Forwarded from The People's Audit - Kris Jurski
We have been carefully vetting the results out of The People's Audit Texas.
Frankly, I was so shocked by what we were finding, I wanted to be sure it was not something wrong in the data we were getting from the state.
We just got word that an important records request from Tarrant County finally came in.
Our TPA reports showed 36,064 Active Registrants in Tarrant County, TX with no good mailing address on file.
The records request on the returned postcard that were recently sent out there showed +33,600 voters returned as undeliverable.
Let's say that printing + postage cost tax payers there about $2 for each mailing.
That is about $67,000 Tarrant County wasted on a SINGLE MAILING!
There are 254 Counties in TX and there is a good bet it cost more to send mail in ballots.
So far in Florida, since the 2020 election, we have reduced the amont of bad addresses by +340,000.
That is easily a MILLION DOLLARS in tax payer savings between printing, postage, retrieval, review, storage & removal.
GET TPA TODAY
Frankly, I was so shocked by what we were finding, I wanted to be sure it was not something wrong in the data we were getting from the state.
We just got word that an important records request from Tarrant County finally came in.
Our TPA reports showed 36,064 Active Registrants in Tarrant County, TX with no good mailing address on file.
The records request on the returned postcard that were recently sent out there showed +33,600 voters returned as undeliverable.
Let's say that printing + postage cost tax payers there about $2 for each mailing.
That is about $67,000 Tarrant County wasted on a SINGLE MAILING!
There are 254 Counties in TX and there is a good bet it cost more to send mail in ballots.
So far in Florida, since the 2020 election, we have reduced the amont of bad addresses by +340,000.
That is easily a MILLION DOLLARS in tax payer savings between printing, postage, retrieval, review, storage & removal.
GET TPA TODAY
🔥20
Forwarded from r p
The ‘Vote Early’ and ‘Bank YOUR Vote’ idea/movement being promoted by the newRNC have what appears to be valid points of concern. ONE) Being that if you vote early, your vote is locked in, and no one can vote for you. TWO) ‘We saw what they did to Kari Lake’s general election; the machines malfunctioning’. Honestly, I can see the logic. HOWEVER, please allow me to elaborate why this approach is misguided at best, purposefully deceptive/deviant at worst.
Yes, by voting in person on Election Day, it IS POSSIBLE that someone can vote for you before hand. SHOULD that happen, call the sheriff and request a report to be filed (demand if needed). Seek a provisional ballot. AT LEAST the ‘steal’ is on record. Someone voting in your stead does happen, but it is QUITE RARE in the larger picture, especially if you are an active voter. You DO HAVE options.
Next, by requesting, filling out, and mailing a ballot early. One has already “played their hand”. Meaning, they (bad guys) KNOW with a high degree of accuracy on WHOM you voted for (understand Heat Maps). Where your ballot is while in transit, and what they need to do to counter/dilute your vote should it NOT be intercepted/trashed. OR, they can simply print YOUR ballot in subtle ways to force it to adjudication when scanned/tallied (QUITE COMMON). There is evidence and affidavits all over this country detailing this chain of events. It is a numbers game. They can print up, change an address, mail, intercept, harvest, and submit ballots by the thousands- QUICKLY!
As to HARVESTING: Let us assume a county has 100,000 registered voters. And for this illustration, let us assume the voter rolls are 100% pristine! In a consequential general election, one can expect a voter turnout upwards to 70% AT BEST. This leaves 30,000 non-voters (FROM A PRISTINE VOTER ROLL) that can be utilized for a potential steal. NOW imagine dirty voter rolls! That is nothing for a high-speed printer. How many precincts and counties had 90-100% participation rates? See the above paragraph.
By voting on Election Day, or as close as possible to Election Day. One has diminished greatly the opportunity for the bad guy’s to intercept/dilute your vote at best. And at worst, force the bad actors to openly cheat/subvert an election (see Kari Lake’s governor election 2022). ALSO, it HAMPERS the ability for bad actors to adjust the computer algorithms aiding the electronic steal early.
It pains many of us that the powers to be in the new RNC are falling for this “Bank the Vote” effort. And are not at all willing to debate many VERY QUALIFIED front line election ‘experts’. In some cases, some newRNC actors being paid to push such an agenda. There is too much at stake!
