We have all identified many opportunities for fraud. We know it's possible and we know where the flaws are. The next step is either to catch them or talk some sense into them. Both options are easier said than done. But it must be done. We need to get creative and we need to do it faster.

🚨 Request for Information! 🚨

The hand count process we have seen have success so far are the ones where counting is done separately in each precinct.

Some states/counties have a central count system, where all ballots are sent to one location for counting. For example, mail in ballots are centrally tabulated, typically.

Are there any hand counting methods that work for a central count style election? If so, please share any info and materials you may have. 🙏

Please and Thanks!

Edit: We know hand counting in the precinct is ideal. But it would require many changes to state law, which we are out of time for in 2024 and even with more time, it would never get past committee with this legislature.

Usually I share things with you all that are completely thought through. I try to help you understand how things work or could work, like when we point out the vulnerabilities. We don't know if they are being abused, but we know it's possible, right?

Anyway... Right now I want to try something different. The other day I said we need to get creative.

This is just an idea that came over me. It hasn't been thought out all the way. It's geared towards mail ballots, but could probably be tweeked to work for other voting methods. Probably won't work in my state, but maybe it will in yours.

If they won't go for a hand count, will they go for a simultaneous machine/manual count of 1 race?

I'm not looking for criticism as to why it won't work. I'm looking for creative solutions. How can we make progress despite running into a brick wall? You don't just give up. You find another way.

Connecting America's Election Networks With FirstNet.

If you haven't already read THIS ARTICLE or THIS ONE, I recommend you do in order to get all the details.

Thank you to Dr. Bernardin for his research and to Erin Clements for her assistance in filling in the gaps and her earlier reporting on the subject.

CoA Elections 101: What Is NCOA?
https://bit.ly/45Cyj5Y 🇺🇸

#elections101 #electionintegrity #americafirst #causeofamerica #electionday #election2020 #ncoa #voting

If they do the bulk of the adjudications a week after election day, they no longer need to worry about matching the actual ballots because the audit is done already.

Lock everything up in "secure storage" and nobody will ever know!

Front Page of National Epoch Times!

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/watchdog-discovers-thousands-unexplained-changes-in-florida-voter-rolls-5419106

PDF Version of the Epoch Times Article

We need to demand accountability. They don't learn anything if we keep cutting them slack with their "oops, sorry!" excuses.

Guess what else? There is no such thing as human error when you are using the machines to count votes. Don't fall for it.

Lastly, when they say, "we are updating our procedures so it doesn't happen again," it's just an attempt to get you to go away.

Don't keep letting them slide! They knew better in the first place, that is their job! Keep letting it slide and it will never end!

Brand new website that covers all the basics of machine-free voting! http://machinefreevoting.com

The Plan 🇺🇸

#elections #electioncrime #wmd #electionfraud #americafirst #causeofamerica #coa #election2020 #elections202

Elections are complicated. Some processes are essential and others are detrimental. Some are a little bit of both. For example, the logic and accuracy test is both necessary and inadequate. We can't skip it, but we can't rely on it either.

You should be able to argue both sides of the debate.

Previously I shared something explaining how logic and accuracy tests are a joke. And they are. But until we change the process, we rely on that test to check the programming of the election definition files.

There should always be someone there from your team to observe the L&A test. It may get boring after a few times of seeing it, but if it doesn't pass, someone needs to be there to make sure proper steps are taken.

Our election, our responsibility.

What is The People's Audit Cooking Up Next?

The analytics that we have created in just the last month are breathtaking.

We can now catch mass address flips as as they happen instead of having to wait for the address to flip back.

We can now see not only the list maintenance patterns of every county, but also how they effect each party. That includes mass additions/activations from any party.

But the next report that is coming will change the game entirely.

Be sure to tune in next week ;)

I have been overwhelmed with gratitude for the outpouring of donations in just the last 24hrs. It really means a lot and reinvigorates me to put in the long hours this solution needs.

We will win this war.

If you feel you can contribute, your help is very appreciated as we are working on adding more states.
https://the-peoples-audit.org/donate/

As a reminder, the four videos we did which show you how to audit an election though public records can all be found on our rumble channel by clicking HERE.

Voter Turnout Trends

Anyone interested in doing a formal voter turnout analysis based on publicly available data found on this Wikipedia page?

A cursory look already suggest this would be very fruitful.

1) Establish a linear baseline trend between 1952 and 2000 for both voter turnout and voting-eligible population (VEP). (After WWII and before the "internet age")

2) Calculate the z-score for each election year between (and including) 1952 to 2000, taking into account the trend.

3) Use the 1952-2000 baseline trend to calculate the z-scores for 2004 to 2020.

———

Based on this simple analysis 1992, 2004 and 2020 stick out (2020 is in a league of its own, but relatively speaking 2004 was pretty bad).

People who deny election fraud in 2020, will have to explain why so many books were written after the 2004 to expose election fraud... most of these books were written by Democrats.

This simple trend analysis clearly identifies 2004 and 2020 as massive outliers. How can you claim 2004 was fraudulent but 2020 was not when the z-score for 2020 looks twice as large as 2004?

———

Is there anyone interested in doing the formal analysis and sharing their results?

KN

Here is a taste.

The trend is very linear and "robust" over a 50 year time span... what changed in 2004 and especially in 2020?

(As if this alone was not convincing enough the trend for VEP between 1980 and 2020 is even more robust... something isn't adding up and we are not doing complicated maths here...)

RFK Jr. on the 2004 election fraud. (Old article)
It's not just one party who commits election fraud, nor is there only one victim.

https://www.commondreams.org/views/2006/06/01/was-2004-election-stolen

Here is another one from RFK Jr. in 2008 talking about how the GOP targets minority voters and disenfranchises them by challenging their registrations. It also goes into HAVA and some other topics of interest.

Read both articles and take them with a grain of salt.

At the same time, some of these old articles sound an awful lot like what we experience still and are some of the same accusations we hear today.

Just sharing because I thought it was interesting due to the author being a presidential candidate.

https://www.commondreams.org/views/2008/10/28/drinking-acorn-kool-aid-how-cries-voter-fraud-cover-gop-elections-theft