Because of Texas ignoring CANON 35…and allowing cameras starting in the 1960s…a case was overturned by U.S. Supreme Court in 1965
…on the grounds that the camera coverage “distracted trial participants” and depraved the defendant of a fair trial.
Gee how convenient.
Guess who the “defendant was?”
BILLIE
SOL
ESTES!!
Does that name ring a bell??
…on the grounds that the camera coverage “distracted trial participants” and depraved the defendant of a fair trial.
Gee how convenient.
Guess who the “defendant was?”
BILLIE
SOL
ESTES!!
Does that name ring a bell??
❤15🔥10👍6
Forwarded from Trey Bonner
Billie Sol Estes Franklin Texas courthouse, murdered Henry Marshall, Billie had ties to LBJ, as they ran a fertilizer tank scam, Henry figured it out and was turning States evidence over to RFK !
🔥24👍5
Forwarded from Lynn Morgan
Whenever I see glorified cases with televised courtrooms, I instantly think that it is more than likely a false flag.
Look at the OJ case as an example, it became more like a TV show as people were glued to their tvs to tune in.
To get a fair trial, I would think that videos would never be allowed.
Look at the OJ case as an example, it became more like a TV show as people were glued to their tvs to tune in.
To get a fair trial, I would think that videos would never be allowed.
💯50👍13❤2
Forwarded from Freedom Prevails
A thought, the OJ trial was televised to elicit support and help create more racial strife using that False Flag .. so with TV and camera's being allowed it gives them the chance to change the narrative whichever way they choose.
🔥30👍11💯8👏2
Television in Court Room:
The OJ Simpson trial was televised.
Prior to the trial the case first started out with the Grand jury.
But then…
OJ Simpson’s Attorneys asked the Judge to do a “probable cause” hearing with the Judge instead.
Their reason?
Excessive media coverage…which they said may have tainted the Grand Jury.
The judge granted the Defense attorney’s request and the Grand Jury was dismissed in favor of a probable cause hearing with Judge Kathleen Kennedy.
Hmm.
Kennedy you say??
If that was the case (which many don’t believe it was)…
WHY
WOULD
YOU
THEN
TURN
AROUND
AND
ALLOW
CAMERAS
IN
THE
COURTROOM
DURING
THE
TRIAL??
Don't we have a big contradiction right there?
The OJ Simpson trial was televised.
Prior to the trial the case first started out with the Grand jury.
But then…
OJ Simpson’s Attorneys asked the Judge to do a “probable cause” hearing with the Judge instead.
Their reason?
Excessive media coverage…which they said may have tainted the Grand Jury.
The judge granted the Defense attorney’s request and the Grand Jury was dismissed in favor of a probable cause hearing with Judge Kathleen Kennedy.
Hmm.
Kennedy you say??
If that was the case (which many don’t believe it was)…
WHY
WOULD
YOU
THEN
TURN
AROUND
AND
ALLOW
CAMERAS
IN
THE
COURTROOM
DURING
THE
TRIAL??
Don't we have a big contradiction right there?
👍42🔥12❤10🤬5
Do you really think the best way to stop a media circus is to create an even bigger media circus?
👍32🔥6🤯6
The Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53 states:
"Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.”
It isn't something a judge can simply allow based on his or her own authority.
Why was it allowed in the Simpson trial?
Was it because the CIA allowed it?
The statutes only apply to REAL trials.
So…was it allowed because it was NOT a real trial??
"Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.”
It isn't something a judge can simply allow based on his or her own authority.
Why was it allowed in the Simpson trial?
Was it because the CIA allowed it?
The statutes only apply to REAL trials.
So…was it allowed because it was NOT a real trial??
🔥28🏆13👍7❤1