Did you know your personal information is for sale? It's also being used to influence elections. It's especially problematic with early voters.

Early voters are disenfranchising themselves by submitting their ballot early.

This leaves too much time for the data crunching cheaters to counter their votes with votes for the "chosen ones" who end up "winning."

So let me get this straight...

A small town in Wisconsin wants to use hand count paper ballots for their election and they get swarmed by feds wanting to investigate what is going on there.

And meanwhile, we got Georgia adding about 50,000 registrations a month to the voter rolls with no list maintenance happening and the feds are not investigating that?

We are in BIZARRO WORLD

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/small-wisconsin-town-under-review-feds-after-eliminating/

I've shared similar data before. This is from WA. It shows voter registrations and registration updates from 2016-2024.

The reason I bring it up is to suggest you keep an eye out, especially in Sept and Oct this year for new voters or changes, like adding mailing addresses or changing addresses that would cause a ballot to be sent somewhere other than to the correct voter.

Lastly, in WA state law, voter challenges must be done 45+ days before an election UNLESS they register within that 45 days, then you can challenge them closer to the election. Check your own state laws on the issue.

I cannot stress how important it is to be present at your elections office. If you aren't there, you can't assume someone else is there, and if they are, do they know what to look for?

Take everything you have learned over the past few years and apply it!

Go get acquainted with your local election staff and know the layout of the land. Visit the machine testing, and use every opportunity there is between now and the election to go make yourself present.

This is very important, and it's not a huge commitment. Go observe everything you can at the elections office. Ask questions when appropriate. Write yourself notes as soon as you leave. (Often don't allow you to take notes while observing, at least here.)

We need eyes in every elections office across the country!

For all of our Northeast US friends! Hand Counting Demo and training!!!

“Let My People Go” Interview: Nation-State Vulnerability Expert Jeff Lenberg Details Election Machine “Instrumentation” That Manipulates Results Up and Down Ballots

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/let-my-people-go-interview-nation-state-vulnerability/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=let-my-people-go-interview-nation-state-vulnerability

🚨 Attention WA voters! 🚨

Your GOP endorsed SOS candidate is now on Telegram! He is running against Hobbs and needs our help! Please give his channel a follow, and if you haven't already heard from him, make sure you go talk to him at an upcoming event! 👇

Oregon all-mail elections are a farce. Especially with such dirty voter rolls. They are essentially littering the pavement with no chain-of-custody ballots.

Anyone who supports this system opposes election integrity.

This is an abbreviated text version of the video above discussing the ridiculous things our SOS wants us to believe.

Suspicious spikes in new registrations in Washington State in the lead up to 2020.

We are seeing them in multiple states including Florida.

We call them the "Trump Towers" although they were NOT done to help him.

h/t: @ElectionEducation

We met with Secretary of State Diego Morales and Kegan Prentice showing them the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) positions on CVRs and other states' published CVRs. Was the Indiana Election Division's guidance in error (Page 333 of https://www.in.gov/sos/elections/files/2024-Election-Administrators-Manual.FINAL.pdf)?  We were told all of the vendors and the Indiana Election Division were called into Luke Britt's office to discuss the dozens of complaints filed, and that no one at that meeting knew what a CVR was exactly.

Mr. Daughtery claims otherwise as you will see in this video.

Why did Senator Greg Walker push so hard to put forth a bill (SB224) deeming CVRs to be made private under state law when they are for the public?

We have been told that Indiana elections are safe and secure. If our elections are truly safe and secure, that will be demonstrated easily via citizen analysis of the CVRs. If our elections are safe and secure, there should be no hesitation by our elected and appointed officials to release this information. However, no transparency, no trust. Give us transparency, and then we will trust.

Ballot imprinters print a unique ID number on each ballot which can be used to later identify ballots for audits. This is common for risk limiting audits.

There has been concern that this can also be used to tie the ballot back to the voter in some cases.

It's not used in all elections offices. Some election systems come with an imprinter, like the DS300, and other imprinters can be added to the scanner later.

Now you know what a ballot imprinter is and what it's used for. Just another tidbit for your tool box. 🇺🇸

Attention mail in ballot states:

My research team and I have been discussing ways to educate the public on important issues that could help cut down on fraud opportunities. This started because during a recent election I spotted a ballot in a community recycle bin. When I went back to investigate further, the ballot was gone.

We wanted to think of a way to educate people so they wouldn't do the same thing and have someone vote their ballot. We came up with an idea of posting friendly signs near groups of mailboxes, like apartment complexes.

Here is an example. It contains basic information, it is non-partisan, and directs voters to an official source for questions regarding their own registration.

We are asking people to print and post something like this in their area anywhere there are lots of mailboxes. Other states that use mail in ballots could come up with a similar sign that is relevant to their state.

He's not a criminal. He's justice challenged.

Suggested Reading:

A research paper from Berkley in Feb. 2020 called " Ballot-Marking Devices (BMDs) Cannot Assure the Will of the Voters"

Good arguments for paper ballots, for any states still not using them, and also lays out some concerns we may have previously overlooked.

For example, one part that talks about how the machines lack "contestability" because if a voter witnesses a machine error, they have no proof to show anyone that it happened. Makes perfect sense now. They built the machines so that even if voters notice an issue, they can't prove it to anyone and therefore goes nowhere.

Some other good points too, but ignore what it says about risk limiting audits. I disagree with this section. Mainly because I disagree with RLA because in WA, the ballots being audited may not even contain the race being audited, and sample sizes are tiny.