Keep asking yourself why frames are missing, reversed, and spliced.

Also keep asking yourself why the film kept switching between black and white…and color….and visa versa.

How did they explain this?

FBI Director, J Edgar Hoover, wrote in 1965 that frames 314 and 315 had been swapped due to a printing error…and that the error did not exist in the original Warren Commission exhibits.

In early 1967, Life released a statement saying that four frames from the original (frames 208–211) were accidentally destroyed, and that the adjacent frames were damaged by a Life photo lab technician on November 23, 1963. That would be the day after the assassination.

Why didn’t they make a statement when it happened? They waited over 3 years to speak up??

Something is not right.

LIFE released those missing frames from the first-generation copy it had received from the film's original version.

Remember this was a copy!

Frames 155–157 and
Frame 341, were also damaged.

They were spliced out of the original rendition of the film…but are present in the copies.

What about New Orleans District Attorney, Jim Garrison’s trial against Clay Shaw in 1969? (Think of the movie JFK).
What film did he use?

Garrison subpoened the original film…but was denied.

A copy of the film…made several generations from the original (a copy of a copy of the original)…was subpoenaed and granted from Time Inc.

The courtroom showing of GARRISON’s copy in 1969 was the first time the Zapruder film had been shown in public as a film.

Garrison allowed copies of the film to be made…and these low quality copies began circulating among assassination researchers.

On March 6, 1975, on the ABC late-night television show Good Night America (hosted by Geraldo Rivera), assassination researchers Robert Groden and Dick Gregory presented the first-ever US network television showing of the Zapruder Film.

This was 11 1/2 years after the assassination!!

People were outraged!!

Worth listening to.

https://youtu.be/nxCH1yhGG3Q

I’m going to stop it here for now. There is more to this story.

In the meantime let’s have a discussion.

WHY DID THEY tamper with the ZAPRUDER FILM? What must have happened that would make them edit/splice/remove/duplicate the frames?
And WHY did the films flip between colored and black & white?

Hey Friends!
I just finished taping a video with Joe & Scott from Truthstream. Part 3 of our JFK series. Once I get it formatted I’ll post it to channel.
I’m working on todays presentation. Should have it out a little later.

10 minutes!

Yesterday we left off talking about the Zapruder film. We disclosed that the first time all of America saw the film was on the Geraldo Rivera show…nearly 12 years after the assassination.

Today we are going to reveal even more shocking information that revolves around this film!!

During the Geraldo Rivera reveal of the Zapruder film in 1973, the shocking revelation of Kennedy's head going backward and to the left resulted in a public outcry so great that Congress created the House Select Committee on Assassinations two years later.

I’m going to mute notifications.

Until a few years ago, the authenticity and reliability of the Zapruder film was accepted by almost all JFK assassination researchers…even those who were very critical of the Warren Report.

But given what we now know with the editing, splicing, duplicating, and removing of frames in the Zapruder film…would you trust it now??

After today’s presentation, NO ONE SHOULD!!

Most Americans don’t know that there were two significant events…involving the famous Zapruder film of President Kennedy’s Assassination…that took place on back-to-back nights, at the CIA’s National Photographic Interpretation Center (NPIC) in Washington, D.C….the weekend immediately following JFK’s assassination.

Two question we ALL need to be asking ourselves…

Is the Zapruder film…which currently resides in the National Archives…an authentic film from which sound, scientific conclusions, regarding JFK’s assassination, can be obtained??

…OR…

Is the Zapruder film an altered film..indicative of a government cover-up, filled with tainted and suspect information?

If so, would this have lead us to false conclusions, about what happened in Dealey Plaza during JFK’s assassination?

The debate of these questions hinge on the answers to two essential questions:

1. First, is the film’s chain of custody…immediately after the assassination…what it has been reported on all these years? Or…is it quite different? 

2. Second, are there visual indications within the film’s imagery which prove it has been tampered with or altered?

If the film’s chain of custody has been misrepresented all this time, and if the opportunity and means existed that weekend to alter the film…then the repercussions of this film and the conclusions we have drawn regarding JFK’s assassination…is far reaching.