"Vaccination is not disease prevention - it's a particularly nasty form of organised crime in that it manipulates parents protective instincts to get them to submit their child into getting poisoned for profit under the guise of disease
prevention." ~ Erwin Alber

What it's all about.

**Warning*

This is what gender transformation surgery looks like.
“This ‘thing’ has NO FUNCTION.
-No sexual function.
-No reproduction function.
-No urination function.
-No feeling,

This young confused girl is likely going to regret it at some point.”

Are aborted fetal cell lines used in vaccine manufacturing?

Human fetal cell lines are used to culture some vaccines. They are listed on the CDCs Vaccine Excipient list as WI-38, MRC-5, HEK293, PERC.6.

WI-38 is a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of an aborted female fetus.

MRC-5 (Medical Research Council cell strain 5) is a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts derived from lung tissue of a 14-week-old aborted male fetus.

Human embryonic kidney cells 293, also often referred to as HEK 293, HEK-293, 293 cells, or less precisely as HEK cells, are a specific cell line originally derived from human embryonic kidney cells grown in a tissue culture.

PERC.6 cell line was derived from human embryonic retinal cells taken from an elective abortion.

The newest cell line created in 2015 for vaccines: WALVAX 2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3-month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted babies. The scientists noted how they followed specific guidelines to mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation. They further noted how they induced labor using a “water bag” abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation. (Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/25803132/)

Lawsuit?

This is not healthcare. It’s coercion!!!

The Refurbished Rogue's Blog
the random scribbles and unrestrained convictions of a wayward fool liberated by grace
Main menu
Skip to content
Finding God
vaccination
my thoughts on true christianity
my list of peer reviewed vaccine research
what’s wrong with this world!
forgiveness
thinking free
About
redemption
God is Love
The bible is smart
my testimony
Fluoride is bad for you
homeschool stuff
SEARCH

GO

May 3, 2013
my list of peer reviewed vaccine research
• 57 Comments
This list is just a thrown together list and is pretty helter skelter..but, there are a lot of links to lead you down the research path if you are searching. There are are so many, many, many more out there that haven’t made it to this list. They sit and wait for me to find them..i better get to looking.. May our truth digging be successful!
Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum disorders.
the potential effects of conjugate vaccines on neural development merit close examination. Conjugate vaccines fundamentally change the manner in which the immune systems of infants and young children function by deviating their immune responses to the targeted carbohydrate antigens from a state of hypo-responsiveness to a robust B2 B cell mediated response. This period of hypo-responsiveness to carbohydrate antigens coincides with the intense myelination process in infants and young children, and conjugate vaccines may have disrupted evolutionary forces that favored early brain development over the need to protect infants and young children from capsular bacteria.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250
Serological association of measles virus and human herpesvirus-6 with brain autoantibodies in autism.
Considering an autoimmunity and autism connection, brain autoantibodies to myelin basic protein (anti-MBP) and neuron-axon filament protein (anti-NAFP) have been found in autistic children. In this current study, we examined associations between virus serology and autoantibody by simultaneous analysis of measles virus antibody (measles-IgG), human herpesvirus-6 antibody (HHV-6-IgG), anti-MBP, and anti-NAFP. We found that measles-IgG and HHV-6-IgG titers were moderately higher in autistic children but they did not significantly differ from normal controls. Moreover, we found that a vast majority of virus serology-positive autistic sera was also positive for brain autoantibody: (i) 90% of measles-IgG-positive autistic sera was also positive for anti-MBP; (ii) 73% of measles-IgG-positive autistic sera was also positive for anti-NAFP; (iii) 84% of HHV-6-IgG-positive autistic sera was also positive for anti-MBP; and (iv) 72% of HHV-6-IgG-positive autistic sera was also positive for anti-NAFP. This study is the first to report an association between virus serology and brain autoantibody in autism; it supports the hypothesis that a virus-induced autoimmune response may play a causal role in autism.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9756729
Effectiveness of pertussis vaccines for adolescents and adults: case-control study
The adjusted estimate of effectiveness of Tdap vaccination against pertussis was 53.0.
http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f4249
Neurologic Adverse Events Following Vaccination (Progress in Health Sciences Vol. 2(1) 2012•pp 129-141.)
“Conclusions: Despite the assurances of the necessity and safety of vaccinations, there are more and more questions and doubts, which both physicians and parents are waiting to be clarified… It seems that it would be worthwhile to apply the precautionary principle – the ethical principle (from 1988) according to which if there is a probable, although poorly known, risk of adverse effects of new technology, it is better not to implement it rather than risk uncertain but potentially very harmful consequences.”
http://progress.umb.edu.pl/sites/progress.umb.edu.pl/files/129-141.pdf
Abnormal measles-mumps-rubella antibodies and CNS autoimmunity in children with autism.