YES, I know the newGOP is endorsed by President Trump, and Laura Trump is one of the co-chairs. Yes I know, the very popular Scott Pressler has been hired by the newGOP. Scott has done some excellent work! BUT THEY ARE WRONG when it comes to ‘legal ballot harvesting’ and the ‘Bank Your Vote’.
Vote in person, on Election Day! And if they automatically send you a mail in ballot, fill it out. Put it in your back pocket or purse. Should there be major machine issues on Election Day. Simply drop off your completed mail-in. BETTER YET, push for paper ballots, hand counted ONLY!
Yes, by voting in person on Election Day, it IS POSSIBLE that someone can vote for you before hand. SHOULD that happen, call the sheriff and request a report to be filed (demand if needed). Seek a provisional ballot. AT LEAST the ‘steal’ is on record. Someone voting in your stead does happen, but it is QUITE RARE in the larger picture, especially if you are an active voter. You DO HAVE options.
Next, by requesting, filling out, and mailing a ballot early. One has already “played their hand”. Meaning, they (bad guys) KNOW with a high degree of accuracy on WHOM you voted for (understand Heat Maps). Where your ballot is while in transit, and what they need to do to counter/dilute your vote should it NOT be intercepted/trashed. OR, they can simply print YOUR ballot in subtle ways to force it to adjudication when scanned/tallied (QUITE COMMON). There is evidence and affidavits all over this country detailing this chain of events. It is a numbers game. They can print up, change an address, mail, intercept, harvest, and submit ballots by the thousands- QUICKLY!
As to HARVESTING: Let us assume a county has 100,000 registered voters. And for this illustration, let us assume the voter rolls are 100% pristine! In a consequential general election, one can expect a voter turnout upwards to 70% AT BEST. This leaves 30,000 non-voters (FROM A PRISTINE VOTER ROLL) that can be utilized for a potential steal. NOW imagine dirty voter rolls! That is nothing for a high-speed printer. How many precincts and counties had 90-100% participation rates? See the above paragraph.
By voting on Election Day, or as close as possible to Election Day. One has diminished greatly the opportunity for the bad guy’s to intercept/dilute your vote at best. And at worst, force the bad actors to openly cheat/subvert an election (see Kari Lake’s governor election 2022). ALSO, it HAMPERS the ability for bad actors to adjust the computer algorithms aiding the electronic steal early.
It pains many of us that the powers to be in the new RNC are falling for this “Bank the Vote” effort. And are not at all willing to debate many VERY QUALIFIED front line election ‘experts’. In some cases, some newRNC actors being paid to push such an agenda. There is too much at stake!
YES, I know the newGOP is endorsed by President Trump, and Laura Trump is one of the co-chairs. Yes I know, the very popular Scott Pressler has been hired by the newGOP. Scott has done some excellent work! BUT THEY ARE WRONG when it comes to ‘legal ballot harvesting’ and the ‘Bank Your Vote’.
Vote in person, on Election Day! And if they automatically send you a mail in ballot, fill it out. Put it in your back pocket or purse. Should there be major machine issues on Election Day. Simply drop off your completed mail-in. BETTER YET, push for paper ballots, hand counted ONLY!
👍17💯16❤4🔥1
Most captured blue states have mail in voting. That should be all you need to know about that.
💯29⚡5🤬5
Where do you get the most pushback in your election accountability efforts?
Anonymous Poll
11%
Observation. They don't want us to see what is going on, we can't watch.
7%
Public records. They won't give us records.
19%
Cleaning the voter rolls. They either deny challenges, leave the rolls dirty, or attack us.
12%
Getting anyone to listen period. They won't listen to my ideas.
30%
The machines. They are hell-bent on using their machines.
2%
What pushback? Everything is going as planned
4%
I'm getting more than push-back. They block me all together.
15%
It's not the elections office that gives me a hard time, it's the establishement party dwellers.
So they won't talk about 2020, but they will talk about Russian elections? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/putin-hails-electoral-victory-that-was-preordained-after-harshly-suppressing-opposition-voices/ar-BB1k4pKW?ocid=winp2fptaskbar&cvid=29cae2e0ec9e4790b5e6f18055f8c129&ei=7
😁4🤯3🤔2⚡1
One of our fellow researchers in WA has been digging into the reason why some NCOA records aren't being updated in the voter rolls.
He has been going back and forth with the state and the counties trying to figure out where problem is in this process for months.
