Please read this article before we present the OJ Simpson presentation…in order to understand the significance of the number 33 and The Cabal.
https://www.dtss.us/blog/everything-changes-at-33-numerology-occult-symbolism/
https://www.dtss.us/blog/everything-changes-at-33-numerology-occult-symbolism/
Debt to Success System
Everything Changes at 33: Numerology & Occult Symbolism - Debt to Success System
The number 33 was important to secret societies and is often concealed within significant literary works. Numerology.
👍4🤯1
Last night I sent an article that discusses the number 33 with the Cabal. The Cabal has always hijacked God’s numbers (go back to the film about Tesla and the sacred numbers of 3-6-9). They’ve also made a mockery of it. In ((their minds))…if they can do that, they feel they can take power away from us. Devin Kling and Lone Wolf in the chat correctly said that, “33 is the number of vertebrae in the spine…in order to allow kristos consciousness to flow from root chakra all the way to the third eye or pineal gland.” 3 is a sacred number. Two 3’s are sacred. So are three “3”s. The Cabal has gone to great lengths to sabotage “33”..taking the power away from God and giving it to themselves. For example, if you take Mickey Mouse..MM for short.. and tilt it on its side…you get 33. We don’t think much of that…but ((they)) do! Q and The Alliance always said, “symbolism”...and that includes numbers…will be their downfall.
Today we are going to discuss the motives behind the OJ Simpson trial…or at least a different version than the one we were led to believe.
Today we are going to discuss the motives behind the OJ Simpson trial…or at least a different version than the one we were led to believe.
🔥8👍4
If you ever watched “Out of Shadows” you will understand how Hollywood works...
The executives at Hollywood work directly with the intelligence agencies…namely the C*I*A…to feed us all a story that ((they)) want us to believe.
Generally the fictional stories they feed us are usually versions of the real truth. We think it’s fiction, but in reality much of it is truth. Conversely, the non-fiction stories or documentaries Hollywood produces are often distorted or changed, in order to keep the real truth from being exposed.
This is how they roll, because they believe in the Laws of karma. We just have to understand their formula, and then we can sift out truth from lies.
We know Hollywood can fake movies. Can real life events be faked too?
The executives at Hollywood work directly with the intelligence agencies…namely the C*I*A…to feed us all a story that ((they)) want us to believe.
Generally the fictional stories they feed us are usually versions of the real truth. We think it’s fiction, but in reality much of it is truth. Conversely, the non-fiction stories or documentaries Hollywood produces are often distorted or changed, in order to keep the real truth from being exposed.
This is how they roll, because they believe in the Laws of karma. We just have to understand their formula, and then we can sift out truth from lies.
We know Hollywood can fake movies. Can real life events be faked too?
🔥9
We all know the events that took place in June of 1993…it was alleged that Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson-the wife of OJ Simpson- were murdered…possibly at the hands of OJ Simpson. Was this all true? Did it all really happen? What if there is evidence to show that this was manufactured…staged…untrue…? We may never really know the answers, but today I’m going to to show you some data points that shows the trial may have been faked, and that there were no murders.
There are many more data points I won’t have time to discuss, but further down in my presentation there is an article that does discuss more of these details. I’ve attached for your review.
There are many more data points I won’t have time to discuss, but further down in my presentation there is an article that does discuss more of these details. I’ve attached for your review.
👍11
THE BRONCO CHASE:
Remember the infamous Bronco chase? We saw the footage over and over. We were led to believe that OJ freaked…and fled in his White Ford Bronco. He was heading to the Mexican border. We were shown footage, that was taken from the helicopters flying overhead, of Simpson going down the 405 freeway. Some of the articles I read and video I reviewed pointed out a simple fact…if the footage of the Bronco came from the helicopters flying above, how were they able to capture front images of OJ driving the Bronco? The only way they could capture video from this angle was if the helicopter was flying in front of him inches from the road. THAT never happened. It was more likely a video crew was filming from another car in front of him, like they do in the movies.
Additionally, it wasn’t OJ driving the Bronco. It was Al Cowlings, OJ’s friend. Check out these pictures…you can see Al and there is no way a helicopter captured that angle.
