Passage One Pro (20 days) challenge completed π
βοΈ For 20 days, you have done 20 passages to become a better reader!
Share your opinions and progress!
Share your opinions and progress!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€11π―5β€βπ₯3
Stay tunedπ
A new challenge is coming soonπ
A new challenge is coming soon
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯15β€8π4π1
Screenshot 2025-08-07 174857.png
134.3 KB
The line graphs detail the number of people who attended the cinema and the amount of money spent on tickets between 1980 and 2015.
Overall, it is clear that both cinema attendance and the money spent on tickets went on an upward trend, with the latter showing more significant growth.
In 1980, around 35% of the population attended cinemas, and 200 AUD was spent on tickets. By 1990, cinema attendance had risen noticeably to 45%; meanwhile, ticket sales saw a similar pattern, increasing twofold to 400 AUD.
In the following years, the number of people attending cinemas grew, though it fluctuated between 50 and 60%. In contrast, sales remained unchanged until 2010. By the end of the timeframe, the attendance rate remained relatively stable at 72%, despite some fluctuations, while ticket sales experienced a dramatic increase, peaking at over 1200 AUD in 2015.
#task1
#linegraph
Overall, it is clear that both cinema attendance and the money spent on tickets went on an upward trend, with the latter showing more significant growth.
In 1980, around 35% of the population attended cinemas, and 200 AUD was spent on tickets. By 1990, cinema attendance had risen noticeably to 45%; meanwhile, ticket sales saw a similar pattern, increasing twofold to 400 AUD.
In the following years, the number of people attending cinemas grew, though it fluctuated between 50 and 60%. In contrast, sales remained unchanged until 2010. By the end of the timeframe, the attendance rate remained relatively stable at 72%, despite some fluctuations, while ticket sales experienced a dramatic increase, peaking at over 1200 AUD in 2015.
#task1
#linegraph
π₯8β€2β€βπ₯2π€©1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€7π₯3π€©2
Forwarded from SPOT ONE
π§ Doston Ubaydullayev - Listening/Reading
π§βπ« @Fazliddin_Giyosov
π§ @Dustin_English
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€10β‘4π₯°2π₯1π³1
The line graph details four types of meat consumed weekly in a European country from 1979 to 2004. Overall, it is evident that the consumption of all sorts of meat decreased to varying degrees, with the exception of chicken, which showed a gradual increase. Initially, beef, later chicken, became a common type of meat, while fish was the least popular throughout.
Approximately 225 grams of meat were consumed per week, which was the highest figure in 1979, followed by lamb and chicken, 150g and 140g, respectively. The figures for fish were the lowest, about 60g weekly. By 1989, the figures for beef and lamb had declined considerably to 200g and 100g, respectively, while the consumption of chicken had shown significant growth to 210g, overtaking beef and lamb. In contrast, the amount of fish eaten per week remained relatively stable at around 50g.
In the following years, weekly consumption of chicken continued to rise to 250g, becoming the most common type of meat, whereas beef and lamb experienced a dramatic decline to 110g and 55g, respectively, in 2004. Despite having declined to 40g in 2004, the consumption of fish remained the lowest figure throughout the given period.
#task1
#linegraph
Approximately 225 grams of meat were consumed per week, which was the highest figure in 1979, followed by lamb and chicken, 150g and 140g, respectively. The figures for fish were the lowest, about 60g weekly. By 1989, the figures for beef and lamb had declined considerably to 200g and 100g, respectively, while the consumption of chicken had shown significant growth to 210g, overtaking beef and lamb. In contrast, the amount of fish eaten per week remained relatively stable at around 50g.
In the following years, weekly consumption of chicken continued to rise to 250g, becoming the most common type of meat, whereas beef and lamb experienced a dramatic decline to 110g and 55g, respectively, in 2004. Despite having declined to 40g in 2004, the consumption of fish remained the lowest figure throughout the given period.
