Doctors For Covid Ethics Channel
6.39K subscribers
166 photos
204 videos
14 files
801 links
We are doctors and scientists from 30 countries, seeking to uphold medical ethics, patient safety and human rights in response to COVID-19. https://doctors4covidethics.org/
Download Telegram
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In this video, I give an overview of the major disease mechanisms by which the COVID mRNA vaccines may cause adverse events. I conclude that the evidence points to immune attack on cells producing spike protein as the major element. We must therefore expect that all future mRNA vaccines will be similarly dangerous.
Update Tuesday 23rd May 2023
Germany 🇩🇪

Sucharit Bhakdi

There is a heavy presence of support outside the court house. It's raining. Police are here but there are so far no protests. Most people queuing are here to support Sucharit’

Taylor Hudak

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh
Sucharit Bhakdi
23rd May 2023

‘We have gained access to the courtroom’
Sucharit Bhakdi and his wife Karina Reiss enter the court room’


Taylor Hudak reporting from Germany 🇩🇪

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Sucharit Bhakdi
23rd May 2023

‘Prof. Bhakdi receives outpour of support when approaching the courthouse’

‘Court beginning now’


Taylor Hudak reporting from Germany 🇩🇪

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh
Sucharit Bhakdi
23rd May 2023

Court has adjourned for at least 45 min.

Prof. Bhakdi’s lawyers argued three reasons for the court to drop the case.

1) the prosecution didn’t have the full video at the time when it opened the court proceedings

2) they didn’t make an effort to receive the entire video (which contained the alleged anti-Semitic statements)

3) concerns over the indictment containing Prof. Bhakdi a private info. The judge adjourned court for a break to consider these arguments’.

Taylor Hudak reporting from Germany 🇩🇪

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh
Update Tuesday 23rd May 2023
Germany

Sucharit Bhakdi

Court was in session for about 40 minutes and is now adjourned again.

The judge stated that his current assessment based upon the videos in which the alleged antisemitic remarks were made, that it does not justify a punishment of the accused. This assessment can change during the course of the hearing.
A police officer was called to testify as a defense witness but was unable to because he did Court was in session for about 40 minutes and is now adjourned again.
The judge stated that his current assessment based upon the videos in which the alleged antisemitic remarks were made, that it does not justify a punishment of the accused.
This assessment can change during the course of the hearing.’


Taylor Hudak reporting from Germany 🇩🇪

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh
Update Tuesday 23rd May 2023
Germany 🇩🇪

Sucharit Bhakdi

Judge agreed to a short interruption for the defense to discuss whether or not they drop the issue related to the judge being biased and not watching the full video footage.’

‘The defense decides not to continue with the discussion about bias. The court has adjourned for 60 minutes’.


Taylor Hudak reports from Germany

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh
Update Tuesday 23rd May 2023
Germany 🇩🇪

Sucharit Bhakdi

The prosecutor wanted to address how many views, likes and shares the videos received.
The defense argues that’s not relevant the judge agrees. The judge will not allow anymore witnesses to be heard. He seems to agree there is sufficient evidence.

The prosecutor and defense has 60 minutes to draft their final pleas’.


Taylor Hudak reports from Germany

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh
Update Tuesday 23rd May 2023
Germany 🇩🇪

Sucharit Bhakdi

Court will reconvene at 3:30pm CET.

Both the defense and prosecution will deliver their final plea
’.

Taylor Hudak reports from Germany

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh
Update Tuesday 23rd May 2023
Germany 🇩🇪

Sucharit Bhakdi

All three of Prof. Bhakdi's lawyers spoke as part of the final argument to the court.

Martin Schwab spoke about Sucharit's conviction in the media before the hearing, and then he spoke about the two charges.

Regarding the interview with Kai Stuht, Schwab stated that Sucharit did not insult Israeli people according to a specific German law.
He provided more context to Sucharit's statements in the interview stating that the Israeli people were the first to be injected under the emergency authorization.

Schwab reiterated Sucharit was not insulting the Israeli people but expressing concern and worry for them.
He said the interpretation of Sucharit's words was completely wrong. Schwab asked for no penalty’.


Taylor Hudak reports from Germany

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh
Update Tuesday 23rd May 2023
Germany 🇩🇪

Sucharit Bhakdi

Sucharit Bhakdi found not guilty’.

Taylor Hudak reports from Germany

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh
Update Tuesday 23rd May 2023
Germany 🇩🇪

Sucharit Bhakdi

Sucharit after he heard the verdict’.

Taylor Hudak reports from Germany

Further information:
https://t.me/+UYLMEVEmA185NDZh
Professor Norman Fenton is an expert in statistics. He has drawn attention to various kinds of data manipulation that were used to mislead the public about COVID morbidity and mortality and vaccine safety and efficacy. As a result, he has been targeted by some of the most aggressive censorship measures so far. He will tell us about these in the following video.

https://rumble.com/v2ps6v7-censorship-in-the-covid-era.html
BREAKING: I can confirm Prosecutor Füssinger filed an appeal against the not guilty verdict in the Prof. Bhakdi case

There are 2 types of appeals that can be applied in this case.

Following a verdict, the dissatisfied party may file an appeal to either enforce another court hearing in which the discovery of evidence is repeated, this kind of appeal is called “Berufung” in German OR the dissatisfied party may file an appeal to determine if the law was properly applied, this kind of appeal is called “Revision” in German. Regarding the latter, the facts on which the judgment is based are not called into question.

At this time, there is no written judgment in the Prof. Bhakdi case, and as long as there is no written judgment, the party who files an appeal may only decide which type of appeal to pursue until the written judgment is available to both the prosecution and defense. Prosecutor Füssinger has filed an appeal and will decide which appeal to pursue based on the written judgment.