Remember the infamous Bronco chase? We saw the footage over and over. We were led to believe that OJ freaked…and fled in his White Ford Bronco. He was heading to the Mexican border. We were shown footage, that was taken from the helicopters flying overhead, of Simpson going down the 405 freeway. Some of the articles I read and video I reviewed pointed out a simple fact…if the footage of the Bronco came from the helicopters flying above, how were they able to capture front images of OJ driving the Bronco? The only way they could capture video from this angle was if the helicopter was flying in front of him inches from the road. THAT never happened. It was more likely a video crew was filming from another car in front of him, like they do in the movies.
Additionally, it wasn’t OJ driving the Bronco. It was Al Cowlings, OJ’s friend. Check out these pictures…you can see Al and there is no way a helicopter captured that angle.
👍7🔥3❤1
Television in Court Room:
The trial was televised. Prior to the trial the case first started out with the Grand jury, but then the Defense attorneys asked the Judge to do a “probable cause” hearing with the Judge instead. Their reason? Excessive media coverage, which they said may have tainted the Grand Jury. The judge granted the Defense attorney’s request and the Grand Jury was dismissed in favor of a probable cause hearing with Judge Kathleen Kennedy.
If that was the case (which many don’t believe it was) why would you then turn around and ALLOW cameras in the courtroom during the trial? Don't we have a big contradiction right there? Do you really think the best way to stop a media circus is to create an even bigger media circus?
The trial was televised. Prior to the trial the case first started out with the Grand jury, but then the Defense attorneys asked the Judge to do a “probable cause” hearing with the Judge instead. Their reason? Excessive media coverage, which they said may have tainted the Grand Jury. The judge granted the Defense attorney’s request and the Grand Jury was dismissed in favor of a probable cause hearing with Judge Kathleen Kennedy.
If that was the case (which many don’t believe it was) why would you then turn around and ALLOW cameras in the courtroom during the trial? Don't we have a big contradiction right there? Do you really think the best way to stop a media circus is to create an even bigger media circus?
🔥12👍2
As soon as the trial was televised, everyone should have immediately known it was fake, because there are statutes forbidding cameras in the courtroom. That is why they have court artists.
The Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53 states:
"Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.”
It isn't something a judge can simply allow based on his or her own authority. Why was it allowed in the Simpson trial? Was it because the C*I*A allowed it? The statutes only apply to REAL trials…so maybe it was allowed because it was NOT a real trial. Therefore, anytime you see a televised trial for murder, you should raise an eyebrow. Remember…just prior to the Simpson trial, another high profile case was televised…the Mendez Brothers trial. Hmmmm….makes you wonder about that trial as well!
The Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53 states:
"Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.”
It isn't something a judge can simply allow based on his or her own authority. Why was it allowed in the Simpson trial? Was it because the C*I*A allowed it? The statutes only apply to REAL trials…so maybe it was allowed because it was NOT a real trial. Therefore, anytime you see a televised trial for murder, you should raise an eyebrow. Remember…just prior to the Simpson trial, another high profile case was televised…the Mendez Brothers trial. Hmmmm….makes you wonder about that trial as well!
🔥15❤1
CHANGE OF VENUE:
We are told Santa Monica—the locus of the alleged crime—was too hot for the grand jury, so it was dismissed. A change of venue was then requested based on excessive local media coverage. So they moved the trial to Los Angeles??? That’s the next county over and very urban.
How did that make any sense? We assume the prosecutors wanted a conviction, correct?
So why would they allow the trial to move to Los Angeles, where they knew the jury pool would be less white than Santa Monica?
What if the trial was moved to make a conviction less likely and easier to broadcast?
We are told Santa Monica—the locus of the alleged crime—was too hot for the grand jury, so it was dismissed. A change of venue was then requested based on excessive local media coverage. So they moved the trial to Los Angeles??? That’s the next county over and very urban.
How did that make any sense? We assume the prosecutors wanted a conviction, correct?
So why would they allow the trial to move to Los Angeles, where they knew the jury pool would be less white than Santa Monica?
What if the trial was moved to make a conviction less likely and easier to broadcast?
🔥7
CRIME SCENE:
There are a lot of photos from the crime scene, with data points that suggest it was a hoax. These particular photos caught my eye. The photos on left has enough resolution that we can Nicole’s skin tone…there is an abundance of natural color. Based on skin color, she looks to be alive. A corpse that had lost all its blood would not look like that.
Next, let’s look at the location of Nicole’s feet. See how they go under the railing? How would they end up under the railing like that if she fell to the ground? The more likely scenario…it was staged.