#task1
#linegraph
β€6β€βπ₯5π₯3π2π€©1
Forwarded from SPOT ONE
π¨βπ« Instructors:
π @SpotOneSchool
π§βπ« @Fazliddin_Giyosov
π§ @Dustin_English
π @Dastamxon_Hamzayev
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯9β€6π1
The line graph details four types of complaints made to Environmental Health in Newtown from 1980 to 1996.
Overall, it is clear that the number of all types of complaints rose to varying degrees, with the exception of complaints about road works, which exhibited a downward trend throughout and eventually had the least number of complaints, while noise from households had the most complaints toward the end of the given period.
In 1980, Environmental Health received 650 complaints about roadworks, the highest figure for that year, followed by domestic, factory, and traffic noise at 500, 400, and 300 respectively. By 1988, complaints regarding road works had decreased significantly to 250, being overtaken by those about factories, which had experienced significant growth to 700. In contrast, the complaints registered about both domestic and traffic noise dropped to 400 and 200, respectively.
In the following years, household-related complaints saw a dramatic increase, peaking at over 1200, while the figures for factories remained relatively stable at around 700. Complaints about road works continued to decrease, reaching approximately 100 in 1996, whereas those about traffic noise rose noticeably to 600.
#task1
#linegraph
Overall, it is clear that the number of all types of complaints rose to varying degrees, with the exception of complaints about road works, which exhibited a downward trend throughout and eventually had the least number of complaints, while noise from households had the most complaints toward the end of the given period.
In 1980, Environmental Health received 650 complaints about roadworks, the highest figure for that year, followed by domestic, factory, and traffic noise at 500, 400, and 300 respectively. By 1988, complaints regarding road works had decreased significantly to 250, being overtaken by those about factories, which had experienced significant growth to 700. In contrast, the complaints registered about both domestic and traffic noise dropped to 400 and 200, respectively.
In the following years, household-related complaints saw a dramatic increase, peaking at over 1200, while the figures for factories remained relatively stable at around 700. Complaints about road works continued to decrease, reaching approximately 100 in 1996, whereas those about traffic noise rose noticeably to 600.
#task1
#linegraph
π₯6β€2β€βπ₯2π1
βIs anyone planning to take the IELTS exam at the beginning of September?β
If so, let me know
If so, let me know
β€10π2π₯1π1
Doston Ubaydullayev | 8.0
βIs anyone planning to take the IELTS exam at the beginning of September?β If so, let me know
I have some good news π‘
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π8β€3π₯1
Registratsiya qilish uchun: @dostonubaydullaev
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯6β€3π2β€βπ₯1π1
The bar graph details the employment rates of five different sectors between 2001 and 2008. Overall, it is clear that the figures for all kinds of jobs rose to varying degrees, except for accounting and farming, which exhibited a decline over the years. The sales sector was by far the largest employer, whereas farming employed the fewest number of workers. Accounting, computing, and nursing had relatively similar employment rates.
In 2001, the sales sector employed 152,000 workers, the highest figure for that year. This was followed by accounting with 60,000, computing, and nursing with approximately 50,000 each. Farming, in contrast, had only 21,000 employees.
By 2008, the number of workers employed in sales had increased significantly, peaking at 165,000. Similarly, the figures for computing and nursing rose noticeably to 65,000 and nearly 60,000, respectively. However, employment in accounting and farming both experienced a slight decrease to 59,000 and 19,000, respectively.
#task1
#bargraph
In 2001, the sales sector employed 152,000 workers, the highest figure for that year. This was followed by accounting with 60,000, computing, and nursing with approximately 50,000 each. Farming, in contrast, had only 21,000 employees.
By 2008, the number of workers employed in sales had increased significantly, peaking at 165,000. Similarly, the figures for computing and nursing rose noticeably to 65,000 and nearly 60,000, respectively. However, employment in accounting and farming both experienced a slight decrease to 59,000 and 19,000, respectively.
#task1
#bargraph
β€7π₯5π€©2
Intelligence is the most important quality to be a leader. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that effective leadership can only be achieved through intelligence, whereas I disagree that one needs to have more important skills, such as communication and decision-making, to be a good team leader, as intelligence alone cannot make a good leader.
