Remember This Charles Manson Interview? He Was Right All Along
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Y7opqN63CfI&si=lsp2HWx136wGN6ub
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Y7opqN63CfI&si=lsp2HWx136wGN6ub
YouTube
Remember This Charles Manson Interview? He Was Right All Along
Sometimes the truth comes from the most unexpected places. This old interview with Charles Manson might make you pause for a second and really think about how the world works. Forget the messenger for a moment and just listen to the message. He talks about…
👍3❤1
Forwarded from 🐎 Mustang Debbie Channel🐎 (🐎Mustang Debbie🐎)
https://x.com/kuwlshow/status/2040763886354210823?s=52
On Easter Day, Resurrection Intel
Rescuing & Reconstituting the United States for America, a nation born in Covenant by Declaration to God, always had to be, is today, and will always require, our U.S. Military.
It is logically and legally possible for DOJ and DoD personnel to cooperate on investigations and prosecutions. Military lawyers can be detailed to DOJ as Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys, and DOJ policy expressly allows sensitive investigations to proceed without public disclosure of their existence or progress before charges are filed. DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel stated in 2025 that the Posse Comitatus Act does not bar full-time details of military attorneys to serve as SAUSAs so long as they operate under civilian control and supervision. DOJ’s own media-relations policy also says the Department generally will not confirm or comment on ongoing investigations before charges are public.
As a matter of law and operational common sense, highly sensitive national-security or law-enforcement matters can be coordinated without public reporting of all details. DOJ policy, FOIA Exemption 7 materials, and DoD OPSEC guidance all point in the same direction: disclosure can be restricted when it would interfere with enforcement, reveal techniques, expose sources, or compromise operations. That supports the proposition that silence does not equal inactivity.
You can find strong official support for the broader idea that military lawyers can be used as SAUSAs, including a DOJ OLC opinion from 2025 and DOJ postings showing SAUSA detail programs. I also found a January 2026 DOJ press release from the Western District of Tennessee explicitly stating that the “Department of War assigns 20 military lawyers to serve as Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys.” This shows this kind of staffing move is real in some districts.
The official record supports Guantánamo Bay as a real military-commission site, with the Office of Military Commissions listing Guantánamo Bay, Fort Meade, and CCTV sites as its facilities.
“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
Welcome to America 250 - and our second, glorious, inevitable Declaration of Independence from godless a City of London Banking Cartel - and their international cartel of counterfeit jackals and control freaks who care nothing about God, Life, Liberty, Jesus Christ or pursuit of purpose as our Creator inalienably and individually vested with each of us.
@POTUS @DeptofWar @dojphofficial @BoardOfPeace @PrometheanActn @EXIT_FIAT @rattletrap1776
On Easter Day, Resurrection Intel
Rescuing & Reconstituting the United States for America, a nation born in Covenant by Declaration to God, always had to be, is today, and will always require, our U.S. Military.
It is logically and legally possible for DOJ and DoD personnel to cooperate on investigations and prosecutions. Military lawyers can be detailed to DOJ as Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys, and DOJ policy expressly allows sensitive investigations to proceed without public disclosure of their existence or progress before charges are filed. DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel stated in 2025 that the Posse Comitatus Act does not bar full-time details of military attorneys to serve as SAUSAs so long as they operate under civilian control and supervision. DOJ’s own media-relations policy also says the Department generally will not confirm or comment on ongoing investigations before charges are public.
As a matter of law and operational common sense, highly sensitive national-security or law-enforcement matters can be coordinated without public reporting of all details. DOJ policy, FOIA Exemption 7 materials, and DoD OPSEC guidance all point in the same direction: disclosure can be restricted when it would interfere with enforcement, reveal techniques, expose sources, or compromise operations. That supports the proposition that silence does not equal inactivity.
You can find strong official support for the broader idea that military lawyers can be used as SAUSAs, including a DOJ OLC opinion from 2025 and DOJ postings showing SAUSA detail programs. I also found a January 2026 DOJ press release from the Western District of Tennessee explicitly stating that the “Department of War assigns 20 military lawyers to serve as Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys.” This shows this kind of staffing move is real in some districts.
The official record supports Guantánamo Bay as a real military-commission site, with the Office of Military Commissions listing Guantánamo Bay, Fort Meade, and CCTV sites as its facilities.
“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
Welcome to America 250 - and our second, glorious, inevitable Declaration of Independence from godless a City of London Banking Cartel - and their international cartel of counterfeit jackals and control freaks who care nothing about God, Life, Liberty, Jesus Christ or pursuit of purpose as our Creator inalienably and individually vested with each of us.
@POTUS @DeptofWar @dojphofficial @BoardOfPeace @PrometheanActn @EXIT_FIAT @rattletrap1776
❤7