It appears the issue is within our VoteWA (total vote) system at the SOS level. Not all records are being passed on to the counties for processing.
This is in violation of state law and it's causing our voter rolls to be inaccurate. Which also means we are sending out excess ballots each election.
Now that the problem has been identified, and the issue pointed out to the state, will they do anything about it? Or duck and dodge like normal?
He has been going back and forth with the state and the counties trying to figure out where problem is in this process for months.
It appears the issue is within our VoteWA (total vote) system at the SOS level. Not all records are being passed on to the counties for processing.
This is in violation of state law and it's causing our voter rolls to be inaccurate. Which also means we are sending out excess ballots each election.
Now that the problem has been identified, and the issue pointed out to the state, will they do anything about it? Or duck and dodge like normal?
🤔15👏7👍2
Please alert each other (and us) of any issues while voting! (Especially you, AZ)
We need to watch this to track what to expect in the future. The more we understand the better we can prepare.
We need to watch this to track what to expect in the future. The more we understand the better we can prepare.
🔥10👍4🫡3
Forwarded from Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Brookings County SD begrudgingly allowed “election denier” Rick Weible 5 minutes to voice his concerns on election software being used.
It only took him 4 to drive a truck through their illusions of what they thought was a secure system.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 Twitter ▪️ Truth Social
It only took him 4 to drive a truck through their illusions of what they thought was a secure system.
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 Twitter ▪️ Truth Social
🔥18👏3❤1
Forwarded from The People's Audit - Kris Jurski
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It's almost like all the DMVs....the same people that register most people in this country to vote...are all on the same networks and technology structure.
Hmm..wonder why we had to read about them going down in the UK NEWS???
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-13224269/DMV-outage-US.html
Hmm..wonder why we had to read about them going down in the UK NEWS???
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-13224269/DMV-outage-US.html
⚡9
Does anyone have a copy of either one of these two manuals from ES&S called "Verification procedure: DS850 high speed scanner & tabulator" or "Verification procedure: election management system?" If so, please share them in a response to this message!
I'm not looking for any old manuals, they need to have the same name, please. Thanks!
I'm not looking for any old manuals, they need to have the same name, please. Thanks!
👍2❤1
Election fraud comes in many forms, including gerrymandering/redistricting.
https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/judicial-activism-in-redistricting-alters-17th-ld-and-a-dozen-washington-legislative-districts/
https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/judicial-activism-in-redistricting-alters-17th-ld-and-a-dozen-washington-legislative-districts/
ClarkCountyToday.com
Judicial activism in redistricting alters 17th LD and a dozen Washington legislative districts
A dozen Republican legislators and one Democrat legislator will be impacted by judicial redistricting decision.
⚡6❤2👍2🔥1
ESS v Hobbes Complaint - FILED.PDF
217.2 KB
Why is ES&S fighting so hard to stop the disclosure of their manuals?
⚡9👍4🔥2
Hash validation is required before each election in some states. Find out if your state performs a hash test on the election system. If not, find out why.
A hash validation is a test that is supposed to determine if a machine's code has been altered or if it is the same as the certified version of the software.
This is an important step, but like many other processes, it has flaws. Just because the hash codes match doesn't mean the system is safe.
It's one of those things that should be required, but not relied upon.
A hash validation is a test that is supposed to determine if a machine's code has been altered or if it is the same as the certified version of the software.
This is an important step, but like many other processes, it has flaws. Just because the hash codes match doesn't mean the system is safe.
It's one of those things that should be required, but not relied upon.
👍9🔥3👏1
Forwarded from The Lone Raccoon (Lone Raccoon)
Rumble link to Chapter One: https://rumble.com/v4lksnx-fingerprints-of-fraud-the-movie-chapter-1-the-voter-rolls.html
Rumble
Fingerprints of Fraud - The Movie - Chapter 1 - The Voter Rolls
First part of Jeff O'Donnell's (hopefully) epic story of his election findings over the past 3 years.
🔥4👍3
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨This week, Kate Starbird appeared on 60 Minutes, lamenting that 𝕏 only responded to 30% of the "misinformation" she flagged.
In 2018, Starbird begged her Facebook followers to vote Democrat to hold Trump responsible for "corruption and collusion" and his "racist, anti-LGBT agenda."
During the 2020 election, Starbird utilized AI to censor millions of social media posts, mapping out entire networks of Trump supporters and flagging entire narratives she deemed as "misinformation."
