Rekognition was available to police departments to catch criminals. Amazon also made it available to the public for testing. The ACLU took them up on their offer. In the test run they used Men and Women from legislatures across the country, including Republicans and Democrats.

Using a database that included the mugshots of 25,000 criminals, the software identified/matched 28 members of Congress.

These matches identifyed them as people who had been previously arrested for a crime.

Everyone was up in arms over the results. Congress claimed that these matches were “false matches, and blamed it on the ACLU, saying they did the test wrong. The ACLU said the software was “racist” because these matches “disproportionately included people of color, which included 6 members of Black Caucus.”

Were these false matches…or accurate matches?

Remember…it was Congress who put a moratorium on the sale of this Amazon technology to police departments. Were they afraid more would be identified? Here is the link to an article that explains.

https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/26/17615634/amazon-rekognition-aclu-mug-shot-congress-facial-recognition

Thorn’s affiliation to other companies and entities was vast. One of the NGOs connected to THORN and the “fight to stop child trafficking” was The McCain Institute.

Today we are going deeper down “McCain Institute” rabbit hole.
We are going to reveal some significant findings on The McCain Institute. This is just the tip of the iceberg.

THE MCCAIN INSTITUTE

The McCain Institute claims it exists to fight human trafficking.

If you go to their website, their mission statement is plastered across the webpage…

“Combatting Human Trafficking: We are committed to driving systemic change and implementing comprehensive, action-based solutions to prevent and end all forms of modern slavery.”

Given the importance of the McCain Institute’s mission statement…”combatting human trafficking”...why doesn’t Wikepedia acknowledge this in any way?

Look Wikipedia’s description of The McCain Institute in the screenshot above. Do you see anything about “human trafficking?”

Take a look for yourself with this link.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCain_Institute

Could it be that the reason we aren’t seeing a connection is because the “McCain Institute” hasn’t put ANY money towards fighting child trafficking?”

We will be able to answer that question in a bit… Let's keep going…

Lets go to the “McCain Institute’s” website and look at their most recent article (which was written on October 13, 2022 by Kristen Abrams and Evelyn Farkas) titled, “COMBATTING HUMAN TRAFFICKING.”

☝️☝️Read their excerpt.
The authors, who both work at the Institute, have cautioned us on the use of the term “human trafficking” and they give an example that recently happened at Martha’s Vineyard.

Apparently 50 Venezuelans were trafficked into Martha’s Vineyard from Texas. They were flown at Florida taxpayers’ expense, yet the authors say that we shouldn’t describe this incident as “human trafficking.”

Texas to Martha’s Vineyard (which is near Boston) at Florida’s taxpayer’s expense? Florida??? What’s going on here?

Were they in a roundabout way trying to diminish the gravity of the situation at Martha’s Vineyard, because [they] might be involved?

And then they have the audacity to write this excerpt about Q and the Anons...👇👇

Could the people who are actually involved/connected with human trafficking seriously calling out the very people who are actually bringing awareness to this crisis of child/human trafficking??!!

Remember these words: McCain Institute.

Now check out this ☝️blurb which comes directly from The McCain Institute’s website…

The say,
“THE INTERNET HAS MADE PURCHASING A CHILD FOR SEX NEARLY AS EASY AS ‘BUYING A PIZZA.”

PIZZA? As in “Pizzagate?”These people are SICK!!!

They also take the opportunity to connect themselves to THORN, while also taking a swipe/smear/shot at Backpage.