There are a lot of photos from the crime scene, with data points that suggest it was a hoax. These particular photos caught my eye. The photos on left has enough resolution that we can Nicole’s skin tone…there is an abundance of natural color. Based on skin color, she looks to be alive. A corpse that had lost all its blood would not look like that.
Next, let’s look at the location of Nicole’s feet. See how they go under the railing? How would they end up under the railing like that if she fell to the ground? The more likely scenario…it was staged.
🔥10👍2
Let’s start with OJ himself…After OJ had a successful career in football, he immediately went to work in Hollywood as an ACTOR!!
He made all the Naked Gun movies…including the 3rd installment which was called Naked Gun 331/3 (there we get our first two “33” references. 1/3rd is equal to 33%). The “33” reference will come up later.
Another movie Simpson appeared in was the 1978 movie “Capricorn One.” The movie was about faking a Mars landing. The movie was based on theories that the Moon landing was a hoax.
Why would Hollywood make such a movie to expose themselves and NASA? The reason…Damage control. Many people back then were doubting that there was ever a moon landing. The movie was conceived of and promoted by the government itself. In the movie they didn’t confirm the Moon landing was a hoax, but rather they took an idea, which they knew was already in the minds of many, and subtly turned it away from its target.
At the end of Capricorn One, the landing-on -Mars hoax is exposed. That is the crucial element of the film…not the hoax itself. They hoped that people would draw the conclusion from the movie and apply it to real life. If something fishy had gone on with the Moon Landing, the movie showed us that it would come out eventually. The fact that nothing came out about the Moon Landing, either before or after 1978, seemed to confirm to most people that the Moon Landing was real. As silly as that sounds, that’s how the majority of people think.
He made all the Naked Gun movies…including the 3rd installment which was called Naked Gun 331/3 (there we get our first two “33” references. 1/3rd is equal to 33%). The “33” reference will come up later.
Another movie Simpson appeared in was the 1978 movie “Capricorn One.” The movie was about faking a Mars landing. The movie was based on theories that the Moon landing was a hoax.
Why would Hollywood make such a movie to expose themselves and NASA? The reason…Damage control. Many people back then were doubting that there was ever a moon landing. The movie was conceived of and promoted by the government itself. In the movie they didn’t confirm the Moon landing was a hoax, but rather they took an idea, which they knew was already in the minds of many, and subtly turned it away from its target.
At the end of Capricorn One, the landing-on -Mars hoax is exposed. That is the crucial element of the film…not the hoax itself. They hoped that people would draw the conclusion from the movie and apply it to real life. If something fishy had gone on with the Moon Landing, the movie showed us that it would come out eventually. The fact that nothing came out about the Moon Landing, either before or after 1978, seemed to confirm to most people that the Moon Landing was real. As silly as that sounds, that’s how the majority of people think.
🔥3👍1
MARCIA CLARK:
What about Marcia Clark? If you go to IMDB you see she is an WRITER, PRODUCER, ACTOR...
What about Marcia Clark? If you go to IMDB you see she is an WRITER, PRODUCER, ACTOR...
Additionally, Marcia Clark wasn't even the District Attorney. She was the Deputy DA. Deputy DA's don't normally prosecute major felonies...certainly not ones of this magnitude. Deputy DAs usually lead a prosecution in misdemeanor cases.. So where was the DA during this time? Gil Garcetti was the LA County DA from 1992 to 2000. So where was he in 1994?
Clark is said to have compiled 19 consecutive murder convictions, but there appears to be no record of that to back that claim up on the internet.
Clark is supposed to have convicted Robert John Bardo of murdering actress Rebecca Schaeffer. But if you go to the link to “Ironwood prison”, where Bardo is supposed to be serving a life sentence…there is a man there named Robert ALLEN Bardo…not Robert JOHN Bardo.
You see what they did? They switched the middle name so we wouldn’t notice. Some may say “close enough”. Close enough? NO! “Close enough” only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.
Clark is said to have compiled 19 consecutive murder convictions, but there appears to be no record of that to back that claim up on the internet.
Clark is supposed to have convicted Robert John Bardo of murdering actress Rebecca Schaeffer. But if you go to the link to “Ironwood prison”, where Bardo is supposed to be serving a life sentence…there is a man there named Robert ALLEN Bardo…not Robert JOHN Bardo.
You see what they did? They switched the middle name so we wouldn’t notice. Some may say “close enough”. Close enough? NO! “Close enough” only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.
🔥6👍4