She worked with the Election Integrity Partnership, a CISA-backed censorship consortium, to systematically monitor, track, and censor entire belief systems at scale in the months before, during, and after the election.
What did they censor?
They silenced the discussions that the First Amendment was created to protect, including the debate on the integrity of mass mail-in voting, early voting, ballot dropboxes, and voting machines.
Since 2013, U.S. taxpayers have funded Starbird's work on censoring American citizens.
She held positions as the director of the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, a board member of CISA’s “disinformation” subcommittee, and a founding partner of the EIP.
In her 2018 Facebook post, Starbird claimed Trump's “nationalism” and "patriotism" actually stood for “white supremacy," as she encouraged her followers to vote Democrat.
During the 2020 election, Starbird and the EIP claimed every "repeat spreader of election misinformation" happened to be a Trump supporter.
When 60 Minutes featured Starbird this week, they portrayed her as an objective, non-partisan "leader of a misinformation research group."
They must have missed her Facebook post where she urged her followers to vote Democrat to stop the "rise of fascism and white nationalism."
"If we can't stop it here, it won't be stopped," she emphasized. "Your children's lives depend upon it."
"We are facing a wholly different kind of threat."
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1772712350157869503
@KanekoaTheGreat
In 2018, Starbird begged her Facebook followers to vote Democrat to hold Trump responsible for "corruption and collusion" and his "racist, anti-LGBT agenda."
During the 2020 election, Starbird utilized AI to censor millions of social media posts, mapping out entire networks of Trump supporters and flagging entire narratives she deemed as "misinformation."
She worked with the Election Integrity Partnership, a CISA-backed censorship consortium, to systematically monitor, track, and censor entire belief systems at scale in the months before, during, and after the election.
What did they censor?
They silenced the discussions that the First Amendment was created to protect, including the debate on the integrity of mass mail-in voting, early voting, ballot dropboxes, and voting machines.
Since 2013, U.S. taxpayers have funded Starbird's work on censoring American citizens.
She held positions as the director of the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, a board member of CISA’s “disinformation” subcommittee, and a founding partner of the EIP.
In her 2018 Facebook post, Starbird claimed Trump's “nationalism” and "patriotism" actually stood for “white supremacy," as she encouraged her followers to vote Democrat.
During the 2020 election, Starbird and the EIP claimed every "repeat spreader of election misinformation" happened to be a Trump supporter.
When 60 Minutes featured Starbird this week, they portrayed her as an objective, non-partisan "leader of a misinformation research group."
They must have missed her Facebook post where she urged her followers to vote Democrat to stop the "rise of fascism and white nationalism."
"If we can't stop it here, it won't be stopped," she emphasized. "Your children's lives depend upon it."
"We are facing a wholly different kind of threat."
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1772712350157869503
@KanekoaTheGreat
🤬4
Forwarded from Guy Smith
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S4654 August 3, 2020 pg. 1
In 2016, the Obama-Biden administration had to lean on congressional leadership to act as a bridge to the States because the States so distrusted their Department of Homeland Security. Over the last 4 years, this administration’s DHS has develop its own deep relationship with State officials. In 2016, only 14 State or local jurisdictions had received high-tech Albert sensors to alert them to cyber intrusions. They are deployed in all 50 States today. There were 14 States that had them in 2016, and every State has them today. It was this administration that stood up the new Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center, with participation from more than 2,600 local jurisdictions and counting.
https://www.congress.gov/116/crec/2020/08/03/CREC-2020-08-03.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2020-08-03/pdf/CREC-2020-08-03-pt1-PgS4654-2.pdf
In 2016, the Obama-Biden administration had to lean on congressional leadership to act as a bridge to the States because the States so distrusted their Department of Homeland Security. Over the last 4 years, this administration’s DHS has develop its own deep relationship with State officials. In 2016, only 14 State or local jurisdictions had received high-tech Albert sensors to alert them to cyber intrusions. They are deployed in all 50 States today. There were 14 States that had them in 2016, and every State has them today. It was this administration that stood up the new Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center, with participation from more than 2,600 local jurisdictions and counting.
https://www.congress.gov/116/crec/2020/08/03/CREC-2020-08-03.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2020-08-03/pdf/CREC-2020-08-03-pt1-PgS4654-2.pdf
❤2😱2