Back to Hunter…
Hunter's birth name is supposed to be Robert Burns, linking him to the Scottish poet, but there is no evidence of that. His listed name is Robert C. Christie Hunter. How many times have we seen this subtle name switching by the C-I-A…thinking no one would notice?. This is how the C-I-A does it folks.

Hunter is “alleged” to have been from a broken family in San Luis Obispo, with his drunken father leaving him and the family destitute at age 7. He grew up in foster homes…The usual fake sob story created by Tavistock & the C-I-A.
Researchers believe he is really Robert Hunter III… son of Robert E. Hunter, Jr.

☝️THAT Robert Hunter was a lifetime member of Bohemian Grove, along with Bob Weir (member of the Grateful Dead) and others. They were all Freemasons. Hunter's first band was with Jerry Garcia.

It is alleged that Robert Hunter, Jr. came out of the Marine Corps (there’s that military connection) , and then became a banker.

He was a limited partner of Brown Brothers Harriman, the oldest private bank in the US.

This now links us to Prescott Bush (yes those Bushes), whose father had been president of A. Harriman & Co.

We are told that lyricist Robert Hunter moved to Connecticut with his family in his last year of high school, and he attended University of Connecticut.
That would have been about 1958...
Well, Brown Brothers Harriman was also there.
Prescott Bush, one of the heads, lived in Greenwich, CT.

Eight of the original partners of Brown Brothers were members of Skull and Bones.
The bank was the US headquarters of Fritz Thyssen, who bankrolled the scientists coming over during Operation Paperclip.

This also links Hunter to the Rockefellers. Seems like we’ve come full circle!!

Next week we will finish up talking about experiments and operations that took place as an extension of Operation Paperclip.

Following that we will start the discussion on Nixon….the REAL TRUTH!

Have a great weekend!

MOTION WAS DENIED!

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.69.0_1.pdf

We’ve talked about the color of Trump’s ties being of significance, as well as the color of ties or dresses of politicians when they are in the presence of Trump.

We’ve also talked about Trump trolling the cabal at the rallies.
Just because Trump endorses a candidate, does not mean he’s really endorsing them. He’s circling them and letting us know we need to dig into their past. The same applies when he tells a candidate “stand up” or “where’s so and so? Come up here.” He wants us to do our research.

Trump was wearing a red tie at the Wilkes-Barre rally. Doug Mastriano was wearing a Red shirt and a navy blue jacket. Seems as though he’s playing for both sides.

Or...WAS he playing for the Dems (hence the blue jacket), but is now playing for the White hats (red shirt)?

What are your thoughts?

Doing my research I found out that the Democrats wanted Mastriano to win his primary ...saying he would be an easier candidate to beat in November.
Since when has a Democrat ever promoted a Republican under this premise?
Check out this link below. Was Doug playing both sides? If so what side is he on now?

https://reason.com/2022/05/18/pennsylvania-democrats-say-doug-mastriano-is-a-danger-to-democracy-why-did-they-help-him-win/

I lean on Q in my research ALWAYS! Q substantiates and reinforces what I find in my Web searches. Q keeps me on the right track.

I’m going to send a few Q drops that are relevant to the topic of MK Ultra that we have been discussing. It sickens me to read what [they] did to humans. So sad.
👇