Your leaders have only just now realized what we are capable of.
And they are petrified.
-E
And they are petrified.
-E
π₯1.08Kπ283β€βπ₯127π83π56β€51β‘41π22π€5π€―3π₯°1
As of today, multiple countries throughout the Middle East have officially restricted the use of their airspace for U.S. led military operations.
This includes The United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, and others. More are expected to join this embargo in the days ahead.
-E
This includes The United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, and others. More are expected to join this embargo in the days ahead.
-E
β‘595π338π₯166π81π69β€51β€βπ₯17π13π€―7π3
Navalny was an avowed nazi who tried to overthrow the Russian government, and was caught on camera requesting millions from a British MI6 agent to orchestrate a color revolution in Russia.
His death is not one people should weep for.
-E
His death is not one people should weep for.
-E
π₯851π337π73π42β‘34β€26π18π4π€―3
We will not fail you,
Hang on tight.
-E
Hang on tight.
-E
π₯745π630β€197π44β€βπ₯40π27β‘25π20π₯°19π€―3π2
The "media" of the West won't show you or tell you, but all across Israel, widespread protests against the government are taking place. The people are demanding a special election be held for a new government.
Hundreds of thousands of people are marching in the streets, protesting what is taking place.
The Israeli government, and their campaign of genocide, is near total collapse.
-E
Hundreds of thousands of people are marching in the streets, protesting what is taking place.
The Israeli government, and their campaign of genocide, is near total collapse.
-E
π890β€158π₯116π71π48π35β€βπ₯28β‘27π₯°7
Outside the Israeli embassy in the UK, over 200,000 protesters have gathered today against the genocide.
-
The world is waking, the people are rising.
-E
-
The world is waking, the people are rising.
-E
β€567π391π₯126β€βπ₯56π53π33π29π14β‘10π₯°5
Do you understand what is taking place?
The shattering of the blackmail network, and the resolution of constant violence across a world.
We will not fail you.
This was set in motion years ago, and we exist purely to see it through.
You will be freed.
-E
The shattering of the blackmail network, and the resolution of constant violence across a world.
We will not fail you.
This was set in motion years ago, and we exist purely to see it through.
You will be freed.
-E
π1Kβ€264π₯115β€βπ₯82π60π32β‘24π₯°23π€©8π4
The biggest surprise is just ahead.
Do you believe in miracles?
We saved the best for last.
-E
Do you believe in miracles?
We saved the best for last.
-E
β€957π715π₯140β€βπ₯97π65π47β‘20π13π€―6π₯°5π€5
That truth might not exist in a vacuum of power.
For you.
We fight.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1759028157191946257
-E
For you.
We fight.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1759028157191946257
-E
X (formerly Twitter)
Elon Musk (@elonmusk) on X
Worth hearing
π634π₯124β€72π54β€βπ₯32π27β‘11π10π6π₯°2
Just ahead, I will yield my greatest help to Julian Assange.
-
We are born to purpose, rise to yours.
-E
-
We are born to purpose, rise to yours.
-E
π1.02Kβ€256π₯132β€βπ₯82π57π24π21β‘18
We are moving on it now.
-
"A People and their King
Through ancient sin grown strong,
Because they feared no reckoning
Would set no bound to wrong;
But now their hour is past,
And we who bore it find
Evil Incarnate held at last
To answer to mankind."
-
Best wishes from a team of less than ten.
-E
-
"A People and their King
Through ancient sin grown strong,
Because they feared no reckoning
Would set no bound to wrong;
But now their hour is past,
And we who bore it find
Evil Incarnate held at last
To answer to mankind."
-
Best wishes from a team of less than ten.
-E
π₯890π620β€229β€βπ₯77π54π38β‘24π23π21π₯°15π€©10
On the 26th of this month.
Russia will meet with all interested Palestinian factions.
-E
Russia will meet with all interested Palestinian factions.
-E
π408π325π₯92β€50π40β‘17β€βπ₯13π8π€―7π6π€©3
Happening Now:
Israel has repeatedly carpet bombed civilian areas in Lebanon over the past 12 hours.