On the one hand, being intelligent is not the most essential trait to be able to build strong leadership, as there are other required skills and qualities. Someone who is intelligent and can come up with different and novel ideas, but is not able to communicate with or motivate team members, cannot be a team leader. Knowing that there is no communication between the leader and the members, it is believed that this might eventually lead to failure, as leadership is not only about intelligence. Moreover, a person with too much intelligence can be arrogant and may feel superior to the rest of the team. Arrogance can often result in ignoring people's opinions, which is, in fact, highly responsible for failing to build teamwork. History itself shows that the most successful people were not the smartest, but they were the ones who had charisma, a strong character, and, most importantly, good communication skills.
On the other hand, although intelligence is important, there are some other qualities needed to be a good leader, and a strong leader must have a mix of qualities. First, leaders need to have a clear vision and decision-making skills. It is often believed that those who can lead their team under a clear goal and can adapt to different situations, coming up with different solutions, are likely to build strong and effective leadership, as being united under the same motivation and purpose is one of the most important characteristics of a good team. Being able to show empathy and support is also essential. A leader is someone who can support the team where there is something that needs to be worked on, or someone who can show empathy towards team members, figuring out what has gone wrong, or if there is something that is worthy of the leader's support. As a result, team members might build loyalty and feel special, as if they are a meaningful part of the team, which in turn leads the team to be more successful. Steve Jobs, one of the most intelligent and successful people in the world, but what made him a true leader was his vision and ability to inspire others, and without his charisma, Apple would not be where it is now.
In conclusion, although intelligence is an important quality to have to be a good leader, a mix of other traits, such as charisma and empathy, as well as communication and problem-solving skills, need to be equally important.
#task2
#agreedisagree
Some people believe that effective leadership can only be achieved through intelligence, whereas I disagree that one needs to have more important skills, such as communication and decision-making, to be a good team leader, as intelligence alone cannot make a good leader.
On the one hand, being intelligent is not the most essential trait to be able to build strong leadership, as there are other required skills and qualities. Someone who is intelligent and can come up with different and novel ideas, but is not able to communicate with or motivate team members, cannot be a team leader. Knowing that there is no communication between the leader and the members, it is believed that this might eventually lead to failure, as leadership is not only about intelligence. Moreover, a person with too much intelligence can be arrogant and may feel superior to the rest of the team. Arrogance can often result in ignoring people's opinions, which is, in fact, highly responsible for failing to build teamwork. History itself shows that the most successful people were not the smartest, but they were the ones who had charisma, a strong character, and, most importantly, good communication skills.
On the other hand, although intelligence is important, there are some other qualities needed to be a good leader, and a strong leader must have a mix of qualities. First, leaders need to have a clear vision and decision-making skills. It is often believed that those who can lead their team under a clear goal and can adapt to different situations, coming up with different solutions, are likely to build strong and effective leadership, as being united under the same motivation and purpose is one of the most important characteristics of a good team. Being able to show empathy and support is also essential. A leader is someone who can support the team where there is something that needs to be worked on, or someone who can show empathy towards team members, figuring out what has gone wrong, or if there is something that is worthy of the leader's support. As a result, team members might build loyalty and feel special, as if they are a meaningful part of the team, which in turn leads the team to be more successful. Steve Jobs, one of the most intelligent and successful people in the world, but what made him a true leader was his vision and ability to inspire others, and without his charisma, Apple would not be where it is now.
In conclusion, although intelligence is an important quality to have to be a good leader, a mix of other traits, such as charisma and empathy, as well as communication and problem-solving skills, need to be equally important.
#task2
#agreedisagree
π₯11β€6β€βπ₯1π1
Ready for Reading Passage Two Challenge?π
If this gets β€οΈ 50 likes, we will get started!
If this gets β€οΈ 50 likes, we will get started!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
1β€54β€βπ₯1π1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€5π4
Today at 12 PM sharp, weβre kicking off the 20-Day Passage Two Pro Reading Challenge! π
β
Day 1 - Passage 2 will be posted at noon.
β
Stay active, stay consistent, and challenge yourself every day!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€11π₯3π₯°2