“Thus the MMR antibody in autistic sera detected measles HA protein, which is unique to the measles subunit of the vaccine. Furthermore, over 90% of MMR antibody-positive autistic sera were also positive for MBP autoantibodies, suggesting a strong association between MMR and CNS autoimmunity in autism. Stemming from this evidence, we suggest that an inappropriate antibody response to MMR, specifically the measles component thereof, might be related to pathogenesis of autism.”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534
 Influenza: marketing vaccine by marketing disease
Closer examination of influenza vaccine policies shows that although proponents employ the rhetoric of science, the studies underlying the policy are often of low quality, and do not substantiate officials’ claims. The vaccine might be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and the threat of influenza appears overstated.
http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3037
An unmasking phenomenon in an observational post-licensure safety study of adolescent girls and young women.
Our recent experience in a post-licensure safety study of autoimmune conditions following the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in 189,629 girls and young women ages 9-26 years led us to question the adequacy of the exclusion of Day 0 events to prevent the erroneous association of prevalent conditions with vaccination. Of the 18 confirmed cases of Graves’ disease diagnosed in days 1-60 following vaccination, only 6 cases appeared to be truly new onset. Among the remaining 12 cases, 2 cases had abnormal thyroid stimulating hormone or thyroxine labs drawn prior to or on Day 0 but had no documented pre-existing symptoms. The other 10 cases had mention of symptoms of hyperthyroidism referencing a period prior to first HPV-4 dose. This ‘unmasking’ phenomenon, due to health care visits that include vaccination and new workups of preexisting symptoms, may not be adequately controlled through the exclusion of Day 0 events.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22580356/
 
How aluminum, an intracellular ROS generator promotes hepatic and neurological diseases: the metabolic tale
Metal pollutants are a global health risk due to their ability to contribute to a variety of diseases. Aluminum (Al), a ubiquitous environmental contaminant is implicated in anemia, osteomalacia, hepatic disorder, and neurological disorder. In this review, we outline how this intracellular generator of reactive oxygen species (ROS) triggers a metabolic shift towards lipogenesis in astrocytes and hepatocytes. This Al-evoked phenomenon is coupled to diminished mitochondrial activity, anerobiosis, and the channeling of α-ketoacids towards anti-oxidant defense. The resulting metabolic reconfiguration leads to fat accumulation and a reduction in ATP synthesis, characteristics that are common to numerous medical disorders. Hence, the ability of Al toxicity to create an oxidative environment promotes dysfunctional metabolic processes in astrocytes and hepatocytes. These molecular events triggered by Al-induced ROS production are the potential mediators of brain and liver disorders.”
Advertisement
The Role of Spiritual Enlightenment a...

An Analogy with Butterfly Metamorphosis Today’s discourse touches upon the in...

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10565-013-9239-0
Waning of Maternal Antibodies Against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella in Communities With Contrasting Vaccination Coverage
Conclusions: Children of mothers vaccinated against measles and, possibly, rubella have lower concentrations of maternal antibodies and lose protection by maternal antibodies at an earlier age than children of mothers in communities that oppose vaccination. This increases the risk of disease transmission in highly vaccinated populations.
http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/04/29/infdis.jit143.full
“vaccine injury is so rare..don’t worry about it!” who has heard this?

“The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is publishing this notice of petitions received under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.. A pet…ition may be filed with respect to injuries, disabilities, illnesses, conditions, and deaths resulting from vaccines described in the Vaccine Injury Table… Set forth below is a list of petitions received by HRSA on * March 13, 2013, through April 30, 2013.*”
[take note of #7 and #17..]
1. Tory J. and Sarah E. Moody on behalf of Victorya E. Moody, Bedford, Indiana, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0190V.
2. Pamela Jean Peguess, Memphis, Tennessee, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0191V.
3. Eileen Goeschel, Sarasota, Florida, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0199V.
4. Kearsten Demczuk, Park Ridge, Illinois, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0205V. 5. Howard Reddy and Hanan Tarabay on behalf of Andrew Howard Reddy, Pensacola, Florida, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0208V.
6. Mona Marie Troup, Everett, Washington, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0209V.
7. Angel Blackstone on behalf of S.B., Deceased, Trenton, New Jersey, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0213V.
8. Isidra Durwin, Sarasota, Florida, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0214V.
9. Nancy and Sandro Giannetta on behalf of A.M.G., Sarasota, Florida, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0215V.
10. Kimberly Pedersen, West Allis, Wisconsin, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0216V.
11. Charles and Jeannie Maikish on behalf of S.M., Nyack, New York,Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0217V.
12. Ina Scanlon, Muncie, Indiana, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0219V.
13. David Stachlewitz on behalf of H.G.S., Glendale, Arizona, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0220V.
14. Mary E. Thompson, Brookport, Illinois, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0222V.
15. Matthew Gorski, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0224V.
16. Woodrow Coffey, Jr., Irvine, California, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0225V. 17. Stephen Warren on behalf of Taylor Warren, Deceased, New York, New York, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0226V.
18. Robert Wiggins, Nashville, North Carolina, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0228V.
19. Peggy Kalmeyer, Depew, New York, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0230V.
20. Rosemary and Wayne Trezza on behalf of P.T., West Orange, New Jersey, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0231V.
21. Jane Tomassetti, Woodbury, Minnesota, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0234V.
22. Everett Johnson, Sr., Ashland, Kentucky, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0235V.
23. Edwin W. Fockler, Sarasota, Florida, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0237V. 24. James Cox, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0238V. 25. Chanel and Paul A. Monroe on behalf of Angelina Monroe, Las Vegas, Nevada, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0239V.
26. Noteel Koss, Houston, Texas, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0240V.
27. Tamika M. Kratzer on behalf of Ian M. Kratzer, Sacramento, California, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0243V.
28. Rosalie Peck, Boston, Massachusetts, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0249V. 29. Shannon Keller, Sacramento, California, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0250V.
30. Edwina Bradshaw, North Myrtle Beach, North Carolina, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0252V.
31. William and Brenda Lehann Rodriguez on behalf of C.R., Clayton, Georgia, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0253V.
32. Corrine K. Ibana, Kamuela, Hawaii, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0257V. 33. Lorel Cubano, San Juan, Puerto Rico, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0259V. 34. Brittany and Davey Lambert on behalf of Noah Lambert, Memphis, Tennessee, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0265V.
35. Scott and Caroline VanScoy on behalf of Alyssa VanScoy, Simi Valley, California, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0266V.
36. Jane Sprecher, Reading, Pennsylvania, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0271V.
37. Georgia Murdock, Silver Spring, Maryland, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0273V.
38. Willie Andre Simmons, Augusta, Georgia, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0274V.
39. Jung Park, M.D., New York, New York, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0275V. 40.