-
Brazil has officially cut all diplonatic ties with Israel, and recalled its ambassador.
-
The Israeli economy is in a tailspin, having shrunk over 20% since their terrorist campaign began.
-
The head of Hamas (Qatar-based) has arrived safely in Cairo, Egypt at this moment for peace talks and further discussions over Rafah.
-
Norway has moved to take frozen tax funds stolen by Israel, and facilitate their transfer to Palestine where they belonged.
-
After intellience reports predit catastrophic civilian casualties, the US will intervene at the UN security counsel and force a ceasefire and stop Israel's planned Rafah assault.
-E
Israel has repeatedly carpet bombed civilian areas in Lebanon over the past 12 hours.
-
Brazil has officially cut all diplonatic ties with Israel, and recalled its ambassador.
-
The Israeli economy is in a tailspin, having shrunk over 20% since their terrorist campaign began.
-
The head of Hamas (Qatar-based) has arrived safely in Cairo, Egypt at this moment for peace talks and further discussions over Rafah.
-
Norway has moved to take frozen tax funds stolen by Israel, and facilitate their transfer to Palestine where they belonged.
-
After intellience reports predit catastrophic civilian casualties, the US will intervene at the UN security counsel and force a ceasefire and stop Israel's planned Rafah assault.
-E
π597π₯129π56β€43π32β€βπ₯12β‘6
The final trial of Julian Assange begins today.
-
It will be covered here.
-E
-
It will be covered here.
-E
π939π109π₯78β€43π17β€βπ₯14β‘7π€©4π2
Assange trial live:
-
Assange's lawyers have argued today that the CIA plotted to kill Julian Assange, and that he cannot be safely extradited to a country that planned his kidnapping/ assassintion.
Fresh evidence shows options were presented directly to President Trump over killing Assange after Vault-7 leaks.
(Defense for Assange is establising that entire US government was/is hostile to Assange and cannot therefore guarantee a safe trial. They are appealing the scope of previous findings ruled on by the court)
-
Assange's lawyers have argued today that the CIA plotted to kill Julian Assange, and that he cannot be safely extradited to a country that planned his kidnapping/ assassintion.
Fresh evidence shows options were presented directly to President Trump over killing Assange after Vault-7 leaks.
(Defense for Assange is establising that entire US government was/is hostile to Assange and cannot therefore guarantee a safe trial. They are appealing the scope of previous findings ruled on by the court)
π722β€βπ₯119π₯72π63β€27β‘14π4π3π1
E
Assange trial live: - Assange's lawyers have argued today that the CIA plotted to kill Julian Assange, and that he cannot be safely extradited to a country that planned his kidnapping/ assassintion. Fresh evidence shows options were presented directly toβ¦
Assange trial live:
cont.
Defense has raised point that document U.S. is relying on for extradition contains clause forbidding extradition of political prisoners. Argues U.S. cannot simultaneously want to extradite because of political embarrassment while ignoring that section of the treaty.
Also raised was fact that Wikileaks was not the first or only outlet to recieve said classified documents from Manning, but the prosecution has been selective (targeting Assange) with no explanation for this behavior.
(note*** for posterity. This is not entirely correct as the charges actually revolve around an unidentified WL rep offering to help Manning obtain more* But* there is no way for positive identification of Assange possible as that rep. so it is a nonsequitor, legally speaking. Also, no such assistance took place.)
cont.
Defense has raised point that document U.S. is relying on for extradition contains clause forbidding extradition of political prisoners. Argues U.S. cannot simultaneously want to extradite because of political embarrassment while ignoring that section of the treaty.
Also raised was fact that Wikileaks was not the first or only outlet to recieve said classified documents from Manning, but the prosecution has been selective (targeting Assange) with no explanation for this behavior.
(note*** for posterity. This is not entirely correct as the charges actually revolve around an unidentified WL rep offering to help Manning obtain more* But* there is no way for positive identification of Assange possible as that rep. so it is a nonsequitor, legally speaking. Also, no such assistance took place.)
