From part 4, How to Audit an Election Using Voting System Event Logs

Dr. Charles Bernardin's FirstNet Presentation on Day 2 of Lindell's Symposium begins at 34:23 at this link.
https://frankspeech.com/Video/obstacles-and-solutions-to-getting-rid-of-machines-part-1

President Donald Trump has just re-Truthed the Gateway Pundit Article about FirstNet which described the Precincts in St. Johns County, FL.

We have all heard them say, "It's not connected to the internet." But do they really know that? How can we be sure?

Last week Mike Lindell and team presented to the world a tool that the public can use to detect internet connections to the election systems.

Here is what we know so far about this tool.

Everyone needs to be aware of how to respond to election malfunctions and interference.

If something is preventing you from submitting a ballot, you must hold your ground.

If the elections office is not able to process ballots, you need to find out why.

Make sure you have an emergency plan, and make sure everyone knows what to do in the event of an election emergency.

We are the only ones willing to hold anyone accountable. Address any issues immediately. If they say they will address something later, they won't. Holding them accountable later will not change the course of the election. Immediate action can.

There is a process that needs to be followed. It's that simple.

If your county or state is resistant to the idea of hand counting, here is an idea.

Hand counting should be part of all election officials training, because it should be part of their emergency plan.

Get them used to the hand counting procedures, so they can see for themselves that it's not impossible or scary.

If you have it in place as a back-up plan, it will be a fairly smooth transition when the plug gets pulled on the machines.

Plus, how can they say they don't need to know how to conduct a hand count with the many cyber attacks and related risks of today's technology?

To summarize:

Introduce hand counting as the back-up plan, then pull the plug on the machines.

Heads up, everyone! I'm getting anxious about 2024. Hope you are working as hard as I am at getting ready! It's up to us, nobody is coming to save the day.

Vote flipping is a real risk. It's not just an "election denier's conspiracy theory"

Who came up with that title, anyway? Nobody is denying the election itself. Just it's validity and accuracy. 😉 We all agree it happened. Nobody is denying there was a (s)election.

It's possible and it happens. Remember the "human error" excuses?

(This one I shared previously on the chat, not the channel. I changed the font and other minor edits.)

They made it look too easy because that was their plan all along.

We have all identified many opportunities for fraud. We know it's possible and we know where the flaws are. The next step is either to catch them or talk some sense into them. Both options are easier said than done. But it must be done. We need to get creative and we need to do it faster.

🚨 Request for Information! 🚨

The hand count process we have seen have success so far are the ones where counting is done separately in each precinct.

Some states/counties have a central count system, where all ballots are sent to one location for counting. For example, mail in ballots are centrally tabulated, typically.

Are there any hand counting methods that work for a central count style election? If so, please share any info and materials you may have. 🙏

Please and Thanks!

Edit: We know hand counting in the precinct is ideal. But it would require many changes to state law, which we are out of time for in 2024 and even with more time, it would never get past committee with this legislature.

Usually I share things with you all that are completely thought through. I try to help you understand how things work or could work, like when we point out the vulnerabilities. We don't know if they are being abused, but we know it's possible, right?

Anyway... Right now I want to try something different. The other day I said we need to get creative.

This is just an idea that came over me. It hasn't been thought out all the way. It's geared towards mail ballots, but could probably be tweeked to work for other voting methods. Probably won't work in my state, but maybe it will in yours.

If they won't go for a hand count, will they go for a simultaneous machine/manual count of 1 race?

I'm not looking for criticism as to why it won't work. I'm looking for creative solutions. How can we make progress despite running into a brick wall? You don't just give up. You find another way.

Connecting America's Election Networks With FirstNet.

If you haven't already read THIS ARTICLE or THIS ONE, I recommend you do in order to get all the details.

Thank you to Dr. Bernardin for his research and to Erin Clements for her assistance in filling in the gaps and her earlier reporting on the subject.