🚨 Attention WA voters! 🚨

Your GOP endorsed SOS candidate is now on Telegram! He is running against Hobbs and needs our help! Please give his channel a follow, and if you haven't already heard from him, make sure you go talk to him at an upcoming event! 👇

Oregon all-mail elections are a farce. Especially with such dirty voter rolls. They are essentially littering the pavement with no chain-of-custody ballots.

Anyone who supports this system opposes election integrity.

This is an abbreviated text version of the video above discussing the ridiculous things our SOS wants us to believe.

Suspicious spikes in new registrations in Washington State in the lead up to 2020.

We are seeing them in multiple states including Florida.

We call them the "Trump Towers" although they were NOT done to help him.

h/t: @ElectionEducation

We met with Secretary of State Diego Morales and Kegan Prentice showing them the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) positions on CVRs and other states' published CVRs. Was the Indiana Election Division's guidance in error (Page 333 of https://www.in.gov/sos/elections/files/2024-Election-Administrators-Manual.FINAL.pdf)?  We were told all of the vendors and the Indiana Election Division were called into Luke Britt's office to discuss the dozens of complaints filed, and that no one at that meeting knew what a CVR was exactly.

Mr. Daughtery claims otherwise as you will see in this video.

Why did Senator Greg Walker push so hard to put forth a bill (SB224) deeming CVRs to be made private under state law when they are for the public?

We have been told that Indiana elections are safe and secure. If our elections are truly safe and secure, that will be demonstrated easily via citizen analysis of the CVRs. If our elections are safe and secure, there should be no hesitation by our elected and appointed officials to release this information. However, no transparency, no trust. Give us transparency, and then we will trust.

Ballot imprinters print a unique ID number on each ballot which can be used to later identify ballots for audits. This is common for risk limiting audits.

There has been concern that this can also be used to tie the ballot back to the voter in some cases.

It's not used in all elections offices. Some election systems come with an imprinter, like the DS300, and other imprinters can be added to the scanner later.

Now you know what a ballot imprinter is and what it's used for. Just another tidbit for your tool box. 🇺🇸

Attention mail in ballot states:

My research team and I have been discussing ways to educate the public on important issues that could help cut down on fraud opportunities. This started because during a recent election I spotted a ballot in a community recycle bin. When I went back to investigate further, the ballot was gone.

We wanted to think of a way to educate people so they wouldn't do the same thing and have someone vote their ballot. We came up with an idea of posting friendly signs near groups of mailboxes, like apartment complexes.

Here is an example. It contains basic information, it is non-partisan, and directs voters to an official source for questions regarding their own registration.

We are asking people to print and post something like this in their area anywhere there are lots of mailboxes. Other states that use mail in ballots could come up with a similar sign that is relevant to their state.

He's not a criminal. He's justice challenged.

Suggested Reading:

A research paper from Berkley in Feb. 2020 called " Ballot-Marking Devices (BMDs) Cannot Assure the Will of the Voters"

Good arguments for paper ballots, for any states still not using them, and also lays out some concerns we may have previously overlooked.

For example, one part that talks about how the machines lack "contestability" because if a voter witnesses a machine error, they have no proof to show anyone that it happened. Makes perfect sense now. They built the machines so that even if voters notice an issue, they can't prove it to anyone and therefore goes nowhere.

Some other good points too, but ignore what it says about risk limiting audits. I disagree with this section. Mainly because I disagree with RLA because in WA, the ballots being audited may not even contain the race being audited, and sample sizes are tiny.

Friendly reminder!

It’s been said over and over again that the GOP is going the way of the Whigs.

But I will all but guarantee you the party will collapse if they made a sincere effort to not nominate Trump at the convention.

Tens of millions will never again support the party. Hell, they’ve nominated him twice and I’m probably done with them after 2024.

Relish the opportunity to be an outsider—Embrace that label…because it's the outsiders who change the world…

2024 belongs to We the People!

There are so many possible ways to sabotage an election. Familiarize yourself with some of the possibilities.

Try to prepare for all options. Prevent the ones you can and plan your response to the ones you can't prevent.

Education is a big factor here. How are you getting the message across to the voters? How are you going to get your information out quickly? Do you have a central reporting method?

(List is not exhaustive and answers will vary by state)

There has been chatter that people are trying to remove Trump from the ballot here in Washington after his wrongful conviction.

Point 1:
Let me share with you the story of Terra Simmons. She was convicted of a drug related felony in 2011 and did like 20 months in prison. She was elected to our state legislature in 2020, representing the 23rd district. Can you guess which party? Yes, Democrat.

Point 2:
Washington state law says that a felon's voting rights are restored automatically unless the person is serving a "sentence of total confinement" and last I checked, Trump was not sitting in a prison cell. (yet, and praying never) RCW 29A.08.520

It's just click-bait. Don't buy into it. Trump 2024! 🇺🇸