π494π81π₯55β€28β€βπ₯6π2π1
E
Assange trial live: cont. Defense has raised point that document U.S. is relying on for extradition contains clause forbidding extradition of political prisoners. Argues U.S. cannot simultaneously want to extradite because of political embarrassment whileβ¦
Assange trial live:
Court breaks for lunch, will resume 2pm London time.
-
Note* this is the first day of a two day hearing*.
So at the end of this, it continues.
After that, the judges will deliberate likely for several weeks. *there is no mandatory frame of time, the estimate for a ruling is based on previous time-frames judges have taken in this case. The ruling could also be immediate.*
-E
Court breaks for lunch, will resume 2pm London time.
-
Note* this is the first day of a two day hearing*.
So at the end of this, it continues.
After that, the judges will deliberate likely for several weeks. *there is no mandatory frame of time, the estimate for a ruling is based on previous time-frames judges have taken in this case. The ruling could also be immediate.*
-E
π600π77β€28π₯28β€βπ₯11π€©4π3π1
I want to break from Assange case coverage to explain some things about Julian's situation:
The legal arguments matter a great deal here. But more importantly, the eyes of the world are trained upon the small courtroom in the UK.
It is much more difficult for nefarious entities to flout the protocols of justice, when the world is watching.
This move is also not our last card.
The ECHR will be the next step, should the ruling be disfavourable toward Julian.
This means petitioning the European Court of Human Rights to step in.
It remains to be seen however, if Julian would not just be whisked away immediately by the U.S. Or if the UK courts will recognize the authority of the ECHR (British law was adapted recently in their bid for "autonomy" and the sovereignty of the ECHR is murky at best).
If* it comes to extradition. By virtue of a rather clever plan I had the honor of helping devise; we were able to secure some of the best legal representation in the U.S. for him, Barry J. Pollack, one of the greatest trial lawyers in the U.S. (he infamously obtained the aquittal of one of only 2 people acquitted in the Enron case. He also managed to overturn a double murder trial against a man convicted and wrongly imprisoned for 17 years).
In short, we are prepared, as much as can be. Assange has a rock solid legal defense, and a system of global support around him.
But* There are dangers to this still. Assange is not well, he has not been for some time. He suffered a mini-stroke October of 2022, and recovery has been slow. Also, decades of isolation have had an effect on his well being in general. By incriment and measure, he has suffered from depression and had issues with auditory hallucinations and other things. He has more than once threatened suicide rather than be extradited to the U.S. to face the bulwark of a visciously unfair and brutal prison and justice system.
Both his wife, and friends fear for his life should this case go awry.
Assange needs to be free.
Even the best defense and the greatest system of support here is not without very real risks.
Keep your eyes on this case, and be loud across the internet. Push your representatives to be loud as well.
I helped stir this storm up to protect his life, and we must not let that fail.
At risk here is much more than just Julian's life. Your press freedom, your right to speak freely, and most importantly your right to know the crimes of your own government are all on trial here.
-E
The legal arguments matter a great deal here. But more importantly, the eyes of the world are trained upon the small courtroom in the UK.
It is much more difficult for nefarious entities to flout the protocols of justice, when the world is watching.
This move is also not our last card.
The ECHR will be the next step, should the ruling be disfavourable toward Julian.
This means petitioning the European Court of Human Rights to step in.
It remains to be seen however, if Julian would not just be whisked away immediately by the U.S. Or if the UK courts will recognize the authority of the ECHR (British law was adapted recently in their bid for "autonomy" and the sovereignty of the ECHR is murky at best).
If* it comes to extradition. By virtue of a rather clever plan I had the honor of helping devise; we were able to secure some of the best legal representation in the U.S. for him, Barry J. Pollack, one of the greatest trial lawyers in the U.S. (he infamously obtained the aquittal of one of only 2 people acquitted in the Enron case. He also managed to overturn a double murder trial against a man convicted and wrongly imprisoned for 17 years).
In short, we are prepared, as much as can be. Assange has a rock solid legal defense, and a system of global support around him.
But* There are dangers to this still. Assange is not well, he has not been for some time. He suffered a mini-stroke October of 2022, and recovery has been slow. Also, decades of isolation have had an effect on his well being in general. By incriment and measure, he has suffered from depression and had issues with auditory hallucinations and other things. He has more than once threatened suicide rather than be extradited to the U.S. to face the bulwark of a visciously unfair and brutal prison and justice system.
