Death Sentence FAQ : Pros & cons of the death penalty - Avantages et inconvénients de la peine mort - Amnesty Bullshit Leaked
112 subscribers
365 photos
19 videos
152 links
Download Telegram
1: Contrary to human rights: BULLSHIT! The definition of human rights IS SHIT! and need a full change NOW!
https://t.me/SuicideRape/72
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/413
https://t.me/PolitikTelegram/440
https://t.me/PolitikTelegram/441
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/20

Without considering that such organisations are almost shit!
https://t.me/AfDWahrheit/25
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/1152
https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/476
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/465
https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/340

2: not a deterrent - Homicide in Canada 📉 = BULLSHIT!!!!!!
https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/340
https://t.me/PrisonFacts/915
to
https://t.me/PrisonFacts/938
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/7
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/8
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/210

3: revenge not justice - it depends
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/206
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/1167
So the answer is yes, we agree with "killing just to make victims happy" BUT nope, it's not just revenge! IS SAFETY!
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/206

4: irreversible — please don't come here again with this innocent bullshit!
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/151
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/157
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/12
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/21

The problem here is how we do things, not the death sentence!

5: torture
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/209
https://t.me/IsraeliFacts/373

6: discrimination =
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences!
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/211

7: political repression = same!
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/211

8: trauma: don't ignore other traumas too!!!!
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/157
https://t.me/CrimesTelegram/66

9: obstacle to the truth: FACTS DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS!
https://t.me/FactsReality
https://t.me/AspergerSyndromeTelegram
They are the first one not promoting science! but bullshit!

10: rehabilitation 🤦‍♂️
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/208
🇺🇸 ⚡️ BULLSHIT! Lethal injection is the most widely-used method of execution, but states still authorize other methods, including electrocution, gas chamber, hanging, and ring squad.
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/464

Electrocution was the sole method in Nebraska until the State Supreme Court ruled the method unconstitutional in February 2008 https://perma.cc/WKQ7-XRUA

8 states (in South Carolina, electrocution is the primary method; the other 7 have lethal injection as primary method) https://perma.cc/J7V4-W4Y9

A South Carolina trial court has issued an injunction preventing the state from carrying out executions using a firing squad or the electric chair https://perma.cc/M6E3-ENY5

No matter, ⚡️ is 💩!

For all others: 💩! but we haven't verified if this is bullshit or not ...

Lethal dosis and 🇨🇭 suicide pods 👌!
https://t.me/LethalDosis/7

Related
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/679
Let we do now some math ... He had 17 years. If he die with 110 years, means 93 years in prison.

Well, now let we consider 100$/day
https://t.me/PrisonFacts/611

93 years * 365 * 100 = 3.4 MIO DOLLARS!

if we consider 400$/day = 13.6 MIO DOLLARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry, do you find correct to waste 3-14 mio of dollars for criminals that deserve a death penalty, but at the same time we give a shit to homeless! Sorry but nope! THIS IS NOT OK AT ALL!

DEATH SENTENCE TO KIDS! AND IN EUROPE NOW!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/48
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences
https://t.me/DeathSentenceBullshit
https://t.me/DeathExecutionMethod
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence
https://t.me/SerialKillerDeathSentence
https://t.me/DahmerDeathSentence
https://t.me/BreivikParole
https://t.me/ParoleFacts
https://t.me/RecidivismFacts
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
https://t.me/BreivikAbuse
AND EVEN DEATH SENTENCE FOR ANIMAL CRIMES!
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence

What he got instead of death after killing 17 people in a school = this doesn't mean killing your mother (with maybe a good reason behind ...)? Life ...
https://t.me/IsraeliFacts/238
https://t.me/RecidivismFacts/121

100 - 400$ means helping the life of 10-40 homeless!!!!
Better to kill a killer, than helping 40 homeless?! Sorry, we would help 40 homeless and don't trash money for killers!
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/88
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/101
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66

Let we remember this is just prison!!!! Then we need to consider other things like court / lawyer cost, damages, help for families etc. With Breivik all is much worse!

