Thank you all for the messages, and outpouring of love ❤️❤️‍🔥and sweetness
🥰🎉🙏 you bestowed upon me and my husband today.

It made us both very happy!!
Thank You! 🤗

HAPPY BIRTHDAY
MICHAEL JACKSON!!!

Enjoy your day!!!

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTNKCJBoY/

I am in middle of writing out a presentation.

This dive we are on goes
DEEP DEEP DEEP!!

I should have something out in an hour plus.

While you are waiting I want to ask you two questions. One has to do with prisons. The other has to do with the courthouses.

If there are any lawyers in here that can chime in, that would be great.

Question one:

ARE CAMERAS (legally) ALLOWED IN THE COURTROOM for a murder trial?

Here is the US.gov document that discusses.

What say you.

https://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/judiciary-policies/cameras-courtroom-policy

Question Two:
What is the policy regarding men’s hair in prisons?

Do they have to keep hair short? Shaved?

What about hats? Are they allowed to be worn?

Interesting article about cameras in the courtroom.

Let’s unpack...

https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/cameras-in-the-courtroom/

The Lindbergh Baby kidnapping trial spurred the camera bans in court rooms.


Bruno Hauptmann was convicted of kidnapping and killing Charles Lindbergh’s baby.

After Bruno was convicted, he appealed to the New Jersey Court of Appeals… claiming  that the presence of courtroom cameras and media activity in the courtroom denied him a fair trial.

In 1937…After The
Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping trial…

the American Bar Association amended “Canon 35” of its Canons of Judicial Ethics to forbid photographic, television and other broadcast coverage of trials.

In the 1960s, Texas ignored Canon 35…and gave presiding judges in the state broad discretion
to allow cameras in the courtroom.

Hmm.

WHY???

Because of Texas ignoring CANON 35…and allowing cameras starting in the 1960s…a case was overturned by U.S. Supreme Court in 1965
…on the grounds that the camera coverage “distracted trial participants” and depraved the defendant of a fair trial.

Gee how convenient.

Guess who the “defendant was?”



BILLIE
SOL
ESTES!!

Does that name ring a bell??

What was the case and who did they want freed?

☝️Bingo!!

BILLIE SOL ESTES…

Think
PRESIDENT LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON.
“LBJ!”

When LBJ wanted large sums of money…Billie Sol gave it to him; in return Sol received key government contracts—the price being kickbacks.



“…this way of doing political business in Texas was nothing short of a banana republic.”

Sooo…

Did Texas change the “camera in the courtroom” policy so that Billy Sol…LBJ’s money man…could appeal his “conviction?”

Billie Sol Estes Franklin Texas courthouse, murdered Henry Marshall, Billie had ties to LBJ, as they ran a fertilizer tank scam, Henry figured it out and was turning States evidence over to RFK !

RFK
GOT
THE
EVIDENCE
about
LBJ and
BILLY SOL ESTES.

WHAT
HAPPENED
TO
RFK?


ASSASSINATED. (In one time line)! Might there be another timeline to consider?😁

Then came the OJ SIMPSON TRIAL.


That trial was viewed as a major setback for courtroom camera proponents, because of the perception that the media environment had too much negative impact on the case.

Whenever I see glorified cases with televised courtrooms, I instantly think that it is more than likely a false flag.
Look at the OJ case as an example, it became more like a TV show as people were glued to their tvs to tune in.
To get a fair trial, I would think that videos would never be allowed.