facilities in number doesn’t necessarily yield expected results. The underlying problem is much more complex than it seems. We need to address the root problems deteriorating public health, such as a sedentary lifestyle, an unhealthy diet or detrimental habits such as smoking or drug addiction. In my opinion, increasing public awareness of such issues is the way forward, and this should be done with the help of the media. TV or radio programs, posters and such other things should be created in sheer amounts and placed in many places at an eye level. Celebrities should play a role by creating an image of a healthy lifestyle in the public eye.

To sum up, the issue in question is much weightier and no solution can produce immediate results. The difficulty associated with poor public health is people’s wrong attitude to their own body and only when we succeed in shifting their view of health, maintenance of good health in the society can be achieved.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

- Sen IELTS dan yaxshi bal olishing uchun avval grammatikani yaxshi o’qishing kerak!
- Grammatika rostan shartmi? IELTSda grammatika savoli yo’qku? 😒

Tanish savol, tanish javob. Shunday emasmi?! Sizga aksariyat IELTS o’qituvchilari shu maslahatni berishadi. Lekin aksariyat IELTS o’rganuvchilarni bu maslahatga quloq solishmaydi. O’qituvchim yo meni bilimlarimni to’gri baholay olmayapti, yoki darslarni atayin cho’zib, menda ko’proq daromad undirib olmoqchi deb o’ylashadimiyey!

Yaqinda kanalimiz obunachilarimizdan biri bizga quyidagi fikrlarini yubordilar. O’qib ko’ring (ba’zi imloviy o’zgartirishlar kiritildi):

Grammatikaga doir tushuntirishlarni ham qo'shib borsangiz sizdan minnatdor bo'lar edik. Misol uchun: ingliz tilida gaplarni predlogsiz tasavvur qilib bolmaydi. Otlar ham, fe’llar ham, sifatlar ham object bilan birikishi uchun predlogga ehtiyoj sezadi. Self-study o'qiyotgan va ba'zi qurilmalar(structures)ni o’zbekchaga tarjima qilishda muammoga duch kelayotganlar uchun ham yaxshi bo’lardi. Grammatika qoidalarini uzviy IELTS bilan birgalikda olib borilsa demoqchiman.I think being aware of all grammar rules helps students (to) improve their understanding of tasks in all skills.


“IELTS da grammatika rostanam shartmi?” deb so’raydigan o’quvchilarga qarab, “ещё как!” deging keladi!

Men ko’p yillik tajribam orqali shuni kuzatdimki, IELTS dan 5-5,5-6 va ba’zan 6,5 oladigan talabarning grammatika bo’yicha bilimlarida katta bo’shliqlar bor va yuqori bal olish uchun bu bo’shliqlarni to’ldirish lozim. Ba’zida esa, ular grammatikani faqat nazariy jihatdan o’rganishgan, va amalda esa bu qoidalarni qo’llab, speaking va writingda gaplar tuza olishmaydi. Har ikki holda ham, grammatika qoidalarni chuqur o’rganish va ularni faol amalda qo’llashga harakat qilish til darajangizni oshirishga foyda beradi.

Ushbu fikrlarni inobatga olgan holda, keyin postlarimizda grammatikaga bag'ishlangan matnlar tayyorlashga harakat qilamiz.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

I liked this series of videos 🎥 so much that I decided to share with you. A funny boy called Markian 🙋‍♂️makes videos to make people smile! 😊 His videos are full of positive energy! Hope you enjoy watching this video!

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw

A LACK OF IDEAS LEADS TO REPETITION by Pauline Cullen

Common problem: People often tell me they don’t know what to write about in writing task 2 and they find it hard to get ideas.

When candidates don’t know what to write about, the result is often at least one paragraph where the same idea is repeated over and over. This type of writing will keep you stuck at band 6 or 6.5.

Here is an example from an essay I was sent recently. I have corrected the language errors so that you can focus only on the ideas.

https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUDtTlZ8_NI0R8pLw