So such dude cost much more to the government! THIS DUDE DID A MASSACRE AND IS CAUSING BANKRUPT! with no sense! This is just discrimination against homeless or poor people! THIS IS HUMAN RIGHT ABUSE! THIS IS SYNONYM OF SHITTY LAWS! and let we remember America has better laws than EU ...
https://t.me/HumanRightAbuse

He deserves just a 💉 and ciao sogni doro!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This video is the best example because it summarizes so many things!

a) like said before WE DON'T AGREE with such death penalty
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/223
but remember we don't know the whole story ... no matter our first impression is "@ShittyDeathSentences"!

and many other have the same opinion too:

"Why does he die after killing one person when people really sitting in prison for life for killing 10?" 😍 this are our governments🤦‍♂️ like said previously
https://t.me/PrisonFacts/228
https://t.me/PrisonFacts/224
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/968
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/151
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/1167
etc.

b) Maybe this shitty sentence is even based on discrimination because he is black ...
https://t.me/BlackHumanRights
in the style of
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/149
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/150

Again, sentences SHOULD BE APPLIED with BRAIN! and the same, no matter age, religion, colour, nationality, sex or whatever!

Yes, even 16 years old people should get same sentence like 18 years old + 1 day
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/659
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/211
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/73
https://t.me/RapeTelegram/1660

c) Such type of people should be reeducated! exactly like Sucre
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/208

at the end even homeless have drugs issues!
https://t.me/BreivikAbuse/36

This is not the case of serious criminal ...

d) so like said in a) this show how sentences get applied with shit! and this is the problem. Not the death penalty, but those who apply such things with no sense and discrimination!

So the point is not to protest against death penalty BUT TO PROTEST AGAINST HOW OUR GOVERNMENTS ARE SHIT! and criminal
https://t.me/GovernmentInPrison

and nothing happens to such dudes too! even if someone remains 50 years in prison as innocent!
https://t.me/GovernmentInPrison/5
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/128

We need to change this!
It's really sad to see bullshit over bullshit if we check stats Amnesty @AmnestyBullshit is using to promote their "no death sentence" fight!

Our world should check pro and contra, not just pro with 50% of the informations, and maybe even false informations!

As we said multiple times, we are against any type of discrimination, means even innocent people sentenced for life or death just for other personal interests, like https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/201

In such case all people making bullshit sentence should get in prisons!

We are against bullshit shared as scientific facts! So, yes, maybe the death sentence doesn't reduce the homicide rates, this still doesn't mean that such sentence is bad, if we consider other aspects, that Amnesty just IGNORE! We know, we haven't done a full detailed search about this huge complex topic, but just the things we checked, most of them are just false or partially false! So first check all previous posts to make a conclusion.

Plus like we said multiple times we are not just focused on promoting few human rights, like Amnesty is doing. They do almost nothing about euthanasia, animals and planet rights. Plus remember that there are not just right of prisoners, but of the victims and other people. This is important to remember, otherwise it happens the same shit like with trans women wanting to compete in women sport, discriminating the women rights! THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, like prisoners getting more rights than normal people!

It's time to make proper sentence without discrimination and using facts. It's time to remove all soft sentences, where people can kill or rape again after few years ... It's time to defend the right of people and not using bullshit religious ideas / opinions. Yes, religion has an huge influence, just think about the topic "abortion" or other things! It's time that people start to think with facts and the brain, not with tradition, social pressure, bullshit and no sense religious aspects. It's ok to follow a religion, but ....
The Death Penalty: No Evidence for Deterrence

What the paper simply write: there is no evidence, means no way to show with high quality scientific studies that cannot be applied at all, that a death sentence is effective.

What people understand when they read quickly just the title: a death sentence is not effective. This is not what the paper is saying! It clearly says there is no positive or negative evidence, because doing proper studies would be unethical, especially if we would removed all factors that influence such values.

This doesn't happen just with the prison, but even in many other topics. We cannot crash a plane to study what are the effects ... we cannot tell a patient "please eat 0 kcal, because i want to check how many days it requires before you die". There are so many scientific questions that cannot be answer, due to ethical problem with such studies ...

Studies show no link between the presence or absence of the death penalty and murder rates
https://perma.cc/6P4Q-SP5J

If the death penalty is not a proven deterrent to murder (= MEANS NO REAL POSITIVE STUDIES), is it worth the excessive costs, risks of error, uncertainty of completion, and other problems that are inherent to its practice? —> so since we cannot answer that by science, we use factors like errors during execution or the price to say "it's not ok" —> we cannot say "scientifically there is a negative evidence!"

Even saying "murders are less" is bullshit, like we showed in previous posts, because yes, maybe in one US state this is the case, in another one is totally fake saying that ...

Plus even if there is an increase or decrease, can we really say "it's due to the death sentence?". Canada was the best example. An increase without that ...
https://t.me/WomenRightsTelegram/340

So instead of checking half of the information, let we really check facts:
- scientific evidence: NEUTRAL or better NOT POSSIBLE TO ANSWER DUE TO ETHICAL ISSUES
- more / less homicide = bullshit
- cost: not clear
- wrong sentence / errors: depends