Both his wife, and friends fear for his life should this case go awry.
Assange needs to be free.
Even the best defense and the greatest system of support here is not without very real risks.
Keep your eyes on this case, and be loud across the internet. Push your representatives to be loud as well.
I helped stir this storm up to protect his life, and we must not let that fail.
At risk here is much more than just Julian's life. Your press freedom, your right to speak freely, and most importantly your right to know the crimes of your own government are all on trial here.
-E
π922β€179π91π₯50β€βπ₯26β‘10π10π2
E
Assange trial live: Court breaks for lunch, will resume 2pm London time. - Note* this is the first day of a two day hearing*. So at the end of this, it continues. After that, the judges will deliberate likely for several weeks. *there is no mandatory frameβ¦
Assange trial live:
cont.
Defense is raising an Article 7 ECHR/ 5th Ammendment argument, stating that multiple forms of classified material have been published and gone unprosecuted, stating there is no precedent in U.S. law for the prosection of journalists.
They are arguing that the previous judge refused to engage that line of legal argument stating it should be resolved in U.S. courts because it is a 5th ammendment issue (due process).
Defense argues that because Article 7 of the ECHR applies, the judge should have had to engage it and acknowledge its legal standing.
(defense for Assange is once more appealing the previous court actions and errors here).
Section 7 of the ECHR protects someone from being prosecuted for future crime. In other words retroactively making something illegal in order to prosecute them.
Sec 7 of ECHR: "No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed."
cont.
Defense is raising an Article 7 ECHR/ 5th Ammendment argument, stating that multiple forms of classified material have been published and gone unprosecuted, stating there is no precedent in U.S. law for the prosection of journalists.
They are arguing that the previous judge refused to engage that line of legal argument stating it should be resolved in U.S. courts because it is a 5th ammendment issue (due process).
Defense argues that because Article 7 of the ECHR applies, the judge should have had to engage it and acknowledge its legal standing.
(defense for Assange is once more appealing the previous court actions and errors here).
Section 7 of the ECHR protects someone from being prosecuted for future crime. In other words retroactively making something illegal in order to prosecute them.
Sec 7 of ECHR: "No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed."
π410π₯151π69β€32π8π₯°1π1π1
E
Assange trial live: cont. Defense is raising an Article 7 ECHR/ 5th Ammendment argument, stating that multiple forms of classified material have been published and gone unprosecuted, stating there is no precedent in U.S. law for the prosection of journalists.β¦
Assange trial live:
cont.
Defense now raises article 10 of the ECHR saying that Manning's actions in leaking information fall under the protection of freedom of speech and expression.
Article 10 of the ECHR protects whistleblowers if documents are authentic and it is well within the public interest to know.
It protects both their right to recieve and send such information; including in cases of classified documents if, like in Manning's case; said documents were improperly classified to cover up war crimes.
This pertains to the charge against Julian for allegedly (again, unprovably) offering to help Manning procure the documents if needed.
If in fact the documents were improperly classified and covering up war crimes (they were); then Manning as a whistleblower falls under that protection of the ECHR and by extension, the journalist helping break that story in public interest.
This is weighty legally because according to multiple reviews, no one was directly harmed by the release of said information.
cont.
Defense now raises article 10 of the ECHR saying that Manning's actions in leaking information fall under the protection of freedom of speech and expression.
Article 10 of the ECHR protects whistleblowers if documents are authentic and it is well within the public interest to know.
It protects both their right to recieve and send such information; including in cases of classified documents if, like in Manning's case; said documents were improperly classified to cover up war crimes.
This pertains to the charge against Julian for allegedly (again, unprovably) offering to help Manning procure the documents if needed.
If in fact the documents were improperly classified and covering up war crimes (they were); then Manning as a whistleblower falls under that protection of the ECHR and by extension, the journalist helping break that story in public interest.
This is weighty legally because according to multiple reviews, no one was directly harmed by the release of said information.
π498π₯89π63β€19π17π3π1