Allison and Steven Council on behalf of Adam Council, Plainfield, Illinois, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0276V.
41. Maryann Giordano, Lindenhurst, New York, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0277V.
42. Laura A. Jones, Greensboro, North Carolina, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0279V.
43. David D. Griffin, Afghanistan, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0280V.
44. James Demoski, Endicott, New York, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0286V. 45. Christina N. Steinat, Seattle, Washington, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0287V.
46. Jessica L. Stone, Baraboo, Wisconsin, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0289V. 47. Holly Rhew, Wichita, Kansas, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0293V.
48. Janet DeYear, Dallas, Texas, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0299V.
49. Cynthia Adkins, Sarasota, Florida, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0295V.
50. Saurabh V. and Archana Amin on behalf of Sheaa Amin, Linwood, New Jersey, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0300V.
51. Juliet and Mohamed Edoo on behalf of Justin Edoo, Miami, Florida, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0302V.
52. James Boyer, Boston, Massachusetts, Court of Federal Claims No: 13-0303V.
*these are from March 13, 2013 – April 30, 2013. 48 days. what is the true number that these 52 petitions represent? how many don’t file claims? think about it..its scary. I wish we could see more about these petitions..more about the injury caused.It is impossible for a parent to make a solid risk/benefit analysis when it comes to vaccinations.. I don’t care what anyone may say.. vaccine injury is downplayed and pushed aside, disease rates and risks are over exaggerated and blasted throughout the media via mass scare campaigns (remember those 8 measly cases of the measles in Wales during the month of march 2013?) ..and natural and safe preventative measures and treatments are suppressed. How are we supposed to make an informed medical decision when it comes to our children being injected with almost 50 doses of 16 vaccines before the age of 6?
https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/05/24/2013-12347/national-vaccine-injury-compensation-program-list-of-petitions-received?utm_content=next&utm_medium=PrevNext&utm_source=Article
“In 1990, infants received a total of 15 vaccine doses prior to their first year of life: 3 DPT injections (9 vaccine doses), 3 polio, and 3 Hib vaccines—5 vaccine doses at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. By 2007, the CDC recommended 26 vaccine doses for infants: 3 DTaP, 3 polio, 3 Hib, 3 hepatitis B, 3 pneumococcal, 3 rotavirus, and 2 influenza vaccines. While each childhood vaccine has individually undergone clinical trials to assess safety, studies have not been conducted to determine the safety (or efficacy) of combining vaccines during a single physician visit as recommended by CDC guidelines. For example, 2-, 4-, and 6-month-old infants are expected to receive vaccines for polio, hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, rotavirus, Haemophilus influenzae type B, and pneumococcal, all during a single well-baby visit—even though this combination of 8 vaccine doses was never tested in clinical trials.
An article written by Guess, representing a vaccine manufacturer, claimed that it is “impractical to conduct preapproval studies of all combinations [of vaccines] in clinical practice.”1 However, a recent study by Miller and Goldman found that among the developed nations, infant mortality increased with an increase in the number of vaccine doses.2 Similar associations have also been found with respect to other serious adverse outcomes. Delong reported that the higher the proportion of children receiving recommended vaccinations, the higher the prevalence of autism or speech and language impairment.3 A CDC report on mixed exposures to chemical substances and other stressors, including prescribed pharmaceuticals, found that they may produce “increased or unexpected deleterious health effects.” In addition, “exposures to mixed stressors can produce health consequences that are additive, synergistic, antagonistic, or can potentiate the response expected from individual component exposures.